Food leftover and solid kitchen waste disposed on open land surface, consequences different problems like air pollution, human health problem, ground water pollution, disturbance of ecosystem etc. For this problem recovering leftover food and solid kitchen waste for biogas production is critical solution. Sustainable energy production is the current issue for non renewable energy crises. The quality biogas determined by factors (temperature, PH, retention time and substrates). The method that determines the quality and quantity of biogas: first Data (leftover food and solid kitchen waste) was collected, characterize, then the slurry solution where prepared. At pH of solution (slurry) adjusted 4.6 – 6.3, at the temperature of Mesophilic range 25 – 40°C). The biogas production procedure: Hydrolysis - Acidogenesis – Acetogenesis – Methanogenesis. the volumew of biogas and CH4 maximization is the objective of this syudies. depending on experiental result output optimization model equation was developed using design expert, central composite method. In this experimental design With the retention time of 29 days, the quality is tested at an different alternatives. From the substrate source of leftover food and solid kitchen wastes, using experimental input, optimization result output from design expert: 63.3% CH4, 27.9% CO2, 0.316% O2 and 3.35L biogas quality and quantity respectively produced, from 1.75L of proportional slurry substrate prepared, at temperature 26.1°C and pH 5.51.
| Published in | Science Research (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14 |
| Page(s) | 20-30 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biogas, Digester, Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Substrate, Temperature, Slurry, Quality, Optimization
| [1] | Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA. Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 657: 1023-9. |
| [2] | Naqvi SR, Jamshaid S, Naqvi M, Farooq W, Niazi MBK, Aman Z, et al. Potential of biomass for bioenergy in Pakistan based on present case and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 81: 1247-58. |
| [3] | Rahman MM, Lee YS, Tamiri FM, Hong MGJ. Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste. Anaerobic Digestion Processes: Springer; 2018. p. 105-22. |
| [4] | Fitamo T, Treu L, Boldrin A, Sartori C, Angelidaki I, Scheutz C. Microbial population dynamics in urban organic waste anaerobic co-digestion with mixed sludge during a change in feedstock composition and different hydraulic retention times. Water research. 2017; 118: 261-71. |
| [5] | Tufaner F, Avşar Y. Effects of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: a review. International journal of environmental science and technology. 2016; 13 (9): 2303-12. |
| [6] | Tian Y, Zhang H, Chai Y, Wang L, Mi X, Zhang L, et al. Biogas properties and enzymatic analysis during anaerobic fermentation of Phragmites australis straw and cow dung: influence of nickel chloride supplement. Biodegradation. 2017; 28 (1): 15-25. |
| [7] | Franco B, Mahieu E, Emmons L, Tzompa-Sosa Z, Fischer E, Sudo K, et al. Evaluating ethane and methane emissions associated with the development of oil and natural gas extraction in North America. Environmental Research Letters. 2016; 11 (4): 044010. |
| [8] | Angelidaki I, Treu L, Tsapekos P, Luo G, Campanaro S, Wenzel H, et al. Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives. Biotechnology advances. 2018; 36 (2): 452-66. |
| [9] | Sun Q, Li H, Yan J, Liu L, Yu Z, Yu X. Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015; 51: 521-32. |
| [10] | Mboowa D, Quereshi S, Bhattacharjee C, Tonny K, Dutta S. Qualitative determination of energy potential and methane generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Dhanbad (India). Energy. 2017; 123: 386-91. |
| [11] | Murugan N, Appavu P. Investigation on low temperature biogas generation. International Journal of Ambient Energy. 2018: 1-3. |
| [12] | Latha K, Velraj R, Shanmugam P, Sivanesan S. Mixing strategies of high solids anaerobic co-digestion using food waste with sewage sludge for enhanced biogas production. Journal of cleaner production. 2019; 210: 388-400. |
| [13] | Dioha I, Ikeme C, Nafi’u T, Soba N, Yusuf M. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on biogas production. International Research Journal of Natural Sciences. 2013; 1 (3): 1-10. |
| [14] | Fitamo T, Boldrin A, Boe K, Angelidaki I, Scheutz C. Co-digestion of food and garden waste with mixed sludge from wastewater treatment in continuously stirred tank reactors. Bioresource technology. 2016; 206: 245-54. |
| [15] | M Nikiema NB, MK Somda. OPTIMIZATION OF BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM ORGANIC FRACTION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE: EXPERIMENTAL TEST USING LIQUID FROM WASTE FERMENTATION. researchgate. 2017; 18 (2): 211 – 22. |
| [16] | Dorbane Z, Kadi SA, Boudouma D, Berchiche M, Bannelier C, Gidenne T, editors. NUTRITIVE VALUE OF CRUDE OLIVE CAKE (Olea europaea L.) FOR GROWING RABBIT2016. |
| [17] | Oppermann A, Piqueras-Fiszman B, De Graaf C, Scholten E, Stieger M. Descriptive sensory profiling of double emulsions with gelled and non-gelled inner water phase. Food Research International. 2016; 85: 215-23. |
| [18] | Prentice P, Ong KK, Schoemaker MH, van Tol EA, Vervoort J, Hughes IA, et al. Breast milk nutrient content and infancy growth. Acta Paediatrica. 2016; 105 (6): 641-7. |
| [19] | Alzahrani HR, Kumakli H, Ampiah E, Mehari T, Thornton AJ, Babyak CM, et al. Determination of macro, essential trace elements, toxic heavy metal concentrations, crude oil extracts and ash composition from Saudi Arabian fruits and vegetables having medicinal values. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2017; 10 (7): 906-13. |
| [20] | Ciccoli R, Sperandei M, Petrazzuolo F, Broglia M, Chiarini L, Correnti A, et al. Anaerobic digestion of the above ground biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke in a pilot plant: Impact of the preservation method on the biogas yield and microbial community. Biomass and bioenergy. 2018; 108: 190-7. |
| [21] | Mihaescu L, Lazaroiu G, Negreanu GP, Pisa I. INFLUENCE OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF BIOGAS GENERATED IN THE LEATHER INDUSTRY ON COMBUSTION QUALITY. Thermal Science. 2018; 22. |
| [22] | Ghidotti M, Fabbri D, Torri C. Determination of linear and cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in biogas and biomethane by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2019; 195: 258-64. |
| [23] | Gholizadeh T, Vajdi M, Rostamzadeh H. Energy and exergy evaluation of a new bi-evaporator electricity/cooling cogeneration system fueled by biogas. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. |
| [24] | Valadkhani A, Smyth R, Nguyen J. Effects of primary energy consumption on CO2 emissions under optimal thresholds: Evidence from sixty countries over the last half century. Energy Economics. 2019; 80: 680-90. |
| [25] | Wu N, Moreira C, Zhang Y, Doan N, Yang S, Phlips E, et al. Techno-Economic Analysis of Biogas Production from Microalgae through Anaerobic Digestion. Biogas: IntechOpen; 2019. |
| [26] | Neves L. GE, Oliveira R., and Alves M. M.,... Influence of composition on the biomethanation potential of restaurant waste at mesophilic temperatures. Waste management 2008: 965-72. |
APA Style
Desalegn Abdissa Akuma. (2020). Biogas Production and Optimization from Leftover Food and Solid Kitchen Wastes. Science Research, 8(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14
ACS Style
Desalegn Abdissa Akuma. Biogas Production and Optimization from Leftover Food and Solid Kitchen Wastes. Sci. Res. 2020, 8(1), 20-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14
AMA Style
Desalegn Abdissa Akuma. Biogas Production and Optimization from Leftover Food and Solid Kitchen Wastes. Sci Res. 2020;8(1):20-30. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14,
author = {Desalegn Abdissa Akuma},
title = {Biogas Production and Optimization from Leftover Food and Solid Kitchen Wastes},
journal = {Science Research},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {20-30},
doi = {10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sr.20200801.14},
abstract = {Food leftover and solid kitchen waste disposed on open land surface, consequences different problems like air pollution, human health problem, ground water pollution, disturbance of ecosystem etc. For this problem recovering leftover food and solid kitchen waste for biogas production is critical solution. Sustainable energy production is the current issue for non renewable energy crises. The quality biogas determined by factors (temperature, PH, retention time and substrates). The method that determines the quality and quantity of biogas: first Data (leftover food and solid kitchen waste) was collected, characterize, then the slurry solution where prepared. At pH of solution (slurry) adjusted 4.6 – 6.3, at the temperature of Mesophilic range 25 – 40°C). The biogas production procedure: Hydrolysis - Acidogenesis – Acetogenesis – Methanogenesis. the volumew of biogas and CH4 maximization is the objective of this syudies. depending on experiental result output optimization model equation was developed using design expert, central composite method. In this experimental design With the retention time of 29 days, the quality is tested at an different alternatives. From the substrate source of leftover food and solid kitchen wastes, using experimental input, optimization result output from design expert: 63.3% CH4, 27.9% CO2, 0.316% O2 and 3.35L biogas quality and quantity respectively produced, from 1.75L of proportional slurry substrate prepared, at temperature 26.1°C and pH 5.51.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Biogas Production and Optimization from Leftover Food and Solid Kitchen Wastes AU - Desalegn Abdissa Akuma Y1 - 2020/04/28 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14 DO - 10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14 T2 - Science Research JF - Science Research JO - Science Research SP - 20 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0927 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20200801.14 AB - Food leftover and solid kitchen waste disposed on open land surface, consequences different problems like air pollution, human health problem, ground water pollution, disturbance of ecosystem etc. For this problem recovering leftover food and solid kitchen waste for biogas production is critical solution. Sustainable energy production is the current issue for non renewable energy crises. The quality biogas determined by factors (temperature, PH, retention time and substrates). The method that determines the quality and quantity of biogas: first Data (leftover food and solid kitchen waste) was collected, characterize, then the slurry solution where prepared. At pH of solution (slurry) adjusted 4.6 – 6.3, at the temperature of Mesophilic range 25 – 40°C). The biogas production procedure: Hydrolysis - Acidogenesis – Acetogenesis – Methanogenesis. the volumew of biogas and CH4 maximization is the objective of this syudies. depending on experiental result output optimization model equation was developed using design expert, central composite method. In this experimental design With the retention time of 29 days, the quality is tested at an different alternatives. From the substrate source of leftover food and solid kitchen wastes, using experimental input, optimization result output from design expert: 63.3% CH4, 27.9% CO2, 0.316% O2 and 3.35L biogas quality and quantity respectively produced, from 1.75L of proportional slurry substrate prepared, at temperature 26.1°C and pH 5.51. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: