Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors

Received: 25 February 2025     Accepted: 8 March 2025     Published: 21 March 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Experimental finance stresses the role of emotions and psychological feelings in understanding the behavior and decision-making of investors on the stock markets. This article focuses on individual investors, who are thought to develop a kind of predisposition to behavioral and cognitive biases. Based on data collected from an experiment in the field of trading and supported by the use of qualitative analysis tools, we demonstrate that the participants in the experiment are more likely to trade in companies with the highest market capitalizations. Indeed, by examining and analyzing the different investment strategies chosen during the experiment, we observe a strong link between the company size and the investment choices. We also highlight, during the experiment, intensive media coverage (or media overexposure) specifically directed to the largest companies. To some extent, this can be explained by the large number of opinions and recommendations issued by financial analysts that are either directly related to companies in the news or focused on companies in the same sector (spillover effects). Financial analysts can therefore be considered as helping to reduce uncertainty and providing guidance for individual investors who are chronically in need of references on the stock markets. In addition, our results suggest that a lack of experience and a low level of familiarity regarding how stock markets work will naturally direct the attention of investors towards companies extensively covered by financial analysts (in other words, large ones) and the most media covered ones. To a certain extent, corporate communications and the marketing of stock market websites would therefore become central markers for the definition of investment strategies. The data collected show the development of “all that glitters attracts” bias, which can be explained by a strong focus on easily available and highly visible information (the availability bias). The more visible they would be, the larger the companies and the more they would be followed by financial analysts. We believe that how information is covered by the media leads to the development of herd behavior. Ultimately, stock market websites would therefore appear to facilitate behavioral and cognitive biases.

Published in Journal of Finance and Accounting (Volume 13, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12
Page(s) 71-85
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Qualitative Research, Uncertainty, Stock Markets, Experimental Finance, Behavioral Biases

References
[1] Chandra, A. (2008, December). Decision making in the stock market: Incorporating psychology with finance. In National Conference on Forecasting Financial Markets of India.
[2] Bourghelle, D., & Brandouy, O. (2006). Sensitivity of financial markets to macroeconomic information: A conventionalist reading. L'économie des conventions, Méthodes et Résultats, 209-226.
[3] Junghans, P. (2016). Irrationality at the heart of information processing by the large company executive. I2D - Information, données & documents, 53(1), 12-14.
[4] Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & Seppi, D. (2009). The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38(2), 95-115.
[5] Wu, C., Schulz, E., Pleskac, T., & Speekenbrink, M. (2022). Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty. Scientific Reports, 8(1).
[6] Postel, N. (2008). Uncertainty, rationality and institution: A cross-reading of Keynes and Simon. Revue Économique, 59(2), 265-289.
[7] Piluso, N. (2007). The role of uncertainty in Keynes' theory of unemployment. Cahiers d’Économie Politique, L’Harmattan, 13 pages.
[8] Gambaro, M., & Puglisi, R. (2015). What do ads buy? Daily coverage of listed companies on the Italian press. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 41-57.
[9] Chen, C., Lu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Is attention-based stock buying profitable? Empirical evidence from Chinese individual investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 82.
[10] Akyol, A. C., Qian, Y., & Yu, F. (2023). How do experienced analysts improve price efficiency? Journal of Banking and Finance, 149, 106798.
[11] Andrade, S. C., Bian, J., & Burch, T. R. (2013). Analyst Coverage, Information, and Bubbles. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(5), 1573–1605.
[12] Du, N., & Budescu, D. V. (2017). How (Over) Confident Are Financial Analysts? Journal of Behavioral Finance.
[13] Nardi, P. C. C., Ribeiro, E. M. S., Bueno, J. L. O., & Aggarwal, I. (2022). The Influence of Cognitive Biases and Financial Factors on Forecast Accuracy of Analysts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
[14] Broihanne, M. H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behavior of finance professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11, 64–73.
[15] Loffler, G. (1998). Biases in analyst forecasts: cognitive, strategic or second-best? International Journal of Forecasting, 14, 261–275.
[16] Rainelli-Weiss, H. (2012). Behavioral finance The case of financial analysts. Encyclopédie des Ressources Humaines, pp. 618-624.
[17] Huang, S. X., Pereira, R., & Wang, C. (2017). Analyst Coverage and the Likelihood of Meeting or Beating Analyst Earnings Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 871–899.
[18] He, J., & Tian, X. (2013). The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3), 856–878.
[19] Doukas, J. A., Kim, C. (F.), & Pantzalis, C. (2005). The Two Faces of Analyst Coverage. Financial Management, 34(2), 99–125.
[20] Rees, L., Sharp, N., & Twedt, B. (2015). Who’s heard on the Street? Determinants and consequences of financial analyst coverage in the business press. Review of Accounting Studies, 20, 173–209.
[21] Bonsall IV, S. B., Green, J., & Muller III, K. A. (2020). Market uncertainty and the importance of media coverage at earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 69.
[22] Jiraporn, P., Liu, Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). How Do Powerful CEOs Affect Analyst Coverage? European Financial Management, 20(3), 652–676.
[23] Clochard, G., Hollard, G., & Perez, F. (2018). Richard H. Thaler et les limites de la rationalité. Revue d'Économie Politique, 128(4), 535-548.
[24] Charreaux, G., & Albouy, M. (2017). The construction of modern financial theory: From neoclassical finance to neoinstitutional and behavioral finance. An introduction to the major authors in finance. In M. Albouy (Ed.), Les Grands Auteurs en Finance (pp. 4-54). Caen: EMS Editions.
[25] Grether, D. (1981). Financial incentive effects and individual decision-making. Social Science Working Paper, 401, 13 pages.
[26] Bloomfield, R., & Anderson, A. (2009). Experimental finance. Johnson School Research Paper Series, 23, 22 pages.
[27] Libby, R., Bloomfield, R., & Nelson, M. W. (2002). Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 775–810.
[28] Finet, A., Kristofordis, K., & Laznicka, J. (2025). How to design a financial market experimentation: The qualitative approach. International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, forthcoming, 16 pages.
[29] Finet, A., Laznicka, J., & Palumbo, H. (2024). From which planet do they come from? Biases in trading strategies: Does the gender matter? The International Journal of Business & Management, 12(12), 1-11.
[30] Finet, A., Kristoforidis, K., & Viseur, R. (2022). The emergence of behavioral biases in trading situations: an exploratory study. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 313, 43-51.
[31] Finet, A., Kristoforidis, K., & Viseur, R. (2022). Decision-making tools in trading situations: an exploratory study. La Revue du Financier, 44(248), 4-18.
[32] Finet, A., Kristoforidis, K., & Viseur, R. (2021). The emergence of behavioral biases in trading situations: an exploratory study. Revue Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, 146, 147-182.
[33] Finet, A., & Laznicka, J. (2025). Addressing Emotional Dysregulation in Experimental Design. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 7-18.
[34] Severin, M. I., Raes, F., Notebaert, E., Lambrecht, L., Everaert, G., & Buysse, A. (2022). A qualitative study on emotions experienced at the coast and their influence on well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 902122.
[35] Mwita, K. (2022). Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research in social science studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(6), 618-625.
[36] Pérez-Sánchez, J., & Delgado, A. R. (2022). A metamethod study of qualitative research on emotion regulation strategies. Papeles del Psicólogo, 43(2), 103-109.
[37] Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K., Tompkins, J., & Zhang, P. (2005). What's in a name? An experimental examination of investment behavior. Review of Finance, 9(2), 281-304.
[38] She, S., Eimontaite, I., Zhang, D., & Sun, Y. (2017). Fear, anger, and risk preference reversals: An experimental study on a Chinese sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1371.
[39] Widyarini, I. (2017). The role of negative moral emotions (anger and disgust) in ethical decision making. In 8th International Conference of Asian Association of Indigenous and Cultural Psychology (ICAAIP 2017) (pp. 244-250). Atlantis Press.
[40] Dorn, D., & Sengmueller, P. (2009). Trading as entertainment? Management Science, 55(4), 591-603.
[41] Claudon, P., & Weber, M. (2009). Emotion: Contribution to the psychodynamic study of the development of thought in children without language in interaction. Devenir, 21(1), 61-99.
[42] Barber, B., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292.
[43] Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2016). The discrete emotions questionnaire: A new tool for measuring state self-reported emotions. PloS One, 11(8).
[44] Gueroui, F. (2016). Designing and using the scenario method. Management & Avenir, 87(5), 15-34.
[45] Raheja, S., & Dhiman, B. (2017). Influence of personality traits and behavioral biases on investment decision of investors. Asian Journal of Management, 8(3), 819-826.
[46] Domeignoz, C., & Morin, E. (2016). Emotions Have their Reasons: We Should Listen to Them.. Entreprendre & Innover, (2), 7-15.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Finet, A., Kristoforidis, K., Laznicka, J. (2025). Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 13(2), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Finet, A.; Kristoforidis, K.; Laznicka, J. Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors. J. Finance Account. 2025, 13(2), 71-85. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Finet A, Kristoforidis K, Laznicka J. Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors. J Finance Account. 2025;13(2):71-85. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12,
      author = {Alain Finet and Kevin Kristoforidis and Julie Laznicka},
      title = {Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors
    },
      journal = {Journal of Finance and Accounting},
      volume = {13},
      number = {2},
      pages = {71-85},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfa.20251302.12},
      abstract = {Experimental finance stresses the role of emotions and psychological feelings in understanding the behavior and decision-making of investors on the stock markets. This article focuses on individual investors, who are thought to develop a kind of predisposition to behavioral and cognitive biases. Based on data collected from an experiment in the field of trading and supported by the use of qualitative analysis tools, we demonstrate that the participants in the experiment are more likely to trade in companies with the highest market capitalizations. Indeed, by examining and analyzing the different investment strategies chosen during the experiment, we observe a strong link between the company size and the investment choices. We also highlight, during the experiment, intensive media coverage (or media overexposure) specifically directed to the largest companies. To some extent, this can be explained by the large number of opinions and recommendations issued by financial analysts that are either directly related to companies in the news or focused on companies in the same sector (spillover effects). Financial analysts can therefore be considered as helping to reduce uncertainty and providing guidance for individual investors who are chronically in need of references on the stock markets. In addition, our results suggest that a lack of experience and a low level of familiarity regarding how stock markets work will naturally direct the attention of investors towards companies extensively covered by financial analysts (in other words, large ones) and the most media covered ones. To a certain extent, corporate communications and the marketing of stock market websites would therefore become central markers for the definition of investment strategies. The data collected show the development of “all that glitters attracts” bias, which can be explained by a strong focus on easily available and highly visible information (the availability bias). The more visible they would be, the larger the companies and the more they would be followed by financial analysts. We believe that how information is covered by the media leads to the development of herd behavior. Ultimately, stock market websites would therefore appear to facilitate behavioral and cognitive biases.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Big Is Beautiful: It Matters for Small Investors
    
    AU  - Alain Finet
    AU  - Kevin Kristoforidis
    AU  - Julie Laznicka
    Y1  - 2025/03/21
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12
    T2  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    JF  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    JO  - Journal of Finance and Accounting
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 85
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7323
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfa.20251302.12
    AB  - Experimental finance stresses the role of emotions and psychological feelings in understanding the behavior and decision-making of investors on the stock markets. This article focuses on individual investors, who are thought to develop a kind of predisposition to behavioral and cognitive biases. Based on data collected from an experiment in the field of trading and supported by the use of qualitative analysis tools, we demonstrate that the participants in the experiment are more likely to trade in companies with the highest market capitalizations. Indeed, by examining and analyzing the different investment strategies chosen during the experiment, we observe a strong link between the company size and the investment choices. We also highlight, during the experiment, intensive media coverage (or media overexposure) specifically directed to the largest companies. To some extent, this can be explained by the large number of opinions and recommendations issued by financial analysts that are either directly related to companies in the news or focused on companies in the same sector (spillover effects). Financial analysts can therefore be considered as helping to reduce uncertainty and providing guidance for individual investors who are chronically in need of references on the stock markets. In addition, our results suggest that a lack of experience and a low level of familiarity regarding how stock markets work will naturally direct the attention of investors towards companies extensively covered by financial analysts (in other words, large ones) and the most media covered ones. To a certain extent, corporate communications and the marketing of stock market websites would therefore become central markers for the definition of investment strategies. The data collected show the development of “all that glitters attracts” bias, which can be explained by a strong focus on easily available and highly visible information (the availability bias). The more visible they would be, the larger the companies and the more they would be followed by financial analysts. We believe that how information is covered by the media leads to the development of herd behavior. Ultimately, stock market websites would therefore appear to facilitate behavioral and cognitive biases.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections