Agriculture is the main contributor of the Ethiopian economy as it accounts for about 55% of the GDP, 60% of the foreign exchange earnings and provides livelihood to 85% of the population. The field experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of drip irrigation systems werer agricultural research station, middle awash, Ethiopia. Middle awash is largest irrigated part of the country. It is well gifted with the land, sunshine and highly fortune in available water resources. Drip irrigation has greater water economy over other systems in arid and semi-arid regions characterized by high evaporation rates and it has the potential to increase yields of crops even with reduced irrigation water application. The performance of drip irrigation system was evaluated on the basis of parameters like emitter flow variation (qvar), distribution uniformity (DU), application uniformity (Ea), coefficient of variation (CV), statistical uniformity (SU) and Christiansen uniformity coefficient (UCC). High values of uniformity coefficient and uniformity of distribution are attributed to the effect land levelling. The hydraulic performance of drip irrigation result shows the emitter flow variation (0.07%), emission uniformity (92.2%), coefficient of variation (0.07%), Christiansen uniformity coefficient (90.8) and application efficiency of (85%).
Published in | Engineering Science (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.es.20210604.11 |
Page(s) | 57-61 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Application, Distribution, Efficiency, Emission, Uniformity
[1] | Camp, C. R., E. Sadler, and W. Busscher, A comparison of uniformity measures for drip irrigation systems. Transactions of the ASAE, 1997. 40 (4): p. 1013-1020. |
[2] | Burt, C. M., Rapid field evaluation of drip and microspray distribution uniformity. Irrigation and drainage systems, 2004. 18 (4): p. 275-297. |
[3] | Barragan, J., et al., Water distribution uniformity and scheduling in micro-irrigation systems for water saving and environmental protection. Biosystems engineering, 2010. 107 (3): p. 202-211. |
[4] | Bralts, V. F. and C. D. Kesner, Drip irrigation field uniformity estimation. Transactions of the ASAE, 1983. 26 (5): p. 1369-1374. |
[5] | Wu, I. and H. M. Gitlin, Drip irrigation application efficiency and schedules. Transactions of the ASAE, 1983. 26 (1): p. 92-0099. |
[6] | Gebrehiwot, K. A. and M. G. Gebrewahid, The need for agricultural water management in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2016. 8 (09): p. 835. |
[7] | Hoffman, G. and D. Martin, Engineering systems to enhance irrigation performance. Irrigation Science, 1993. 14 (2): p. 53-63. |
[8] | Tagar, A., et al., Comparative study of drip and furrow irrigation methods at farmer’s field in Umarkot. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2012. 69: p. 863-867. |
[9] | Rockström, J., J. Barron, and P. Fox, Water productivity in rain-fed agriculture: challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in drought-prone tropical agroecosystems. Water productivity in agriculture: Limits and opportunities for improvement, 2003. 85199 (669): p. 8. |
[10] | Playán, E. and L. Mateos, Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. Agricultural water management, 2006. 80 (1-3): p. 100-116. |
[11] | Postel, S., Growing more food with less water. Scientific American, 2001. 284 (2): p. 46-51. |
[12] | Merriam, J. L., et al., Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1999. 125 (2): p. 97-99. |
[13] | Van der Kooij, S., M. Zwarteveen, and M. Kuper, The material of the social: the mutual shaping of institutions by irrigation technology and society in Seguia Khrichfa, Morocco. International Journal of the Commons, 2015. 9 (1). |
[14] | Tanji, K. and C. Keyes, Water quality aspects of irrigation and drainage: Past history and future challenges for civil engineers. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2002. 128 (6): p. 332-340. |
[15] | Luquet, D., et al., ‘More crop per drop’: how to make it acceptable for farmers? Agricultural Water Management, 2005. 76 (2): p. 108-119. |
[16] | Fikadu, R., Effect of Drip and Furrow Irrigation at Different Irrigation Levels on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield, and Water Use Efficiency at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. 2020, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
[17] | Ella, V. B., M. R. Reyes, and R. Yoder, Effect of hydraulic head and slope on water distribution uniformity of the IDE drip irrigation system. 2008. |
[18] | Pereira, L. S., Higher performance through combined improvements in irrigation methods and scheduling: a discussion. Agricultural Water Management, 1999. 40 (2-3): p. 153-169. |
[19] | James, L. G., Principles of farm irrigation systems design. 1988: John Wiley and Sons Limited. |
[20] | Howell, T. A., Irrigation efficiency. Encyclopedia of water science, 2003. 467. |
[21] | Haman, D. Z., A. Smajstrla, and D. Pitts, Efficiencies of irrigation systems used in Florida nurseries. 1996: University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. |
[22] | Christiansen, J. E., Irrigation by sprinkling. Vol. 4. 1942: University of California Berkeley. |
[23] | Prichard, T., et al., Deficit irrigation of quality winegrapes using micro-irrigation techniques. Publications of University of California Co-operation Extension, Department of Land, Air and water Resources, university of California, Davis, 2004. |
[24] | Solomon, K., Subsurface drip irrigation: Product selection and performance. Subsurface drip irrigation: theory, practices and applications, 1993: p. 3-25. |
[25] | Association, E. E., Annual report on the Ethiopian economy. Vol. 1. 2000: The Association. |
APA Style
Fikadu Robi Borena, Robi Borena. (2021). Performance of Drip Irrigation at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Engineering Science, 6(4), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20210604.11
ACS Style
Fikadu Robi Borena; Robi Borena. Performance of Drip Irrigation at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Eng. Sci. 2021, 6(4), 57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20210604.11
AMA Style
Fikadu Robi Borena, Robi Borena. Performance of Drip Irrigation at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Eng Sci. 2021;6(4):57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.es.20210604.11
@article{10.11648/j.es.20210604.11, author = {Fikadu Robi Borena and Robi Borena}, title = {Performance of Drip Irrigation at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia}, journal = {Engineering Science}, volume = {6}, number = {4}, pages = {57-61}, doi = {10.11648/j.es.20210604.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20210604.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.es.20210604.11}, abstract = {Agriculture is the main contributor of the Ethiopian economy as it accounts for about 55% of the GDP, 60% of the foreign exchange earnings and provides livelihood to 85% of the population. The field experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of drip irrigation systems werer agricultural research station, middle awash, Ethiopia. Middle awash is largest irrigated part of the country. It is well gifted with the land, sunshine and highly fortune in available water resources. Drip irrigation has greater water economy over other systems in arid and semi-arid regions characterized by high evaporation rates and it has the potential to increase yields of crops even with reduced irrigation water application. The performance of drip irrigation system was evaluated on the basis of parameters like emitter flow variation (qvar), distribution uniformity (DU), application uniformity (Ea), coefficient of variation (CV), statistical uniformity (SU) and Christiansen uniformity coefficient (UCC). High values of uniformity coefficient and uniformity of distribution are attributed to the effect land levelling. The hydraulic performance of drip irrigation result shows the emitter flow variation (0.07%), emission uniformity (92.2%), coefficient of variation (0.07%), Christiansen uniformity coefficient (90.8) and application efficiency of (85%).}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance of Drip Irrigation at Werer, Middle Awash, Ethiopia AU - Fikadu Robi Borena AU - Robi Borena Y1 - 2021/10/19 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20210604.11 DO - 10.11648/j.es.20210604.11 T2 - Engineering Science JF - Engineering Science JO - Engineering Science SP - 57 EP - 61 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9279 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.es.20210604.11 AB - Agriculture is the main contributor of the Ethiopian economy as it accounts for about 55% of the GDP, 60% of the foreign exchange earnings and provides livelihood to 85% of the population. The field experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of drip irrigation systems werer agricultural research station, middle awash, Ethiopia. Middle awash is largest irrigated part of the country. It is well gifted with the land, sunshine and highly fortune in available water resources. Drip irrigation has greater water economy over other systems in arid and semi-arid regions characterized by high evaporation rates and it has the potential to increase yields of crops even with reduced irrigation water application. The performance of drip irrigation system was evaluated on the basis of parameters like emitter flow variation (qvar), distribution uniformity (DU), application uniformity (Ea), coefficient of variation (CV), statistical uniformity (SU) and Christiansen uniformity coefficient (UCC). High values of uniformity coefficient and uniformity of distribution are attributed to the effect land levelling. The hydraulic performance of drip irrigation result shows the emitter flow variation (0.07%), emission uniformity (92.2%), coefficient of variation (0.07%), Christiansen uniformity coefficient (90.8) and application efficiency of (85%). VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -