The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of project-based learning (PJBL) on writing skills of laboratory report for undergraduate female students at school of education in Al-Baha university. The study used a quasi-experimental design for the experimental and control groups, with a pre- and post-tests. The study sample included 40 female students distributed equally between the two groups. Learners in the experimental group were taught using the PJBL strategy while their peers in the control group were taught conventionally. The content analysis tool was employed to assess the writing skills of laboratory report components which include the introduction, methods and procedures, results and discussions. The Independent Samples T-test was used to compare the mean scores between the groups and Eta squared (η²) formula was employed to evaluate the effectiveness level. Post-test results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. This improvement of the experimental group reached the highest level in writing the method and procedures, while remaining at the intermediate level in writing the introduction, results, and discussion. This suggests that the PJBL strategy was effective in improving laboratory report writing skills in all three components: the introduction, methods and procedures, and results and discussion, as well as in the overall score. The effect size (η²= 0.47) indicated the substantial impact of the PJBL strategy in developing the laboratory writing skills for science students. The study recommended the needs for training programs on teaching practices and group projects activities that enhance student skills in writing laboratory reports through engaging learners with the writing process and emphases on sharing newly learned scientific concepts.
Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12 |
Page(s) | 11-21 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Project Based Learning, Laboratory Report, Scientific Writing
[1] | Watts, F. M., Spencer, J. L., & Shultz, G. V. (2020). Writing assignments to support the learning goals of a CURE. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 510-514. |
[2] | McWhorter, K. T. (2012). Successful college writing: skills-strategies-learning styles. Macmillan. |
[3] | Gustiani, S., Simanjuntak, T., & Agustinasari, E. (2021, January). The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning to Improve Students’ Report Writing. In 4th Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST-T3-20) (pp. 21-25). Atlantis Press. |
[4] | Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Ed ucational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. |
[5] | Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literatu re. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277. |
[6] | Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the pro ject-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. |
[7] | Kavanagh S. S., Rainey E. (2017). Learning to support adolescent literacy: Teacher educator pedagogy and novice teacher take up in secondary English language arts teacher preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 904–937. |
[8] | Reisman, A., Kavanagh, S. S., Monte-Sano, C., Fogo, B., McGrew, S. C., Cipparone, P., & Simmons, E. (2018). Facilitating whole-class discussions in history: A framework for preparing teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Edu cation, 69(3), 278-293. |
[9] | Habulembe, S. H. (2007). A Classroom Response to HIV/AIDS--Project Proposal Writing. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 36-42). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5. |
[10] | Baş, G. (2011). Investigating the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards English lesson. The online journal of New Horizons in Education, 1(4). |
[11] | Yusof, WR Wan, Melody Kimi, W. S. H. W. Zullkiplee, Mohd Alhafiizh Zailani, Mardhiah Shahabudin, Abdul Al-Hafiz Ismail, S. M. A. A. Abdullah, Iswan Nur Ariff Ismail, and Dhana Jay Raja Gopal. "Assessment of Practical and Scientific Writing Skills for Pre-University Students through Project-Based Learning. Journal of Chemical Education 99, no. 2 (2022): 715-722. |
[12] | Hancock, L. M., & Hollamby, M. J. (2020). Assessing the practical skills of undergraduates: the evolution of a station-based practical exam. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(4), 972-979. |
[13] | Brigati, J. R., & Swann, J. M. (2015). Facilitating improvements in laboratory report writing skills with less grading: a laboratory report peer-review process. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 61-68. |
[14] | Hosbein, K. N., Alvarez-Bell, R., Callis-Duehl, K. L., Sampson, V., Wolf, S. F., & Walker, J. P. (2020). Development of the investigation design, explanation, and argument assessment for general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 293-306. |
[15] | Aghayani, B., & Hajmohammadi, E. (2019). Project-based learning: Promoting EFL learners’ writing skills. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22(1), 78- 85 |
[16] | Susana, T., & Efendi, A. (2020, August). The Improvement of Short Story Reading and Writing Skill through Project-Based Learning. In 1st International Conference on Language, Literature, and Arts Education (ICLLAE 2019) (pp. 148-152). Atlantis Press. |
[17] | Juleha, S., Nugraha, I., & Feranie, S. (2019). The Effect of Project in Problem-Based Learning on Students' Scientific and Information Literacy in Learning Human Excretory System. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 33-41. |
[18] | Parwati, N. W., Suarni, N. K., Suastra, I. W., & Adnyana, P. B. (2019, October). The effect of project based learning and authentic assessment on students’ natural science learning outcome by con trolling critical thinking skill. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1318, No. 1, p. 012096). IOP Publishing. |
[19] | Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students' perspectives with project-based learn ing. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 6. |
[20] | Loyens S. M., Jones S. H., Mikkers J., van Gog T. (2015). Problem-based learning as a facilitator of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 38, 34– 42. |
[21] | Grossman, P., Dean, C. G. P., Kavanagh, S. S., & Herrmann, Z. (2019). Preparing teachers for project- based teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(7), 43-48. |
[22] |
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation Available
http://www.bie.org/object/document/a_ review of research on project based-learning |
[23] | Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learn ing. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Hand book of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275– 297). Cambridge University Press. |
[24] | Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future, 19-40. |
[25] | Lin, C. F., Lu, M. S., Chung, C. C., & Yang, C. M. (2010). A comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching in nursing ethics education. Nursing Ethics, 17(3), 373–382. |
[26] | Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022). Effects of problem-based learning instructional intervention on critical thinking in higher education: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101069. |
[27] | Shin, N., Bowers, J., Krajcik, J., & Damelin, D. (2021). Promoting computational thinking through project-based learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3, 1-15. |
[28] | Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, K., & Toikkanen, T. (2016). Mobile apps for reflection in learning: A design research in K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202. |
[29] | Jang, J. Y., & Hand, B. (2017). Examining the value of a scaffolded critique framework to promote argumentative and explanatory writings within an argument-based inquiry approach. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1213–1231. |
[30] | Stephenson, N. S., & Sadler-McKnight, N. P. (2016). Developing critical thinking skills using the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 72–79. |
[31] | Choi, A., Hand, B., & Greenbowe, T. (2013). Students’ written arguments in general chemistry laboratory investigations. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1763–1783. |
[32] | Chen, Y. C. (2019). Writing as an Epistemological Tool: Perspectives from Personal, Disciplinary, and Soci ocultural Landscapes. In Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 115- 132). (Con temporary Trends and Issues in Science Education; Vol. 49). Springer Science and Business Media B. V. |
[33] | Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670. |
[34] | Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition. New York: Academic Press. |
[35] | Nurhajati, D. (2016). Project-based learning used to develop supplementary materials for writing skill. The Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 2, 51-56. |
[36] | Lu, Q. (2021). A New Project-Based Learning in English Writing. International journal of emerging technologies in learning, 15(5). 214-227. |
APA Style
Almuntasheri, S. (2025). Effectiveness of Project-Based-Learning on Laboratory Report Writing Skills Among Undergraduate Science Students. Science Journal of Education, 13(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12
ACS Style
Almuntasheri, S. Effectiveness of Project-Based-Learning on Laboratory Report Writing Skills Among Undergraduate Science Students. Sci. J. Educ. 2025, 13(1), 11-21. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12
@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12, author = {Saeed Almuntasheri}, title = {Effectiveness of Project-Based-Learning on Laboratory Report Writing Skills Among Undergraduate Science Students}, journal = {Science Journal of Education}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, pages = {11-21}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20251301.12}, abstract = {The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of project-based learning (PJBL) on writing skills of laboratory report for undergraduate female students at school of education in Al-Baha university. The study used a quasi-experimental design for the experimental and control groups, with a pre- and post-tests. The study sample included 40 female students distributed equally between the two groups. Learners in the experimental group were taught using the PJBL strategy while their peers in the control group were taught conventionally. The content analysis tool was employed to assess the writing skills of laboratory report components which include the introduction, methods and procedures, results and discussions. The Independent Samples T-test was used to compare the mean scores between the groups and Eta squared (η²) formula was employed to evaluate the effectiveness level. Post-test results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. This improvement of the experimental group reached the highest level in writing the method and procedures, while remaining at the intermediate level in writing the introduction, results, and discussion. This suggests that the PJBL strategy was effective in improving laboratory report writing skills in all three components: the introduction, methods and procedures, and results and discussion, as well as in the overall score. The effect size (η²= 0.47) indicated the substantial impact of the PJBL strategy in developing the laboratory writing skills for science students. The study recommended the needs for training programs on teaching practices and group projects activities that enhance student skills in writing laboratory reports through engaging learners with the writing process and emphases on sharing newly learned scientific concepts.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effectiveness of Project-Based-Learning on Laboratory Report Writing Skills Among Undergraduate Science Students AU - Saeed Almuntasheri Y1 - 2025/01/24 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 11 EP - 21 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251301.12 AB - The aim of this research is to evaluate the impact of project-based learning (PJBL) on writing skills of laboratory report for undergraduate female students at school of education in Al-Baha university. The study used a quasi-experimental design for the experimental and control groups, with a pre- and post-tests. The study sample included 40 female students distributed equally between the two groups. Learners in the experimental group were taught using the PJBL strategy while their peers in the control group were taught conventionally. The content analysis tool was employed to assess the writing skills of laboratory report components which include the introduction, methods and procedures, results and discussions. The Independent Samples T-test was used to compare the mean scores between the groups and Eta squared (η²) formula was employed to evaluate the effectiveness level. Post-test results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group. This improvement of the experimental group reached the highest level in writing the method and procedures, while remaining at the intermediate level in writing the introduction, results, and discussion. This suggests that the PJBL strategy was effective in improving laboratory report writing skills in all three components: the introduction, methods and procedures, and results and discussion, as well as in the overall score. The effect size (η²= 0.47) indicated the substantial impact of the PJBL strategy in developing the laboratory writing skills for science students. The study recommended the needs for training programs on teaching practices and group projects activities that enhance student skills in writing laboratory reports through engaging learners with the writing process and emphases on sharing newly learned scientific concepts. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -