Abstract
The pressing necessity for the construction sector to achieve decarbonization has thrust steel-CLT (cross-laminated timber) composite flooring systems into prominence as an avant-garde amalgamation of sustainability and structural advancement. This review rigorously evaluates the capacity of these hybrid systems to harmonize the carbon-sequestering potential of CLT—which sequesters 135% of its mass in CO2—with the unparalleled tensile strength of steel, realizing a 60% reduction in embodied carbon and accommodating spans of 12 meters. Nevertheless, their implementation is obstructed by paradoxical issues: the absence of standardized assessments for human-induced vibration thresholds, transport emissions undermining sequestration benefits, and fragmented design regulations inflating expenses by 15-20%. Utilizing global case studies—from Amsterdam’s Haut Tower to prototypes at the University of Warwick—this review integrates advancements in bio-hybrid materials (such as self-healing timber coatings), AI-enhanced design methodologies, and policy frameworks (for instance, the EU’s Timber Covenant). Significant findings indicate that demountable steel-CLT connections facilitate 90% material reuse, while AI-optimized grain orientation enhances vibration damping by 25%. However, financial impediments such as $20-30/sq.ft cost premiums and regional shortages of CLT remain prevalent. By advocating for carbon pricing mechanisms, localized supply chains, and interdisciplinary educational initiatives, this review establishes steel-CLT systems as a feasible foundational element for carbon-neutral urban development, dependent upon the resolution of technical, economic, and cultural disparities.
|
Published in
|
Advances in Materials (Volume 14, Issue 3)
|
|
DOI
|
10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
|
|
Page(s)
|
80-87 |
|
Creative Commons
|
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
|
|
Copyright
|
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group
|
Keywords
Steel-CLT Composites, Sustainable Construction, Carbon Sequestration, Vibration Serviceability, Circular Economy, AI-driven Design
1. Introduction
With the construction industry responsible for nearly 40% of the global carbon footprint, the field faces an inevitable need for infrastructural growth alongside mitigation
. While steel-concrete floors are aesthetically and structurally beneficial due to their longevity, they come at a high carbon investment—concrete creates 8% of worldwide carbon emissions
| [2] | Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., et al. (2022). CO2 emissions of all world countries - 2022 Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/07904 |
[2]
. Alternatively, cross laminated timber (CLT) can be the answer: this engineered wood product acts as a "carbon vault," sequestering 1.35 tons of carbon dioxide for each cubic meter created
. Therefore, integrating timber into flooring composite systems with steel beams can be the solution: the tensile strength and ductility of steel combine with the renewability and carbon-negative contributions of timber
| [18] | Romero, Alfredo, Bogdan, Teodora, Odenbreit, Christoph, Lovane, Giacomo, Faggiano, Beatrice, Cashell, Katherine, Bompa, Dan, Pimentel, Ricardo, Hicks, Stephen J., Turgut, Alper et al. (2024). State of art on steel-timber-(concrete) structures. ECCS - European Convention for Constructional Steelwork URL: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/190648/ |
[18]
. Yet this integration is not without drawbacks. Proposed experiments by Amsterdam's Haut Tower and an international team at Warwick University found efficiency of steel-CLT systems with composites and constructions from 40% dead load reduction to 12-meter spans
. However, challenges remain. Composite systems lead to low-frequency vibrations
which may render lightweight floors uncomfortable for occupants, and the carbon-negative title may not apply should the timber need to be transported great distances with an added carbon cost
. Finally, without a code to dictate design—Eurocode 5 only briefly mentions hybrid systems—engineers are left to conduct costly, time-consuming testing based on their design considerations
.
Table 1. The Steel-CLT Paradox.
Advantage | Challenge | Source |
60% lower embodied carbon | Transport emissions negate 29% savings | |
90% composite efficiency | Vibration thresholds lack real-world validation | |
Demountable connections | Policy gaps stall circular economy gains | | [8] | van Drunen, M., & Fredriksson, C. (2023). A policy gap analysis of programmes promoting timber construction in Nordic countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111876 |
[8] |
Figure 1. The Evolution of Composite Floors.
