| Peer-Reviewed

Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon

Received: 18 November 2021     Accepted: 27 April 2022     Published: 8 June 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The concept of public space, which had its letter of nobility with Habermas, is at the center of democratic organization. It defines an intermediary space between civil society and the State. However, we cannot speak about such a space today without taking into account the complexity of the digital reality that characterizes it. The development of digital technology has redefined the physical borders between States as well as the relationship between citizenship and territory. The use of digital media has also transformed the modalities of collective action by making new forms of intersubjectivity possible, and more spontaneous and direct forms of participation have also emerged. Through the digital effect, the transformation of public space into digital public space reflects big problems of impoverishment of living together and collective action in Cameroon. This paper goes through the different modes of regulation, not without defining its role as a framework that would make public space a place based on communicative action and ethics. It also attempts to organize new forms of digital sociability and to rebuild living together. A moral education focused on redefining the bases of the social contract extended to all virtual spheres is presented as a way of reintegrating the fundamental principles of living.

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19
Page(s) 162-167
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Public Space, Digital Public Space, Social Regulation, Digital Media, Living Together

References
[1] Abolo Mbita Christian, Médias, politique et opinion publique. Les logiques d’influence, [Media, politics and public opinion. The logics of influence]. Yaoundé, Éditions Afrédit S. A., 2020, p. 12.
[2] Bartlett Jamie, The People vs Tech: How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it), Londres, Ebury Press, 2018.
[3] Boisvert, Yves (dir.), Magalie Jutras et Allison Marchildon. Guide d’éthique organisationnelle, Centre d’expertise de gestion des ressources humaines. [Organizational Ethics Guide, Human Resources Management Center of Expertise]. SCT., 2003.
[4] Boisvert Yves, Georges A. Legault, Louis C. Côté, Allison Marchildon et Magalie Jutras. Raisonnement éthique dans un contexte de marge de manœuvre accrue: clarification conceptuelle et aide à la décision – Rapport de recherche, Centre d’expertise en gestion des ressources humaines, Secrétariat du Conseil du trésor, [Ethical reasoning in a context of increased leeway: conceptual clarification and decision support – Research report, Center of Expertise in Human Resources Management, Treasury Board Secretariat]. 2003.
[5] Boisvert Yves, Magalie Jutras, Georges A. Legault et Allison Marchildon avec la collaboration de Louis Côté, Petit manuel d’éthique appliquée à la gestion publique, [Small manual of ethics applied to public management], Montréal, Liber, 2003.
[6] Andrew Feenberg, La pensée de la technique: pour une approche humaniste, [Thinking about technology: for a humanist approach]. Entretien avec Pierre Antoine Chardel, Esprit, n° 390, décembre 2012.
[7] Fraser, Nancy, Transnationaliser l’espace public, dans Nancy Fraser, Qu’est-ce que la justice sociale ? Reconnaissance et distribution, [Transnationalizing public space, in Nancy Fraser, What is social justice? Recognition and distribution]. Paris, La Découverte, 2011.
[8] Girard Charles, Quel espace public pour internet ?, [What public space for the internet?], Esprit, Novembre 2021, p. 3.
[9] Guattari, Félix, Vers une ère Post Média, [Towards a Post Media era] dans Terminal, n° 51, octobre-novembre 1990.
[10] Günther Anders, L’obsolescence de l’homme. Sur l’âme à l’époque de la deuxième révolution industrielle [1956] [The obsolescence of man. On the Soul in the Age of the Second Industrial Revolution], traduit de l’allemand par Christophe David, Paris, Éditions de l’Encyclopédie des nuisances/Éditions Ivrea, 2002.
[11] Hindman Matthew, The Myth of Digital Democracy, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009.
[12] Loiseau Gregoire, Repenser l’action publique à l’heure du numérique [Rethinking public action in the digital age], Les Échos, 4 juin 2019.
[13] Paquot, Thierry, L’espace public, [The public space], Paris, La Découverte, 2009.
[14] Sunstein Cass R., Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2017.
[15] Le renforcement de la gouvernance et de la gestion démocratiques des foules en Afrique: CAFRAD/ EIFORCES/ [Strengthening democratic governance and management of crowds in Africa], Mai 2017, Yaoundé.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ngo Yon Mekeme Michèle. (2022). Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ngo Yon Mekeme Michèle. Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10(3), 162-167. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ngo Yon Mekeme Michèle. Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon. Humanit Soc Sci. 2022;10(3):162-167. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19,
      author = {Ngo Yon Mekeme Michèle},
      title = {Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon},
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {162-167},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20221003.19},
      abstract = {The concept of public space, which had its letter of nobility with Habermas, is at the center of democratic organization. It defines an intermediary space between civil society and the State. However, we cannot speak about such a space today without taking into account the complexity of the digital reality that characterizes it. The development of digital technology has redefined the physical borders between States as well as the relationship between citizenship and territory. The use of digital media has also transformed the modalities of collective action by making new forms of intersubjectivity possible, and more spontaneous and direct forms of participation have also emerged. Through the digital effect, the transformation of public space into digital public space reflects big problems of impoverishment of living together and collective action in Cameroon. This paper goes through the different modes of regulation, not without defining its role as a framework that would make public space a place based on communicative action and ethics. It also attempts to organize new forms of digital sociability and to rebuild living together. A moral education focused on redefining the bases of the social contract extended to all virtual spheres is presented as a way of reintegrating the fundamental principles of living.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Social Regulation and the Digital Public Space in Cameroon
    AU  - Ngo Yon Mekeme Michèle
    Y1  - 2022/06/08
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 162
    EP  - 167
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221003.19
    AB  - The concept of public space, which had its letter of nobility with Habermas, is at the center of democratic organization. It defines an intermediary space between civil society and the State. However, we cannot speak about such a space today without taking into account the complexity of the digital reality that characterizes it. The development of digital technology has redefined the physical borders between States as well as the relationship between citizenship and territory. The use of digital media has also transformed the modalities of collective action by making new forms of intersubjectivity possible, and more spontaneous and direct forms of participation have also emerged. Through the digital effect, the transformation of public space into digital public space reflects big problems of impoverishment of living together and collective action in Cameroon. This paper goes through the different modes of regulation, not without defining its role as a framework that would make public space a place based on communicative action and ethics. It also attempts to organize new forms of digital sociability and to rebuild living together. A moral education focused on redefining the bases of the social contract extended to all virtual spheres is presented as a way of reintegrating the fundamental principles of living.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Communication Sciences, Advanced School of Mass Communication, University of Yaoundé II-Soa, Yaoundé, Cameroon

  • Sections