Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia

Received: 18 March 2024    Accepted: 8 April 2024    Published: 17 May 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices could help smallholder farmers in Ethiopia enhance food security and appropriately manage climate change impacts. Conservation agricultural practice is intended to conserve, improve and make more efficient use of natural resources. However, despite these potential benefits, CSA is only practiced in some areas of Ethiopia and has not been sufficiently adopted by smallholder farmers. Therefore, this experiment was intended to improve the production and productivity of maize through different moisture conservation practices and to determine and recommend the best moisture conservation practices for agro-pastoralists in Yabello District, Borana Zone. The field experiment was conducted at Qobo, Qadale and Colksa Kebeles of Yabello districts for two consecutive years, from 2019 to 2020, the main cropping seasons. The experiments had four treatments (Runoff diversion, Furrow, Runoff diversion plus Furrow and Control) laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) of three replications. The analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference among treatments in days to maturity, cob diameter, cob length, hundred seed weight and grain yield in all cropping seasons and locations. The highest grain yield was obtained from furrow with diversion structure treatment (5.83, 5.59, 4.2 t/ha), followed by diversion structure (5.51, 4.84, 3.9 t/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. The lowest grain yield was recorded for the control (farmers practice) treatment (3.56, 3.05 and 3.36 ton/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. In all sites, moisture conservation treatments (furrow plus diversion, diversion and furrow) have yield advantages of 2.27 t/ha (40.68%), 2.54 t/ha (45.44%), 0.84 t/ha (20%), 1.95 t/ha (35.39%), 1.79 t/ha (36.98%), 0.54 t/ha (13.84%) and 1.88 t/ha (34.55%), 2.02 t/ha (39.84%) and 0.36 t/ha (9.43%) more than farmer’s practices, respectively. Therefore, moisture conservation practices are recommended for optimum production of maize in moisture stress areas of Yabello District, Borana Zone.

Published in World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12
Page(s) 46-53
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Conservation Agriculture, Furrow, Run off Diversion, Yield