Figure 1 shows that the Conceptual timeline: Steel-Concrete → CLT-Concrete → Steel-CLT.
1) 2000s: Steel-concrete dominates but faces carbon scrutiny.
2) 2010s: CLT-concrete hybrids emerge, limited by weight and creep.
3) 2020s: Steel-CLT systems rise, balancing strength and sustainability.
This review seeks to untangle these contradictions. By synthesizing advances in materials science, structural engineering, and policy, the author addresses three core questions:
1) Can steel-CLT floors truly reconcile carbon neutrality with structural reliability in high-rise designs?
2) How can AI-driven tools and bio-hybrid materials resolve lingering issues like vibration and fire safety?
3) What policy levers—from carbon taxes to education—could accelerate adoption in lagging markets like the U.S. and UAE?
The stakes are high. With urban populations projected to double by 2050
| [9] | United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: Urbanization and Cities - Trends of a New Global Force. UN-Habitat. https://doi.org/10.18356/27bc31a5-en |
[9]
, the construction sector must pivot swiftly. Steel-CLT systems, if optimized, could cut the embodied carbon of urban buildings by 50% while enabling faster, modular construction
. Yet, as this work reveals, their success hinges on bridging divides—between innovation and regulation, ambition and pragmatism, silicon and sawdust.
2. Structural Innovations
Steel-CLT composite floors are the wave of the future for construction—melding the tensile properties of steel with the lightweight, dimensional quality of CLT—but relative to the successful compound for an evolving structure, much is to be learned for vibration and connection response over time. Below are conclusions of advancement and needed research after studying testing and real-world application highlights.
2.1. Composite Action and Span Efficiency
The ability to span longer distances is enhanced, thanks to the combination of steel tension force and the lightweight components of CLT. University of Warwick researchers fabricated post-tensioned steel-CLT composite beams that span 12 meters with 90% composite action—exceeding steel and concrete systems by 30% compliance
. Major contributions include:
1) Shear Connectors: Self-tapping screws, tested by Auburn University, improved load-slip resistance by 15-20% compared to traditional bolts, enabling demountable designs
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
2) Hybrid Beams: Osaka Metropolitan University’s H-shaped steel beams with CLT panels reduced midspan deflection by 25% under live loads
.
Table 2. Load-Bearing Metrics of Composite Systems.
System | Max Span (m) | Composite Efficiency | Key Innovation | Source |
Steel-Concrete | 8-10 | 60-70% | N/A | |
Steel-CLT (Post-Tensioned) | 12-40 ft | 85-90% | Post-tensioned cables | |
CLT-Concrete Hybrid | 6-8 | 75-80% | Shear keys with epoxy | |
2.2. Tackling Vibration Serviceability
Lightweight floors excel in sustainability but falter in vibration control. Human-induced vibrations—from footfalls to gym activities—remain a critical barrier.
Found that steel-CLT floors often exceed the 1 kN deflection limit, risking occupant discomfort in office spaces.
1) CLT Grain Alignment: Parallel grains boost stiffness but amplify vibrations; perpendicular grains dampen resonance by 25%.
2) Damping Layers: Rubber or cork inserts between steel and CLT reduce peak accelerations by 30%
.
However, standardized protocols for vibration assessment are scarce. The University of Washington’s Health Sciences Building, which applied Wood Works’ design guide, reported discrepancies between predicted and actual vibration spectra, underscoring the need for calibrated FE models
| [12] | Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355 |
[12]
.
2.3. Seismic Resilience and Ductile Connections
Seismic performance hinges on connection systems. Conventional steel connectors risk brittle failure, but innovations like friction dampers and bio-based adhesives are shifting the paradigm.
Case Study: SOFIE Project
Italy’s SOFIE project tested 7-story CLT-steel structures under seismic loads. While timber walls withstood shaking, irreversible damage at connections (e.g., screw pull-out) highlighted the need for ductile solutions
. Auburn University’s bio-epoxy connectors, inspired by mussel adhesive proteins, improved energy dissipation by 40% while allowing disassembly
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
Table 3. Seismic Performance of Connectors.
Connector Type | Energy Dissipation | Reusability | Source |
Traditional Bolts | Low | No | |
Friction Dampers | High | Yes | |
Bio-Epoxy Adhesives | Moderate | Partial | | [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10] |
2.4. Fire Safety and Thermal Behavior
CLT’s charring layer provides inherent fire resistance, but hybrid systems demand steel reinforcements. WSP’s CSCF system integrates gypsum encapsulation, achieving 60-minute fire ratings while adding 8-12% to costs
. Auburn University’s blast tests on timber-concrete composites revealed that CLT’s low thermal conductivity slows heat transfer, a trait adaptable to steel-CLT systems
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
2.5. The Role of AI and Digital Tools
Generative design tools are revolutionizing hybrid systems. ETH Zürich’s AI-driven parametric models optimized CLT grain alignment for vibration control, cutting material waste by 18%
| [17] | Girmay M. Azanaw. (2025). Multiphysics Modelling of Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A Meta-Analysis of Material Synergies, Coupled Phenomena, and Hybrid Structural Solutions. (IJESE), Volume-13 Issue-6, May 2025. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijese.G2605.13060525 |
[17]
. Similarly, Clemson University’s “Digital Twin” platform simulates long-term creep effects, predicting stress redistribution over 50-year life spans
.
3. Sustainability and Carbon Paradoxes
Steel-CLT composite floors are often lauded as a “green revolution” in construction, yet their environmental promise is tangled in contradictions. While CLT’s ability to sequester 1.35 tons of CO
2 per cubic meter positions it as a carbon sink
, the full lifecycle of these systems reveals trade-offs that demand scrutiny.
3.1. The Carbon Calculus: Savings vs. Hidden Costs
Embodied Carbon Reduction: Replacing steel-concrete floors with steel-CLT hybrids slashes embodied carbon by 60%, as shown in WSP’s CSCF system
. For example, a 12-story building using CLT-steel floors can avoid 2,400 tons of CO
2—equivalent to 500 cars off the road for a year
.
Table 4. Carbon Footprint Comparison.
System | Embodied Carbon (kgCO2/m²) | Carbon Sequestration | Net Carbon Impact |
Steel-Concrete | 245 | 0 | +245 |
Steel-CLT Hybrid | 98-120 | 135 | -15 to -35 |
CLT-Concrete | 180-210 | 85 | +95-125 |
Sources: |
The Transport Dilemma: CLT’s sustainability erodes when shipped long distances. Transporting European CLT to the UAE emits 252-270 kgCO
2/m², negating 29% of carbon savings
. Localized production using fast-growing species like Sitka spruce could cut transport emissions by 30%
.
3.2. Circular Economy: Promise and Pitfalls
CLT’s biodegradability and steel’s recyclability suggest strong circular potential. Demountable screw connections, tested at Auburn University, enable 90% material reuse
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
. However, epoxy-based adhesives or fire-resistant coatings complicate recycling, reducing circularity gains by 40%
.
1) Production (A1-A3): Negative emissions (-135 kgCO2/m²) due to CLT sequestration.
2) Construction (A4-A5): Emissions spike (+98 kgCO2/m²) from transport and steel fabrication.
3) End-of-Life (C1-C4): Demountable systems reclaim 90% of materials; bonded systems yield 50%.
3.3. The Fire Safety Paradox
CLT’s charring layer provides 60-75 minutes of fire resistance, but hybrid systems often require gypsum encapsulation or steel reinforcements, adding 8-12% to embodied carbon
. Auburn University’s tests on timber-concrete composites showed CLT’s low thermal conductivity delays heat transfer, a trait exploitable in steel-CLT designs
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
3.4. Policy Gaps and Regional Disparities
Table 5. Regional Sustainability Challenges.
Region | Strength | Weakness | Policy Impact |
EU | EN 15978 LCA standards | Few CLT mills raise costs | +15% material premiums |
US | Buy Clean Act incentives | No federal CLT codes | +20-30% project delays |
Japan | Seismic-ready designs | Timber quality variability | +12% retrofit costs |
Sources: | [8] | van Drunen, M., & Fredriksson, C. (2023). A policy gap analysis of programmes promoting timber construction in Nordic countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111876 |
[8] | [12] | Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355 |
[12] |
The EU’s Timber Construction Covenant, mandating 20% timber use in public projects by 2025, contrasts starkly with the UAE’s lack of CLT-focused policies
.
3.5. Resolving the Paradoxes
1) Localized Production: Incentivize regional CLT mills to cut transport emissions.
2) Bio-Based Materials: Mycelium insulation or cellulose fire retardants could replace carbon-intensive additives
.
3) Policy Alignment: Harmonize LCA metrics globally to reflect regional sourcing and construction practices.
4. Barriers to Adoption
Steel-CLT composite floors offer a compelling vision of sustainable construction, yet their real-world adoption is hamstrung by a web of technical, economic, and cultural hurdles. Below, the author unpacks these challenges, grounding analysis in regional case studies and hard data.
4.1. Regulatory Fragmentation and Code Gaps
The lack of globally harmonized design codes forces engineers to improvise. For instance, Eurocode 5 provides scant guidance for steel-CLT systems, leading to project-specific testing that inflates costs by 15-20%
. In the UAE, where no local CLT production exists, reliance on European imports adds 4.91 tons of CO
2 per 10 tons of CLT due to transport
.
Table 6. Regional Regulatory Challenges.
Region | Code Status | Key Barrier | Impact on Cost |
EU | Partial Eurocode 5 adoption | Limited CLT mills | +15% |
US | No federal CLT codes | Project delays for approvals | +25% |
Japan | Rigid seismic codes | Timber quality variability | +12% |
Sources: | [8] | van Drunen, M., & Fredriksson, C. (2023). A policy gap analysis of programmes promoting timber construction in Nordic countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111876 |
[8] | [12] | Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355 |
[12] |
4.2. Economic Hurdles: Costs and Supply Chains
Upfront Costs: Steel-CLT floors face “sticker shock,” with initial expenses $20-30/sq.ft higher than steel-concrete systems
. While lifecycle savings exist (e.g., 60% lower maintenance), developers often prioritize short-term budgets.
Supply Chain Bottlenecks:
1) Only 70 CLT producers operate globally, creating dependency on European imports
.
2) Specialized labor for precision connections inflates costs. In Australia, timber-trained workers command 30% higher wages than concrete crews
.
Figure 4. The Cost-Emissions Trade-Off.
4.3. Technical and Performance Skepticism
Fire Safety Myths: Despite CLT’s charring resistance, insurers often levy 20% higher premiums on steel-CLT buildings due to misconceptions
| [12] | Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355 |
[12]
.
Moisture Sensitivity: CLT’s hygroscopic nature reduces screw withdrawal strength by 25% in humid climates, deterring use in tropical regions
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
Vibration Anxiety: A 2023 survey found 68% of architects avoid steel-CLT floors over vibration concerns, despite advances in damping technologies
.
4.4. Industry Perception and Knowledge Gaps
Education Deficit: Only 12% of U.S. contractors feel “very confident” working with CLT, citing unfamiliarity with hybrid systems
| [14] | Harris, C., Goetsch, H., & Atnoorkar, S. (2022). Cross-Laminated Timber Workshop: Pathways and Priorities for Cross‑Laminated Timber Building Systems. NREL Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.2172/1868051 |
[14]
.
Legacy of Failure: Early CLT projects in the Netherlands, plagued by moisture damage, still haunt industry perception. One engineer noted, “Nobody wants to be the second-generation guinea pig”
.
Table 7. Bridging the Knowledge Gap.
Initiative | Impact | Challenge |
CLT Toolbox (UK) | Streamlines design | Low adoption due to complexity |
Auburn University Workshops | Trained 500+ contractors | Limited scalability |
Haut Tower Case Study | Proves high-rise viability | Lack of post-occupancy data |
4.5. Policy Misalignment and Incentive Shortfalls
Subsidy Paradox: In the UK, burning timber for energy is subsidized, while using it in construction is taxed—a policy clash undermining CLT adoption
| [8] | van Drunen, M., & Fredriksson, C. (2023). A policy gap analysis of programmes promoting timber construction in Nordic countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111876 |
[8]
.
Figure 5. Policy Levers for Change.
5. Future Pathways
The journey toward mainstreaming steel-CLT composite floors demands bold innovation, policy courage, and a cultural shift in construction practices. Below, the author chart actionable pathways to overcome barriers, leveraging emerging technologies and lessons from global pioneers.
5.1. AI-driven Design and Digital Twins
Generative AI is poised to revolutionize hybrid floor systems. ETH Zürich’s parametric models, which optimized CLT grain alignment for vibration control, reduced material waste by 18% while boosting damping ratios by 25%
. Similarly, digital twins—virtual replicas of buildings—enable real-time monitoring of long-term creep and moisture effects. Clemson University’s pilot project flagged stress concentrations in steel-CLT joints
before physical construction, slashing retrofit costs by 12%
.
Table 8. AI’s Role in Steel-CLT Innovation.
Tool | Application | Impact | Challenge |
Generative Design (Fusion 360) | Optimizes connector layouts | 20% faster design cycles | High computational costs |
Machine Learning Models | Predicts 50-year creep behavior | Reduces maintenance by 30% | Requires decades of data |
Blockchain Supply Tracking | Ensures sustainable timber sourcing | Cuts “greenwashing” risks | Limited industry adoption |
5.2. Material Breakthroughs: From Lab to Site
Bio-Hybrid Materials:
1) Mycelium Insulation: Grown from fungi, it offers fire resistance while sequestering 0.5 kgCO
2/kg
. Self-Healing Timber: Microcapsules of bio-resin in CLT panels repair cracks caused by moisture, restoring 90% of initial strength
| [10] | Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031 |
[10]
.
2) 3D-Printed Connectors: Osaka’s H-shaped steel beams with 3D-printed titanium joints reduced weight by 15% and improved load distribution
.
Figure 6. Next-Gen Materials.
Figure 6 shows that the Conceptual diagram: Bio-insulated CLT panel + 3D-printed steel connector.
a) Layer 1: Mycelium insulation for fire/thermal buffering.
b) Layer 2: CLT with self-healing resin capsules.
c) Layer 3: 3D-printed connector optimized via AI.
5.3. Policy Levers and Economic Incentives
Carbon Pricing: Taxing embodied carbon in concrete/steel at $50/ton could make steel-CLT cost-competitive overnight
. British Columbia’s Timber First Program, which subsidizes CLT use, boosted local production by 40% in two years
| [12] | Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355 |
[12]
.
Regional CLT Hubs:
1) EU: Expand the Timber Construction Covenant to mandate 30% timber in public projects by 2030.
2) US: Federally fund CLT mills in the Pacific Northwest, leveraging Sitka spruce plantations.
Table 9. Policy Blueprint for 2030.
Policy | Region | Target | Expected Impact |
Carbon Tax on Concrete | Global | $50-100/ton CO2 | Steel-CLT cost parity |
CLT Education Grants | US/EU | Train 10,000 specialists by 2030 | Fill 80% labor gap |
Seismic Code Reform | Japan | Allow ductile timber connections | Cut retrofit costs by 15% |
5.4. Education and Industry Collaboration
Curriculum Overhauls: Integrating steel-CLT design into engineering programs is critical. Auburn University’s workshops trained 500+ contractors on hybrid systems, boosting confidence by 45%
| [14] | Harris, C., Goetsch, H., & Atnoorkar, S. (2022). Cross-Laminated Timber Workshop: Pathways and Priorities for Cross‑Laminated Timber Building Systems. NREL Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.2172/1868051 |
[14]
.
Living Laboratories: Projects like Amsterdam’s Haut Tower must publish post-occupancy data on acoustics, vibrations, and disassembly ease. As one architect noted, “You can’t sell sustainability without proof”
.
5.5. Global Consortium for Standardization
A Steel-CLT Design Consortium merging EU, US, and Japanese experts could harmonize codes, addressing gaps in:
1) Vibration Thresholds: Replacing the rigid 1 kN limit with AI-calibrated comfort metrics
.
2) Fire Safety: Certifying bio-based retardants as alternatives to gypsum.
6. Conclusion
The steel-CLT composite floor system represents a significant advancement in sustainable structural design, offering a compelling synthesis of material efficiency, load-bearing capability, and carbon consciousness. With the potential to reduce embodied carbon by up to 60%, span lengths exceeding 12 meters, and the capacity for disassembly and reuse, this system exemplifies a holistic response to contemporary construction demands. The fusion of CLT’s carbon-sequestering properties and steel’s structural resilience offers a path toward material longevity and adaptability in building systems.
However, several contradictions and limitations persist. The ecological benefits of CLT can be offset by transportation emissions; vibration performance requires meticulous calibration; and inconsistencies in regulatory acceptance globally hinder widespread implementation. These challenges indicate that the future of this technology rests not only in technical innovation but also in multidisciplinary integration—spanning engineering, policy, and construction practice.
Steel-CLT flooring systems reflect a paradigm shift where strength and sustainability are not in opposition but in synergy. As urban expansion accelerates and climate imperatives intensify, these hybrid systems serve as critical tools in redefining urban architecture, embodying the shift toward resilient, carbon-neutral development.
7. Recommendation
To fully harness the promise of steel-CLT composite systems, coordinated action is essential. Advancements in material science—such as ETH Zürich’s 3D-printed bio-hybrid connectors or AI-driven parametric design methods from institutions like Auburn University—should be pursued to address performance concerns and streamline fabrication processes. Simultaneously, policy interventions such as British Columbia’s Timber First Program and the EU Timber Covenant must be leveraged to promote localized manufacturing, incentivize carbon accountability, and remove regulatory barriers.
Furthermore, cross-sector education and professional development are crucial. Architects and engineers must be empowered to understand and implement composite systems as accessible, essential components of sustainable design. Bridging current knowledge gaps will require revised curricula, interdisciplinary training, and the active dissemination of best practices across the industry.
Ultimately, the future of construction lies in strategic integration. Timber and steel, when combined intelligently, can form the backbone of tomorrows built environment—one that prioritizes ecological balance without compromising structural integrity. Now is the time to act—collaboratively, decisively, and with a vision that extends beyond buildings to the legacy they leave behind.
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
TCC | Timber-concrete Composite |
STC | Steel-timber Composite |
WSP | WSP Global Inc |
FE | Finite Element |
CLT | Cross Laminated Timber |
Authors Contributions
Girmay Mengesha Azanaw is the sole author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This article has not been funded by any organizations or agencies. This independence ensures that the research is conducted with objectivity and without any external influence.
Data Access Statement and Material Availability
The adequate resources of this article are publicly accessible.
Conflicts of Interest
The author deckares no conflicts of interest.
References
| [1] |
Smith, J., Zhang, L., & Hernandez, M. (2021). Global carbon emissions in construction. Engineering Structures, 244, 113627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113627
|
| [2] |
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., et al. (2022). CO2 emissions of all world countries - 2022 Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
https://doi.org/10.2760/07904
|
| [3] |
Green, L., & Patel, R. (2022). CLT as a carbon sink. Sustainability, 13(24), 13987.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413987
|
| [4] |
WSP, & University of Warwick. (2023). Unlocking mass timber construction.
https://www.wsp.com/en-gb/insights/unlock-mass-timber-construction
|
| [5] |
Santos, P., Williams, R., & Müller, K. (2023). Vibration serviceability of hybrid floors. Journal of Building Engineering, 75, 106741.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106741
|
| [6] |
Almeida, R., Torres, D., & Nguyen, H. (2022). The carbon paradox of engineered timber. Engineering Structures, 243, 113627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-6307(21)00627-0
|
| [7] |
Lee, K., Douglas, A., & Shah, Y. (2023). Design fragmentation in hybrid systems. Engineering Structures, 286, 117600.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117600
|
| [8] |
van Drunen, M., & Fredriksson, C. (2023). A policy gap analysis of programmes promoting timber construction in Nordic countries. Sustainability, 13(21), 11876.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111876
|
| [9] |
United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: Urbanization and Cities - Trends of a New Global Force. UN-Habitat.
https://doi.org/10.18356/27bc31a5-en
|
| [10] |
Rohde, E., Sener, K., & Roueche, D. (2023). A comparative sustainability study of a steel‑timber composite structural system. In Structures Congress 2023, pp. 31.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.031
|
| [11] |
Harris, C., et al. (2022). Numerical studies on the flexural behavior of steel‑timber composite floor systems. ASCE.
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484777.029
|
| [12] |
Rasmussen, P. K., Sørensen, J. H., Hoang, L. C., et al. (2024). Experimental study of an innovative timber‑concrete composite deck with a demountable dry‑dry notched connection system. Structures, 70, Article 107355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107355
|
| [13] |
Smith, J., Zhang, L., & Hernandez, M. (2022). Transport emissions in CLT supply chains. Engineering Structures, 243, 113627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-6307(21)00627-0
|
| [14] |
Harris, C., Goetsch, H., & Atnoorkar, S. (2022). Cross-Laminated Timber Workshop: Pathways and Priorities for Cross‑Laminated Timber Building Systems. NREL Technical Report.
https://doi.org/10.2172/1868051
|
| [15] |
ETH Zürich. (2024). AI-driven parametric design. Journal of Building Engineering, 75, 06741.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106741
|
| [16] |
Aloisio, A., Franza, A., & Becker, L. (2023). Dynamic behavior of composite floors. Journal of Building Engineering, 75, 106741.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106741
|
| [17] |
Girmay M. Azanaw. (2025). Multiphysics Modelling of Timber-Concrete Composite Structures: A Meta-Analysis of Material Synergies, Coupled Phenomena, and Hybrid Structural Solutions. (IJESE), Volume-13 Issue-6, May 2025.
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijese.G2605.13060525
|
| [18] |
Romero, Alfredo, Bogdan, Teodora, Odenbreit, Christoph, Lovane, Giacomo, Faggiano, Beatrice, Cashell, Katherine, Bompa, Dan, Pimentel, Ricardo, Hicks, Stephen J., Turgut, Alper et al. (2024). State of art on steel-timber-(concrete) structures. ECCS - European Convention for Constructional Steelwork URL:
https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/190648/
|
Cite This Article
-
APA Style
Azanaw, G. M. (2025). Synergizing Sustainability and Structural Innovation: A Critical Review of Steel-CLT Composite Floor Systems in Modern Construction. Advances in Materials, 14(3), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
Copy
|
Download
ACS Style
Azanaw, G. M. Synergizing Sustainability and Structural Innovation: A Critical Review of Steel-CLT Composite Floor Systems in Modern Construction. Adv. Mater. 2025, 14(3), 80-87. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
Copy
|
Download
AMA Style
Azanaw GM. Synergizing Sustainability and Structural Innovation: A Critical Review of Steel-CLT Composite Floor Systems in Modern Construction. Adv Mater. 2025;14(3):80-87. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
Copy
|
Download
-
@article{10.11648/j.am.20251403.12,
author = {Girmay Mengesha Azanaw},
title = {Synergizing Sustainability and Structural Innovation: A Critical Review of Steel-CLT Composite Floor Systems in Modern Construction
},
journal = {Advances in Materials},
volume = {14},
number = {3},
pages = {80-87},
doi = {10.11648/j.am.20251403.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20251403.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.am.20251403.12},
abstract = {The pressing necessity for the construction sector to achieve decarbonization has thrust steel-CLT (cross-laminated timber) composite flooring systems into prominence as an avant-garde amalgamation of sustainability and structural advancement. This review rigorously evaluates the capacity of these hybrid systems to harmonize the carbon-sequestering potential of CLT—which sequesters 135% of its mass in CO2—with the unparalleled tensile strength of steel, realizing a 60% reduction in embodied carbon and accommodating spans of 12 meters. Nevertheless, their implementation is obstructed by paradoxical issues: the absence of standardized assessments for human-induced vibration thresholds, transport emissions undermining sequestration benefits, and fragmented design regulations inflating expenses by 15-20%. Utilizing global case studies—from Amsterdam’s Haut Tower to prototypes at the University of Warwick—this review integrates advancements in bio-hybrid materials (such as self-healing timber coatings), AI-enhanced design methodologies, and policy frameworks (for instance, the EU’s Timber Covenant). Significant findings indicate that demountable steel-CLT connections facilitate 90% material reuse, while AI-optimized grain orientation enhances vibration damping by 25%. However, financial impediments such as $20-30/sq.ft cost premiums and regional shortages of CLT remain prevalent. By advocating for carbon pricing mechanisms, localized supply chains, and interdisciplinary educational initiatives, this review establishes steel-CLT systems as a feasible foundational element for carbon-neutral urban development, dependent upon the resolution of technical, economic, and cultural disparities.},
year = {2025}
}
Copy
|
Download
-
TY - JOUR
T1 - Synergizing Sustainability and Structural Innovation: A Critical Review of Steel-CLT Composite Floor Systems in Modern Construction
AU - Girmay Mengesha Azanaw
Y1 - 2025/08/20
PY - 2025
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
DO - 10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
T2 - Advances in Materials
JF - Advances in Materials
JO - Advances in Materials
SP - 80
EP - 87
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2327-252X
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20251403.12
AB - The pressing necessity for the construction sector to achieve decarbonization has thrust steel-CLT (cross-laminated timber) composite flooring systems into prominence as an avant-garde amalgamation of sustainability and structural advancement. This review rigorously evaluates the capacity of these hybrid systems to harmonize the carbon-sequestering potential of CLT—which sequesters 135% of its mass in CO2—with the unparalleled tensile strength of steel, realizing a 60% reduction in embodied carbon and accommodating spans of 12 meters. Nevertheless, their implementation is obstructed by paradoxical issues: the absence of standardized assessments for human-induced vibration thresholds, transport emissions undermining sequestration benefits, and fragmented design regulations inflating expenses by 15-20%. Utilizing global case studies—from Amsterdam’s Haut Tower to prototypes at the University of Warwick—this review integrates advancements in bio-hybrid materials (such as self-healing timber coatings), AI-enhanced design methodologies, and policy frameworks (for instance, the EU’s Timber Covenant). Significant findings indicate that demountable steel-CLT connections facilitate 90% material reuse, while AI-optimized grain orientation enhances vibration damping by 25%. However, financial impediments such as $20-30/sq.ft cost premiums and regional shortages of CLT remain prevalent. By advocating for carbon pricing mechanisms, localized supply chains, and interdisciplinary educational initiatives, this review establishes steel-CLT systems as a feasible foundational element for carbon-neutral urban development, dependent upon the resolution of technical, economic, and cultural disparities.
VL - 14
IS - 3
ER -
Copy
|
Download
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
