| Peer-Reviewed

Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model

Received: 5 October 2017     Accepted: 6 February 2018     Published: 2 March 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
Page(s) 15-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Text, Sense, Spatial Focusing of Sense, Comprehension

References
[1] Gal'perin, I. R. Tekst kak obyekt lingvisticheskogo issledovanija. Monografija/I. R. Gal'perin. – M.: Nauka, 1981. 140 s.
[2] Ginzburg K. Mify – jemblemy – primety: Morfologijaiistorija. Sb. statej/Per. s it. iposlesl. S. L. Kozlova. – M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2004. 348 s.
[3] Lotman, Ju. M. Semiotika kul'tury I ponjatie teksta// Istorija I tipologija russkoj kul'tury/ Ju. M. Lotman. – SPb.: Iskusstvo - SPB, 2002. S. 158–162.
[4] Bart, R. Ot proizvedenija k tekstu//Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Pojetika: Per.s fr./ R. Bart. – M.: Progress. 1989. S. 413-423.
[5] Piaget, J. The development of object concept: The construction of reality in the child /J. Piaget.– New York: Basic Books, 1954. Pp. 3-96.
[6] Nikitina, E. S. Smyslovoj analiz teksta: Psihosemioticheskij podhod/E. S. Nikitina.– M.: LENAND, 2016. 200 s.
[7] Bahtin, M. M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugih gumanitarnyh naukah. Opyt filosofskogo analiza//Jestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva/M. M. Bahtin. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s.
[8] Origen. O nachalah. Protiv Cel'sa. Kn. 4 (Po izdaniju Kazanskoj Duhovnoj Akademii, 1892)/Origen.–SPb.: Bibliopolis, 2008. 792 s.
[9] Mak-Ljujen, Marshall. Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul'tury/M.mak-Ljujen. – Kiev: Nika-Centr, 2004. 432 s.
[10] Raushenbah. B. V. Logika troichnosti / B. V. Raushenbah // Voprosy filosofii. –1993– № 3. S. 63-70.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. (2018). Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2018, 6(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nikitina Elena Sergeevna. Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model. Int J Lang Linguist. 2018;6(1):15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13,
      author = {Nikitina Elena Sergeevna},
      title = {Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {6},
      number = {1},
      pages = {15-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20180601.13},
      abstract = {As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model
    AU  - Nikitina Elena Sergeevna
    Y1  - 2018/03/02
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 15
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
    AB  - As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Psycholinguistics Department, RAS Institute of Linguistics, Moscow, Russia

  • Sections