The study investigated the quality of tree ear mushroom or Auricularia auricula judae (AAJ) as affected by the pre-treatment blanching and drying. This pre-treatment technique was optimized using RSM in which the independent variables blanching time (hot water), drying temperature (hot air oven)), and responses were fitted to a second order regression model by performing the ANOVA to determine the individual effects of the variables on the responses of the AAJ. whereas the method of association of vitamin chemist as described by Kirk and Sawyer was used to determine the vitamin content of the tree ear mushroom riboflavin and thiamine contents were determined using spectrophotometric method while niacin analysis were carried out using the extracting method filter all the analysis The result revealed that the total vitamin content was observed to have the highest concentration, while riboflavin was the lowest with observed peak values of 4.63% and 0.04% respectively. This result strongly suggests that the fungus is rich and healthy which could be explored for beneficial purposes. And it is recommended that incentive should be given to farmers to cultivate much of the mushroom to meet their natural demands.
Published in | International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11 |
Page(s) | 1-19 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tree Ear Mushroom, Optimization, Vitamin, Blanching, Nutritional Content
EXP. RUN | Blanching Time (SEC) | Drying Time (MINS) | Drying Temp °C | Total Vitamin C | Soluble Vitamin C | Riboflavin | Thaimin | Niacin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20 | 110 | 75 | 2.72 ± 0.02 | 1.48 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 |
2 | 6.59 | 90 | 65 | 3.68 ± 0.02 | 1.84 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.1 | 0.93 ± 0.01 |
3 | 15 | 90 | 48.18 | 4.00 ± 0.1 | 1.78 ± 0.01 | 1.00 ± 0.1 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.01 |
4 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
5 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
6 | 10 | 110 | 75 | 2.98 ± 0.02 | 1.62 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.02 |
7 | 10 | 70 | 75 | 4.12 ± 0.02 | 2.05 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 1.04 ± 0.02 |
8 | 10 | 70 | 55 | 4.33 ± 0.01 | 2.16 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.01 |
9 | 20 | 70 | 55 | 3.85 ± 0.01 | 1.92 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.1 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 |
10 | 23.409 | 90 | 65 | 3.06 ± 0.02 | 1.52 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.01 |
11 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
12 | 20 | 110 | 55 | 2.68 ± 0.02 | 1.83 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.02 |
13 | 15 | 56.364 | 65 | 4.63 ± 0.01 | 2.31 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 1.17 ± 0.01 |
14 | 20 | 70 | 75 | 3.74 ± 0.02 | 1.87 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.1 | 0.94 ± 0.02 |
15 | 10 | 110 | 55 | 3.98 ± 0.02 | 1.99 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.1 |
16 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
17 | 15 | 90 | 81.8179 | 2.74 ± 0.02 | 1.37 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.01 |
18 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
19 | 15 | 123.636 | 65 | 2.11 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.01 |
20 | 15 | 90 | 65 | 3.37 ± 0.01 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | Significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 6.39 | 3 | 2.13 | 32.72 | < 0.0001 | |
A-Blanching Time | 0.9087 | 1 | 0.9087 | 13.97 | 0.0018 | |
B-Drying Time | 4.66 | 1 | 4.66 | 71.65 | < 0.0001 | |
C-Drying Temp | 0.8164 | 1 | 0.8164 | 12.55 | 0.0027 | |
Residual | 1.04 | 16 | 0.0651 | |||
Lack of Fit | 1.04 | 11 | 0.0946 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 7.43 | 19 |
Std. Dev. | 0.2551 | R² | 0.8598 |
Mean | 3.44 | Adjusted R² | 0.8336 |
C.V.% | 7.42 | Predicted R² | 0.7428 |
Adeq Precision | 19.0530 |
Factor | Coefficient Estimate | df | Standard Error | 95% CI Low | 95% CI High | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 3.44 | 1 | 0.0570 | 3.32 | 3.56 | |
A-Blanching Time | -0.2579 | 1 | 0.0690 | -0.4043 | -0.1116 | 1.0000 |
B-Drying Time | -0.5842 | 1 | 0.0690 | -0.7305 | -0.4379 | 1.0000 |
C-Drying Temp | -0.2445 | 1 | 0.0690 | -0.3908 | -0.0982 | 1.0000 |
Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 1.05 | 3 | 0.3486 | 12.45 | 0.0002 | Significant |
A-Blanching Time | 0.1159 | 1 | 0.1159 | 4.14 | 0.0588 | |
B-Drying Time | 0.7494 | 1 | 0.7494 | 26.76 | < 0.0001 | |
C-Drying Temp | 0.1804 | 1 | 0.1804 | 6.44 | 0.0219 | |
Residual | 0.4480 | 16 | 0.0280 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.4480 | 11 | 0.0407 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 1.49 | 19 |
Std. Dev. | 0.1673 | R² | 0.7001 |
Mean | 1.74 | Adjusted R² | 0.6438 |
C.V.% | 9.60 | Predicted R² | 0.4579 |
Adeq Precision | 11.7943 |
Factor | Coefficient Estimate | df | Standard Error | 95% CI Low | 95% CI High | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 1.74 | 1 | 0.0374 | 1.66 | 1.82 | |
A-Blanching Time | -0.0921 | 1 | 0.0453 | -0.1881 | 0.0039 | 1.0000 |
B-Drying Time | -0.2342 | 1 | 0.0453 | -0.3302 | -0.1383 | 1.0000 |
C-Drying Temp | -0.1149 | 1 | 0.0453 | -0.2109 | -0.0189 | 1.0000 |
Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 0.4896 | 2 | 0.2448 | 13.00 | 0.0004 | significant |
C-Drying Temp | 0.2270 | 1 | 0.2270 | 12.06 | 0.0029 | |
C² | 0.2625 | 1 | 0.2625 | 13.94 | 0.0017 | |
Residual | 0.3200 | 17 | 0.0188 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.3200 | 12 | 0.0267 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 0.8096 | 19 | ||||
Std. Dev. | 0.1372 | R² | 0.6047 | |||
Mean | 0.1300 | Adjusted R² | 0.5582 | |||
C.V.% | 105.54 | Predicted R² | -0.2991 | |||
Adeq Precision | 11.1998 |
Factor | Coefficient Estimate | Df | Standard Error | 95% CI Low | 95% CI High | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.0387 | 1 | 0.0392 | -0.0441 | 0.1214 | |
C-Drying Temp | -0.1289 | 1 | 0.0371 | -0.2073 | -0.0506 | 1.0000 |
C² | 0.1338 | 1 | 0.0358 | 0.0582 | 0.2093 | 1.0000 |
Source | Sum of Squares | Df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 0.0200 | 3 | 0.0067 | 13.28 | 0.0001 | Significant |
A-Blanching Time | 0.0060 | 1 | 0.0060 | 12.05 | 0.0032 | |
B-Drying Time | 0.0064 | 1 | 0.0064 | 12.74 | 0.0026 | |
C-Drying Temp | 0.0075 | 1 | 0.0075 | 15.03 | 0.0013 | |
Residual | 0.0080 | 16 | 0.0005 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.0080 | 11 | 0.0007 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 0.0280 | 19 |
Std. Dev. | 0.0224 | R² | 0.7134 |
Mean | 0.1800 | Adjusted R² | 0.6597 |
C.V.% | 12.44 | Predicted R² | 0.4692 |
Adeq Precision | 13.2129 |
Factor | Coefficient Estimate | df | Standard Error | 95% CI Low | 95% CI High | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.1800 | 1 | 0.0050 | 0.1694 | 0.1906 | |
A-Blanching Time | -0.0210 | 1 | 0.0061 | -0.0339 | -0.0082 | 1.0000 |
B-Drying Time | -0.0216 | 1 | 0.0061 | -0.0345 | -0.0088 | 1.0000 |
C-Drying Temp | -0.0235 | 1 | 0.0061 | -0.0363 | -0.0107 | 1.0000 |
Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 0.5924 | 6 | 0.0987 | 75.28 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
A-Blanching Time | 0.0281 | 1 | 0.0281 | 21.40 | 0.0005 | |
B-Drying Time | 0.3311 | 1 | 0.3311 | 252.43 | < 0.0001 | |
C-Drying Temp | 0.1578 | 1 | 0.1578 | 120.35 | < 0.0001 | |
AB | 0.0010 | 1 | 0.0010 | 0.7720 | 0.3955 | |
AC | 0.0003 | 1 | 0.0003 | 0.2383 | 0.6336 | |
BC | 0.0741 | 1 | 0.0741 | 56.51 | < 0.0001 | |
Residual | 0.0170 | 13 | 0.0013 | |||
Lack of Fit | 0.0170 | 8 | 0.0021 | |||
Pure Error | 0.0000 | 5 | 0.0000 | |||
Cor Total | 0.6095 | 19 |
Std. Dev. | 0.0362 | R² | 0.9720 |
Mean | 0.8615 | Adjusted R² | 0.9591 |
C.V.% | 4.20 | Predicted R² | 0.8720 |
Adeq Precision | 30.2982 |
Factor | Coefficient Estimate | df | Standard Error | 95% CI Low | 95% CI High | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.8615 | 1 | 0.0081 | 0.8440 | 0.8790 | |
A-Blanching Time | -0.0453 | 1 | 0.0098 | -0.0665 | -0.0242 | 1.0000 |
B-Drying Time | -0.1557 | 1 | 0.0098 | -0.1769 | -0.1345 | 1.0000 |
C-Drying Temp | -0.1075 | 1 | 0.0098 | -0.1287 | -0.0863 | 1.0000 |
AB | 0.0112 | 1 | 0.0128 | -0.0164 | 0.0389 | 1.0000 |
AC | 0.0062 | 1 | 0.0128 | -0.0214 | 0.0339 | 1.0000 |
BC | -0.0963 | 1 | 0.0128 | -0.1239 | -0.0686 | 1.0000 |
AAJ | Auricularia Auricula Judae |
ADP | Aricultural Development Project |
RSM | Response Surface Methodology |
[1] | Bandoni, R. J. (1984). The Tremellales and Auriculariales: an alternative classification. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan. 25: 489-530. |
[2] | Bernas, E., Jaworska, G., Lisiewska, Z. (2006). Edible Mushrooms as a source of valuable Nutritive Constituents. ACTA Sci. Poly Technol. Aliment. 5(1), 5-20. |
[3] | Brian, P. L., Joshua, M. B., Brandon, P. M. (2013). Systematics of the genus Auricularia with an emphasis on species from the Sourthern United States; North American Fungi, 8(6): 1-25. |
[4] |
Crosby, W. (2019). How to Preserve Mushrooms: 5 Awesome Methods to Know? Downloaded from
https://fungially.com/how-to-preserve-mushrooms-awesome-methods-to-know/ on 22nd March, 2020. |
[5] | Coskuner, Y., Ozdemir, Y. (2000). Acid and EDTA blanching effects on the essential element cow14, 2074-2076. |
[6] | Ergomul, GP. G., Akata, L, Kalyoncu, F., Engonnul, B. (2010). Fatty Acid Compoitions of six wild edible Musroom species. Sci. World Journal. 2013, Article ID 163964: 1-4. |
[7] | Han, P. (2008). Inhibitory effects of chlorosalicylic acid on mushroom tyrosinase and its antimicrobial activities. Food Chemistry, volume 107(2, 15), 797-803. |
[8] | Harding, P. (2008). Collins Mushroom. Miscellany. Publishers- Collins. 9780007828920: Amazon. Com: Books. |
[9] | Hou Xu jie, Chen Wei (2007). Optimization of extraction process of crude polysaccharide from Wild edible Bacu mushroom by response surface methodology. Journal of ScienceDirect vol. 72(67-74). |
[10] | Irina, A. K., Costa, R., Tatiana, K. K., Olga, N. G., Shi, Y. (2015). Chemical composition and nutritional Value of the mushroom Auricularia auIricula judae. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Research, (8): 8: 478-482. |
[11] | Izli, N. (2014). Effect of different drying methods on drying characteristics, colour and microstructure properties of mushroom. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 53(2): 105–116. |
[12] |
Lama, SC. (2020). 3 Nutritional Benefits of Wood Ear Mushrooms. Downloaded from
http://www.livestrong.com/article/329389-benefits-of-black-fungus/ on 22nd March, 2020. |
[13] |
Makau, C. (2017). Follow these steps to preserve your mushrooms for five years. Downloaded from
https://www.nation.co.ke/business/seedsofgold/steps-to-preserve-your-mushrooms-for-five-years/2301238-3808320-12hshoe/index.html on 22nd March, 2020. |
[14] | Mohanan, C. (2011). Macro fungi of Kerala, Kerala forest. Research Institute Peechi, Kerala, India, 670. ISBN 81-85041-73-3, Research Gate. |
[15] | Mutukwa, I. (2014). Drying and Pretreatments Affect the Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Oyster Mushrooms. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science (7-19). Fargo, North Dakota. |
[16] | Muyanja, C. (2014). Effects of pretreatment and drying methods on chemical composition and Sensory Evaluation of Oyster mushroom (pluerotus oestreatus) powder and soup. Institude of Food Science and Technology. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 10(1745-4549). |
[17] | Nicholls, D and Burroughs, R. (2011). Jelly Ear Fungus-Auricularia Auricula – Judae. |
[18] | Nwabueze, T. U. (2010). Review article: Basic Steps in Adapting Response Surface Methodology modelling for bioprocess optimization in the food system. International journal of food science and Technology 45(9): 1768-1776. |
[19] | Patel, S. and Goyal, A. (2012). Recents Developments in Mushrooms as anti-cancer therapeutics: a review; 3 Biotech, 2(1). 1-15. |
[20] |
Panoff, L. (2020). Can You Freeze Mushrooms, and Should You? In Nutrition. Downloaded From
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/can-you-freeze-mushroom#how-to-freeze-them on 23rd March, 2020. |
[21] | Reis FS, Banos L, Martins A, and Ferreira ICFR. (2012) Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of the most widely appreciated cultivated mushrooms: an inter- species comparative Study. Food Chem. Toxicol 50(2): 191-197. |
[22] |
Ruhlman, M. (2009). "Blanching, Shocking, Refreshing". Downloaded from
https://ruhlman.com/2009/01/20/blanching-shocking-refreshing/ on 23rd March, 2020. |
[23] | Xiao, H., Zhang, Q. (2017). Recent Developments and Trends in Thermal Blanching – A Comprehensive Review. In Information Processing in Agriculture, 4(2): 101–127. |
