Psychology and Behavioral Sciences

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Stroop Paradigms and Stroop Effects: Origin, Variation and Controversy

The Stroop paradigm is one of the classic experimental paradigms in cognitive neuroscience. This study starts with John Riddley Stroop's first color word test paper published in 1935, reviewing Stroop's own trade-offs between major and interest, and tracing the origins of the Stroop paradigm and Stroop effect. The author conducted a comprehensive collection and organization of Stroop related research published from 2003 to 2023, analyzing the current status of Stroop related research from three aspects: the quantity of literature, published journals and research institutions, and research hotspots. The results showed that the number of Stroop studies steadily increased year by year between 2003 and 2023, with Neurophysiology (in English) and Journal of Physiological Science (in Chinese) having the highest publication volume, The largest number of research topics is the Emotion-Stroop study. It has also been found that the diversification of Stroop variants and the computerization of Stroop tasks, combined with new technologies such as EEG, ERP, fMRI and eye trackers etc., have become new research trends. The timing of the Stroop effect and the "trend trap" of the Stroop task also were discussed and presenting realistic stimuli and improving response methods were suggested to enhance the ecological validity of the Stroop task.

Stroop, Cognition, Unconscious, Validity

APA Style

Li Chen, Zhi Chen. (2023). Stroop Paradigms and Stroop Effects: Origin, Variation and Controversy. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 12(5), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20231205.13

ACS Style

Li Chen; Zhi Chen. Stroop Paradigms and Stroop Effects: Origin, Variation and Controversy. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2023, 12(5), 81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231205.13

AMA Style

Li Chen, Zhi Chen. Stroop Paradigms and Stroop Effects: Origin, Variation and Controversy. Psychol Behav Sci. 2023;12(5):81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20231205.13

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
2. Macleod, C. M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109 (2), 163–203.
3. Stroop, J. R. (1935). The Basis of Ligon's Theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 47 (3), 499–504.
4. Stroop, J. R. (1932). Is the Judgment of the Group Better Than That of the Average Member of the Group? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15 (5), 550–562.
5. Caikang Wang. (1994). Stroop and the Stroop effect. Psychological Science, 17 (4), 232-236.
6. Gotlib, I. H., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Construct Accessibility and Depression: An Examination of Cognitive and Affective Factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 427–439.
7. Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., & Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the Color–Word Stroop Task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22 (2), 135–138.
8. Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic Semantic Processing in A Picture–Word Interference Task. Child Development, 46, 247–253.
9. Besner, D., & Colthart, M. (1979). Ideographic and Alphabetic Processing in Skilled Reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467–472.
10. Gestadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The Relationship Between Cognition and Action: Performance of Children 321–7 Years Old on a Stroop-like Day–Night Test. Cognition, 53 (2), 129–153.
11. Starreveld, P. A., & Heij, W. L. (1995). Semantic Interference, Orthographic Facilitation, and Their Interaction in Naming Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (3), 686–698.
12. Kokonyei, G., Kovacs, L. N., Baksa, D., Kocsel, N., Gecse, K., Dobos, D., Eszlari, N., & Juhasz, G. (2021). Midcingulate Activation to Inhibiting Prepotent Response in Emotion-Face Stroop Task is Associated with Covid-related Ruminative thoughts. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 53 (1), S378-S379.
13. Harry R. Smolker, Kai Wang, Monica Luciana, James M. Bjork, Raul Gonzalez, Deanna M. Barch, Erin C. McGlade, Roselinde H. Kaiser, Naomi P. Friedman, John K. Hewitt, Marie T. Banich. (2022). The Emotional Word-Emotional Face Stroop Task in the ABCD Study: Psychometric validation and associations with measures of cognition and psychopathology. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 53, 101054.
14. Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. A. (1995). Measuring the Relative Magnitude of Unconscious Influences. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422–439.
15. Yoshifumi Ikeda, Hideyuki Okuzumi, Mitsuru Kokubun. (2013). Stroop/Reverse-Stroop Interference in Typical Development and Its Relation to Symptoms of ADHD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34 (8), 2391-2398.
16. Ruipeng Ning. (2021). How Language Proficiency Influences Stroop Effect and Reverse-Stroop Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 60, 101027.
17. Kahneman D, Chajczyk D. (1983). Tests of the Automaticity of Reading: Dilution of Stroop Effects by Color-irrelevant Stimuli. Journal of experimental psychology-Human perception and performance, 9 (4), 497-509.
18. Robert, D. M., & Daniel, A. (2003). Driven by Information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects. Psychological Review, 110 (3), 422.
19. Jun Chen, Haiyan Liu, Jijia Zhang. (2007). New Advances in Stroop Effect Research - Theory, Paradigm, and Impact. Journal of Psychological Science, 30 (2), 415–418.
20. Ania Lipat, Sudha R. Dhulipala, Natalie C. Ebner, Yenisel Cruz-Almeida. (2022). The Impact of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain on Traditional and Modified Pain Stroop Task Performance in Older Adults. The Journal of Pain, 23 (5), 39.
21. Collette, F., Amieva, H., & Adam, S. (2007). Comparison of Inhibitory Functioning in Mild Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia. Cortex, 43 (7), 866–874.
22. Harrison, D. M., & Haut, D. M. (2005). Performance Differences in the Stroop Color–Word Interference Test in Patients with Partial Epilepsy of Known Localization. Journal of Clinic Neurophysiology, 22 (5), 358–364.
23. Ying Yang, Renlai Zhou, Pan Liu. (2008). The Attention Bias Characteristics of School Fear Children. Chinese Journal of Special Education, (11), 57–63.
24. Yasmin Zakiniaeiz, Cheryl M. Lacadie, Grace Macdonald-Gagnon, Elise E. DeVito, Marc N. Potenza. (2023). Diagnostic Group Differences and Exploratory Sex Differences in Intrinsic Connectivity During fMRI Stroop in Individuals with and Without Cocaine Use Disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 251, 110962.
25. Becker, T. M., Kerns, J. G., & Macdonald, A. W. (2008). Prefrontal Ddysfunction in First-degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients During a Stroop Task. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33 (11), 2619–2625.
26. Liwei Zhang. (2000). The Factor Structure, Self-evaluation, and Attention Characteristics of Pre-competition Emotions. China Sport Science, 20 (4), 67–70.
27. Mingqiang Xiang, Guanru Li, Jianuo Ye, Meng Wu, Ruiping Xu, Min Hu. (2023). Effects of Combined Physical and Cognitive Training on Executive Function of Adolescent Shooting Athletes: A functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy Study. Sports Medicine and Health Science, 5 (3), 220–228.
28. Weerakkody, N. S., Taylor, C. J., Bulmer, C. L., Hamilton, D. B., Gloury, J., O’Brien, N. J., Saunders, J. H., Harvey, S., Patterson. T. A. (2021). The Effect of Mental Fatigue on the Performance of Australian Football Specific Skills Amongst Amateur Athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 24 (6), 592–596.
29. Vendemia, J. M. C., & Rodriguez, P. D. (2010). Repressors vs. Low–and High–anxious Coping Styles: EEG Differences During a Modified Version of the Emotional Stroop Task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78 (3), 284–294.
30. Szücs, D., & Soltész, F. (2008). The Interaction of Task–Relevant and Task–Irrelevant Stimulus Features in the Number/Size Congruity Paradigm: An ERP Study. Brain Research, 1190, 143–158.
31. Wei Lin Toh, David J. Castle, Susan L. Rossell. (2017). Attentional Biases in Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD): Eye-tracking Using the Emotional Stroop Task. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 74, 151–161.
32. Jiacheng Liu, Danping, Bai Jing Sun. (2008). Research on the Adjustment Mechanism of Stroop Effect Based on fMRI. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 48 (9), 142–144.
33. Roberts, M. A, & Besner, D. (2005). Stroop Dilution Revisited: Evidence for Domain–Specific, Limited–Capacity Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005, 31 (1), 3–13.
34. Greenwald, A., Draine, S., & Abrams. R. (1996). Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation. Science, 273 (5282), 1699–1702.
35. Daza, M. T. & Ortells. J. J. (2002). Perception Without Awareness: Further Evidence from a Stroop Priming Task. Perception & Psyhchophysics, 64 (8), 1316–1324.
36. Merikle, P. M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Measuring Unconscious Influences. In J. D. Cohen., & J. W. Schooler. (Eds.). Scientific Approachesto Consciousness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 109–123.
37. Yajun Zhao, Zhijun Zhang. (2009). Eye Gaze Cue Effect: Endogenous Attention or Exogenous Attention? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41 (12), 1133–1142.
38. Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. J. (2007). The Automaticity of Emotional Stroop: A Meta–analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38 (2). 184–199.
39. Chajut, E., Mama, Y., Levy, L., & Algom, D. (2010). Avoiding the Approach Trap: A Response Bias Theory of the Emotional Stroop Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 36 (6), 1567–1572.