| Peer-Reviewed

Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance

Received: 26 October 2022     Accepted: 11 November 2022     Published: 23 November 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.

Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
Page(s) 115-120
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Fracturing Fluid, Additives, Residue, Proppant Carrying Capacity

References
[1] Economidies, M. J., and Nolte, K. G. 2000. Reservoir Stimulation. 3rd Edition. Houston: Schlumberger Educational Services.
[2] Miskimins, J. L. 2020. Hydraulic Fracturing: Fundamentals and Advancements‬. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Richardson, Texas.
[3] Driweesh, S. M., Al-Atwi, M. A., Malik, A. R., Olarte, J. E., Jauregui, J. A., Bolarinwa, S. O. 2013. Successful Implementation of Zirconate Borate Based Dual Crosslinked Gel and Continuous Mixing System During Proppant Fracturing Treatment in a Complex High-Temperature and High-Pressure Sandstone Gas Reservoir in Saudi Arabia that Exceeded the Well Object. International Petroleum Technology Conference. Beijing, China.
[4] Azizov, E., Quintero, H. J., Saxton, K., and Sessarego, S. 2015. Carboxymethylcellulose a Cost-Effective Alternative to Guar, CMHPG and Surfactant-Based Fluid Systems. SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
[5] Hai, Q., Liancheng, R., Wenhao, H., Tingxue, J., and Yiming, Y. 2018. Successful Application of Clean Fracturing Fluid Replacing Guar Gum Fluid to Stimulate Tuffstone in San Jorge Basin, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Argentina. Louisiana.
[6] Yaritz, J., Stegent, N., Bailey, T., and Fritcher, E. 1997. Development of a Dual Crosslinker Fracturing Fluid System. Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
[7] Hai, Q., and Liancheng, R. 2018. Successful Application of Clean Fracturing Fluid Replacing Guar Gum Fluid to Stimulate Tuffstonein San Jorge Basin, Argentina. SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control (p. 14). Society of Petroleum Engineers Lafayette, Lousiana, USA.
[8] Tariq Almubarak, J. H. 2020. Insights on Potential Formation Damage Mechanisms Associated with the Use of Gel Breakers in Hydraulic Fracturing. Polymers, 22.
[9] Ming, H., Lu, Y., Qiu, X., Shu, Y., and Wang, S. 2016. Development and Field Application of a Novel Cellulose Fracturing Fluid. SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Beijing, China.
[10] Ming H, Lu, Y. 2016. A Cellulose Fracturing Fluid with Instant Solution and Residue. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition (p. 7). Society of Petroleum Engineers. Perth, Australia.
[11] Zhao, G. 2018. Synthesis and Application of Nonionic Polyacrylamide with Controlled Molecular Weight for Fracturing in Low-permeability Oil Reservoirs. Journal of Applied Polymer ScienceVolume 132, Issue 11.
[12] Ding, Y., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, F. 2010. Propped Fracturing with a Novel Surface Cross-linked Acid in High Temperature Deep Carbonate Formation. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. (2022). Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 10(5), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dewi Asmorowati; Dedy Kristanto; Mia Ferian Helmy; Fanata Yudha; Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022, 10(5), 115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dewi Asmorowati, Dedy Kristanto, Mia Ferian Helmy, Fanata Yudha, Nur Ilham Tarsila, et al. Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2022;10(5):115-120. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11,
      author = {Dewi Asmorowati and Dedy Kristanto and Mia Ferian Helmy and Fanata Yudha and Nur Ilham Tarsila and Sukma Bayu Yusanto},
      title = {Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance},
      journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
      volume = {10},
      number = {5},
      pages = {115-120},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20221005.11},
      abstract = {Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Compatibility of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid and Breaker Due to Residue and Proppant Carrying Performance
    AU  - Dewi Asmorowati
    AU  - Dedy Kristanto
    AU  - Mia Ferian Helmy
    AU  - Fanata Yudha
    AU  - Nur Ilham Tarsila
    AU  - Sukma Bayu Yusanto
    Y1  - 2022/11/23
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
    T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    SP  - 115
    EP  - 120
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20221005.11
    AB  - Hydraulic fracturing is a method to improve reservoir permeability by injecting high-viscosity fluid (polymer) to allow fractures to occur in the formation and fill it with proppant. One factor that influences the success of hydraulic fracturing is the selection of fracturing fluid and its additives. A good fracturing fluid must have a high viscosity to conduct fractures and carry the proppant. In addition, the use of fracturing fluids containing polymers and crosslinkers is used to increase the viscosity, in order to be able to fracture reservoir rocks. However, the polymer contained in the fracturing fluid must be decomposed so as not to leave a residue in the reservoir that can cause clogging of the rock pores and reduce the permeability of the fracture. This research was conducted using a compatibility test between Guar gum-based fracturing fluid with various concentrations of borate crosslinker and two type of breaker. The compatibility tests include residue and proppant carrying performance. There are two types of breakers used in this research, oxidizer and encapsulated breaker. From the results of the analysis, it can be seen that the GF-1A fracturing fluid has the smallest residue of 0.887 gr and the GF-2C fracturing fluid has the best performance of carrying proppant of 0.00012 mm/s.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Fracturing Services, Bukit Apit Bumi Persada Ltd., Bekasi, Indonesia

  • Sections