References
[1] Temesgen, M., Hoogmoed, W. B., Rockstrom, J. and Savenije, H. H. G. Conservation Tillage Implements and Systems for Smallholder Farmers in Semi-Arid Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Res. 2009, 104(1), 185–191.
[2] Stellmacher, T. and Kelboro, G. Family Farms, Agricultural Productivity, and the Terrain of Food (In)Security in Ethiopia. Sustainability. 2019, 11, 4981.
[3] Njeru, E., Grey, S. and Kilawe, E. Eastern Africa Climate-Smart Agriculture Scoping Study: Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda; FAO: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2016.
[4] Ahmad, M. M., Yaseen, M., and Saqib, S. E. Climate change impacts of drought on the livelihood of dryland smallholders: Implications of adaptation challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022, 80, 103210.
[5] Bai, X., Huang, Y., Ren, W., Coyne, M., Jacinthe, P., Tao, B., Hui, D., Yang, J. and Matocha, C. Responses of Soil Carbon Sequestration to Climate-smart Agriculture Practices: A Meta-analysis. Global Change Biology. 2019, 25, 2591–2606.
[6] Agegnehu, G. and Tilahun, T. Integrated Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrient Management in Tropical Agro-Ecosystems: A Review. Pedosphere. 2017, 27, 662–680.
[7] Wassie, A. and Pauline, N. Evaluating Smallholder Farmers’ Preferences for Climate Smart Agricultural Practices in Tehuledere District, Northeastern Ethiopia: Evaluating Smallholder Farmers’ Preferences. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 2018, 39, 300–316.
[8] Jirata, M., Grey, S. and Kilawe, E. Ethiopia Climate-Smart Agriculture Scoping Study; FAO: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2016.
[9] Aweke, M. G. Climate-Smart Agriculture in Ethiopia: CSA Country Profiles for Africa Series. International Center for Tropical Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA. 2017.
[10] Welteji, D. A. Critical Review of Rural Development Policy of Ethiopia: Access, Utilization and Coverage. Agricultural Food Security. 2018, 7, 55.
[11] Manyatsi AM, Mhazo N, Mkhatshwa M and Masarirambi MT. The Effect of Different in-situ Water Conservation Tillage Methods on Growth and Development of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L.). 2011, 11-18.
[12] Mudatenguha F, Anena J, Kiptum CK and Mashingaidze AB. In situ rain water harvesting techniques increases maize growth and grain yield in a semi-arid agro-ecology of Nyagatare, Rwanda. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 2014, 16, 996-1000.
[13] Yosef, B. A., and Asmamaw, D. K. Rainwater harvesting: An option for dry land agriculture in arid and semi-arid Ethiopia. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. 2015, 7(2), 17-28.
[14] Desta L, Carucci V, Wendem-Ageňehu A and Abebe Y. Community Based Participatory Watershed Development: A Guideline. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2005.
[15] Milkias, A., Tadesse, T., and Zeleke, H. Evaluating the effects of in-situ rainwater harvesting techniques on soil moisture conservation and grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Fedis district, Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology. 2018, 6(9), 1129-1133.
[16] Mekuria W., Noble A., McCartney M., Hoanh CT. and Douangsavanh S. Soil management for raising crop water productivity in rainfed production systems in Lao PDR. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2016, 62, 53-68.
[17] Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York, USA.: John Willey and Sons Ltd: 1984, p. 680.
[18] Ayalaa, G., Geremua, T., Ararsob, E., and Bultia, A. Evaluation of In-situ water harvesting Structures on Soil Moisture, Yield and Yield Components of Sorghum in Moisture Deficit Areas of Daro Lebu and Boke districts. 2019.
[19] Wolde B., Naba W. and Gebremichael A. Evaluation of In-situ Moisture Conservation Techniques for Maize Production in Moisture Stress Areas of Mirab Abaya Woreda, Southern, Ethiopia. Advances in Crop Science and Technology. 2020, 8, 442.
[20] Gebreyesus BT. Effect of Tillage and Fertilizer Practices on Sorghum Production in bergelle Area, Northern Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science (MEJS). 2012, 4(2), 5269.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tola, F., Lolo, I. (2024). Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tola, F.; Lolo, I. Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2024, 2(2), 46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tola F, Lolo I. Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia. World J Agric Sci Technol. 2024;2(2):46-53. doi: 10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12,
      author = {Fenan Tola and Isihak Lolo},
      title = {Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia},
      journal = {World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology},
      volume = {2},
      number = {2},
      pages = {46-53},
      doi = {10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjast.20240202.12},
      abstract = {The adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices could help smallholder farmers in Ethiopia enhance food security and appropriately manage climate change impacts. Conservation agricultural practice is intended to conserve, improve and make more efficient use of natural resources. However, despite these potential benefits, CSA is only practiced in some areas of Ethiopia and has not been sufficiently adopted by smallholder farmers. Therefore, this experiment was intended to improve the production and productivity of maize through different moisture conservation practices and to determine and recommend the best moisture conservation practices for agro-pastoralists in Yabello District, Borana Zone. The field experiment was conducted at Qobo, Qadale and Colksa Kebeles of Yabello districts for two consecutive years, from 2019 to 2020, the main cropping seasons. The experiments had four treatments (Runoff diversion, Furrow, Runoff diversion plus Furrow and Control) laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) of three replications. The analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference among treatments in days to maturity, cob diameter, cob length, hundred seed weight and grain yield in all cropping seasons and locations. The highest grain yield was obtained from furrow with diversion structure treatment (5.83, 5.59, 4.2 t/ha), followed by diversion structure (5.51, 4.84, 3.9 t/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. The lowest grain yield was recorded for the control (farmers practice) treatment (3.56, 3.05 and 3.36 ton/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. In all sites, moisture conservation treatments (furrow plus diversion, diversion and furrow) have yield advantages of 2.27 t/ha (40.68%), 2.54 t/ha (45.44%), 0.84 t/ha (20%), 1.95 t/ha (35.39%), 1.79 t/ha (36.98%), 0.54 t/ha (13.84%) and 1.88 t/ha (34.55%), 2.02 t/ha (39.84%) and 0.36 t/ha (9.43%) more than farmer’s practices, respectively. Therefore, moisture conservation practices are recommended for optimum production of maize in moisture stress areas of Yabello District, Borana Zone.},
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Introducing and Evaluation of Conservation Agriculture in Dry Land of Borana, Oromia, Southern Ethiopia
    AU  - Fenan Tola
    AU  - Isihak Lolo
    Y1  - 2024/05/17
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12
    T2  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JF  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    JO  - World Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
    SP  - 46
    EP  - 53
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7332
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjast.20240202.12
    AB  - The adoption of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices could help smallholder farmers in Ethiopia enhance food security and appropriately manage climate change impacts. Conservation agricultural practice is intended to conserve, improve and make more efficient use of natural resources. However, despite these potential benefits, CSA is only practiced in some areas of Ethiopia and has not been sufficiently adopted by smallholder farmers. Therefore, this experiment was intended to improve the production and productivity of maize through different moisture conservation practices and to determine and recommend the best moisture conservation practices for agro-pastoralists in Yabello District, Borana Zone. The field experiment was conducted at Qobo, Qadale and Colksa Kebeles of Yabello districts for two consecutive years, from 2019 to 2020, the main cropping seasons. The experiments had four treatments (Runoff diversion, Furrow, Runoff diversion plus Furrow and Control) laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) of three replications. The analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference among treatments in days to maturity, cob diameter, cob length, hundred seed weight and grain yield in all cropping seasons and locations. The highest grain yield was obtained from furrow with diversion structure treatment (5.83, 5.59, 4.2 t/ha), followed by diversion structure (5.51, 4.84, 3.9 t/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. The lowest grain yield was recorded for the control (farmers practice) treatment (3.56, 3.05 and 3.36 ton/ha) at Qadale, Colkasa and Qobo Kebeles, respectively. In all sites, moisture conservation treatments (furrow plus diversion, diversion and furrow) have yield advantages of 2.27 t/ha (40.68%), 2.54 t/ha (45.44%), 0.84 t/ha (20%), 1.95 t/ha (35.39%), 1.79 t/ha (36.98%), 0.54 t/ha (13.84%) and 1.88 t/ha (34.55%), 2.02 t/ha (39.84%) and 0.36 t/ha (9.43%) more than farmer’s practices, respectively. Therefore, moisture conservation practices are recommended for optimum production of maize in moisture stress areas of Yabello District, Borana Zone.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Yabello, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Yabello Pastoral and Dryland Agriculture Research Center, Yabello, Ethiopia

  • Sections