This study aims to examine students’ perspective of using eportfolios for their writing assignments and assessment in Indiana University of Pennsylvania (20 males and 38 females) first year freshman writing courses. The data for this research was collected by using Qualtrics survey software and analyzed by the reporting system of the software itself. Some emerging themes came to the surface to provide a positive attitude toward the use of eportfolios. The findings of the research showed that students used eportfolios for submitting assignments and following their progress throughout the semester. Students also used them for feedback, grading, reflection, and reading relevant course material. The findings also touched upon some challenges that students faced while using eportfolios. Most challenges had nothing to do with the software itself but with external factors such as internet connection and computer bugs. However, more research was needed to examine the use of eportfolios over longer time and to examine teachers’ perception of using eportfolios as well.
| Published in |
International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 2, Issue 6-3)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer-Assisted Language Learning & Teaching |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-11 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Eportfolios, Writing, Assessment, Constructivism
| [1] | Aalderink, M. W., & Veugelers, M.H. C. H. (2006). eportfolio and educational change in higher education in the Netherlands. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-portfolios (pp. 358-369). Hershey: Idea Group Reference. |
| [2] | Abrami, P. C., and Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1-15. Retrieved December 17, 2011, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/viewArticle/92/86 |
| [3] | Alawdat, M. (2013). Using e-portfolios and ESL learners. US-China Education Review 3(5),339-351. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543181.pdf |
| [4] | Barrett, H. C (2009). Balancing the two faces of eportfolio. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.org/balance |
| [5] | Barrett, H. (2010). Balancing the two faces of eportfolios. Educação, Formação & Tecnologias, 3(1), 6–14. |
| [6] | Cambridge, D. (2010). eportfolios for lifelong learning and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. |
| [7] | Chang, C. C., Liang, C. & Chen, Y. H. (2013). Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio. Computers and Education 60 (2013), 325-334. |
| [8] | Chang, C. C., Liang, C. & Chen, Y. H. (2012). A Comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers and Education 58(1), 303-320. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.005 |
| [9] | Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2011). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 932-950. |
| [10] | Chien, C. W. C. (2013). Pre-service English teacher’s perceptions and practice of electronic portfolios. CALL-EJ, 1-15. Retrieved from http:callej.org/journal/14-1/Chien_2013.pdf |
| [11] | Cole, D. J., Ryan, C. W., Kick, F., & Mathies, B. K. (2000). Portfolios across the curriculum and beyond, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. |
| [12] | Gebric, P., Lewis, L., & Amin, N. M. (2011). Student perspectives of eportfolios: Change over four semesters. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown and B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, 423-436. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Gerbic-full.pdf |
| [13] | Genc, Z. and Tinmaz, H. (2010). A reflection of preservice teachers on e-portfolio assessment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1204-1508. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042810024614 |
| [14] | Fidel, R. & Pejtersen, A. M. (2005). Cognitive Work Analysis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/fidelr/RayaPubs/CWA-bookchapter.pdf |
| [15] | Hackman, D. G., and Alsbury, T. L. (2005). The use of portfolio assessments for administrator preparation program improvement. Educational Considerations, 32(2), 36-45. |
| [16] | Himpsel-Guterman, K. (2012). A4-Phase Model for the long-term use of eportfolios. International eportfolios and Identity. Retrieved on March 1, 2013 from http://www.epforum.eu/sites/www.epforum.eu/files/ePIC%202012.pdf |
| [17] | Hung, S. T. (2009). Promoting self-assessment strategies: an electronic portfolio approach. Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 129-146. Retrieved December 17, 2011, from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/June_2009_EBook.pdf |
| [18] | Jaramillo, A. J. (1996). Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education. |
| [19] | Johnson, H. L. (2012).Making learning visible with eportfolios: Coupling the right pedagogy with the right technology. International Journal of eportfolio 2(2), 139-148. |
| [20] | Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. |
| [21] | Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
| [22] | Lowenthal, R., White, J. W., & Cooley, K. (2011). Remake/Remodel: Using eportfolios and a System of Gates to Improve Student Assessment and Program Evaluation. International Journal of eportfolio 1(1), 61-70. |
| [23] | Mostafa, A. A. M. (2011). The impact of electronic assessment-driven instruction on preservice EFL teachers’ quality teaching. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1), 18-35. |
| [24] | Peters, M., Chevrier, J., LeBlanc, R., Fortin, G., & Malette, J. (2006). The e-portfolio: A learning tool for Pre-Service Teachers. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-portfolios (pp. 313- 326). Hershey: Idea Group Reference. |
| [25] | Pitts, W. & Ruggierello, R. (2012). Using the e-Portfolio to Document and Evaluate Growth in Reflective Practice: The Development and Application of a Conceptual Framework. International Journal of eportfolio, 2(1), 49-74. Retrieved on February 23, 2013 from http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP43.pdf |
| [26] | Robbins, H. (2004).Reflection and the electronic teaching portfolios: The nature and quality of preservice teachers’ reflective writing. In C. Crawford, N. Dacis, J. Price, & D. Wills, (Eds.), Technology and Teacher Education Annual (pp. 222-227). Norfolk, VA: Association for The Advancement of Computing in Education |
| [27] | Vicente, K.J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
| [28] | Vygotsky (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
| [29] | Wetzel, K. & Strudler, N. (2006). Costs and benefits of electronic portfolios in teacher education: Student voices. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 22(3), 69-78. |
| [30] | Wills, K. V. & Rice, R. (2013). eportfolios performance support system: Constructing, presenting, and assessing portfolios. Colorado, Fort Collins: Te WAC. |
| [31] | Yancey, K. (2001) Digitized student portfolios. In Barbara Cambridge et al. (Eds.) Electronic portfolios” Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional language. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education, 15-30 |
| [32] | Yancey, K. B. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade into the twenty-first century: What we know, what we need to know. Peer Review 11(1), 28-32. |
APA Style
Maha Alawdat. (2014). English Writing Students’ Perspective of Using Eportfolio in the Writing Class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(6-3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11
ACS Style
Maha Alawdat. English Writing Students’ Perspective of Using Eportfolio in the Writing Class. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2014, 2(6-3), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11,
author = {Maha Alawdat},
title = {English Writing Students’ Perspective of Using Eportfolio in the Writing Class},
journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
volume = {2},
number = {6-3},
pages = {1-11},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.s.2014020603.11},
abstract = {This study aims to examine students’ perspective of using eportfolios for their writing assignments and assessment in Indiana University of Pennsylvania (20 males and 38 females) first year freshman writing courses. The data for this research was collected by using Qualtrics survey software and analyzed by the reporting system of the software itself. Some emerging themes came to the surface to provide a positive attitude toward the use of eportfolios. The findings of the research showed that students used eportfolios for submitting assignments and following their progress throughout the semester. Students also used them for feedback, grading, reflection, and reading relevant course material. The findings also touched upon some challenges that students faced while using eportfolios. Most challenges had nothing to do with the software itself but with external factors such as internet connection and computer bugs. However, more research was needed to examine the use of eportfolios over longer time and to examine teachers’ perception of using eportfolios as well.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - English Writing Students’ Perspective of Using Eportfolio in the Writing Class AU - Maha Alawdat Y1 - 2014/09/02 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020603.11 AB - This study aims to examine students’ perspective of using eportfolios for their writing assignments and assessment in Indiana University of Pennsylvania (20 males and 38 females) first year freshman writing courses. The data for this research was collected by using Qualtrics survey software and analyzed by the reporting system of the software itself. Some emerging themes came to the surface to provide a positive attitude toward the use of eportfolios. The findings of the research showed that students used eportfolios for submitting assignments and following their progress throughout the semester. Students also used them for feedback, grading, reflection, and reading relevant course material. The findings also touched upon some challenges that students faced while using eportfolios. Most challenges had nothing to do with the software itself but with external factors such as internet connection and computer bugs. However, more research was needed to examine the use of eportfolios over longer time and to examine teachers’ perception of using eportfolios as well. VL - 2 IS - 6-3 ER -
Information
Email: