Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers

Received: 22 February 2025     Accepted: 13 March 2025     Published: 21 March 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Offshore CO2 storage in shallow saline aquifers presents significant potential due to its operational feasibility and large storage capacity. However, the natural or anthropogenic damage to the caprock integrity may trigger submarine CO2 leakage. High-velocity ocean currents accelerate the dissolution and dispersion of leaked CO2 in seawater, while current understanding in this field remains limited. This study establishes a seawater-CO2 dissolution-dispersion numerical model based on shallow marine environments, in order to quantify how high-velocity currents affect CO2 dispersion paths and the trend of concentration variations. Simulations reveal that at typical leakage rates (17.0-60.0 kg/day), high-velocity currents (0.20-0.405 m/s) expand the horizontal spread of dissolved CO2 at different water depths by up to 45 m within 2 minutes, approximately 9 times wider than low-velocity situations (0.05 m/s). Simultaneously, rapid dilution occurs: while the peak concentration of CO2 bubbles in high-velocity currents exhibit 1.37 times higher than low-velocity scenarios, dissolved CO2 concentration stabilizes at merely 24.80% of the latter. The results indicate that high-velocity currents complicate the monitoring efforts of CO2 leakage. These findings provide critical insights for predicting impacts of CO2 leakage and optimizing monitoring strategies in shallow marine CO2 storage projects.

Published in Science Discovery (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12
Page(s) 6-15
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CO2 Leakage, CO2 Storage, Numerical Simulation, Extreme Ocean Current Environment, Safety Analysis

References
[1] Steel L. L., Mackay E. A., Liu Q., et al. CO2 solubility measurements in brine under reservoir conditions: A comparison of experimental and geochemical modeling methods [J]. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 197-217,
[2] Taylor P. J., Stahl H., Vardy M. E., et al. A novel sub-seabed CO2 release experiment informing monitoring and impact assessment for geological carbon storage [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38, 3-17,
[3] 罗海中, 吴大卫, 范永春, et al. 碳中和背景下CCUS技术发展及广东离岸封存潜力评估 [J]. 南方能源建设, 2023, 10(6): 1-13,
[4] 许晓艺, 李琦, 谭永胜, et al. 日本苫小牧CO2海底地质封存监测技术分析及其启示 [J]. 高校地质学报, 2023, 29(1): 013-024,
[5] Sasaki T., Sawada Y. Capture and Compression Process of the Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project [J]. Social Science Research Network, 2021,
[6] Weijermars R. Concurrent challenges in practical operations and modeling of geological carbon-dioxide sequestration: Review of the Gorgon project and FluidFlower benchmark study [J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2024,
[7] 衣华磊, 郭欣, 贾津耀, et al. 恩平15-1油田开发CO2回注封存工程方案研究 [J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(1): 163-169,
[8] Jones D. G., Beaubien S. E., Blackford J., et al. Developments since 2005 in understanding potential environmental impacts of CO2 leakage from geological storage [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 40: 350-377,
[9] Kim H., Kim Y. H., Kang S. G., et al. Development of environmental impact monitoring protocol for offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS): A biological perspective [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2016, 57: 139-150,
[10] Barry J. P., Buck K. R., Lovera C. F., et al. Utility of deep sea CO2 release experiments in understanding the biology of a high-CO2 ocean: Effects of hypercapnia on deep sea meiofauna [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2005, 110: C09S12,
[11] Sellami N., Dewar M., Stahl H., et al. Dynamics of rising CO2 bubble plumes in the QICS field experiment: Part 1 – The experiment [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38: 44-51,
[12] Dewar M., Sellami N., Chen B. Dynamics of rising CO2 bubble plumes in the QICS field experiment: Part 2 – Modelling [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38, 52-63,
[13] Maeda Y., Shitashima K., Sakamoto A. Mapping observations using AUV and numerical simulations of leaked CO2 diffusion in sub-seabed CO2 release experiment at Ardmucknish Bay [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38: 143-152,
[14] Totland C., Eek E., Blomberg A. E., et al. The correlation between pO2 and pCO2 as a chemical marker for detection of offshore CO2 leakage [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 99: 103085,
[15] Gros J., Schmidt M., Dale A. W., et al. Simulating and Quantifying Multiple Natural Subsea CO2 Seeps at Panarea Island (Aeolian Islands, Italy) as a Proxy for Potential Leakage from Subseabed Carbon Storage Sites [J]. Environmental science & technology, 2019,
[16] Flohr A., Schaap A., Achterberg E. P., et al. Towards improved monitoring of offshore carbon storage: A real-world field experiment detecting a controlled sub-seafloor CO2 release [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021,
[17] Mori C., Sato T., Kano Y., et al. Numerical study of the fate of CO2 purposefully injected into the sediment and seeping from seafloor in Ardmucknish Bay [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38, 153-161,
[18] Atamanchuk D., Tengberg A., Aleynik D., et al. Detection of CO2 leakage from a simulated sub-seabed storage site using three different types of pCO2 sensors [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38: 121-134,
[19] OSPAR. 2007 Amendment to 1992 OSPAR Convention, Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic [Z]. 2007,
[20] Shitashima K., Maeda Y., Sakamoto A. Detection and monitoring of leaked CO2 through sediment, water column and atmosphere in a sub-seabed CCS experiment [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 38, 135-142,
[21] Dewar M., Wei W., McNeil D. A., et al. Small-scale modelling of the physiochemical impacts of CO2 leaked from sub-seabed reservoirs or pipelines within the North Sea and surrounding waters [J]. Marine pollution bulletin, 2013, 73 2: 504-15,
[22] Pham L. P., Rusli R., Shariff A. M., et al. Dispersion of carbon dioxide bubble release from shallow subsea carbon dioxide storage to seawater [J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2020, 196, 104075,
[23] Pham L. P., Rusli R., Keong L. K. Consequence Study of CO2 Leakage from Ocean Storage [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 148: 1081-1088,
[24] Drew D. A., Lahey R. T., In Particulate Two-Phase Flow [M]. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993: 509–566,
[25] Takamasa T., Tomiyama A. Three-Dimensional Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Bubbly Flow in a C-Shaped Tube [C]. Ninth International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-9). San Francisco. 1999,
[26] Tomiyama A. Struggle with computational bubble dynamics [C]. Third International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Lyon, France. 1998,
[27] Shih T. H., Liou W. W., Shabbir A. H., et al. A new k-ɛ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows [J]. Computers & Fluids, 1995, 24: 227-238,
[28] Ji M., Utomo T. S., Woo J. S., et al. CFD investigation on the flow structure inside thermo vapor compressor [J]. Energy, 2010, 35: 2694-2702,
[29] Xing J., Liu Z., Huang P., et al. Experimental and numerical study of the dispersion of carbon dioxide plume [J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2013, 256-257, 40-8,
[30] Ramkrishna D. Population Balances: Theory and Applications to Particulate Systems in Engineering [M]. New York: Academic Press, 2000,
[31] Sato T., Sato K. Numerical prediction of the dilution process and its biological impacts in CO2 ocean sequestration [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2002, 6: 169-180,
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Weng, H., Wang, D. (2025). Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers. Science Discovery, 13(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Weng, H.; Wang, D. Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers. Sci. Discov. 2025, 13(1), 6-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Weng H, Wang D. Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers. Sci Discov. 2025;13(1):6-15. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12,
      author = {Hao Weng and Dayong Wang},
      title = {Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers
    },
      journal = {Science Discovery},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {6-15},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20251301.12},
      abstract = {Offshore CO2 storage in shallow saline aquifers presents significant potential due to its operational feasibility and large storage capacity. However, the natural or anthropogenic damage to the caprock integrity may trigger submarine CO2 leakage. High-velocity ocean currents accelerate the dissolution and dispersion of leaked CO2 in seawater, while current understanding in this field remains limited. This study establishes a seawater-CO2 dissolution-dispersion numerical model based on shallow marine environments, in order to quantify how high-velocity currents affect CO2 dispersion paths and the trend of concentration variations. Simulations reveal that at typical leakage rates (17.0-60.0 kg/day), high-velocity currents (0.20-0.405 m/s) expand the horizontal spread of dissolved CO2 at different water depths by up to 45 m within 2 minutes, approximately 9 times wider than low-velocity situations (0.05 m/s). Simultaneously, rapid dilution occurs: while the peak concentration of CO2 bubbles in high-velocity currents exhibit 1.37 times higher than low-velocity scenarios, dissolved CO2 concentration stabilizes at merely 24.80% of the latter. The results indicate that high-velocity currents complicate the monitoring efforts of CO2 leakage. These findings provide critical insights for predicting impacts of CO2 leakage and optimizing monitoring strategies in shallow marine CO2 storage projects.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Numerical Simulation of the Impact of High-Velocity Ocean Currents on CO2 Leakage in Shallow Saline Aquifers
    
    AU  - Hao Weng
    AU  - Dayong Wang
    Y1  - 2025/03/21
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12
    T2  - Science Discovery
    JF  - Science Discovery
    JO  - Science Discovery
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 15
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0650
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20251301.12
    AB  - Offshore CO2 storage in shallow saline aquifers presents significant potential due to its operational feasibility and large storage capacity. However, the natural or anthropogenic damage to the caprock integrity may trigger submarine CO2 leakage. High-velocity ocean currents accelerate the dissolution and dispersion of leaked CO2 in seawater, while current understanding in this field remains limited. This study establishes a seawater-CO2 dissolution-dispersion numerical model based on shallow marine environments, in order to quantify how high-velocity currents affect CO2 dispersion paths and the trend of concentration variations. Simulations reveal that at typical leakage rates (17.0-60.0 kg/day), high-velocity currents (0.20-0.405 m/s) expand the horizontal spread of dissolved CO2 at different water depths by up to 45 m within 2 minutes, approximately 9 times wider than low-velocity situations (0.05 m/s). Simultaneously, rapid dilution occurs: while the peak concentration of CO2 bubbles in high-velocity currents exhibit 1.37 times higher than low-velocity scenarios, dissolved CO2 concentration stabilizes at merely 24.80% of the latter. The results indicate that high-velocity currents complicate the monitoring efforts of CO2 leakage. These findings provide critical insights for predicting impacts of CO2 leakage and optimizing monitoring strategies in shallow marine CO2 storage projects.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

  • Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

  • Sections