Traditional educational frameworks, characterized by standardized curricula and a uniform pace of instruction, frequently struggle to meet the varied learning requirements of students with disabilities. This systemic rigidity contributes to a persistent gap in educational outcomes and reveals the limitations of existing non-AI assistive tools, which are often static and unable to adapt to a learner's progress. The purpose of this article is to address this critical issue by examining the development of adaptive learning technologies driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to provide genuinely individualized educational experiences. It proposes a systematic approach for creating effective and ethical systems tailored to students with diverse needs. The methodology for this conceptual work involves a systematic review of the existing body of knowledge, which informs the introduction of a new development framework. This proposed framework outlines the essential components for robust adaptive systems, including: dynamic user profiling to create a rich, continuously updated understanding of a student’s learning patterns; generative AI models for the real-time creation and modification of educational content; immediate and constructive feedback mechanisms; and longitudinal progress monitoring to inform educators and guide long-term learning trajectories. The article concludes that while AI offers powerful tools to build more inclusive and equitable educational environments, its potential can only be realized through responsible and ethical implementation. The development process must be guided by a firm commitment to mitigating algorithmic bias, ensuring transparency and explainability in AI-driven decisions, establishing clear lines of accountability, and upholding robust data privacy standards. Ultimately, the successful integration of these advanced technologies depends on a foundation of ethical principles and human oversight to ensure fair and effective support for all students.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 13, Issue 5) | 
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14 | 
| Page(s) | 179-187 | 
| Creative Commons | 
 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. | 
| Copyright | Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group | 
Artificial Intelligence, Special Education, Assistive Technology, Students with Disabilities, Personalized Learning, Educational Technology, Ethical AI
| [1] | Wang, S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 245, 124167. | 
| [2] | Kouroupa, A., et al. (2022). The use of social robots with children and young people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 17(6), e0269800. | 
| [3] | Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 220–238. | 
| [4] | Whittaker, M., et al. (2019, November). Disability, bias, and AI. AI Now Institute at New York University. | 
| [5] | Chen, X., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligent robots for precision education: A topic modeling-based bibliometric analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 171–186. | 
| [6] | Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2006). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 13(1), 29–38. | 
| [7] | A. T. Corbett and J. R. Anderson. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 4(4): 253–278, 1994. | 
| [8] | Cullen, J. M., & Alber-Morgan, S. R. (2015). Technology mediated self-prompting of daily living skills for adolescents and adults with disabilities: A review of the literature. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 55–64. | 
| [9] | Evmenova, A. S., & Behrmann, M. M. (2011). Research-based strategies for teaching content to students with intellectual disabilities: Adapted videos. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(3), 40–49. | 
| [10] | Evmenova, A. S., & Behrmann, M. M. (2017). Enabling access and enhancing comprehension of video content for postsecondary students with intellectual disability. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 40–49. | 
| [11] | Parker, A. T., et al. (2021). Wayfinding tools for people with visual impairments in real-world settings: A literature review of recent studies. Frontiers in Education, 6, 723816. | 
| [12] | High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/high-level-expert-group-artificial-intelligence | 
| [13] | W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel. Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019. | 
| [14] | Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 923–938. | 
| [15] | Kim, C. The role of affective and motivational factors in designing personalized learning environments. Education Tech Research Dev 60, 563–584 (2012). | 
| [16] | Kleinert, H. L., Browder, D. M., & Towles-Reeves, E. A. (2008). Models of cognition for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Implications for assessment. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 30–53. | 
| [17] | Lee, C.-A., et al. (2021). Prediction of student performance in massive open online courses using deep learning system based on learning behaviors. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 130–146. | 
| [18] | Mittelstadt, B. D., et al. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. | 
| [19] | Gomes, D. (2025). A comprehensive study of advancements in intelligent tutoring systems through artificial intelligent education platforms. In Improving student assessment with emerging AI tools (pp. 32). IGI Global. | 
| [20] | C. O’Neil. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown, 2016. | 
| [21] | Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. | 
| [22] | Arora, S. J., & Singh, R. P. (2012). Automatic speech recognition: A review. International Journal of Computer Applications, 60(9), 34–39. | 
| [23] | Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2017). How to present more readable text for people with dyslexia. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 29–49. | 
| [24] | Seale, J., Draffan, E. A., & Wald, M. (2010). Digital agility and digital decision-making: Conceptualising digital inclusion in the context of disabled learners in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 445–461. | 
| [25] | International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. | 
| [26] | Zhang, H., et al. (2024). Impact of intelligent learning environments on perception and presence of hearing-impaired college students: Findings of design-based research. Educational Technology & Society, 27(4), 362–384. | 
APA Style
Hassen, M. Z. (2025). Developing Adaptive Learning Technologies with AI for Students with Disabilities. Science Journal of Education, 13(5), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14
ACS Style
Hassen, M. Z. Developing Adaptive Learning Technologies with AI for Students with Disabilities. Sci. J. Educ. 2025, 13(5), 179-187. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14
@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14,
  author = {Mohammed Zeinu Hassen},
  title = {Developing Adaptive Learning Technologies with AI for Students with Disabilities
},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {13},
  number = {5},
  pages = {179-187},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20251305.14},
  abstract = {Traditional educational frameworks, characterized by standardized curricula and a uniform pace of instruction, frequently struggle to meet the varied learning requirements of students with disabilities. This systemic rigidity contributes to a persistent gap in educational outcomes and reveals the limitations of existing non-AI assistive tools, which are often static and unable to adapt to a learner's progress. The purpose of this article is to address this critical issue by examining the development of adaptive learning technologies driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to provide genuinely individualized educational experiences. It proposes a systematic approach for creating effective and ethical systems tailored to students with diverse needs. The methodology for this conceptual work involves a systematic review of the existing body of knowledge, which informs the introduction of a new development framework. This proposed framework outlines the essential components for robust adaptive systems, including: dynamic user profiling to create a rich, continuously updated understanding of a student’s learning patterns; generative AI models for the real-time creation and modification of educational content; immediate and constructive feedback mechanisms; and longitudinal progress monitoring to inform educators and guide long-term learning trajectories. The article concludes that while AI offers powerful tools to build more inclusive and equitable educational environments, its potential can only be realized through responsible and ethical implementation. The development process must be guided by a firm commitment to mitigating algorithmic bias, ensuring transparency and explainability in AI-driven decisions, establishing clear lines of accountability, and upholding robust data privacy standards. Ultimately, the successful integration of these advanced technologies depends on a foundation of ethical principles and human oversight to ensure fair and effective support for all students.
},
 year = {2025}
}
											
										TY - JOUR T1 - Developing Adaptive Learning Technologies with AI for Students with Disabilities AU - Mohammed Zeinu Hassen Y1 - 2025/10/31 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 179 EP - 187 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20251305.14 AB - Traditional educational frameworks, characterized by standardized curricula and a uniform pace of instruction, frequently struggle to meet the varied learning requirements of students with disabilities. This systemic rigidity contributes to a persistent gap in educational outcomes and reveals the limitations of existing non-AI assistive tools, which are often static and unable to adapt to a learner's progress. The purpose of this article is to address this critical issue by examining the development of adaptive learning technologies driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) to provide genuinely individualized educational experiences. It proposes a systematic approach for creating effective and ethical systems tailored to students with diverse needs. The methodology for this conceptual work involves a systematic review of the existing body of knowledge, which informs the introduction of a new development framework. This proposed framework outlines the essential components for robust adaptive systems, including: dynamic user profiling to create a rich, continuously updated understanding of a student’s learning patterns; generative AI models for the real-time creation and modification of educational content; immediate and constructive feedback mechanisms; and longitudinal progress monitoring to inform educators and guide long-term learning trajectories. The article concludes that while AI offers powerful tools to build more inclusive and equitable educational environments, its potential can only be realized through responsible and ethical implementation. The development process must be guided by a firm commitment to mitigating algorithmic bias, ensuring transparency and explainability in AI-driven decisions, establishing clear lines of accountability, and upholding robust data privacy standards. Ultimately, the successful integration of these advanced technologies depends on a foundation of ethical principles and human oversight to ensure fair and effective support for all students. VL - 13 IS - 5 ER -