The construction industry is one of the most complex industries worldwide. In Ethiopia also the difficulties and complex industry, it related to low tenders to win project work. These problems continue to lead to a lesser quality of construction facilities, a high rate of claims and litigation, and frequent cost and schedule overruns have become the key indicators of Ethiopian public construction work contracts. This research was taken on to assess the performance of public-owned construction projects awarded on a least bidder bid awarding system and its impacts on quality in the case of Assosa City. 20 pieces of paper were distributed as a questionnaire survey and 12 were collected from among the different stakeholders of Assosa city project members in Assosa city such as clients, contractors, and the construction department of the public construction works city. The collected questionnaires were analyzed by using MS Excel version 19. The results found that currency exchange variation/oscillation, variability in the economy of the nation, and material price/accessibility/source/quality /imports are 0.92, 0.88, and 0.78, (RII) with 1st, 2nd and 3rd ranked respectively. It was resolved that more than 80% of the construction projects overrun the budget and end up with a higher cost, and its results accomplish that due to one of the top impact factors of the least bid procurement system. It suggests that further needs to investigate how the Federal procurement administration system embraces features of other alternative bidding methods for evaluation and award.
Published in | Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12 |
Page(s) | 29-33 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bid Awarding, Construction Industry, Complex, Quality, Procurement
[1] | M. H. And S. Saha, “Builders’ Perceptions of Lowest Cost Procurement and its Impact on Quality,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2007. |
[2] | T. H. Khan, K. H. Road, R. Cantt, and A. Q. Khan, “Effects of Lowest Bidding Bid Awarding System In Public Sector Construction Projects In Pakistan,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 132–147, 2015. |
[3] | L. Mechegiaw and A. Dinku, "performance study of lowest bidder bid awarding system," no. march 2012. |
[4] | L. Gebreegziabher and N. Haile Selassie, "Identifying causes of building construction site accidents in Tigray region, towards a safe construction industry Identifying causes of building construction site accidents in Tigray region, towards a safe construction industry," pp. 1–6, 2016. |
[5] | M. O. F. Finance, "federal public procurement directive ministry of finance & economic development table of contents," 2010. |
[6] | I. Vereinigung and B. Ingenieure, Conditions of Contract for. 2005. |
[7] | F. i. d. e. s. ingenieurs-conseils, "conditions of contract for works of civil engineering construction part i general conditions part ii conditions of particular preparation of part ii clauses," 1992. |
[8] | F. international design, "2927771-FIDIC-for-civil-engineering-construction-1987.pdf". |
[9] | G. Alexandersson, “The Problem of Predatory Bidding in Competitive Tenders,” 2003. |
[10] | “High and low bids in tenders : strategic pricing and other bidding behavior in public tenders of by gunnar alexandersson and,” pp. 161–194, 2007. |
[11] | B. Letarge, E. T. Quezon, and Y. C. Macarubbo, “Evaluation on the Performance of Lowest Responsive Bid Contract and the Quality of Materials Used on Governmental Building Projects in Jimma Town,” vol. 7, no. 12, 2016. |
[12] | North American Development Bank, North American Development Bank (the Bank) for guidance of staff and borrowers in the implementation of procurement for Bank-financed contracts," pp. 1–100. |
[13] | G. F. A good evaluation about the final award decision," pp. 1–34, 2021. |
[14] | Asian Development Bank, guide on bid evaluation," June 2018. |
[15] | United Nations Procurement Division, Lowest Responsive/Compliant/Acceptable Offer," pp. 4, 200. |
APA Style
Assefa Tekla Bedada. (2022). Assessment of Impact Factors Affecting of Lowest Bidder Bid Accuracy Evaluation System: In Case of Assosa Town. Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, 7(2), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12
ACS Style
Assefa Tekla Bedada. Assessment of Impact Factors Affecting of Lowest Bidder Bid Accuracy Evaluation System: In Case of Assosa Town. Landsc. Archit. Reg. Plan. 2022, 7(2), 29-33. doi: 10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12
@article{10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12, author = {Assefa Tekla Bedada}, title = {Assessment of Impact Factors Affecting of Lowest Bidder Bid Accuracy Evaluation System: In Case of Assosa Town}, journal = {Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {29-33}, doi = {10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.larp.20220702.12}, abstract = {The construction industry is one of the most complex industries worldwide. In Ethiopia also the difficulties and complex industry, it related to low tenders to win project work. These problems continue to lead to a lesser quality of construction facilities, a high rate of claims and litigation, and frequent cost and schedule overruns have become the key indicators of Ethiopian public construction work contracts. This research was taken on to assess the performance of public-owned construction projects awarded on a least bidder bid awarding system and its impacts on quality in the case of Assosa City. 20 pieces of paper were distributed as a questionnaire survey and 12 were collected from among the different stakeholders of Assosa city project members in Assosa city such as clients, contractors, and the construction department of the public construction works city. The collected questionnaires were analyzed by using MS Excel version 19. The results found that currency exchange variation/oscillation, variability in the economy of the nation, and material price/accessibility/source/quality /imports are 0.92, 0.88, and 0.78, (RII) with 1st, 2nd and 3rd ranked respectively. It was resolved that more than 80% of the construction projects overrun the budget and end up with a higher cost, and its results accomplish that due to one of the top impact factors of the least bid procurement system. It suggests that further needs to investigate how the Federal procurement administration system embraces features of other alternative bidding methods for evaluation and award.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Impact Factors Affecting of Lowest Bidder Bid Accuracy Evaluation System: In Case of Assosa Town AU - Assefa Tekla Bedada Y1 - 2022/07/29 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12 DO - 10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12 T2 - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning JF - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning JO - Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning SP - 29 EP - 33 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-4374 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20220702.12 AB - The construction industry is one of the most complex industries worldwide. In Ethiopia also the difficulties and complex industry, it related to low tenders to win project work. These problems continue to lead to a lesser quality of construction facilities, a high rate of claims and litigation, and frequent cost and schedule overruns have become the key indicators of Ethiopian public construction work contracts. This research was taken on to assess the performance of public-owned construction projects awarded on a least bidder bid awarding system and its impacts on quality in the case of Assosa City. 20 pieces of paper were distributed as a questionnaire survey and 12 were collected from among the different stakeholders of Assosa city project members in Assosa city such as clients, contractors, and the construction department of the public construction works city. The collected questionnaires were analyzed by using MS Excel version 19. The results found that currency exchange variation/oscillation, variability in the economy of the nation, and material price/accessibility/source/quality /imports are 0.92, 0.88, and 0.78, (RII) with 1st, 2nd and 3rd ranked respectively. It was resolved that more than 80% of the construction projects overrun the budget and end up with a higher cost, and its results accomplish that due to one of the top impact factors of the least bid procurement system. It suggests that further needs to investigate how the Federal procurement administration system embraces features of other alternative bidding methods for evaluation and award. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -