This inquiry rigorously examines the intricate interplay between Ethiopian preparatory EFL teachers’ epistemological beliefs and the pedagogical enactment of grammar instruction, emphasizing focus-on-form methodologies within contextualized teaching paradigms. This study’s paramount objective is to ascertain the degree of congruity between teachers’ theoretical orientations and their practical deployment in classroom settings, while discerning the ramifications for communicative competence within EFL contexts. To this end, two grade twelve English teachers at Mekprey Preparatory School were selected via purposive sampling, aligning participant expertise with the study’s nuanced focus. A qualitative research design, underscored by an exploratory framework, facilitated in-depth data collection through systematic classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, yielding a rich corpus of insights. Analytical procedures hinged on thematic analysis, rigorously delineating both latent and manifest patterns in the alignment—or lack thereof—between instructional beliefs and observed practices. Results illuminated a pronounced dissonance between teachers’ professed commitment to contextualized, communicative grammar pedagogy and their predominant focus on discrete grammatical features, ostensibly tailored to the exigencies of exam-centric instruction. This misalignment underscores the pervasive influence of examination imperatives, which appear to circumscribe the adoption of communicative methods. In response, the study advocates for targeted professional development initiatives that surmount the inherent challenges of embedding focus-on-form and contextualized instructional strategies in exam-driven settings. Furthermore, it calls for a recalibration of curricular frameworks to harmonize the dual imperatives of communicative competence and high-stakes testing, thereby fostering a more holistic and efficacy-driven approach to EFL grammar pedagogy.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 12, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15 |
| Page(s) | 157-165 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Context, Focus on Form, Teaching Grammar, Teachers’ Beliefs
| [1] | Atkinson, D. (1987). “The mother tongue in the classroom: a neglected resource?” ELT Journal, 41(4): 241-247, http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/4/241 |
| [2] | Bernat, E., & Gvozdenko, I. (2005). Beliefs about Language Learning: Current Knowledge, Pedagogical Implications, and New Research Directions. TESL-EJ, 9, 1-21. |
| [3] | Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language teaching, 36(02), 81-109. |
| [4] | Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN: 1474219985, 9781474219983. |
| [5] | Borg, S. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In P. Garett & J. M. Cots (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness. (pp. 75-91). Routledge Handbooks Online. |
| [6] | Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
| [7] | Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications. |
| [8] | Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design (5thed.). SAGE Publications. |
| [9] |
Crystal, D. (2004). Rediscover Grammar. London: Pearson, Longman.
https://www.amazon.com/Rediscover-Grammar-David-Crystal/dp/0582848628 |
| [10] | DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55, Supplement 1, 1–25. |
| [11] | DeKeyser RM. Learning Second Language Grammar Rules: An Experiment With a Miniature Linguistic System. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1995; 17(3): 379-410. |
| [12] | Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
| [13] | Duncan, G., & Met, M. (2010). STARTALK: From paper to practice. College Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center at the University of Maryland. Available at |
| [14] | Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305-352. |
| [15] | Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [16] | Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused instruction. Language learning, 51(1), 1-46. |
| [17] | Ellis, R. (2002). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign curriculum. In E. Hinkel, & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17-34). New York: Routledge. |
| [18] | Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107. |
| [19] | Ellis, R. (2010). Does explicit grammar instruction work. NINJAL Project Review, 1(2), 3-22. |
| [20] | Farrell, T. & Lim, P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13. |
| [21] | Ferreira, P. (2014). Beliefs and Practices towards Teaching and Learning Grammar: A Multi-case Study. Bellaterra: journal of teaching and learning language and literature, 7(3), 14-29. |
| [22] | Gill, M. G, & Fives, H., (2015). International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs. New York, NY: Routledge. beliefs/oclc/872622709. |
| [23] | Harbord, J. (1992). The Use of the Mother Tongue in the Classroom. ELT Journal, 46(4), 350-355. |
| [24] | Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman. |
| [25] | Harmer, J. (2009). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman. |
| [26] | Harmer, J. (1987). Teaching and learning grammar. London: Longman. |
| [27] | Harun, H., Abdullah, N., Ab Wahab, N. S., & Zainuddin, N. (2017). The use of metalanguage among second language learners to mediate L2 grammar learning. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 14(2), 85-114. |
| [28] | Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical teacher, 42(8), 846-854. |
| [29] | Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language teaching, 48(2), 263-280. |
| [30] | Lewis, K. A. B. (2009). Adult Learners’ Perceptions of the Incorporation of their L1 in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Applied Linguistics, 30(2): 216-235. |
| [31] | Mackenzie, N., Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2011). How does teaching experience affect attitudes towards literacy learning and teaching in the early years?. Issues in Educational Research, 21(3), 281-293. |
| [32] | Michelle E. Kiger & Lara Varpio (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131, Medical Teacher, |
| [33] | Mulugeta Kahsay (2020). Secondary School Teachers’ Beliefs about Grammar Teaching in Ethiopia. Bahir Dar Journal of Education, 20(1). |
| [34] | Ng, E. K. J., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2003). Do Teachers' Beliefs of Grammar Teaching Match their Classroom Practices? A Singapore Case Study. In D. Deterding. Brown A & Low E L (Eds. 2003) English in Singapore: Research on Grammar. Singapore (pp. 128-137): McGraw Hill, 128-137. |
| [35] | Nicholls, G. (2002). Developing teaching and learning in higher education. Routledge. |
| [36] | Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction. A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. |
| [37] | Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–420). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
| [38] | Phipps, S. & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380-390. |
| [39] | Prodromou, L. (2001). “From Mother Tongue to Other Tongue”. |
| [40] | Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press. |
| [41] | Richards, J. C., Gallo, P. B., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Exploring Teachers' Beliefs and the Processes of Change. PAC Journal, 1,1, 41-58. |
| [42] | Richards, Jack C. (2015). Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. |
| [43] | Swan, M. (2011). Grammar. In J. Simpson (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 557–570). London: Routledge. |
| [44] | Williams, M., & Burden, R. (2002). Pulling it together: the challenge for the educator. Thinking through the Curriculum, 189-197. |
| [45] | Williams, M., Burden, R., Poulet, G., & Maun, I. (2004). Learners' perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 30(1), 19-29. |
| [46] | Zewudie Tamiru. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar: The Case of Two EFL Teachers in Ethiopia. English for Specific Purposes World, 19 (53), 1-22. |
APA Style
Tadegew, T. M. (2024). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools. Science Journal of Education, 12(6), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15
ACS Style
Tadegew, T. M. Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools. Sci. J. Educ. 2024, 12(6), 157-165. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15
AMA Style
Tadegew TM. Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools. Sci J Educ. 2024;12(6):157-165. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15,
author = {Tsegaye Mekasha Tadegew},
title = {Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools
},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {12},
number = {6},
pages = {157-165},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20241206.15},
abstract = {This inquiry rigorously examines the intricate interplay between Ethiopian preparatory EFL teachers’ epistemological beliefs and the pedagogical enactment of grammar instruction, emphasizing focus-on-form methodologies within contextualized teaching paradigms. This study’s paramount objective is to ascertain the degree of congruity between teachers’ theoretical orientations and their practical deployment in classroom settings, while discerning the ramifications for communicative competence within EFL contexts. To this end, two grade twelve English teachers at Mekprey Preparatory School were selected via purposive sampling, aligning participant expertise with the study’s nuanced focus. A qualitative research design, underscored by an exploratory framework, facilitated in-depth data collection through systematic classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, yielding a rich corpus of insights. Analytical procedures hinged on thematic analysis, rigorously delineating both latent and manifest patterns in the alignment—or lack thereof—between instructional beliefs and observed practices. Results illuminated a pronounced dissonance between teachers’ professed commitment to contextualized, communicative grammar pedagogy and their predominant focus on discrete grammatical features, ostensibly tailored to the exigencies of exam-centric instruction. This misalignment underscores the pervasive influence of examination imperatives, which appear to circumscribe the adoption of communicative methods. In response, the study advocates for targeted professional development initiatives that surmount the inherent challenges of embedding focus-on-form and contextualized instructional strategies in exam-driven settings. Furthermore, it calls for a recalibration of curricular frameworks to harmonize the dual imperatives of communicative competence and high-stakes testing, thereby fostering a more holistic and efficacy-driven approach to EFL grammar pedagogy.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar Through Focus-on-Form and Context: The Case of EFL Teachers in Ethiopia Preparatory Schools AU - Tsegaye Mekasha Tadegew Y1 - 2024/11/29 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 157 EP - 165 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20241206.15 AB - This inquiry rigorously examines the intricate interplay between Ethiopian preparatory EFL teachers’ epistemological beliefs and the pedagogical enactment of grammar instruction, emphasizing focus-on-form methodologies within contextualized teaching paradigms. This study’s paramount objective is to ascertain the degree of congruity between teachers’ theoretical orientations and their practical deployment in classroom settings, while discerning the ramifications for communicative competence within EFL contexts. To this end, two grade twelve English teachers at Mekprey Preparatory School were selected via purposive sampling, aligning participant expertise with the study’s nuanced focus. A qualitative research design, underscored by an exploratory framework, facilitated in-depth data collection through systematic classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, yielding a rich corpus of insights. Analytical procedures hinged on thematic analysis, rigorously delineating both latent and manifest patterns in the alignment—or lack thereof—between instructional beliefs and observed practices. Results illuminated a pronounced dissonance between teachers’ professed commitment to contextualized, communicative grammar pedagogy and their predominant focus on discrete grammatical features, ostensibly tailored to the exigencies of exam-centric instruction. This misalignment underscores the pervasive influence of examination imperatives, which appear to circumscribe the adoption of communicative methods. In response, the study advocates for targeted professional development initiatives that surmount the inherent challenges of embedding focus-on-form and contextualized instructional strategies in exam-driven settings. Furthermore, it calls for a recalibration of curricular frameworks to harmonize the dual imperatives of communicative competence and high-stakes testing, thereby fostering a more holistic and efficacy-driven approach to EFL grammar pedagogy. VL - 12 IS - 6 ER -
Department of English Language and Literature, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
Information