[24] | Zhang, J. J Li, Y, Zhou T. and Xu, D. (2016). Bioactivities and Health Benefits of Mushrooms mainly in China. Research Gate in molecules 21(7): 938. |
APA Style
Michael, I. G., Okwoche, A. S., Mfam, M. E., Edem, C. E., Deg, O. J. D. (2025). The Effect of Independent Variables on the Vitamin Contents of Auricularia Auricula Judae (AAJ) Using Response Surface Methodology. International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11
ACS Style
Michael, I. G.; Okwoche, A. S.; Mfam, M. E.; Edem, C. E.; Deg, O. J. D. The Effect of Independent Variables on the Vitamin Contents of Auricularia Auricula Judae (AAJ) Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Food Eng. Technol. 2025, 9(1), 1-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11, author = {Inah Grace Michael and Ajoma Simon Okwoche and Mfam Egar Mfam and Ceasar Essien Edem and Otu John Deg Deg}, title = {The Effect of Independent Variables on the Vitamin Contents of Auricularia Auricula Judae (AAJ) Using Response Surface Methodology}, journal = {International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {1-19}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfet.20250901.11}, abstract = {The study investigated the quality of tree ear mushroom or Auricularia auricula judae (AAJ) as affected by the pre-treatment blanching and drying. This pre-treatment technique was optimized using RSM in which the independent variables blanching time (hot water), drying temperature (hot air oven)), and responses were fitted to a second order regression model by performing the ANOVA to determine the individual effects of the variables on the responses of the AAJ. whereas the method of association of vitamin chemist as described by Kirk and Sawyer was used to determine the vitamin content of the tree ear mushroom riboflavin and thiamine contents were determined using spectrophotometric method while niacin analysis were carried out using the extracting method filter all the analysis The result revealed that the total vitamin content was observed to have the highest concentration, while riboflavin was the lowest with observed peak values of 4.63% and 0.04% respectively. This result strongly suggests that the fungus is rich and healthy which could be explored for beneficial purposes. And it is recommended that incentive should be given to farmers to cultivate much of the mushroom to meet their natural demands.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of Independent Variables on the Vitamin Contents of Auricularia Auricula Judae (AAJ) Using Response Surface Methodology AU - Inah Grace Michael AU - Ajoma Simon Okwoche AU - Mfam Egar Mfam AU - Ceasar Essien Edem AU - Otu John Deg Deg Y1 - 2025/03/18 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11 T2 - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology JF - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology JO - International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology SP - 1 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1584 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20250901.11 AB - The study investigated the quality of tree ear mushroom or Auricularia auricula judae (AAJ) as affected by the pre-treatment blanching and drying. This pre-treatment technique was optimized using RSM in which the independent variables blanching time (hot water), drying temperature (hot air oven)), and responses were fitted to a second order regression model by performing the ANOVA to determine the individual effects of the variables on the responses of the AAJ. whereas the method of association of vitamin chemist as described by Kirk and Sawyer was used to determine the vitamin content of the tree ear mushroom riboflavin and thiamine contents were determined using spectrophotometric method while niacin analysis were carried out using the extracting method filter all the analysis The result revealed that the total vitamin content was observed to have the highest concentration, while riboflavin was the lowest with observed peak values of 4.63% and 0.04% respectively. This result strongly suggests that the fungus is rich and healthy which could be explored for beneficial purposes. And it is recommended that incentive should be given to farmers to cultivate much of the mushroom to meet their natural demands. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -