In Iran, there are two statutes with regard to the protection of literary and artistic works, namely the Act on Protection of Authors and Composers 1969 and the Act on Translating and Reproducing Publications and Audio Works 1973 (from here on respectively, APAC and ATRP). In addition, computer programs are protected by the Act on the Protection of Computer Program Authors (APCP) ratified in 2000. These statutes, when closely examined, reveal the differences of the authors' material rights in terms of duration and methods of protection, although there are similarities between literary and artistic works and computer programs. This issue has affected the exceptions stipulated in material rights where these differences are observed in a larger scale. In this regard, computer programs, unlike literary and artistic works, cannot be used for educational purposes while modifications, arrangements, making backups, etc. are permitted. These differences, however, are natural and necessary when taking into account the essential differences of these genres—i.e., the commercial aspect of computer programs which outweighs its literary and artistic aspects as opposed to works of art and literature. Therefore, it seems that according to the laws of Iran regarding the Material rights belonging to the authors of computer programs an exclusive system which is not only based on literary and artistic works has been accepted.
Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15 |
Page(s) | 306-313 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Material Rights, Computer Programs, Literary and Artistic Works, Similarities, Differences
[1] | Hart, T. & Fazanni, L. (2004). Intellectual property law. American University-Washington college of law. |
[2] | Sadeqi, N. (1997). Protecting the righst of computer program authors. Planning and Budget Publishing House. |
[3] | Robert, M. (1996). Contracting into liability rules: international property Right and Collective Rights Organization: California law Review. |
[4] | Marett. Pual. Intellectual property. Sweet and Maxwell. London. 1996. |
[5] | Nodehi, M. (2002). Intellectual property law or jeopardizing intellectual property. Pegah Howzeh, (63). |
[6] | Salehi Joaf. (2009). Dos and don’ts of copyright in domestic and international laws. The Iranian Bar Association Journal, (96), pp. 91-115. |
[7] | Safaee, S. H. (2002). Authors’ rights and its shortcomings: an examination. in Lectures and Essays Presented in the Special Conference on Reproduction Rights of Books in Iran: Challenges and Approaches. Khaneh Ketab, p. 51. |
[8] | Sterling, J. (2002). World copyright law (2nd ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell. |
[9] | Zarkalam, S. (2005). The laws on literary and artistic property in France and Germany (1st ed.). Management and Planning Organization Press. |
[10] | Zarkalm, S. (2008). Literary and artistic law. Tehran: SAMT. |
[11] | Ayati, H. (1996). Intellectual creation law with an emphasis on the law of literary and artistic creations (1st ed.). Hoghodan Press. |
[12] | Mas’udi, A. (2004). Moral and material rights of programs developed by during employment. in Collection of Essays for the Seminar on legal aspects of Information Technology, pp. 305-317. Qom Press. |
[13] | Habiba, S. & Shakeri, Z. (2012). A discussion on limitations and exceptions of literary and artistic property law. Comparative Law Studies, 3 (1), pp. 37-54. |
[14] | WIPO. (2003) Study on limitations and exceptions of copyright and related rights in the digital environment, (prepared by S. Rickeston). wipo Doc SCCR/09/07. |
[15] | Geiger. Chrisophe (2004). Der interess enausgleich in urheberrecht-taliz: Die Thesen. Tagung des max planck instituts fur Geistiges Eigentum in berlin vom 4-6 November 2004. Munchen. |
[16] | Guibault. Luice Mc. RC. R (2021) copyright. Limitations and contracts. Kluwar Law international. |
[17] | Imani, A. (2003). “Fair use” of a work by another author: the important exception of authors’ rights. Journal of Legal Research, (3), pp. 193-212. |
[18] | Nasr-Abadi, M. (2015). Nature and ways of violating the material rights of literary creations. Journal of Din va Qanoon, (9), pp. 153-192. |
[19] | Colombet, C. (2006). Grands principes du droit d'auteur des droits voisns dans le monde, (A. Mohammadzadeh Vadghani, trans.) (1st edition). Tehran: Mizan Press. |
[20] | Standing committee on copyright and related right. 22nd session. Geneva. June 15 to 34/2011.SCCR/22/12. |
[21] | First civil chamber 28 February (2006) perquin and ufc que choisir v. sa films Alain sarde. steuniversal pictures video srance et all. IIC. P760 8-Wipo copyright Treaty 1996. |
APA Style
Seyed Mohsen Hashemi Nasab Zavareh. (2022). The Material Rights Belonging to the Authors of Computer Programs, Literary and Artistic Works with an Emphasis on the Iranian Laws: A Comparison. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(5), 306-313. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15
ACS Style
Seyed Mohsen Hashemi Nasab Zavareh. The Material Rights Belonging to the Authors of Computer Programs, Literary and Artistic Works with an Emphasis on the Iranian Laws: A Comparison. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10(5), 306-313. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15
@article{10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15, author = {Seyed Mohsen Hashemi Nasab Zavareh}, title = {The Material Rights Belonging to the Authors of Computer Programs, Literary and Artistic Works with an Emphasis on the Iranian Laws: A Comparison}, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {5}, pages = {306-313}, doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20221005.15}, abstract = {In Iran, there are two statutes with regard to the protection of literary and artistic works, namely the Act on Protection of Authors and Composers 1969 and the Act on Translating and Reproducing Publications and Audio Works 1973 (from here on respectively, APAC and ATRP). In addition, computer programs are protected by the Act on the Protection of Computer Program Authors (APCP) ratified in 2000. These statutes, when closely examined, reveal the differences of the authors' material rights in terms of duration and methods of protection, although there are similarities between literary and artistic works and computer programs. This issue has affected the exceptions stipulated in material rights where these differences are observed in a larger scale. In this regard, computer programs, unlike literary and artistic works, cannot be used for educational purposes while modifications, arrangements, making backups, etc. are permitted. These differences, however, are natural and necessary when taking into account the essential differences of these genres—i.e., the commercial aspect of computer programs which outweighs its literary and artistic aspects as opposed to works of art and literature. Therefore, it seems that according to the laws of Iran regarding the Material rights belonging to the authors of computer programs an exclusive system which is not only based on literary and artistic works has been accepted.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Material Rights Belonging to the Authors of Computer Programs, Literary and Artistic Works with an Emphasis on the Iranian Laws: A Comparison AU - Seyed Mohsen Hashemi Nasab Zavareh Y1 - 2022/09/21 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 306 EP - 313 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221005.15 AB - In Iran, there are two statutes with regard to the protection of literary and artistic works, namely the Act on Protection of Authors and Composers 1969 and the Act on Translating and Reproducing Publications and Audio Works 1973 (from here on respectively, APAC and ATRP). In addition, computer programs are protected by the Act on the Protection of Computer Program Authors (APCP) ratified in 2000. These statutes, when closely examined, reveal the differences of the authors' material rights in terms of duration and methods of protection, although there are similarities between literary and artistic works and computer programs. This issue has affected the exceptions stipulated in material rights where these differences are observed in a larger scale. In this regard, computer programs, unlike literary and artistic works, cannot be used for educational purposes while modifications, arrangements, making backups, etc. are permitted. These differences, however, are natural and necessary when taking into account the essential differences of these genres—i.e., the commercial aspect of computer programs which outweighs its literary and artistic aspects as opposed to works of art and literature. Therefore, it seems that according to the laws of Iran regarding the Material rights belonging to the authors of computer programs an exclusive system which is not only based on literary and artistic works has been accepted. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -