The oil palm industry contributes significantly to the economic development of producing countries such as Cameroon. Unfortunately, the exploitation of palm oil constitutes a source of environmental pollution due to the production of enormous quantities of waste during its extraction process, including solid sludge generating greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming climatic. All this leads to the search for alternatives which consists of isolating and characterizing indigenous bacteria with biodegradation capacities in sludge from palm oil extraction. The pH and bacterial counts were determined by the potentiometric method and the decimal dilution technique, respectively. The isolated bacteria were identified by their cultural, cellular and biochemical characteristics. In addition, the identification of Gram- bacteria was further explored by the API 20 E gallery. The palm oil biodegradability test was carried out on M2 medium supplemented with 2% palm oil. The solid sludge biodegradability test was carried out on liquid MSM medium supplemented with 4% sludge stock solution. The results showed that the sludge sample had a slightly alkaline pH of 7.3. A bacterial load of around 109 CFU/g of soil was counted. Thirty-one bacterial strains were isolated and purified, including 12 Bacillus sp, 10 Pseudomonas sp, 8 Proteus mirabilis and 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae. All isolates tested for their ability to degrade palm oil or solid sludge grew in culture media with palm oil or solid sludge as the sole source of carbon and energy but with a difference in load. Thus, isolates BI2, BI5, BI31, BI10 and BI 9 showed the highest degradation capacities. These isolates could be used to constitute consortia of microorganisms that can be used in the treatment of waste generated by palm oil extraction.
Published in | Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11 |
Page(s) | 29-44 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biodegradation, Consortium, Isolate, Microorganism, Solid Sludge
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Evaluation of Hydrogen Potential
2.2.2. Isolation, Purification and Storage of Bacterial Isolates
2.2.3. Cultural and Cellular Characterization of Isolates
(i). Macroscopic Appearance
(ii). Microscopic Appearance
2.2.4. Biochemical Characterization of Isolates
2.2.5. Biodegradability Test of Palm Oil and Extraction Sludge Using Isolates
(i). Palm oil Biodegradability Test
(ii). Biodegradability Test of Solid Sludge from Palm Oil Extraction
2.2.6. Data Analyzes
3.1. Evaluation of Hydrogen Potential
3.2. Isolation, Purification and Storage of Bacterial Isolates
3.3. Cultural and Cellular Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
Isolate code | Form | Color | Elevation | Outline | Size | Surface | Opacity | Consistency | Growth on Mossel medium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI1 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI2 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI3 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI4 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI5 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI6 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI7 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI8 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI9 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI10 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI11 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI12 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI13 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI14 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI15 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI16 | Rounds | Whitish | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI17 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | Régulières | Small | Smooth | Translucent | Mucosa | NA |
BI18 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI19 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI20 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI21 | Rounds | Beige | Flat | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI22 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI23 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasives | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI24 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI25 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI26 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Large | Rough | Opaque | Dried | + |
BI27 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI28 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI29 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI30 | Irregular | Beige | Domed | Irregular | Punctiform | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
BI31 | Rounds | Beige | Domed | NA | Invasive | Smooth | Translucent | NA | NA |
Isolate code | Gram stain | cell shape | arrangement | Mobility | sporulation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI1 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI2 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI3 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI4 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI5 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI6 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI7 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI8 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI9 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI10 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI11 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI12 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI13 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI14 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI15 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI16 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI17 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Immobile | NA |
BI18 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI19 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI20 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI21 | Gram + | stick | Isolated | Mobile | + |
BI22 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI23 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI24 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI25 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI26 | Gram+ | stick | Isolated | mobile | + |
BI27 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI28 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI29 | Gram - | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI30 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
BI31 | Gram- | stick | Isolated | Mobile | NA |
3.4. Biochemical Characterization of Isolates
3.4.1. Characterization of Gram+ Bacteria
Stem code | Gram test | Catalase test | Oxidase test |
---|---|---|---|
BI1 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI2 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI3 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI4 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI5 | Gram - | Positive | Negatif |
BI6 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI7 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI8 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI9 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI10 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
BI11 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
BI12 | Gram- | Positive | Positive |
BI13 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
BI14 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI15 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI16 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI17 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
BI18 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI19 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI20 | Gram- | Positive | Positive |
BI21 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI22 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI23 | Gram - | Positive | Negatif |
BI24 | Gram - | Positive | Negatif |
BI25 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
BI26 | Gram + | Positive | Positive |
BI27 | Gram- | Positive | Positive |
BI28 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI29 | Gram - | Positive | Positive |
BI30 | Gram- | Positive | Positive |
BI31 | Gram- | Positive | Negatif |
3.4.2. Characterization of Gram- Bacteria
ONPG | ADH | LDC | ODC | CIT | H2S | URE | TDA | IND | VP | GEL | Species name | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI23 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI29 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI6 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI24 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI5 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI7 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI28 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI22 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI20 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI30 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI10 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI25 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI12 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI27 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI13 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI31 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI17 | + | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | + | - | Klebsiella pneumoniae |
BI11 | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - | + | + | + | Proteus mirabilis |
BI9 | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
GLU | MAN | INO | SOR | RHA | BAG | MEL | AMY | ARA | OX | Species name | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BI23 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI29 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI24 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI10 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI25 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI27 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
BI13 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI31 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI17 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Klebsiella pneumoniae |
BI11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | Proteus mirabilis |
BI9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas sp |
3.5. Biodegradability Test of Palm Oil and Extraction Sludge Using Bacterial Isolates
3.5.1. Palm Oil Biodegradability Test
Bacterial isolates | Growth in the presence of palm oil | Growth in the presence of palm oil and yeast extract |
---|---|---|
BI1 | + | ++ |
BI2 | ++ | ++++ |
BI3 | + | ++ |
BI4 | + | ++ |
BI 5 | ++ | ++++ |
BI6 | + | ++ |
BI7 | + | ++ |
BI8 | + | ++ |
BI9 | ++ | ++++ |
BI10 | ++ | ++++ |
BI11 | + | ++ |
BI12 | + | ++ |
BI13 | ++ | ++++ |
BI14 | + | ++ |
BI15 | + | ++ |
BI16 | + | ++ |
BI17 | + | ++ |
BI18 | + | ++ |
BI19 | + | ++ |
BI20 | + | ++ |
BI21 | + | ++ |
BI22 | ++ | ++++ |
BI23 | + | ++ |
BI24 | + | ++ |
BI25 | + | ++ |
BI26 | + | ++ |
BI27 | + | ++ |
BI28 | + | ++ |
BI29 | ++ | ++++ |
BI30 | + | ++ |
BI31 | ++ | ++++ |
3.5.2. Biodegradability Test of Solid Sludge from Palm Oil Extraction
4.1. Evaluation of Hydrogen Potential
4.2. Isolation, Purification and Storage of Bacterial Isolates
4.3. Cultural and Cellular Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
4.4. Biochemical Characterization of Bacterial Isolates
4.4.1. Characterization of Gram+ Bacteria
4.4.2. Characterization of Gram- Bacteria
4.5. Biodegradability Test of Palm Oil and Extraction Sludge Using Bacterial Isolates
4.5.1. Palm Oil Biodegradability Test
4.5.2. Biodegradability Test of Solid Sludge from Palm Oil Extraction
[1] | Jacquemard, J. C The oil palm. Quae Editions; (2012), 274 p. |
[2] | USDA. World palm oil production by country. (2022), 37p. |
[3] | OCDE/FAO Perspectives agricoles de l’OCDE et de la FAO 2021-2030. Edition OCDE, paris; (2021), 4p. |
[4] | FAO Market Assesment: Oil Crops, Oil and Meals; (2017), 18p. |
[5] |
FAO International Day of Forests. Indonesia’s Forests in the Limelight | FAO in Indonesia | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; (2015), 56p. Disponible sur:
http://www.fao.org/indonesia/news/detail-events/en/c/409648/ |
[6] | Halimah, M., Zulkifli H., Subramaniam V., Tan Y. A., Puah C. W., Chong C., Choo Y. M. Life cycle assessment of oil palm seedling production (Part 1). Journal of Oil Palm Research. (2010), 22(3), 878-886. |
[7] | Pellerin, S., Bamière, L., Pardon, L. Agriculture and greenhouse gases: Ten actions to reduce emissions. Quae Editions; 2015. 202 p. |
[8] | Parveen, F. R., Rajeev, P. S., Hakimi, I. M., Norizan E. Review of Current Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Treatment Methods: Vermicomposting as a Sustainable Practice. World Applied Sciences Journal. (2010), 10(10), 1190-1201. |
[9] | Austin, B., Bucke, D., Feist, S. W., Helm, M. M. Disease problems among cultured bivalve larvae. ministry of Agricuture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Lowestoft, InternaI Report N°16; (1988), p. 22. |
[10] | Goma-Tchimbakala, J., Obambi, N. J. R, Lebonguy, A. A., Gouolally, T. Biodegradation of PAHs from Used Oil by Consortia of Microorganisms Isolated from Polluted Soils of Brazzaville, Congo. European Journal of Scientific Research. (2020), 155(4), 378–387. |
[11] | Marchal, N., Bourdon J. L. Culture media for the isolation and biochemical identification of bacteria. Doin Ed., Paris; (1982), 482p. |
[12] | Delarras, C., Practical Microbiology For The Sanitair Analysis Or Control Laboratory, 1st edition, Paris: Tec Edition and doc; (2007), p. 476. |
[13] | Obayori, O. S., Ilori, M. O., Adebusoye, S. A., Oyetibo, G. O., Amund, O. O. Degradation of hydrocarbons and biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas sp strain LP1. World. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol, (2009), 1615-1623. |
[14] | Joffin, J. N., Leyral, G. Technical microbiology, Volume 1: Dictionary of techniques, 4th edition. CRDP edition of aquitaire; (2006), p. 368. |
[15] | Selmoun, M., Benkhebcheche, D. E. Contribution to the study of the biodegradation of hydrocarbons in drilling muds by bacteria producing biosurfactants. Document of the end of Master cycle for obtaining a Master’s degree in Microbial Ecology; (2016), 77p. |
[16] | Carlone, GM et al. Methods for Distinguishing Gram-Positive from Gram-Negative Bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. (1983), 1157-1159. |
[17] | Singleton, P. Bacteriology, Duonod Edition, 4th edition Paris; (1999), p. 415. |
[18] | Ndzobo, N. E. J., Tavea, M. F., Bella, J et al. Isolation, Screening and Biochemical Identification of Bacteria with Purifying Potential in the Effluents of a Paint Manufacturing Industry. Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology. 8(1), (2022), pp. 6-12. |
[19] | Temesgen, O., Diriba, M., Mulissa, J. Potential applications of some indigenous bacteria isolated from polluted areas in the treatment of brewery effluents. Biotechnology Research International. (2018), Article ID 9745198, 13 pages |
[20] | Oksfriani, J. S., Risjani, Y. Bacteria as indicators of environmental pollution: Review. International Journal of Ecosystem (2014), 4(6), 251-258. |
[21] | Lima, S. D. A., Oliveira, F., Golin, R et al. Isolation and characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from gas station leaking-contaminated groundwater in the Southern Amazon, Brazi. Brazilian Journal of Biology. (2020), 80(2), 354-361. |
[22] | Benyahia, D., Ayadi, M. Characterization of microbial flora of waste sludge from RTC-SONATRACH oil tanks. Thesis for obtaining the state engineer diploma in Environmental Biological Sciences; (2012), 53p. |
[23] | Lebonguy, A. A. Characterization of microorganisms isolated from soil polluted by hydrocarbons and diesel from the bottom of a tank. Unique doctoral thesis, Marien NGouabi University, (2019). 183p. |
[24] | Djien, N. F., Noubou, T. D., Fobasso, T. R et al. Isolation of Bacteria with Purifying Potential and Application in the Treatment of Effluents from an Artisanal Palm Oil Mill in the Littoral Region of Cameroon. Journal of Environmental Protection. (2021), 12, 462-471. |
[25] | Xingjian, X., Wenming, L., Shuhua, T. et al. Petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria for the remediation of oil pollution under aerobic conditions: A perspective analysis. Front Microbiol. (2018), 9, 2885. |
[26] | Benadjila, Isolation and identification of bacteria from soil polluted by hydrocarbons and phenol biodegradation test. Thesis for obtaining the Master's degree in Biological Science; (2017), 53p. |
[27] | Liang, L., Song, X., Kong, J et al. Anaerobic biodegradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by a facultative anaerobe Pseudomonas sp. JP1. Biodegradation, (2014), 25, 825-833. |
[28] | Benchouk, A., chibani Petroleum-hydrocarbons biodegradationby pseudomanas strains isolated from hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. J. fundam. Appl. Sci. (2017), 9(2), 713-726. |
[29] | Lebonguy, A. A., Goma-Tchimbakala, J., Miambi, E., Keleke, S. Isolation and caracterisation of petroleum product emulsifing pseudomonas strains from a generation set fuel tank. African journal of microbiology reasearch, (2017), 11(22), 920-926. |
[30] | Guermouche, M. A. Molecular characterization of bacteria involved in the biodegradation of hydrocarbons. Doctoral thesis in biotechnology, University of Oran, (2014), 153p. |
APA Style
Denis, T. S., Claude, S., Désiré, T. V. (2024). Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous Bacteria with Purifying Potential in Solid Palm Oil Extraction Sludge Generated by SOCAPALM-Mbambou. Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology, 10(2), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11
ACS Style
Denis, T. S.; Claude, S.; Désiré, T. V. Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous Bacteria with Purifying Potential in Solid Palm Oil Extraction Sludge Generated by SOCAPALM-Mbambou. Front. Environ. Microbiol. 2024, 10(2), 29-44. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11
AMA Style
Denis TS, Claude S, Désiré TV. Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous Bacteria with Purifying Potential in Solid Palm Oil Extraction Sludge Generated by SOCAPALM-Mbambou. Front Environ Microbiol. 2024;10(2):29-44. doi: 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11
@article{10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11, author = {Tassong Saah Denis and Simo Claude and Taffouo Victor Désiré}, title = {Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous Bacteria with Purifying Potential in Solid Palm Oil Extraction Sludge Generated by SOCAPALM-Mbambou }, journal = {Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {29-44}, doi = {10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.fem.20241002.11}, abstract = {The oil palm industry contributes significantly to the economic development of producing countries such as Cameroon. Unfortunately, the exploitation of palm oil constitutes a source of environmental pollution due to the production of enormous quantities of waste during its extraction process, including solid sludge generating greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming climatic. All this leads to the search for alternatives which consists of isolating and characterizing indigenous bacteria with biodegradation capacities in sludge from palm oil extraction. The pH and bacterial counts were determined by the potentiometric method and the decimal dilution technique, respectively. The isolated bacteria were identified by their cultural, cellular and biochemical characteristics. In addition, the identification of Gram- bacteria was further explored by the API 20 E gallery. The palm oil biodegradability test was carried out on M2 medium supplemented with 2% palm oil. The solid sludge biodegradability test was carried out on liquid MSM medium supplemented with 4% sludge stock solution. The results showed that the sludge sample had a slightly alkaline pH of 7.3. A bacterial load of around 109 CFU/g of soil was counted. Thirty-one bacterial strains were isolated and purified, including 12 Bacillus sp, 10 Pseudomonas sp, 8 Proteus mirabilis and 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae. All isolates tested for their ability to degrade palm oil or solid sludge grew in culture media with palm oil or solid sludge as the sole source of carbon and energy but with a difference in load. Thus, isolates BI2, BI5, BI31, BI10 and BI 9 showed the highest degradation capacities. These isolates could be used to constitute consortia of microorganisms that can be used in the treatment of waste generated by palm oil extraction. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Isolation and Characterization of Indigenous Bacteria with Purifying Potential in Solid Palm Oil Extraction Sludge Generated by SOCAPALM-Mbambou AU - Tassong Saah Denis AU - Simo Claude AU - Taffouo Victor Désiré Y1 - 2024/04/17 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11 DO - 10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11 T2 - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology JF - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology JO - Frontiers in Environmental Microbiology SP - 29 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8067 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20241002.11 AB - The oil palm industry contributes significantly to the economic development of producing countries such as Cameroon. Unfortunately, the exploitation of palm oil constitutes a source of environmental pollution due to the production of enormous quantities of waste during its extraction process, including solid sludge generating greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming climatic. All this leads to the search for alternatives which consists of isolating and characterizing indigenous bacteria with biodegradation capacities in sludge from palm oil extraction. The pH and bacterial counts were determined by the potentiometric method and the decimal dilution technique, respectively. The isolated bacteria were identified by their cultural, cellular and biochemical characteristics. In addition, the identification of Gram- bacteria was further explored by the API 20 E gallery. The palm oil biodegradability test was carried out on M2 medium supplemented with 2% palm oil. The solid sludge biodegradability test was carried out on liquid MSM medium supplemented with 4% sludge stock solution. The results showed that the sludge sample had a slightly alkaline pH of 7.3. A bacterial load of around 109 CFU/g of soil was counted. Thirty-one bacterial strains were isolated and purified, including 12 Bacillus sp, 10 Pseudomonas sp, 8 Proteus mirabilis and 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae. All isolates tested for their ability to degrade palm oil or solid sludge grew in culture media with palm oil or solid sludge as the sole source of carbon and energy but with a difference in load. Thus, isolates BI2, BI5, BI31, BI10 and BI 9 showed the highest degradation capacities. These isolates could be used to constitute consortia of microorganisms that can be used in the treatment of waste generated by palm oil extraction. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -