1. Introduction
The Daya River is an ecologically important freshwater system that supports a rich diversity of fish species, each playing a specific role in maintaining food webs, nutrient cycling, and overall ecosystem stability
. Freshwater fish contribute to ecosystem functioning by regulating trophic interactions and recycling nutrients, making their conservation ecologically significant
. Assessment of genetic diversity within these fish populations is important due to their bearing on the potential of such populations to cope with environmental stressors resulting from pollution, habitat alteration, climatic variability, and overexploitation
| [3] | Sahoo, L., et al. (2016). Impact of habitat fragmentation on genetic diversity of riverine fishes. Ecological Genetics, 8, 45–54. |
[3]
. Generally, populations with high genetic diversity exhibit stronger evolutionary potential and are more resilient, thus enabling their long-term persistence under changing environmental conditions
. Conversely, low genetic diversity increases extinction risk due to reduced ability to adapt and increased vulnerability to diseases and disturbances in the environment
. Genetic diversity analysis also provides information on the demographic history of populations. Patterns in DNA variation can indicate past population expansions, bottlenecks, or extended periods of isolation. In addition, quantifying gene flow between populations over various river reaches informs about connectivity and dispersal potential, impacts of natural or anthropogenic barriers such as dams and pollution gradients. The knowledge generated is important for conservation planning at the river basin–level and sustainable fisheries management. Nucleotide diversity, π, is a widely applied molecular index that quantifies genetic variation at the nucleotide level
. It refers to the average number of nucleotide differences per site between two randomly chosen DNA sequences from the same population
| [7] | Tajima, F. (1983). Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics, 105(2), 437–460. |
[7]
. A high nucleotide diversity would reflect a more substantial amount of genetic variation and in most cases represents large stable populations, while a low π may be indicative of recent population decline, inbreeding, founder effects, or habitat fragmentation
| [8] | Behura, S. K. (2006). Molecular marker systems in insects. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 388–399. |
[8]
. As such, an in-silico approach to the estimation of nucleotide diversity offers a cost-effective alternative to extensive field and laboratory studies. DNA sequences of target fish species can be retrieved from public databases like GenBank, followed by quality control and multiple sequence alignment to ensure an accurate comparison of homologous regions. Using appropriate bioinformatics tools, the following calculations could be made: nucleotide diversity, haplotype diversity, and the number of segregating sites. Neutrality tests such as Tajima's D and Fu's Fs add to mismatch distribution analysis in inferring population expansion, contraction, or selection pressures
| [9] | Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis. Genetics, 123, 585–595. |
| [24] | Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., & Briscoe, D. A. (2010). Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809002 |
[9,24]
. Haplotype networks and phylogenetic trees visually portray genetic relationships among individuals and populations. Ecological and conservation interpretations of such results will enable the identification of the most vulnerable fish populations in the Daya River and provide evidence-based management and conservation.
2. Methodology
In silico analysis was employed to determine the nucleotide diversity of target fish species in the Daya River. The nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial gene regions were obtained from the GenBank database. The sequences were checked for quality, trimmed, and aligned using the MUSCLE alignment tool in MEGA. Genetic diversity measures, such as nucleotide diversity (π), haplotype diversity, number of segregating sites, and average nucleotide differences, were calculated using DnaSP software. Neutrality tests, including Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs, were conducted to interpret the demographic history of the species. Phylogenetic trees and haplotype networks were also generated to examine genetic relationships.
2.1. Study Area and Species Selection
The current study was conducted on selected fish species that have been recorded in the Daya River, Odisha, India. The species were selected based on the availability of mitochondrial or nuclear gene sequences in public databases and their ecological significance in the riverine ecosystem. The genetic analysis of fish populations from the Daya River relies on well-established molecular databases and bioinformatics tools. DNA sequence data are primarily retrieved from NCBI GenBank, a comprehensive public repository that provides access to nucleotide sequences submitted worldwide and supports large-scale comparative genetic studies
. When available, BOLD Systems (Barcode of Life Data System) is used to obtain standardized mitochondrial COI barcode sequences, which are widely applied for species identification and population-level genetic analysis as mentioned in
Figure 1,
. In addition, locally generated DNA sequences stored in FASTA format can be incorporated to enhance dataset completeness.
Multiple sequence alignment is a critical step and is performed using tools such as MAFFT, MUSCLE, or Clustal Omega, which accurately align homologous nucleotide regions and minimize alignment errors. MEGA software is used to verify alignments and construct phylogenetic trees using distance-based or likelihood methods
. Genetic diversity indices, including nucleotide diversity (π), haplotype diversity, and neutrality tests such as Tajima’s D, are calculated using DnaSP, a specialized software for DNA polymorphism analysis
| [13] | Rozas, J., et al. (2017). DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 3299–3302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248 |
| [23] | Hughes, J. M., Schmidt, D. J., & Finn, D. S. (2009). Genes in streams: Using DNA to understand the movement of freshwater fauna. Freshwater Biology, 54, 163–181.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02112.x |
[13, 23]
. Arlequin is employed for population structure analyses such as FST and AMOVA
. Haplotype networks are visualized using PopART, while BioPython and R packages (ape, pegas, adegenet) support custom analyses and graphical representation of genetic data
.
Figure 1. Sources of Fish DNA sequence data used for genetic analysis for the Daya River.
2.2. Selection of Genetic Markers for In-Silico Analysis of the Fish Population of the Daya River
The research design is concerned with the choice of focal species of fish that are native to the Daya River and have inherent value in the freshwater biotic ecosystem. Daya River, a distributary of the Kuakhai River, originates near Saradeipur of Khurdha district in Odisha and runs southwest for about 37 km before emptying into the Chilika Lake Asia's biggest brackish water lagoon and an international Ramsar site
| [17] | Khedkar, G. D., et al. (2014). Population genetic structure of freshwater fishes inferred from mtDNA. Journal of Fish Biology, 84, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12256 |
[17]
. The river has an important ecological function in serving as a natural connection linking the freshwater systems of the Mahanadi delta to the coastal lagoon ecosystem. With this connection, the Daya River provides for nutrient passage, organic material, and sediments to allow for the productivity and ecological well-being of riverine and estuarine systems (
Figure 2).
Figure 2. Map showing Geographic location of Daya River and the surrounding study area, Odisha, India.
Species of the Cyprinidae family, as well as the most frequently recorded species in rivers, are mostly preferred due to their abundance and availability of genetic information. However, in cases where in situ collection is difficult, the in silico design is adopted. Here, the choice falls on two to four species that are abundantly recorded in publicly accessible sequence repositories such as the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank or Barcode of Life Data System. The choice of species with an abundance of publicly accessible sequences enables the results to attain statistical validity. The size of the sample is also a key consideration in genetic research, as a small dataset may give rise to biased or unreliable estimations. The more sequences there are, the better the estimation of nucleotide diversity, haplotype diversity, and demographic data can be. Hence, the choice of species should be guided by the quality of its sequence data. The choice of relevant genetic markers is also a critical component of study design. Mitochondrial DNA markers have been extensively employed in population genetic analysis because of their maternal inheritance, lack of recombination, and higher mutation rate, which increase their sensitivity to recent evolutionary processes. The cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene has been used popularly in species-level identification and DNA barcoding, which allows for reliable species identification. By contrast, cytochrome b (cytb) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) genes possess higher resolution to identify genetic variation at a population level in fish
| [15] | Paradis, E. (2010). Pegas: an R package for population genetics. Bioinformatics, 26, 419–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp696 |
| [16] | Cock, P. J. A., et al. (2009). Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology. Bioinformatics, 25, 1422–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 |
| [17] | Khedkar, G. D., et al. (2014). Population genetic structure of freshwater fishes inferred from mtDNA. Journal of Fish Biology, 84, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12256 |
[15-17]
.
2.3. Sequence Retrieval and Data Organization for in-Silico Genetic Analysis of Daya River
The recovery of sequences is a critical initial step in any in silico genetic diversity study, as all further analyses depend directly on the quality and relevance of these sequence data. Sequence data for the target fish species selected and the mitochondrial gene are recovered from the NCBI GenBank database by using specific search queries like genus and species. This search strategy ensures that only the relevant sequence belonging to the target species and target gene region will be recovered. All the selected sequences will be downloaded in FASTA format, universally compatible with most bioinformatics software used for alignment and genetic analysis. It also looks at accompanying metadata carefully, especially information on sampling locality
. The sequences of the Daya River are preferred in order to make sure that samples would be geographically relevant. If available sequences from the Daya River alone are less or none, sequences from neighboring river systems or proximate geographic regions are added in order to increase sample size. Such inclusions, however, will be cautious, with limitations on population mixing, geographic structure, and reduced resolution that will be clearly acknowledged in the analysis and discussion. A spreadsheet is maintained to keep track, for reproducibility and transparency purposes, of all the retrieved sequences. The dataset includes: GenBank accession number, sample or isolate identifier, species name, collection locality, and sequence length. Proper documentation enables data management, traceability, and supports results on genetic diversity and population structure in later stages of analysis has been demonstrated in
Figure 3, which shows how mtDNA sequences are retrieved step by step for Daya River fishes from NCBI's GenBank. Searches are conducted based on species and gene names, sequences are retrieved in FASTA format, data are screened for geographical appropriateness, and details are recorded. There is documentation of all details so that high-quality information is obtained.
Figure 3. Workflow Representing the Sequential Retrieval and Data Organisation in In-silico Genetic Diversity Analysis of Daya River.
The mtDNA sequences are retrieved step by step for Daya River fishes from NCBI's GenBank. Searches are conducted based on species and gene names, sequences are retrieved in FASTA format, data are screened for geographical appropriateness, and details are recorded. There is documentation of all details so that high-quality information is obtained.
2.4. Sequence Quality Control and Distribution of Nucleotide Sequences
The quality control of sequence data is a very important procedure in making in silico genetic analysis credible and accurate. The very first step is the removal of duplicate GenBank accessions. These may be generated in case the same sequence has been submitted more than once or in different studies. The obviously incorrect identifications of species or gene-level sequences are also eliminated. In sequence alignment for estimation of genetic diversity parameters like nucleotide diversity, short sequences or those with a large proportion of ambiguous nucleotides coded by “N” are filtered out. However,
Figure 4 summarizes the distribution of analyzed DNA sequences of three different freshwater fish species found in the Daya River
| [17] | Khedkar, G. D., et al. (2014). Population genetic structure of freshwater fishes inferred from mtDNA. Journal of Fish Biology, 84, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12256 |
| [18] | Katoh, K., et al. (2019). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36, 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz011 |
| [19] | Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792–1797.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 |
[17-19]
. A large percentage of the DNA samples is from
Puntius sophore (38%), suggesting increased representation in the database and the possibility of easy access to sampling. A total of 34% of the DNA samples belong to the species
Labeo rohita, suggesting increased representation to facilitate genetic studies. On the other hand, the remaining 28% is from the species
Cirrhinus mrigala, suggesting low representation. In general, a large proportion of ambiguous nucleotides in sequences leads to misalignments with poor estimation of genetic diversity parameters. With standardized sequence size and bases of high quality, inter-sample sequence comparison becomes more accurate. Lastly, any non-biological part, for example, primers and adaptors, is trimmed if it is present in the sequences. Non-biological parts could influence how analyses and alignments are performed.
Figure 4. Proportional Distribution of No of DNA Sequences among selected Freshwater species of the Daya River.
Trimming occurs through bioinformatics software such as Geneious, MEGA, or scripts, and this leads to pure homologous sequences for proper analyses on genetic diversity and populations.
2.5. Multiple Sequence Alignment and DNA Banding Pattern of Fish Species
Multiple sequence alignment was an important step in the genetic analysis of fish populations collected from the Daya River to ensure that homologous mitochondrial DNA regions of different species (
Labeo rohita,
Puntius sophore, and
Cirrhinus mrigala) are compared accurately. First, selected mitochondrial genes-cytochrome b, COI, or ND2-are retrieved from GenBank. Corresponding nucleotide sequences are aligned using good-quality alignment programs such as MAFFT. The DNA ladder has pieces of known sizes, such as 500 bp, 1000 bp, or 1500 bp. It is used as a molecular weight marker to determine approximate fragment sizes in the PCR-generated DNA samples.
Labeo rohita (green-colored bands) are the PCR amplified DNA fragments that are specific to
Labeo rohita. Multiple bands showed amplification of specific gene regions (usually mitochondrially encoded, such as those coding for COI, 16S rRNA, or cyt b)
| [16] | Cock, P. J. A., et al. (2009). Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology. Bioinformatics, 25, 1422–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 |
| [18] | Katoh, K., et al. (2019). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36, 1530–1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz011 |
| [19] | Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792–1797.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 |
[16, 18, 19]
. Distances of bands from the ladder indicate approximate sizes from 500 bp to 1500 bp.
Puntius sophore (red bands indicate the PCR products from the DNA.
Figure 5. PCR-based DNA banding analysis of selected freshwater fish Species of the Daya River.
The variation in the number of bands and the distance of migration with regard to
Labeo rohita suggests the existence of genetic differences among species. This proves the species-specific amplification. This is useful in molecular identification.
Cirrhinus mrigala (Blue bands represent PCR-amplified DNA fragments in
Cirrhinus mrigala. It can be differentiated from the other two species because of its characteristic band size and position. Sharp bands mean good PCR and good DNA quality
| [20] | Nei, M. (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press. |
[20]
. The significance of color coding is used for visualization only and not for actual DNA colors. These are useful in the process of comparing PCR profile images across various species within a single combined image. These are useful in the overall interpretation of each species a characteristic pattern of bands, and this can be used to Successful PCR amplification, Genetic differences among species. This method is used in identification of species biodiversity, of fish taxonomy.
3. Results
In silico analysis showed varying levels of nucleotide diversity (π) in selected fish species of the Daya River. While some species had moderate to high π and haplotype diversity, others had low nucleotide diversity and fewer segregating sites. Neutrality tests (Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs) showed evidence of recent population expansion in some species, while others had signs of demographic stability. Phylogenetic trees and haplotype networks showed strong genetic structuring, with evidence of distinct lineages and varying degrees of genetic differentiation. These results provide evidence of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation among fish species in the Daya River.
3.1. Nucleotide Diversity Estimation and Related Metrics
The nucleotide diversity and related genetic metrics are computed using a step-by-step procedure. Import the aligned FASTA sequences into DnaSP, making sure that all sequences have the same length and are aligned. Define the sequence sets/populations according to species identification or geographic location, which could enable comparison among populations
. Then, it calculates the key diversity indices of nucleotide diversity (π), a measure of average genetic variation per site; haplotype diversity (Hd), a measure of uniqueness and frequency of haplotypes within a population; estimates the number of segregating sites (S); and the average number of nucleotide differences (k) among sequences. All data are used to conduct neutrality tests-Tajima's D and Fu's Fs-in order to understand evolutionary and demographic processes
| [9] | Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis. Genetics, 123, 585–595. |
| [15] | Paradis, E. (2010). Pegas: an R package for population genetics. Bioinformatics, 26, 419–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp696 |
| [16] | Cock, P. J. A., et al. (2009). Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology. Bioinformatics, 25, 1422–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 |
[9, 15, 16]
. Such neutrality tests will help in detecting deviation from neutral evolution, showing signs of population expansion, bottlenecks, or selection pressures. Similarly, Arlequin software is also common in the analysis of genetic diversity and structure from the obtained DNA sequences.
In the analysis, the aligned sequence data are first prepared and then loaded into the Arlequin software, where the populations are identically divided into species, sampling, or geographical divisions. Upon dividing the populations, the software then computes the nucleotide diversity index (\π) independently for the divided populations to describe the genetic variation within the populations
. The software also computes the average Fst distance between the populations to describe the genetic differentiation of the populations from each other due to gene isolation or gene flow. However, the overview of DnaSP program, which is a computer program that analyzes DNA polymorphism within and between populations has been presented in
Figures 5 and 6. It handles data worked out for a single or multiple loci, and its formats include FASTA sequence alignment, through which the program calculates indices associated with genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, recombination rate, and gene flow. The program also contains neutrality tests, for example, Tajima’s test and Fu and Li’s test, both performed through coalescent simulations. Finally, the software also performs Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) to divide the total genetic diversity present in the populations into genetic divergence within the populations, genetic divergence among the populations, and genetic divergence among groups of the populations, which depends on the final genetic diversity results obtained from the study
. However, in the command-line or Python-based approach, the calculations for nucleotide diversity and other related genetic metrics can be performed with the help of scripting languages and bioinformatics toolkits. This helps in achieving flexibility and reproducibility of results. DNA sequences after alignment, preferably in FASTA or VCF format, are initially processed for analysis with the help of libraries like Biopython, scikit-allel, or by feeding them into scripts
. This approach helps in analyzing large datasets automatically and can also help in analyzing values of tests for neutral evolution or tests for neutrality, like Tajima’s D with help from existing assistance or coding.
Figure 6. Overview of the DnaSP software for DNA polymorphism and neutrality analysis.
3.2. Neutrality Tests & Demographic Analyses
Neutrality tests and demographic analyses are important means to understand the evolutionary and population history of species. Tajima's D compares the number of segregating sites with the average number of nucleotide differences among sequences
| [27] | Spielman, D., Brook, B. W., & Frankham, R. (2004). Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. PNAS, 101, 15261–15264.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403809101 |
[27].
Figure 7. Neutrality test & demographic inference using Tajima’s D, Fu’s Fs and mismatch distribution analysis.
Significant negative values are indicative of an excess of rare mutations, generally associated with recent population expansion or purifying selection, whereas positive values are indicative of balancing selection or population bottlenecks. The Tajima's D is a statistical test that compares the number of segregating sites (S) with the average number of nucleotide differences (k) in a set of DNA sequences. It assesses the hypothesis that the population is evolving neutrally. Significant deviations indicate demographic events, such as population expansion and bottlenecks, or selection, such as balancing or purifying. Similarly, Fu's Fs is particularly sensitive to demographic changes and is a good method for detecting recent population expansions; large negative Fs values indicate an excess of recent haplotypes, while positive values may indicate population decline or genetic structure. In addition to the statistical tests, mismatch distribution analysis examines the frequency distribution of pairwise nucleotide differences among sequences
| [28] | Fu, Y. X. (1997). Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics, 147, 915–925. |
[28]
. An interference of neutrality test and demographic inference has been presented in
Figure 7. A smooth, unimodal mismatch distribution usually indicates a sudden population expansion, while a multimodal or ragged distribution is typical for populations at demographic equilibrium or long-term stability. These methods give complementary information on whether populations have experienced expansion, contraction, or selective pressures during their evolutionary history.
3.3. Haplotype networks and phylogenetic variation in Daya River freshwater fishes.
Haplotype networks and phylogenetic trees are methods of analysis which complement each other when it comes to the display of genetic relationships and the evolution of genetic data from DNA sequences. Haplotype networks, developed using software such as Pop-ART, display genetic relationships between the various haplotypes, with the mutation path between them also highlighted in the networks. Each circle in the networks represents a haplotype, with the size of the circle reflecting the frequency of the haplotypes, which helps to easily distinguish between common, rare, and ancestral haplotypes in the networks. The radar chart depicts Haplotype diversity (Hd) of three fish species
Labeo rohita,
Cirrhinus mrigala, and
Puntius sophore. The maximum extent of each factor is mentioned on both axes, including an increment of 0.2.
Labeo rohita has the highest haplotype diversity of 1.0. This is because it is highly represented by its diversified haplotype.
Cirrhinus mrigala and
Puntius sophore have moderate diversity of 0.5-0.6. This implies that the genetic diversity of
L. rohita is moderate compared to both
Cirrhinus mrigala and
Puntius sophore which has been mentioned in
Figure 8.
Figure 8. Haplotype diversity (Hd) across selected freshwater fish species of the Daya River.
Haplotype networks are particularly important when studies are conducted at the intraspecific level or among populations. On the other hand, phylogenetic trees show evolutionary relationships in a tree-like model. Based on MEGA, sequence evolution can be analyzed by neighbor-joining or maximum-likelihood algorithms according to evolutionary distances or substitution models, respectively. A sunburst chart highlighting the Sequence length and all focuses on the DNA sequence lengths of three types of freshwater fish
Labeo rohita,
Puntius sophore, and
Cirrhinus mrgala. Each type of fish has been depicted by the use of different colours has been represented in
Figure 9.
Figure 9. Comparison of DNA sequence lengths among selected freshwater fish species.
The Species presented in figure are Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus mrgala belong to the Indian carp’s category, another species referred to by the name Puntius sophore falls under the category of barbs. The image also focuses on the variation of the lengths of the DNA sequences studied for the three types of fish. Bootstrap analysis can be used to provide statistical support for branches on a tree and measure reliability of evolutionary relationships for inference. In particular, haplotype networks and phylogenetic trees can complement each other by providing information on genetic variation at both granular and large scales, respectively.
3.4. Statistical Comparison of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Among Selected Freshwater Fish Species of the Daya River
Figure 10. Genetic diversity of selected freshwater fishes.
Statistical comparisons are essential for assessing genetic diversity and population structure. For instance, nucleotide diversity π may be compared among and between species or populations to determine relative genetic variation. Data distribution is considered before analysis; if assumptions of normality are violated, one might apply non-parametric tests like the Kruskal–Wallis test that considers three or more groups against each other to check for significant differences between estimates of π. On the other hand, permutation tests are a rather robust, distribution-free option in which randomness is introduced into the data to create null distributions and test significance. To infer population differentiation, pairwise Fst values are estimated using software such as Arlequin or the pegas package in R. Fst quantifies genetic divergence between populations. The significance of the Fst values is tested by permutation procedures that randomly reassign individuals or haplotypes between populations and their segregating sites has been presents in graphical format in
Figure 9 showing a bar graph of Segregating sites that reflects the number of polymorphic sites observed in three freshwater fish species. The DNA
Puntius sophore demonstrated the highest number of segregating sites, 31, showing more variability where as
Labeo rohita exhibited 24 sites, however,
Cirrhinus mrigala had only 18 sites, demonstrating a comparatively lower variability. The Y-axis represents the total number of segregating sites, ranging from 0 to 35. This comparison indicates variable genetic diversity among the species.
These statistical methods ensure sound inference about genetic differentiation, evolutionary processes, and population structure
| [25] | Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press. |
| [26] | Cooke, S. J., et al. (2012). Conservation physiology in freshwater fishes. Conservation Physiology, 1, cos010.
https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cos010 |
[25, 26]
. Likewise, a comparative figure has been presented in
Table 1.
Labeo rohita has moderate nucleotide diversity (π = 0.0048) with high Hd values (0.821), which clearly depicts high genetic variation with the possibility of recent population expansion.
Puntius sophore demonstrates the greatest genetic diversity with the highest number of haplotypes (h = 10), maximum π values (π = 0.0065), highest number of segregating sites (S = 31), and extremely negative Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs values, which clearly indicate the effect of population expansion.
Cirrhinus mrigala demonstrates relatively lower levels of genetic diversity with lower π values (π = 0.0031) and relatively lower Hd values.
Table 1. Genetic Diversity pattern of selected Fresh Water Fish Species from the Daya River.
Species | NS (n) | SL (bp) | H No. (h) | H D (Hd) | ND (π) | SS (S) | AND (k) | TD | FS |
Labeo rohita | 25 | 650 | 8 | 0.82 ±0.4 | 0.0048 ±0.001 | 24 | 3.12 | −1.2 | −4.8 |
Puntius sophore | 18 | 642 | 10 | 0.92 ± 0.3 | 0.0065 ±0.001 | 31 | 4.18 | −1.6 | −6.4 |
Cirrhinus mrigala | 22 | 648 | 6 | 0.76± 0.05 | 0.0031 ±0.009 | 18 | 2.01 | −0.8 | −2.9 |
NS: No of sequences (n); SL: Sequence Length (bp); H: Haplotype no.; HD: Haplotype Diversity; ND: Nucleotide Diversity; SS: Segregating Sites; AND: Avg Nucleotide Difference (k); TD: Tajima’s D; Fs: Fu’s Fs
4. Discussion
The in-silico analysis of nucleotide diversity in freshwater fish species of the Daya River has helped in understanding the comparative species-specific genetic constitution across previous studies of genetic diversity in riverine fish species. The high genetic diversity of
Puntius sophore, depicted by high π values of nucleotide diversity, haplotype diversity (Hd), and segregating sites, agrees with previous findings on small-bodied cyprinid species tolerant of dynamic river habitats
| [17] | Khedkar, G. D., et al. (2014). Population genetic structure of freshwater fishes inferred from mtDNA. Journal of Fish Biology, 84, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12256 |
| [23] | Hughes, J. M., Schmidt, D. J., & Finn, D. S. (2009). Genes in streams: Using DNA to understand the movement of freshwater fauna. Freshwater Biology, 54, 163–181.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02112.x |
[17, 23]
. Other studies have indicated that species with large dispersal abilities and those that favour high population sizes and whose habitats keep fluctuating tend to have lower Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs values, especially in species that are highly tolerant of ecological factors
| [9] | Tajima, F. (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis. Genetics, 123, 585–595. |
| [10] | Benson, D. A., et al. (2013). GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research, 41, D36–D42.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1195 |
[9, 10]
, thereby indicating adaptation of
P. sophore to environmental variability and large population sizes. In contrast to this,
Labeo rohita shows moderate nucleotide diversity and high haplotype diversity, which has been observed in most Indian major carps, and it has been attributed to past demographic expansion and subsequent stability
. This genotypic structure shows that there lies sufficient adaptation power to survive under moderate stress conditions. On the other hand,
Cirrhinus mrigala has a significantly lower level of genetic diversity, matching previous studies, wherein low gene-flow values were found in riverines and human-made disturbances. A low level of diversity and a low value of neutrality test statistics can be an indicator of low exposure to habitat modification and population decline
| [28] | Fu, Y. X. (1997). Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics, 147, 915–925. |
[28]
. In contrast to the Brahmaputra River, a comparative genetic structuring has been associated with pollution, damming, and fragmentation in the rivers Mahanadi and Godavari in India. Although the use of mitochondrial DNA in in-silico analyses is quite economical and useful, the literature emphasizes the importance of avoiding bias and the limitation imposed by maternal inheritance. In any event, the importance of species-specific conservation policies for the sustainability of fish stocks in the Daya River is evident from the foregoing comparisons.