| Peer-Reviewed

Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment

Received: 24 June 2016     Accepted: 15 July 2016     Published: 6 August 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to undertake an academic assessment on the practice of prevailing decentralization in ensuring good governance at local government in Ethiopia. Although politics is the driving force behind devolution in most countries, fortunately, decentralization may be one of those instances where good politics and economics may serve the same end. In Ethiopia, soon after the end of the cold war, a revolution group called Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) controlled state power in 1991. Despite different commitment to achieve local autonomy and good governance, the country’s governance suffers from a number of limitations in the last two decades. In this respect, the research question revolves around to what extent the existing devolution of power and resources ensuring good governance and democratization process. The research method employed to this study is qualitative method and a descriptive case study research design. The time of 1980s was a “turning point”, particularly in the developing countries that decentralization and good governance became an agenda through policy and academic arena. In Ethiopia, as a policy making, to link decentralization with (good) governance is a very recent phenomenon. Subsequently, since 2001/2, the second wave of decentralization that is DLDP has been implementing. The finding of the study shows a mixed outcome. In one hand, since decentralized power and resource, different institutions, and associations are established. While a decentralized system of governance has formally been introduced in Ethiopia, this paper argues that local authorities still remain instruments of political control by the central government. This and other related factors contributed to lack of local autonomy and good governance that generate a wide public protest for the past many years. In so doing it highlights the factors that continue the trend of central control of local government despite extensive formal decentralization and institutional arrangement. Practically the process of ensuring good governance under a decentralized political system in the study Woreda is far from desirable that is undermined by lack of financial and human resources, existence of one dominant ruling political party, low implementation capacity and lack of adequate autonomy. Therefore, unless measures are taken the challenge of good governance would continue being the worst which will facilitate the existing public protest further.

Published in Urban and Regional Planning (Volume 1, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11
Page(s) 45-58
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ethiopia, Good Governance, Decentralization, Ambo

References
[1] Asfaw K and Terry. G. (2001) ‘New Regional Development Paradigms’: Globalization and the New Regional Development. Vol. 1. in ed. Wlter B, Josefa S & Devyani M(2001) Decentralization Governance, and the New Planning for Local Level Development. Vol. 3. Westport: Greenwood Press.
[2] Assefa F. (2007) Federalism and the Accommodation of Diversity in Ethiopia: a Comparative Study 2nd Ed. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
[3] Ben Lockwood (2009) Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Rreduction? Political Economy approaches to Fiscal decentralization. Ahmed and Brosio (ed). Edward Elgar Publishing. Inc. USA.
[4] Blair, H (2000) Participation and Accountability at the periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development. Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 21-29, 2000.
[5] Carmen M and Mary McNeil (2010) (ed) Demanding Good Governance: Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives in Africa: An Introduction. World Bank: 1818 H Street NW.
[6] Catherine Dawson (2002) Practical Research Methods: A user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects. How to Books Ltd, 3 Newtec Place, United Kingdom.
[7] Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Neighborhood. The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University.
[8] Crook and Manor (1998) Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and performance. Cambridge: UK University press.
[9] Dagafa Tolosa (2005) Rural Livelihood, Poverty and Food insecurity in Ethiopia: A Case Study at Ernese and Garbi Communities in Oromia Zone; Amhara Regional State.
[10] Dhurba. P (2001) Decentralization and good governance. India: Delhi. Adroit publishers.
[11] Elazar, Daniel (1985) Exploring Federalism. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
[12] EshetuChole (1994) Fiscal Decentralization in Ethiopia. (eds) Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University Press.
[13] Fagueast Jean (2012) Decentralization and Popular Democracy: Governance from Below in Bolivia: University of Michigan Press. U.S.A.
[14] Frederik, Fleurke & R. Willemse (2004) Administrative Theory and Practice: ‘Approaches to decentralization and local autonomy: a critical appraisal’. Amsterdam, Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 2004. 523-544.
[15] FSS (2001) Paper of Symposium on Decentralization and Development. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in Uganda. World Institute for development Economic Research.
[16] Gaventa, J. et al (2002) ‘Introduction: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability’. Institute of Development Studies. Bulletin Vol 33:No. 2.
[17] Gregory, R. (2003) “Accountability in Modern Government”, in B. G Peters and Jon Pierre, Handbook of Public Administration, Sage publications.
[18] Harry Blair (2000) Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Development. Volume 28, Number 1, January pp. 21-39. Available at:www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev
[19] Hyden, G (2000) Governance: The Study of Politics in GoranHyden and Michael Bratton, Governance and Politics in Africa. Boulder, Colorado; Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[20] Ida AjuPradnja Resosudarmo (2004) Democratic Decentralization through a Natural Resources Lens: Closer to People and Trees: Will Decentralization Work for the People and the Forest of Indonesia? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America: (eds), Jesse C. Ribot and Anne M. Larson. Published by Taylor and Francis Ltd. Great Britain V. 16. No. 1.
[21] Jae A and Judy L. (1993) The Inclusive Classroom: Educating Exceptional Children. Toronto, Nelson Canada.
[22] Jennie Litvak, J. Ahmd & R. Bird (1998) ‘Rethinking Decentralization in Devolving Countries’. Sector Studies Serious: World Bank
[23] Jennie Litvak, J. Ahmd & R. Bird (1998) ‘Rethinking Decentralization in Devolving Countries’. Sector Studies Serious: World Bank.
[24] John-Mary Kauzya (2001) Ministry of Local Government and Social Affairs. Community development Policy 2nd ed.
[25] John-Mary Kauzya (2005) Decentralization: Prospects for Peace, Democracy and Development: Division for Public Administration and Development Management United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Discussion paper.
[26] John-Mary Kauzya (2007) Political Decentralization in Africa: Experiences of Uganda, Rwanda, and South Africa. Discussion Paper. New York.
[27] Jonathan Rodden (2004) Comparative Federalism and Decentralization on Meaning and Measurement. www.stanford.edu/~jrodden/ComparativeFederalism.
[28] Kassahun Birhanu and Tegegn G/Egziebher (2004). “The Role of Decentralized Governance in Building Local Institutions in Regional Development Dialogue”, vol. 25, No. 1, spring 2004.
[29] Keith Green (2005). Decentralization and Good Governance: The Case of Indonesia. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1493345 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1493345
[30] Kidane M “Ethiopia’s Ethnic Based Federalism: 10 Years After” (2001) 29 (1). African IssuesEthnicity and Recent Democratic Experiment in Africa.
[31] Litvack, J. (1998). Rethinking decentralization in developing countries. Washington D. C: The World Bank.
[32] Litvack, J and Ahmad (1998). “Rethinking decentralization in developing countries”, Loop, vd (2002). Local Democracy and Decentralization in Ethiopia. (ed). UN-habital/RLSD, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[33] Marito G, Andrew S. R (2008). Achieving Better Service Delivery Through Decentralization in Ethiopia. World Bank Working Paper No. 131.
[34] Mathur, Kuldeep (2009), From Government to Governance, National Book Trust, New Delhi.
[35] Mehret Ayenew (2002). Decentralization in Ethiopia. Two Case Studies on Devolution ofPower and Responsibilities in Local Government Authorities. In Ethiopia: The challenge of Democracy from Below, (eds), Baharu Zewude and Siegfried Pausewang. Uppsala: NordiskaAfrikanistitiut; Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies.
[36] Merilee S. Grindile (2007). Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization and The Promise of Good Governance. USA, Princeton University Press. Merilee S. Grindile (2007). Going Local: Decentralization, Democratization and The Promise of Good Governance. USA, Princeton University Press.
[37] Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (2002). Ethiopia: Sustainable development and poverty reduction program.
[38] MulugetaDebeb (2012) Decentralization in Ethiopia: Concept and Process. The Case of Dendi District, West Shoa Zone of Oromia State. Dissertation Submittedto University of Dortmund. Germany.
[39] Mwangi S. K andJohn. M. M (2004). Devolution and Development: Governance Prospects in Decentralizing States:Ethnicity, Institution and Governance in Africa. Mwangi S. K and Patrick M(ed). Ash gate Publishing Company. USA.
[40] OECD-DAC (2004) “Lessons Learned on Donor Support to Decentralization and Local Governance.” DAC Evaluation Series, OECD, Paris.
[41] Omar A, Anthony L, Patrick M, Diana R (2004). Devolution and Development: governance prospects in decentralizing states: Contemporary perspectives on Developing Societies. Decentralization, Governance and Public Services: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements. (eds) Mawangi S. Kimenyi and Patrick Meager. Ashgate Publishing Company. England.
[42] Pablo Pocheco (2004). Democratic Decentralization through a Natural Resources Lens: What Lies Behind Decentralization? Forest, Powers and Actors in Lowland Bolivia. Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America: (eds), Jesse C. Ribot and Anne M. Larson. Published by Taylor and Francis Ltd. Great Britian. V. 16. No. 1.
[43] Paula Dobriansky (2003) ‘Principles of Good Governance: Economic Perspective’. Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs. Available www.4uth.gov.ua/usa/english/trade/ijee0303/dobrians.htm
[44] Philip et al (2004). Governance that matter for the rural poor. IFPRI Forum.
[45] Resnick, Danielle; Birner, Regina (2005): Does Good Governance Contribute to Pro-poor Growth?: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence from Cross- Country Studies, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference. Research Committee Development Economics, No. 5, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19798
[46] Rondinneli, D. et al. (1983) Decentralization in Developing Countries. A Review of Recent Experience. Washington D. C. The World Bank. 4(1): 3-12.
[47] Rondinneli, D. A (1981). ‘Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Theory and Practice in Developing Countries’, International Review of Administrative Sciences XLVII (2): 133-45.
[48] Shabbir (2005) BuildingDemocratic Institutions: governance Reform in Developing Countries. USA. Kumarian Press.
[49] Steiner, S (2005) Decentralization and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework for the Economic Impact Global and Area Studies. Working Paper No. 3, June 2005. http://www.dvi.de/working papers.
[50] Taye and Tegegne G/Egziabher(2007) “Decentralization and Changing Local and Regional Development Planning in Ethiopia.” In. Fukui, E. Kurimoto, and M. Shigeta (eds) Ethiopia in Broad Perspective: Papers of the 8th International Conference of Ethiopian Studies Vol. 3, lcyoto: shokado Book Sellers.
[51] Thomas, P. G. (1998) The Changing Nature of Accountability in Tacking Stack: Assessing Public Sector Reforms, B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoice, Canadian Center for Management Development.
[52] UNDP (1998) Decentralized Governance Monograph: A Global Sampling of Experiences, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Policy Development.
[53] UNDP (2002) Country Paper- Ethiopia Paper Presented at the Fifth African Governance: Forum on Local Governance for Poverty Reduction in Africa, Maputo, Mozambique (23-25 may).
[54] UNDP (1997) Capacity Development and UNDP: The Changing World’ http://magnet.undp.org/edrb/Techpap2.htm(accessed December, 2008). Impact of Institutional Arrangements. (eds) Mawangi S. Kimenyi and Patrick Meager. Ashgate Publishing Company. England
[55] UNDP (1997) Decentralized Governance Programme: Strengthening Capacity for People -Centered Development, Management Development and Governance Division, Bureau for Development Policy.
[56] UNDP (1998) Factors to Consider in Designing Decentralized Governance Policies and Programmes to Achieve Sustainable People-Centered Development, Management Development and Governance Division.
[57] UNDP-German (1999) Decentralization: A Sampling of Definitions. Working paper prepared in connection with the Joint UNDP-Government of Germany evaluation of the UNDP role in decentralization and local governance.
[58] UN-ECA (1991) The Political Empowerment of Women: Six African Regional Conferences on Women, 22-26 November 1999, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[59] UN-HABITAT (2002) Local Democracy and Decentralization in East and Southern Africa: Experiences from Uganda, Kenya, Botswana, Tanzania and Ethiopia.
[60] Varsha V, Serdar Y (2008) Local government discretion and Accountability in Ethiopia: International Studies Program Working Paper 08-38. Georgia State University.
[61] Watts Ronald (1999) Comparing Federal System Kingston: McGill- Queen University Press.
[62] World Bank (2001) The Woreda Studies (main phase) http:/www.worldbank.org/afr/et/reports/2001 woreda.
[63] World Bank (2002) World Development Research, Washington D. C.
[64] World Bank (2004) Ethiopia: The Emerging Challenge, Public Expenditure Review, Volume I. Washington, D. C.
[65] World Bank Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Studies Series. Washington, D. C: World Bank.
[66] World Bank-An Independent Evaluation Group (2007). Decentralization in client countries: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 1999-2007.
[67] Young J (1998) “Regionalism and democracy in Ethiopia” 19(2) Third World Quarterly.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kena Deme Jebessa. (2016). Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment. Urban and Regional Planning, 1(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kena Deme Jebessa. Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment. Urban Reg. Plan. 2016, 1(3), 45-58. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kena Deme Jebessa. Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment. Urban Reg Plan. 2016;1(3):45-58. doi: 10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11,
      author = {Kena Deme Jebessa},
      title = {Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment},
      journal = {Urban and Regional Planning},
      volume = {1},
      number = {3},
      pages = {45-58},
      doi = {10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.urp.20160103.11},
      abstract = {The main purpose of this study is to undertake an academic assessment on the practice of prevailing decentralization in ensuring good governance at local government in Ethiopia. Although politics is the driving force behind devolution in most countries, fortunately, decentralization may be one of those instances where good politics and economics may serve the same end. In Ethiopia, soon after the end of the cold war, a revolution group called Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) controlled state power in 1991. Despite different commitment to achieve local autonomy and good governance, the country’s governance suffers from a number of limitations in the last two decades. In this respect, the research question revolves around to what extent the existing devolution of power and resources ensuring good governance and democratization process. The research method employed to this study is qualitative method and a descriptive case study research design. The time of 1980s was a “turning point”, particularly in the developing countries that decentralization and good governance became an agenda through policy and academic arena. In Ethiopia, as a policy making, to link decentralization with (good) governance is a very recent phenomenon. Subsequently, since 2001/2, the second wave of decentralization that is DLDP has been implementing. The finding of the study shows a mixed outcome. In one hand, since decentralized power and resource, different institutions, and associations are established. While a decentralized system of governance has formally been introduced in Ethiopia, this paper argues that local authorities still remain instruments of political control by the central government. This and other related factors contributed to lack of local autonomy and good governance that generate a wide public protest for the past many years. In so doing it highlights the factors that continue the trend of central control of local government despite extensive formal decentralization and institutional arrangement. Practically the process of ensuring good governance under a decentralized political system in the study Woreda is far from desirable that is undermined by lack of financial and human resources, existence of one dominant ruling political party, low implementation capacity and lack of adequate autonomy. Therefore, unless measures are taken the challenge of good governance would continue being the worst which will facilitate the existing public protest further.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Decentralization of Power and Local Autonomy in Ethiopian Federal System: A Look at Two Decades Experiment
    AU  - Kena Deme Jebessa
    Y1  - 2016/08/06
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11
    T2  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JF  - Urban and Regional Planning
    JO  - Urban and Regional Planning
    SP  - 45
    EP  - 58
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1697
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20160103.11
    AB  - The main purpose of this study is to undertake an academic assessment on the practice of prevailing decentralization in ensuring good governance at local government in Ethiopia. Although politics is the driving force behind devolution in most countries, fortunately, decentralization may be one of those instances where good politics and economics may serve the same end. In Ethiopia, soon after the end of the cold war, a revolution group called Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) controlled state power in 1991. Despite different commitment to achieve local autonomy and good governance, the country’s governance suffers from a number of limitations in the last two decades. In this respect, the research question revolves around to what extent the existing devolution of power and resources ensuring good governance and democratization process. The research method employed to this study is qualitative method and a descriptive case study research design. The time of 1980s was a “turning point”, particularly in the developing countries that decentralization and good governance became an agenda through policy and academic arena. In Ethiopia, as a policy making, to link decentralization with (good) governance is a very recent phenomenon. Subsequently, since 2001/2, the second wave of decentralization that is DLDP has been implementing. The finding of the study shows a mixed outcome. In one hand, since decentralized power and resource, different institutions, and associations are established. While a decentralized system of governance has formally been introduced in Ethiopia, this paper argues that local authorities still remain instruments of political control by the central government. This and other related factors contributed to lack of local autonomy and good governance that generate a wide public protest for the past many years. In so doing it highlights the factors that continue the trend of central control of local government despite extensive formal decentralization and institutional arrangement. Practically the process of ensuring good governance under a decentralized political system in the study Woreda is far from desirable that is undermined by lack of financial and human resources, existence of one dominant ruling political party, low implementation capacity and lack of adequate autonomy. Therefore, unless measures are taken the challenge of good governance would continue being the worst which will facilitate the existing public protest further.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civics and Ethical Studies, College of Social Science and Humanities, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia

  • Sections