In this study an attempt is made to investigate the properties and CBR characteristics of fine sand and waste dust from construction debris. Attempts are also made to study the effect of soaking period on CBR value of waste dust from construction debris. Waste dusts passing through 600 µm sieve from construction debris and river sand are selected for investigation. Standard Test procedures specified by AASHTO are followed in this investigation. The testing includes the determination of specific gravity, sieve analysis, optimum moisture content, dry density and CBR value. Dense unit weight, specific gravity and fineness modulus of construction debris is 1273.44 Kg/m3, 2.43 and 1.36 respectively and for fine sand 1132.25 Kg/m3, 2.62 and 1.64 respectively. Un-soaked CBR value of construction debris and fine sand are 10.36% and 12.5% respectively. Soaked CBR values of construction debris and fine sand are 5.36% and 6.07% respectively. The study reveals that waste dust from construction debris is as good as fine sand for construction of sub-grade from the stand point of properties and CBR characteristics.
| Published in | Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12 |
| Page(s) | 12-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
CBR, Construction Debris, Fine Sand, Socked, Un-soaked
| [1] | Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Disfani, M. M., & Bo, M. W. (2012). Geotechnical and geo-environmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement sub-base applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (8), 1077-1088. |
| [2] | Arulrajah, A., Disfani, M. M., Horpibulsuk, S., Suksiripattanapong, C., &Prongmanee, N. (2014). Physical properties and shear strength responses of recycled construction and demolition materials in unbound pavement base/subbase applications. Construction and Building Materials, 58, 245-257. |
| [3] | Barbudo, A., Agrela, F., Ayuso, J., Jiménez, J. R., & Poon, C. S. (2012). Statistical analysis of recycled aggregates derived from different sources for sub-base applications. Construction and Building Materials, 28 (1), 129-138. |
| [4] | deRezende, L. R., & de Carvalho, J. C. (2003). The use of quarry waste in pavement construction. Resources, conservation and recycling, 39 (1), 91-105. |
| [5] | Gobieanandh, V., & Jayakody, S. (2016). Evaluate the strength of cement treated recycled construction and demolition aggregates as a pavement material. In 7th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (pp. 62-67). |
| [6] | Herrador, R., Pérez, P., Garach, L., & Ordóñez, J. (2011). Use of recycled construction and demolition waste aggregate for road course surfacing. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (2), 182-190. |
| [7] | Vegas, I., Ibañez, J. A., Lisbona, A., De Cortazar, A. S., & Frías, M. (2011). Pre-normative research on the use of mixed recycled aggregates in unbound road sections. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (5), 2674-2682. |
| [8] | Sabat, A. K. (2012). Stabilization of expansive soil using waste ceramic dust. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 17 (Bund. Z). |
| [9] | Pedro, D., De Brito, J., & Evangelista, L. (2014). Influence of the use of recycled concrete aggregates from different sources on structural concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 71, 141-151. |
| [10] | daConceiçãoLeite, F., dos Santos Motta, R., Vasconcelos, K. L., & Bernucci, L. (2011). Laboratory evaluation of recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements Construction and Building Materials, 25 (6), 2972-2979. |
| [11] | Vipulanandan, C., Basheer, M., & O’Neill, M. (1996). Recycled materials in embankments, except glass. The Center for Innovative Grouting Materials and Technology Research Report 0–1351, Preliminary Report, Houston, Texas. |
| [12] | Robinson Jr, G. R., Menzie, W. D., & Hyun, H. (2004). Recycling of construction debris as aggregate in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 42 (3), 275-294. |
| [13] | Silva, R. V., De Brito, J., & Dhir, R. K. (2014). Properties and composition of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Construction and Building Materials, 65, 201-217. |
| [14] | Rahman, M. A., Imteaz, M., Arulrajah, A., & Disfani, M. M. (2014). Suitability of recycled construction and demolition aggregates as alternative pipe backfilling materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 75-84. |
| [15] | Pepe, M., Toledo Filho, R. D., Koenders, E. A., & Martinelli, E. (2014). Alternative processing procedures for recycled aggregates in structural concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 69, 124-132. |
| [16] | Ossa, A., García, J. L., & Botero, E. (2016). Use of recycled construction and demolition waste (CDW) aggregates: a sustainable alternative for the pavement construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 379-386. |
| [17] | Pérez, P., Agrela, F., Herrador, R., & Ordoñez, J. (2013). Application of cement-treated recycled materials in the construction of a section of road in Malaga, Spain. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 593-599. |
| [18] | Huang, Y., Bird, R. N., & Heidrich, O. (2007). A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resources, conservation and recycling, 52 (1), 58-73. |
APA Style
Md. Murad Hasan, Mehejabin Chowdhury Ankan, Md. Ebrahim Shaik. (2020). Evaluation of CBR Characteristics of Waste Dust from Construction Debris as Pavement Material. Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, 5(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12
ACS Style
Md. Murad Hasan; Mehejabin Chowdhury Ankan; Md. Ebrahim Shaik. Evaluation of CBR Characteristics of Waste Dust from Construction Debris as Pavement Material. Landsc. Archit. Reg. Plan. 2020, 5(1), 12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12
AMA Style
Md. Murad Hasan, Mehejabin Chowdhury Ankan, Md. Ebrahim Shaik. Evaluation of CBR Characteristics of Waste Dust from Construction Debris as Pavement Material. Landsc Archit Reg Plan. 2020;5(1):12-20. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12,
author = {Md. Murad Hasan and Mehejabin Chowdhury Ankan and Md. Ebrahim Shaik},
title = {Evaluation of CBR Characteristics of Waste Dust from Construction Debris as Pavement Material},
journal = {Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {12-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.larp.20200501.12},
abstract = {In this study an attempt is made to investigate the properties and CBR characteristics of fine sand and waste dust from construction debris. Attempts are also made to study the effect of soaking period on CBR value of waste dust from construction debris. Waste dusts passing through 600 µm sieve from construction debris and river sand are selected for investigation. Standard Test procedures specified by AASHTO are followed in this investigation. The testing includes the determination of specific gravity, sieve analysis, optimum moisture content, dry density and CBR value. Dense unit weight, specific gravity and fineness modulus of construction debris is 1273.44 Kg/m3, 2.43 and 1.36 respectively and for fine sand 1132.25 Kg/m3, 2.62 and 1.64 respectively. Un-soaked CBR value of construction debris and fine sand are 10.36% and 12.5% respectively. Soaked CBR values of construction debris and fine sand are 5.36% and 6.07% respectively. The study reveals that waste dust from construction debris is as good as fine sand for construction of sub-grade from the stand point of properties and CBR characteristics.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of CBR Characteristics of Waste Dust from Construction Debris as Pavement Material AU - Md. Murad Hasan AU - Mehejabin Chowdhury Ankan AU - Md. Ebrahim Shaik Y1 - 2020/05/28 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12 DO - 10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12 T2 - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning JF - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning JO - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning SP - 12 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-4374 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20200501.12 AB - In this study an attempt is made to investigate the properties and CBR characteristics of fine sand and waste dust from construction debris. Attempts are also made to study the effect of soaking period on CBR value of waste dust from construction debris. Waste dusts passing through 600 µm sieve from construction debris and river sand are selected for investigation. Standard Test procedures specified by AASHTO are followed in this investigation. The testing includes the determination of specific gravity, sieve analysis, optimum moisture content, dry density and CBR value. Dense unit weight, specific gravity and fineness modulus of construction debris is 1273.44 Kg/m3, 2.43 and 1.36 respectively and for fine sand 1132.25 Kg/m3, 2.62 and 1.64 respectively. Un-soaked CBR value of construction debris and fine sand are 10.36% and 12.5% respectively. Soaked CBR values of construction debris and fine sand are 5.36% and 6.07% respectively. The study reveals that waste dust from construction debris is as good as fine sand for construction of sub-grade from the stand point of properties and CBR characteristics. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: