The paper summarizes the literature on the critical impact of beneficial microorganisms on soil vitality. Common soil microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, algae, protozoa, and viruses contribute significantly to enhancing soil fertility through processes such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization and mobilization, sulfur cycle, composting, and heavy metal remediation. Their abundance and biomass vary significantly across taxa within the uppermost 15 cm of soil, with bacteria dominating numerically and fungi contributing substantially to biomass. These microorganisms mediate essential biogeochemical cycles in soil, including carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles, by facilitating the decomposition of organic matter and recycling soil nutrients. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria like Rhizobium are prevalent symbionts capable of biologically fixing nitrogen. Additionally, bacteria such as Micrococcus spp., Enterobacter aerogens, Pseudomonas capacia, fungi including Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. japonicas, Penicillum spp., and actinomycetes like Streptomyces play crucial roles in phosphorus solubilization, making phosphorus available for plant uptake. This synthesis underscores the critical role of beneficial microorganisms in maintaining soil vitality. These organisms interact with plants through beneficial relationships, influencing soil fertility dynamics by enhancing nutrient availability, promoting plant growth, and controlling pathogens. The use of biofertilizers has emerged as a sustainable strategy to improve crop yields and restore soil fertility, reducing environmental impacts linked to chemical fertilizers. Understanding the intricate dynamics of soil-beneficial microorganism and their interactions with Plants are pivotal for optimizing agricultural practices, ensuring long-term soil health, and enhancing productivity in sustainable farming systems.
Published in | Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12 |
Page(s) | 45-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Microorganisms, Soil Fertility, Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus Solubilization, Sustainable Agriculture
Microorganisms | Number/g of soil | Biomass (g/m2) |
---|---|---|
Fungi | 105–106 | 100-1500 |
Bacteria | 108-109 | 40-500 |
Algae | 104–105 | 1-50 |
Nematodes | 102–103 | Varies |
Protozoa | 103–104 | Varies |
Actinomycetes | 107-108 | 40-500 |
Bacteria | Fungi | Actinomycetes |
---|---|---|
Enterobacteraerogenes | Aspergillusflavus | |
Pseudomonas cepacia | Penicilliumradicum | |
Bacillus licheniformis | A. Niger | Streptomyces |
Micrococcus spp. | Penicillium variable | |
Enterobacterintermedium | A. Japonicas |
Crop | Average yields (kg/ha) | |
---|---|---|
Check | Compost | |
Barley | 1115 | 2349 |
Wheat | 1228 | 2494 |
Maize | 1760 | 3748 |
Sorghum | 1338 | 2497 |
Field pea | 1527 | 1964 |
Microorganisms | Elements | Uptake (% dry weight) |
---|---|---|
Citrobacter spp. | Co and Ni | 25 and 13 |
Bacillus spp. | Cd | 170 |
Chlorella vulgaris | Zn and Cu | 15 and 14 |
Rhizopusarrhizus | Au | 10 |
Aspergillusniger | Hg | 58 |
SPP | Species |
C:N | Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio |
FeSO4 | Ferrous Sulfate |
g/m2 | Grams Per Square Meter |
H2S | Hydrogen Sulfide |
H2SO4 | Sulfuric Acid |
K | Potassium |
N | Nitrogen |
NH3 | Ammonia |
P | Phosphorus |
pH | Potential of Hydrogen |
SO3- | Sulfite |
Zn | Zinc |
Tg | Teragram |
Mn2+ | Manganese |
Cd | Cadmium |
Au | Gold |
Hg | Mercury |
MnCO3 | Manganese Carbonate |
N2 | Nitrogen Gas |
Co | Cobalt |
Cu | Copper |
CO2 | Carbon Dioxide |
Ni | Nickel |
kg/ha | Kilograms Per Hectare |
[1] | Gougoulias C, Clark JM, Shaw LJ. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: Tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014; 94(12): 2362-2371. |
[2] | Shah KK, Tripathi S, Tiwari I, Shrestha J, Modi B, Paudel N, Das BD. Role of soil microbes in sustainable crop production and soil health: A review. Agricultural Science and Technology. 2021; 13(2): 1313-8820. |
[3] | Gupta VV, Germida JJ. Soil aggregation: Influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015; 80: A3-A9. |
[4] | Ortiz AMD, Outhwaite CL, Dalin C, Newbold T. A review of the interactions between biodiversity, agriculture, climate change, and international trade: Research and policy priorities. One Earth. 2021; 4(1): 88-101. |
[5] | Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2013; 37(5): 634-663. |
[6] | Bharti VS, Dotaniya ML, Shukla SP, Yadav VK. Managing soil fertility through microbes: Prospects, challenges, and future strategies. Agro-Environmental Sustainability: Volume 1: Managing Crop Health. 2017; 81-111. |
[7] | Kastner M, Miltner A. Application of compost for effective bioremediation of organic contaminants and pollutants in soil. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2016; 100: 3433-3449. |
[8] | Adal YM. Role of rhizosphere on the soil fertility and availability nutrient. Journal of Global Ecology and Environment. 2023; 19(3-4): 22-30. |
[9] | Halder S, Yadav KK, Sarkar R, Mukherjee S, Saha P, Haldar S, Sen T. Alteration of Zeta potential and membrane permeability in bacteria: A study with cationic agents. Springer Plus. 2015; 4(1): 1-14. |
[10] | Zambrano-Mendoza JL, Sangoquiza-Caiza CA, Campaña-Cruz DF, Yánez Guzmán CF. Use of biofertilizers in agricultural production. Technology in Agriculture. 2021; 193. |
[11] | Bever JD, Platt TG, Morton ER. Microbial population and community dynamics on plant roots and their feedback on plant communities. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2012; 66: 265-283. |
[12] | Hoorman JJ. Role of Soil Bacteria: Update and Revision; 2016. |
[13] | Zhang W, Yu C, Wang X, Hai L. Increased abundance of nitrogen transforming bacteria by higher C/N ratio reduces the total losses of N and C in chicken manure and corn stover mix composting. Bioresource Technology. 2020; 297: 122410. |
[14] | Shridhar BS. Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms. Int J Microbiol Res. 2012; 3(1): 46-52. |
[15] | Dicenzo GC, Tesi M, Pfau T, Mengoni A, Fondi M. Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of the symbiosis between a leguminous plant and a nitrogen-fixing bacterium. Nature Communications. 2020; 11(1): 2574. |
[16] | Datta A, Singh RK, Kumar S, Kumar S. An effective and beneficial plant growth promoting soil bacterium “Rhizobium”: A review. Ann Plant Sci. 2015; 4(1): 933-942. |
[17] | Abdel Latef AAH, Abu Alhmad MF, Kordrostami M, Abo–Baker ABAE, Zakir A. Inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum or Azotobacter chroococcum reinforces maize growth by improving physiological activities under saline conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020; 39: 1293-1306. |
[18] | Alleman AB, Mus F, Peters JW. Metabolic model of the nitrogen-fixing obligate aerobe Azotobacter vinelandii predicts its adaptation to oxygen concentration and metal availability. Mbio. 2021; 12(6): e02593-21. |
[19] | Ambrosini A, De Souza R, Passaglia LM. Ecological role of bacterial inoculants and their potential impact on soil microbial diversity. Plant and Soil. 2016; 400: 193-207. |
[20] | Hazarika SN, Thakur D. Actinobacteria. In Beneficial microbes in agro-ecology. Academic Press. 2020; 443-476. |
[21] | Pankievicz VC, Irving TB, Maia LG, Ané JM. Are we there yet? The long walk towards the development of efficient symbiotic associations between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and non-leguminous crops. BMC Biology. 2019; 17(1): 99. |
[22] | Hozzein WN, Abuelsoud W, Wadaan MA, Shuikan AM, Selim S, Al Jaouni S, Abd Elgawad H. Exploring the potential of actinomycetes in improving soil fertility and grain quality of economically important cereals. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 651: 2787-2798. |
[23] | Swami S. Soil microbes for securing the future of sustainable farming. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2020; 9: 2687-2706. |
[24] | Joshi H, Shourie A, Singh A. Cyanobacteria as a source of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture. In Advances in cyanobacterial biology. Academic Press. 2020; 385-396. |
[25] | Islam W, Noman A, Naveed H, Huang Z, Chen HY. Role of environmental factors in shaping the soil microbiome. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 27: 41225-41247. |
[26] | Kuzyakov Y, Razavi BS. Rhizosphere size and shape: Temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2019; 135: 343-360. |
[27] | Ahmad G, Nishat Y, Haris M, Danish M, Hussain T. Efficiency of soil, plant and microbes for healthy plant immunity and sustainable agricultural system. Plant Microbe Interface. 2019; 325-346. |
[28] | Timpane-Padgham BL, Beechie T, Klinger T. A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. Plos One. 2017; 12(3): e0173812. |
[29] | Naranjo-Ortiz MA, Gabaldón T. Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions. Biological Reviews. 2019; 94(4): 1443-1476. |
[30] | Wang F, Zhang L, Zhou J, Rengel Z, George TS, Feng G. Exploring the secrets of hyphosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Processes and ecological functions. Plant and Soil. 2022; 481(1-2): 1-22. |
[31] | Wahab A, Batool F, Muhammad M, Zaman W, Mikhlef RM, Qaddoori SM, Saqib S. Unveiling the complex molecular dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizae: A comprehensive exploration and future perspectives in harnessing phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable progress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2023; 105633. |
[32] | Ibraheem I. Cyanobacteria as alternative biological conditioners for bioremediation of barren soil. Egyptian Journal of Phycology. 2007; 8(1): 99-117. |
[33] | Bhatti AA, Haq S, Bhat RA. Actinomycetes benefaction role in soil and plant health. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017; 111: 458-467. |
[34] | Gao Y, Lu Y, Dungait JA, Liu J, Lin S, Jia J, Yu G. The “Regulator” functions of viruses on ecosystem carbon cycling in the anthropocene. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 10: 858615. |
[35] | Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Papadopoulos T, Luo Z, Wamba SF, Roubaud D. Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019; 144: 534-545. |
[36] | Jansson JK, Hofmockel KS. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2020; 18(1): 35-46. |
[37] | Vincze ÉB, Becze A, Laslo É, Mara G. Beneficial soil microbiomes and their potential role in plant growth and soil fertility. Agriculture. 2024; 14(1): 152. |
[38] | Fan P, Ouyang Z, Basnou C, Pino J, Park H, Chen J. Nature-based solutions for urban landscapes under post- industrialization and globalization: Barcelona versus Shanghai. Environmental Research. 2017; 156: 272-283. |
[39] | Saleem M, Hu J, Jousset A. More than the sum of its parts: Microbiome biodiversity as a driver of plant growth and soil health. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2019; 50: 145-168. |
[40] | Bakker MG, Chaparro JM, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. Impacts of bulk soil microbial community structure on rhizosphere microbiomes of Zea mays. Plant and Soil. 2015; 392: 115-126. |
[41] | Kong X, Han Z, Tai X, Jin D, Ai S, Zheng X, Bai Z. Maize (Zea mays L. Sp.) varieties significantly influence bacterial and fungal community in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and phyllosphere. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2020; 96(3): fiaa020. |
[42] | Rchiad Z, Dai M, Hamel C, Bainard LD, Cade-Menun BJ, Terrat Y, Hijri M. Soil depth significantly shifted microbial community structures and functions in a semiarid prairie agroecosystem. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022; 13: 815890. |
[43] | Hoorman JJ. Understanding Soil Microbes and Nutrient Recycling. Ohio State University Extension, USA; 2020. Available: |
[44] | Aytenew M, Bore G. Effects of organic amendments on soil fertility and environmental quality: A review. Plant Sci. 2020; 8: 112-119. |
[45] | Harman GE, Uphoff N. Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica. 2019; (1): 9106395. |
[46] | Ladha JK, Peoples MB, Reddy PM, Biswas JC, Bennett A, Jat ML, Krupnik TJ. Biological nitrogen fixation and prospects for ecological intensification in cereal-based cropping systems. Field Crops Research. 2022; 283: 108541. |
[47] | Farhan M, Sathish M, Kiran R, Mushtaq A, Baazeem A, Hasnain A, Moustafa M. Plant nitrogen metabolism: Balancing resilience to nutritional stress and abiotic challenges. Phyton. 2024; 93(3): 0031-9457. |
[48] | Sarmah R, Sarma AK. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: A review. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2023; 54(10): 1306-1315. |
[49] | Amarasinghe T, Madhusha C, Munaweera I, Kottegoda N. Review on mechanisms of phosphate solubilization in rock phosphate fertilizer. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2022; 53(8): 944-960. |
[50] | Ibrahim M, Iqbal M, Tang YT, Khan S, Guan DX, Li G. Phosphorus mobilization in plant–soil environments and inspired strategies for managing phosphorus: A review. Agronomy. 2022; 12(10): 2539. |
[51] | Hayat S, Ali B, Ahmad A. Salicylic acid: Biosynthesis, metabolism and physiological role in plants. Salicylic acid: A Plant Hormone. 2007; 1-14. |
[52] | Tian J, Ge F, Zhang D, Deng S, Liu X. Roles of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from managing soil phosphorus deficiency to mediating biogeochemical P cycle. Biology. 2021; 10(2): 158. |
[53] | Jones DL, Oburger E. Solubilization of phosphorus by soil microorganisms. Phosphorus in action: Biological Processes in soil Phosphorus Cycling. 2011; 169-198. |
[54] | Kumar U, Panneerselvam P, Gupta VV, Manjunath M, Priyadarshinee P, Sahoo A, Annapurna K. Diversity of sulfur-oxidizing and sulfur-reducing microbes in diverse ecosystems. Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects: Volume 1: Soil-Microbe Interaction. 2018; 65-89. |
[55] | Saha B, Saha S, Roy PD, Padhan D, Pati S, Hazra GC. Microbial transformation of Sulphur: An approach to combat the Sulphur deficiencies in agricultural soils. Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in soil: Volume 2: Nutrient Management and Crop Improvement. 2018; 77-97. |
[56] | Bhatla SCA, Lal M, Kathpalia R, Bhatla SC. Plant mineral nutrition. Plant Physiology, Development, and Metabolism. 2018; 37-81. |
[57] | Mahala DM, Maheshwari HS, Yadav RK, Prabina BJ, Bharti A, Reddy KK, Ramesh A. Microbial transformation of nutrients in soil: an overview. Rhizosphere Microbes: Soil and Plant Functions. 2020; 175-211. |
[58] | Rivenbark WL. The rates and mechanisms of manganese retention and release in soils. North Carolina State University; 1961. |
[59] | Mulder EG, Gerretsen FC. Soil manganese about plant growth. Advances in Agronomy. 1952; 4: 221-277. |
[60] | Kaviya N, Upadhayay VK, Singh J, Khan A, Panwar M, Singh AV. Role of microorganisms in soil genesis and functions. Mycorrhizosphere and Pedogenesis. 2019; 25-52. |
[61] | Soliman M, Eldyasti A. Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB): Opportunities and applications—a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 2018; 17(2): 285-321. |
[62] | Ayilara MS, Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO, Odeyemi O. Waste management through composting: Challenges and potentials. Sustainability. 2020; 12(11): 4456. |
[63] | Wei Z, Wu J, Chen X, Qi H, Shi M, Chen Y, Xie X. The importance of microbes in organic matter composting. In Microbes in Agri-Forestry Biotechnology. CRC Press. 2022; 341-368. |
[64] | Edwards S, Arefayne A. The impact of compost use on crop yields in Tigray, Ethiopia. In International Conference on Organic Agriculture and Food Security, FAO, Rome. 2007; 2. |
[65] | Yin K, Wang Q, Lv M, Chen L. Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019; 360: 1553- 1563. |
[66] | Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Mao G, Xu H, Zhang Z, Yang L. A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016; 23: 8244-8259. |
[67] | Rashmi I, Roy T, Kartika KS, Pal R, Coumar V, Kal S, Shinoji KC. Organic and inorganic fertilizer contaminants in agriculture: Impact on soil and water resources. Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management. 2020; 3-41. |
[68] | Masso C, Nziguheba G, Mutegi J, Galy-Lacaux C, Wendt J, Butterbach-Bahl K, Datta A. Soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. 2017; 205-231. |
[69] | Karthik A, Maheswari MU. Smart fertilizer strategy for better crop production. Agricultural Reviews. 2021; 42(1): 12-21. |
APA Style
Adal, Y. M. (2024). The Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Soil Vitality: A Review. Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology, 10(2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12
ACS Style
Adal, Y. M. The Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Soil Vitality: A Review. Front. Environ. Microbiol. 2024, 10(2), 45-53. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12
AMA Style
Adal YM. The Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Soil Vitality: A Review. Front Environ Microbiol. 2024;10(2):45-53. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12
@article{10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12, author = {Yimam Mekonen Adal}, title = {The Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Soil Vitality: A Review}, journal = {Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {45-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.fem.20241002.12}, abstract = {The paper summarizes the literature on the critical impact of beneficial microorganisms on soil vitality. Common soil microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, algae, protozoa, and viruses contribute significantly to enhancing soil fertility through processes such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization and mobilization, sulfur cycle, composting, and heavy metal remediation. Their abundance and biomass vary significantly across taxa within the uppermost 15 cm of soil, with bacteria dominating numerically and fungi contributing substantially to biomass. These microorganisms mediate essential biogeochemical cycles in soil, including carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles, by facilitating the decomposition of organic matter and recycling soil nutrients. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria like Rhizobium are prevalent symbionts capable of biologically fixing nitrogen. Additionally, bacteria such as Micrococcus spp., Enterobacter aerogens, Pseudomonas capacia, fungi including Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. japonicas, Penicillum spp., and actinomycetes like Streptomyces play crucial roles in phosphorus solubilization, making phosphorus available for plant uptake. This synthesis underscores the critical role of beneficial microorganisms in maintaining soil vitality. These organisms interact with plants through beneficial relationships, influencing soil fertility dynamics by enhancing nutrient availability, promoting plant growth, and controlling pathogens. The use of biofertilizers has emerged as a sustainable strategy to improve crop yields and restore soil fertility, reducing environmental impacts linked to chemical fertilizers. Understanding the intricate dynamics of soil-beneficial microorganism and their interactions with Plants are pivotal for optimizing agricultural practices, ensuring long-term soil health, and enhancing productivity in sustainable farming systems.}, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Soil Vitality: A Review AU - Yimam Mekonen Adal Y1 - 2024/10/29 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12 DO - 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12 T2 - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology JF - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology JO - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology SP - 45 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8067 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.12 AB - The paper summarizes the literature on the critical impact of beneficial microorganisms on soil vitality. Common soil microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, algae, protozoa, and viruses contribute significantly to enhancing soil fertility through processes such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization and mobilization, sulfur cycle, composting, and heavy metal remediation. Their abundance and biomass vary significantly across taxa within the uppermost 15 cm of soil, with bacteria dominating numerically and fungi contributing substantially to biomass. These microorganisms mediate essential biogeochemical cycles in soil, including carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles, by facilitating the decomposition of organic matter and recycling soil nutrients. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria like Rhizobium are prevalent symbionts capable of biologically fixing nitrogen. Additionally, bacteria such as Micrococcus spp., Enterobacter aerogens, Pseudomonas capacia, fungi including Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. japonicas, Penicillum spp., and actinomycetes like Streptomyces play crucial roles in phosphorus solubilization, making phosphorus available for plant uptake. This synthesis underscores the critical role of beneficial microorganisms in maintaining soil vitality. These organisms interact with plants through beneficial relationships, influencing soil fertility dynamics by enhancing nutrient availability, promoting plant growth, and controlling pathogens. The use of biofertilizers has emerged as a sustainable strategy to improve crop yields and restore soil fertility, reducing environmental impacts linked to chemical fertilizers. Understanding the intricate dynamics of soil-beneficial microorganism and their interactions with Plants are pivotal for optimizing agricultural practices, ensuring long-term soil health, and enhancing productivity in sustainable farming systems. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -