Research & Development

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Digital Learning Assets for Future Instructors: Worldwide Problems in Pakistan Present Time

The rapid growth of digital technologies for education, as well as their application in the educational process for various objectives, necessitates the creation of pedagogical digital assets by teachers. Different types of Forms, modes of engagement, and the use of digital tools by the instructor for self-education and instructional goals are examples of digital pedagogical assets. This study summarizes the findings of a teacher survey on the characteristics of teaching with digital resources, as well as the issues faced and the characteristics of the instructional digital assets of the teacher of the future and will be beneficial for all. The survey was created using Google forms. The study's findings suggest that the time spent studying the characteristics of digital programmes and generating content to work in them was the most frequently chosen by teachers, independent of the subject matter they provided. For the future teacher, such qualities were highlighted: the ability to use digital applications to improve teaching quality, the short time of application of digital tools (if possible during training), and a combination of teachers' pedagogical skills and effective use of digital tools. According to the survey results, the digital educational assets of the future teachers can be identified as mastering a small number of applications, but with maximum compliance with the subject that the teacher teaches (obviously, for teachers of drawing, it is effective to use some applications, whereas for teachers of mathematics - quite different), creating quality content for teaching students with regard to age-specific perception, compliance with norms, and so on.

Educational Assists, App, Digital, Learning Environment, School Learner, Teachers

APA Style

Muzamil Hussain Al Hussaini, Muhammad Jawad Mehdi Naqvi. (2023). Digital Learning Assets for Future Instructors: Worldwide Problems in Pakistan Present Time. Research & Development, 4(4), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rd.20230404.12

ACS Style

Muzamil Hussain Al Hussaini; Muhammad Jawad Mehdi Naqvi. Digital Learning Assets for Future Instructors: Worldwide Problems in Pakistan Present Time. Res. Dev. 2023, 4(4), 131-138. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20230404.12

AMA Style

Muzamil Hussain Al Hussaini, Muhammad Jawad Mehdi Naqvi. Digital Learning Assets for Future Instructors: Worldwide Problems in Pakistan Present Time. Res Dev. 2023;4(4):131-138. doi: 10.11648/j.rd.20230404.12

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Aidarbekova, K. A., Abildina, S. K., Odintsova, S. A., Mukhametzhanova, A. O., & Toibazarova, N. A. (2021). Preparing future teachers to use digital educational resources in primary school. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13 (2), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5653
2. Akhmetshin, E., M., Bochkareva, T. N., Tikhonova A., N. (2019). Analysis and Classification of Digital Educational Resources Used in the Work of a Proactive Teacher. 199-204. doi: 10.1109/DESE.2019.00045.
3. Aydin, R., & İşlek, M. (2021). A comparative examination of the relationship between motivation levels and future expectations of preservice mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7 (1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.1. 119
4. Blumenthal, S., & Blumenthal, Y. (2020). Tablet or paper and pen? examining mode effects on german elementary school students’ computation skills with curriculum-based measurements. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6 (4), 669-680.
5. Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., Dempsey, P. C. (2020). World HealthOrganization 2020 guidelines on physical activity andsedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54, 1451–62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-10295.
6. Bulturbayevich, M. B. (2021). Challenges of Digital Educational Environment. Academic Journal of Digital Economics and Stability, 4, 54-60.
7. Chapter 2: The Montessori philosophy. From Lillard, P. P. Lillard (1972). Montessori: A Modern Approach. Schocken Books, New York.
8. Daniel L. Schacter; Daniel T. Gilbert; Daniel M. Wegner (2011) [2009]. Psychology, 2nd edition. Worth Publishers. p. 264. ISBN 978-1-4292-3719-2.
9. Dincer, B. (2021). Investigating the school climate perceptions and school motivations of middle school students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7 (2), 361-372.
10. Gagliano, Monica; Vyazovskiy, Vladyslav V.; Borbély, Alexander A.; Grimonprez, Mavra; Depczynski, Martial (2016-12-02). "Learning by Association in Plants". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 38427. Bibcode: 2016NatSR...638427G. doi: 10.1038/srep38427. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5133544. PMID 27910933.
11. Heidi, L., Schnackenberg. (2019). Are We Part of the Problem?. Teacher Preparation Programs, Educational Technology, and the Mis-Education of Future Teachers. 110-123. doi: 10.4018/978-1- 5225-7763-8.CH006.
12. Ju., B., Drobotenko., N., А., Duka., О., I., Kurdumanova., N., V., Chekaleva., А., S., Sharov., Stephan, Dyrka. (2019). Educational autonomy of the future teacher as a new quality of the professional training. 6 (382), 280-287. doi: 10.32014/2019.2518-1467.172.
13. Karban, R. (2015). Plant Learning and Memory. In: Plant Sensing and Communication. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 31–44, Archived 2022-12-31 at the Wayback Machine.
14. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.
15. Latipov, Z. A. Galchenko., N, А, Rozova. N. K., Ikonnikova A, N., Filippova S, V. (2019). Digital educational environment as a tool of system changes in the teacher’s professional activity. Humanities and social sciences, 7 (6), 549-553. doi: 10.18510/HSSR.2019.7685.
16. OECD (2018), Teaching for the Future: Effective Classroom Practices to Transform Education, OECD, Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264293243-en.
17. Plotnik, Rod; Kouyomdijan, Haig (2012). Discovery Series: Introduction to Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 208. ISBN 978-1-111-34702-4.
18. Richard Gross, Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour Archived 2022-12-31 at the Wayback Machine 6E, Hachette UK, ISBN 978-1-4441-6436-7.
19. Sahin, A. N. E. (2020). Using the flipped classroom model in the history course: a learning experience. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6 (1), 113-121.
20. Setiawan, D. W., Suharno, & Triyanto. (2019). The influence of active learning on the concept of mastery of sains learning by fifth grade students at primary school. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5 (1), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.1.189
21. Şimşek, U., Yıldırım, E., & Öntaş, T. (2021). First-year experiences of social studies teachers starting their profession in the public sector. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7 (1), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.1.171
22. Tsankov, N., Damyanov, I., 2019. The Digital Competence of Future Teachers: Self-Assessment in the Context of Their Development. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) 13, 4. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v13i12.11068.
23. Yolcu, O. & Akar-Vural, R. (2021). An examination of instructional autonomy practices of science teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7 (1), 79-94.