An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study

Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi; Sultan Hussein Alharbi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study

Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi^*

, Sultan Hussein Alharbi

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 14, Issue 1)

Received: 27 January 2026 Accepted: 10 February 2026 Published: 25 February 2026

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study investigates how professional academic writers construct Engagement in the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections of review articles (RAs) published in Web of Science (WoS)-indexed journals. The Engagement subsystem from the Appraisal framework is used in the current analysis. The study adopts a comparative, mixed-methods, corpus-based research design. Two academic disciplines are selected for comparison: applied linguistics (AL), representing soft-applied disciplines, and medicine (MD), representing hard-applied disciplines. The results revealed that RAs of MD exhibit higher frequencies of monoglossic Engagement, particularly in the introduction and conclusion sections, compared to those of AL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a disciplinary variation in the distribution of heteroglossic Engagement. AL RAs include higher frequencies of expansive heteroglossic Engagement, which expands the dialogic space and conveys propositions as provisional and open for negotiation. In contrast, MD RAs show higher frequencies of contractive heteroglossic Engagement, which restricts the dialogic space and construes propositions as highly warrantable. These findings might be associated with the variation in the nature of knowledge and epistemological foundations across the soft-applied and hard-applied academic disciplines. The findings of this study have important pedagogical implications for academic writing instructors and curriculum designers. Consequently, this study makes the disciplinary-specific use of Engagement accessible to novice writers struggling to produce RAs that meet discoursal conventions in their disciplines.

Published in	International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 14, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
Page(s)	45-66
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Appraisal, Engagement, Review Article, Academic Discourse, Heteroglossia, Monoglossia

References

[1]	Bennett, K. English as a lingua franca in academia: Combating Epistemicide through Translator Training. Interpreter and Translator Trainer. 2013, 7(2), pp. 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007
[2]	Hyland, K. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum; 2009. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211673
[3]	Jenkins, J, Panero, S. M. GLOBAL ENGLISHES: A Resource Book for Students. 4th ed. New York: Routledge; 2025. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027805
[4]	Mauranen, A. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics; 2012.
[5]	Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan Classics Edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2004. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719
[6]	Paltridge, P. Genre and second-language academic writing. Language Teaching. 2014, 47(3), pp. 303 - 318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000068
[7]	Swales, J. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
[8]	Biglan, A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), pp. 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
[9]	Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.
[10]	Fryer, D. L. Engagement in medical research discourse: A multisemiotic approach to dialogic positioning. New York: Routledge; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041146
[11]	Gotti, M., & Salagar-Meyer, F. Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. New York: Peter Lang; 2006. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0396-0
[12]	Research Approaches in Applied Linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (2 Ed.) Oxford: Oxford Academic; 2010, pp. 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0003
[13]	Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Sydney: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
[14]	Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), pp. 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
[15]	Hyland, K., & Diani, G. Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
[16]	Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal. 2009, 26(2), pp. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
[17]	Noguchi, J. (2009). Reviewing science in an information-overloaded world. In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009, pp. 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244290_3
[18]	Byrnes, H. The Changing Scene for Publishing in Applied Linguistics Journals: Views from Editors. The Modern Language Journal. 2010, 94(4), 636-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01095.x
[19]	Hood, S. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York: Springer; 2010.
[20]	Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. Towards an analysis of review article in applied linguistics: Its classes, Purposes and characteristics. English Language Teaching. 20147(10), pp. 76-88. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n10p76
[21]	Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. Analysing the Macroorganisational Structure of the Review Article Genre in Applied Linguistics. Issues in Language Studies. 2017, 6(1), pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.471.2017
[22]	Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda. Scientometrics. 2020, 124(1), pp. 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7
[23]	Morales, O. A., Perdomo, B., Cassany, D., & Izarra, É. The generic structure of Spanish systematic reviews in Dentistry. Circle of Applied Linguistics to Communication. 2020, 83, pp. 133-146. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.70569
[24]	Myers, G. Stories and Styles in Two Molecular Biology Review Articles. In Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1991, pp. 45-74.
[25]	Noguchi, J. The Science Review Article: An Opportune Genre in the Construction of Science. Linguistics Insights. Bern: Peter Lang; 2006.
[26]	Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. The impact of attitude markers on enhancing evaluation in the review article genre. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 2019, 19(1), pp. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-09
[27]	Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. Analysing Authorial Identity Construction in the Review Article Genre in Applied Linguistics. Studies in English Language and Education. 2022. 19(1), pp. 94-114. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21898
[28]	Alotaibi, H. S. An Exploration of Authorial Stance in SSCI-ranked Journals versus Non-SSCI-ranked Journals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature. 2019, 25(3), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-05
[29]	Amornrattanasirichok, S., Jaroongkhongdach, W. Engagement in literature reviews of Thai and International Research Articles in Applied Linguistics. In Proceedings of the International Conference: DRAL 3/19th ESEA, King Mongkut’s University of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, 2017.
[30]	Alshehri, A. The Construction of Stance and Authorial Voice in Medical Texts Written by EFL Saudi Students and Professional Scholars: A Contrastive Study of the Use of the Appraisal Resources. Ph.D. Thesis, King Saud University, 2020.
[31]	Cheng, F. W., Unsworth, L. Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2016, 24, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.001
[32]	Deng, L., Cheng, Y., Gao, X. Engagement patterns in research article introductions: A cross-disciplinary study. System. 2024, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103204
[33]	Hu, G., Wang, G. Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2014, 14, pp. 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
[34]	Moyano, E. I. Knowledge construction in discussions of research articles in two disciplines in Spanish: The role of resources of appraisal. Journal of Pragmatics. 2019, 139, pp. 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.011
[35]	Sun, F., Zhang, L. Engagement resources across disciplines in research articles: A corpus-based study. Sino-US English Teaching. 2022, 19(9), pp. 332-337. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2022.09.006
[36]	Xu, X., Nesi, H. Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2019, 38, pp. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.003
[37]	Yahya, A., Alyousef, H. S. The construction of stance and authorial voice in medical texts written by professional scholars. Sumerianz Journal of Education, Linguistics and Literature. 2022, 53, 58-70. https://doi.org/10.47752/sjell.53.58.70
[38]	Zhao, J. Appraisal Analysis of the Literature Review Section in Published Journal Articles of Applied Linguistics. 2022. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4146824 (Accessed: Jan. 01, 2025).
[39]	Geng, Y. Appraisal in Discussion Sections of Doctoral Theses in the Discipline of ELT: A Corpus-based Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Warwick, Warwick, 2015.
[40]	Hashemi, A., Mahdavirad, F. A cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, and cross-gender study on Appraisal resources in PhD dissertation abstracts: Martin & White’s (2005) Appraisal Theory in focus. Heliyon. 2023, 9(11), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22074
[41]	Hemmati, A., Validi, M., Chamran, S. Heteroglossic engagement resources in discussion sections of good and excellent Master of Arts theses written by Iranian EFL students in applied linguistics. Teaching English Language. 2023, 17(2), pp. 135-167. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2023.384338.1435
[42]	Hsiao, C. H. Attitudes: Authorial Stance in the Review Genre of Taiwanese MA Graduates. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2019, 7(2), pp. 171-183. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1902171H
[43]	Loghmani, Z., Ghonsooly, B., Ghazanfari, M. Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2020, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2020.100851
[44]	Xie, J. Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2016, 23, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
[45]	Bowker, L., Pearson, J. Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London: Routledge; 2002.
[46]	Dornyei, Z. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 2007.
[47]	Creswell, J. W., Creswell, J. D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th Ed, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2018.
[48]	Creswell, J. W. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 5th Ed. London: Pearson, 2015.
[49]	Baker, P. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
[50]	Biber, D. Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 1993, 8(4), pp. 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243
[51]	Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
[52]	Hunston, S. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. 2^nd Ed, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
[53]	Swales, J. M. Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Pres; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
[54]	Hood, S. Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, 2004.
[55]	Fuoli, M. A stepwise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language. 2018, 25(2), pp. 229 - 258. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15016.fuo
[56]	Al-Busafi, R. Analyzing Stance in Parliamentary Debates: A Corpus-Assisted Study using the APPRAISAL Framework. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, 2022.
[57]	Farnia, M., Saeedi, M., Ataei, Z. A cross-disciplinary study on evaluative strategies in research articles conclusion sections. International Journal of Research in English Education. 2020, 5(1), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.5.1.1
[58]	Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A. M., Mashhadi, A. Evaluative strategies in Iranian and international research article introductions: Assessment of academic writing. Research in Applied Linguistics. 2012, 3(1), pp. 81-109. http://rals.scu.ac.ir/article_10373.html
[59]	Taboada, M., Carretero, M., Hinnell, J. Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast. 2014, 14(1), pp. 127 - 161. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab
[60]	Xie, J. Evaluation in Mainland Chinese English-major MA Thesis Literature Review Chapters. Doctoral Dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2014.
[61]	Zhang, W., Cheung, Y. L. The construction of authorial voice in writing research articles: A corpus-based study from an appraisal theory perspective. International Journal of English Studies. 2018, 18(2), pp. 53-75. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/320261
[62]	Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., Pedersen, O. K. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research. 2013, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475
[63]	Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 4th Ed. SAGE, 2019.
[64]	O’Connor, C., Joffe, H. Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
[65]	Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Saldana, J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd Ed. Sage Publications, 2014.
[66]	Brezina, V. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aljuraywi, J. A., Alharbi, S. H. (2026). An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aljuraywi, J. A.; Alharbi, S. H. An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2026, 14(1), 45-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aljuraywi JA, Alharbi SH. An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. Int J Lang Linguist. 2026;14(1):45-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16,
  author = {Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi and Sultan Hussein Alharbi},
  title = {An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {14},
  number = {1},
  pages = {45-66},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20261401.16},
  abstract = {This study investigates how professional academic writers construct Engagement in the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections of review articles (RAs) published in Web of Science (WoS)-indexed journals. The Engagement subsystem from the Appraisal framework is used in the current analysis. The study adopts a comparative, mixed-methods, corpus-based research design. Two academic disciplines are selected for comparison: applied linguistics (AL), representing soft-applied disciplines, and medicine (MD), representing hard-applied disciplines. The results revealed that RAs of MD exhibit higher frequencies of monoglossic Engagement, particularly in the introduction and conclusion sections, compared to those of AL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a disciplinary variation in the distribution of heteroglossic Engagement. AL RAs include higher frequencies of expansive heteroglossic Engagement, which expands the dialogic space and conveys propositions as provisional and open for negotiation. In contrast, MD RAs show higher frequencies of contractive heteroglossic Engagement, which restricts the dialogic space and construes propositions as highly warrantable. These findings might be associated with the variation in the nature of knowledge and epistemological foundations across the soft-applied and hard-applied academic disciplines. The findings of this study have important pedagogical implications for academic writing instructors and curriculum designers. Consequently, this study makes the disciplinary-specific use of Engagement accessible to novice writers struggling to produce RAs that meet discoursal conventions in their disciplines.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study
AU  - Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi
AU  - Sultan Hussein Alharbi
Y1  - 2026/02/25
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 45
EP  - 66
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
AB  - This study investigates how professional academic writers construct Engagement in the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections of review articles (RAs) published in Web of Science (WoS)-indexed journals. The Engagement subsystem from the Appraisal framework is used in the current analysis. The study adopts a comparative, mixed-methods, corpus-based research design. Two academic disciplines are selected for comparison: applied linguistics (AL), representing soft-applied disciplines, and medicine (MD), representing hard-applied disciplines. The results revealed that RAs of MD exhibit higher frequencies of monoglossic Engagement, particularly in the introduction and conclusion sections, compared to those of AL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a disciplinary variation in the distribution of heteroglossic Engagement. AL RAs include higher frequencies of expansive heteroglossic Engagement, which expands the dialogic space and conveys propositions as provisional and open for negotiation. In contrast, MD RAs show higher frequencies of contractive heteroglossic Engagement, which restricts the dialogic space and construes propositions as highly warrantable. These findings might be associated with the variation in the nature of knowledge and epistemological foundations across the soft-applied and hard-applied academic disciplines. The findings of this study have important pedagogical implications for academic writing instructors and curriculum designers. Consequently, this study makes the disciplinary-specific use of Engagement accessible to novice writers struggling to produce RAs that meet discoursal conventions in their disciplines.
VL  - 14
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi

Department of English, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6757-9796
Sultan Hussein Alharbi

Department of English, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-0442

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Aljuraywi, J. A., Alharbi, S. H. (2026). An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Aljuraywi, J. A.; Alharbi, S. H. An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2026, 14(1), 45-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Aljuraywi JA, Alharbi SH. An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study. Int J Lang Linguist. 2026;14(1):45-66. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16,
  author = {Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi and Sultan Hussein Alharbi},
  title = {An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study},
  journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
  volume = {14},
  number = {1},
  pages = {45-66},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20261401.16},
  abstract = {This study investigates how professional academic writers construct Engagement in the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections of review articles (RAs) published in Web of Science (WoS)-indexed journals. The Engagement subsystem from the Appraisal framework is used in the current analysis. The study adopts a comparative, mixed-methods, corpus-based research design. Two academic disciplines are selected for comparison: applied linguistics (AL), representing soft-applied disciplines, and medicine (MD), representing hard-applied disciplines. The results revealed that RAs of MD exhibit higher frequencies of monoglossic Engagement, particularly in the introduction and conclusion sections, compared to those of AL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a disciplinary variation in the distribution of heteroglossic Engagement. AL RAs include higher frequencies of expansive heteroglossic Engagement, which expands the dialogic space and conveys propositions as provisional and open for negotiation. In contrast, MD RAs show higher frequencies of contractive heteroglossic Engagement, which restricts the dialogic space and construes propositions as highly warrantable. These findings might be associated with the variation in the nature of knowledge and epistemological foundations across the soft-applied and hard-applied academic disciplines. The findings of this study have important pedagogical implications for academic writing instructors and curriculum designers. Consequently, this study makes the disciplinary-specific use of Engagement accessible to novice writers struggling to produce RAs that meet discoursal conventions in their disciplines.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - An Appraisal Analysis of Engagement in Published Review Articles in Applied Linguistics and Medicine: A Corpus-based Study
AU  - Jawaher Abdulaziz Aljuraywi
AU  - Sultan Hussein Alharbi
Y1  - 2026/02/25
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
SP  - 45
EP  - 66
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20261401.16
AB  - This study investigates how professional academic writers construct Engagement in the introduction, literature review and conclusion sections of review articles (RAs) published in Web of Science (WoS)-indexed journals. The Engagement subsystem from the Appraisal framework is used in the current analysis. The study adopts a comparative, mixed-methods, corpus-based research design. Two academic disciplines are selected for comparison: applied linguistics (AL), representing soft-applied disciplines, and medicine (MD), representing hard-applied disciplines. The results revealed that RAs of MD exhibit higher frequencies of monoglossic Engagement, particularly in the introduction and conclusion sections, compared to those of AL. Furthermore, the findings indicate a disciplinary variation in the distribution of heteroglossic Engagement. AL RAs include higher frequencies of expansive heteroglossic Engagement, which expands the dialogic space and conveys propositions as provisional and open for negotiation. In contrast, MD RAs show higher frequencies of contractive heteroglossic Engagement, which restricts the dialogic space and construes propositions as highly warrantable. These findings might be associated with the variation in the nature of knowledge and epistemological foundations across the soft-applied and hard-applied academic disciplines. The findings of this study have important pedagogical implications for academic writing instructors and curriculum designers. Consequently, this study makes the disciplinary-specific use of Engagement accessible to novice writers struggling to produce RAs that meet discoursal conventions in their disciplines.
VL  - 14
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download