Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies

Received: 18 December 2025     Accepted: 29 December 2025     Published: 19 January 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Probiotics play a vital role in maintaining gut homeostasis, modulating immune responses, and promoting overall human health. Traditional approaches to probiotic strain development rely primarily on natural isolation and phenotypic screening, which are time-consuming and lack precision. The current study presents an in silico bioinformatics framework for the rational enhancement of probiotic strains through CRISPR-Cas9–guided design, integrated with structural bioinformatics and immunoinformatics analyses. Sequence homology and conservation were evaluated using BLAST and multiple sequence alignment to identify suitable genetic targets while minimizing off-target similarity. Structural insights were obtained from the PDB and MMDB, with PDB ID 2Z7X which was a representative immune-related protein model. Structural stability and conformational variation of hypothetical modifications were assessed using RMSD-based comparisons. Guide RNA candidates for genome editing were computationally nominated and ranked using E-CRISP and CHOPCHOP, emphasizing predicted efficiency and reduced off-target risk. To evaluate immunological safety, reverse vaccinology–based B-cell epitope prediction was performed using BepiPred, with epitope regions mapped onto three-dimensional protein structures. The integrated pipeline enables the identification of modification-tolerant regions while minimizing immunogenic potential. This purely computational strategy reduces experimental dependency, accelerates strain optimization, and provides a reproducible foundation for future probiotic engineering studies under appropriate biosafety and regulatory frameworks. This study provides a computational foundation for designing safer and more effective probiotic strains for gut health, immunomodulation, and disease prevention. The framework can support functional food development, precision microbiome therapies, vaccine-adjuvant research, and regulatory pre-screening of engineered probiotics while minimizing laboratory costs and biosafety risks.

Published in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (Volume 14, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11
Page(s) 1-12
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CRISPR-Cas9, TLR2, Engineering Probiotics, Structural Biology, Genome Editing, Immunobiotics, Structural Bioinformatic

References
[1] Latif, A., Shehzad, A., Niazi, S., Zahid, A., Ashraf, W., Iqbal, M. W., Rehman, A., Riaz, T., Aadil, R. M., Khan, I. M., Ozogul, F., Rocha, J. M., Esatbeyoglu, T., & Korma, S. A. (2023). Probiotics: mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Frontiers in microbiology, 14, 1216674.
[2] Prajapati, K., Bisani, K., Prajapati, H. et al. Advances in probiotics research: mechanisms of action, health benefits, and limitations in applications. Syst Microbiol and Biomanuf 4, 386–406 (2024).
[3] Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G. et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11, 506–514 (2014).
[4] Sarita Bhutada, Samadhan Dahikar, Hassan Md Zakir, Kovaleva Elena G. (2024). A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, Article 1487641.
[5] Ma, J., Lyu, Y., Liu, X. et al. Engineered probiotics. Microb Cell Fact 21, 72 (2022).
[6] Westermann, L., Neubauer, B., & Kotgen, M. (2021). Nobel Prize 2020 in Chemistry honors CRISPR: a tool for rewriting the code of life. Pflugers Archiv: European journal of physiology, 473(1), 1–2.
[7] Zhang, H., Yan, J., Lu, Z. et al. Deep sampling of gRNA in the human genome and deep-learning-informed prediction of gRNA activities. Cell Discov 9, 48 (2023).
[8] Rahmati, R., Zarimeidani, F., Ghanbari Boroujeni, M. R. et al. CRISPR-Assisted Probiotic and In Situ Engineering of Gut Microbiota: A Prospect to Modification of Metabolic Disorders. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. (2025).
[9] Jin, M. S., Kim, S. E., Heo, J. Y., Lee, M. E., Kim, H. M., Paik, S. G., Lee, H., & Lee, J. O. (2007). Crystal structure of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer induced by binding of a tri-acylated lipopeptide. Cell, 130(6), 1071–1082.
[10] Sathyaseelan, C., Sankaran, D., Ravichandran, P. S., Mannu, J., Mathur, P. P. (2024). Role of Bioinformatics in Sustainable Development. In: Sobti, R. C. (eds) Role of Science and Technology for Sustainable Future. Springer, Singapore.
[11] Kumari, U., & Gupta, S. (2023). NGS and Sequence Analysis with Biopython for Prospective Brain Cancer Therapeutic Studies. International Journal For Science Technology And Engineering, 11(4), 3318–3329.
[12] Kukreja, V., & Kumari, U. (2023). Data analysis of brain cancer with Biopython. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3), 2146–2154.
[13] Yuan, S., Chan, H. S., & Hu, Z. (2017). Using PyMOL as a platform for computational drug design. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 7(2), e1298.
[14] Kumari, U., & Gupta, D. (2022). In silico RNA aptamer drug design and modelling. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 9(4), 718–725.
[15] Soria-Guerra, R. E., Nieto-Gomez, R., Govea-Alonso, D. O., & Rosales-Mendoza, S. (2022). An overview of bioinformatics tools for epitope prediction: Implications on vaccine development. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 97, 107645.
[16] Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Hassabis, D. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873), 583–589.
[17] Graham, B. S., Gilman, M. S. A., & McLellan, J. S. (2022). Structure-based vaccine antigen design. Nature Reviews Immunology, 22(12), 787–799.
[18] Rahman, N. A., Ibrahim, M. A., & Mahmud, S. (2023). Immunoinformatics approaches for microbial protein engineering and safety assessment. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(5), bbad284.
[19] Uma Kumari, Gunika Nagpal "NEXT GENRATION SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF AMYLOID PRECURSOR-LIKE PROTEIN 2 (APLP2) E2 DOMAIN IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, Vol. 12, Issue 1, page no. pp d72-d79, 2025.
[20] Bandbe, T., Johri, V., Kumari, U. (2025). Structure-guided Genome-wide Association Analysis of ALK Variants with GWAS Data Using R. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 13(2), 72-85.
[21] Uma Kumari, Narotham BP "Integrative CRISPR-Cas9 and machine learning Approaches for Target Discovery and Therapeutic Development in Malignant Brain Tumor", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (UGC and issn Approved), Vol. 12, Issue 12, page no. ppc749-c759, December-2025, Available at:
[22] Uma Kumari, Keya Pacholee"In-silico drug discovery-based approach to treat impairments in patients of Alzheimer’s Disease", International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, Vol. 10, Issue 12, page no. b236-b245, December 2023,
[23] Uma Kumari, Meenakshi Pradhan, Saptarshi Mukherjee, Sreyashi Chakrabarti, Ngs Analysis approach for neurodegenerative disease with Biopython, 2023, volume 10, issue 9,
[24] Kumari, U., Johri, V., Dhopate, S., & Jha, T. (2024). Structure based drug designing for the prediction of epitope for targeting malignant brain tumor. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 11(7).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kumari, U., Tirkey, R., Rathi, V. (2026). Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kumari, U.; Tirkey, R.; Rathi, V. Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2026, 14(1), 1-12. doi: 10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kumari U, Tirkey R, Rathi V. Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies. Comput Biol Bioinform. 2026;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11,
      author = {Uma Kumari and Rechel Tirkey and Vipasha Rathi},
      title = {Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies},
      journal = {Computational Biology and Bioinformatics},
      volume = {14},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-12},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbb.20261401.11},
      abstract = {Probiotics play a vital role in maintaining gut homeostasis, modulating immune responses, and promoting overall human health. Traditional approaches to probiotic strain development rely primarily on natural isolation and phenotypic screening, which are time-consuming and lack precision. The current study presents an in silico bioinformatics framework for the rational enhancement of probiotic strains through CRISPR-Cas9–guided design, integrated with structural bioinformatics and immunoinformatics analyses. Sequence homology and conservation were evaluated using BLAST and multiple sequence alignment to identify suitable genetic targets while minimizing off-target similarity. Structural insights were obtained from the PDB and MMDB, with PDB ID 2Z7X which was a representative immune-related protein model. Structural stability and conformational variation of hypothetical modifications were assessed using RMSD-based comparisons. Guide RNA candidates for genome editing were computationally nominated and ranked using E-CRISP and CHOPCHOP, emphasizing predicted efficiency and reduced off-target risk. To evaluate immunological safety, reverse vaccinology–based B-cell epitope prediction was performed using BepiPred, with epitope regions mapped onto three-dimensional protein structures. The integrated pipeline enables the identification of modification-tolerant regions while minimizing immunogenic potential. This purely computational strategy reduces experimental dependency, accelerates strain optimization, and provides a reproducible foundation for future probiotic engineering studies under appropriate biosafety and regulatory frameworks. This study provides a computational foundation for designing safer and more effective probiotic strains for gut health, immunomodulation, and disease prevention. The framework can support functional food development, precision microbiome therapies, vaccine-adjuvant research, and regulatory pre-screening of engineered probiotics while minimizing laboratory costs and biosafety risks.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Engineering Probiotic Strains for Gut Health Enhancement Using CRISPR and Molecular Marker-assisted Technologies
    AU  - Uma Kumari
    AU  - Rechel Tirkey
    AU  - Vipasha Rathi
    Y1  - 2026/01/19
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11
    T2  - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
    JF  - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
    JO  - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 12
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8281
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20261401.11
    AB  - Probiotics play a vital role in maintaining gut homeostasis, modulating immune responses, and promoting overall human health. Traditional approaches to probiotic strain development rely primarily on natural isolation and phenotypic screening, which are time-consuming and lack precision. The current study presents an in silico bioinformatics framework for the rational enhancement of probiotic strains through CRISPR-Cas9–guided design, integrated with structural bioinformatics and immunoinformatics analyses. Sequence homology and conservation were evaluated using BLAST and multiple sequence alignment to identify suitable genetic targets while minimizing off-target similarity. Structural insights were obtained from the PDB and MMDB, with PDB ID 2Z7X which was a representative immune-related protein model. Structural stability and conformational variation of hypothetical modifications were assessed using RMSD-based comparisons. Guide RNA candidates for genome editing were computationally nominated and ranked using E-CRISP and CHOPCHOP, emphasizing predicted efficiency and reduced off-target risk. To evaluate immunological safety, reverse vaccinology–based B-cell epitope prediction was performed using BepiPred, with epitope regions mapped onto three-dimensional protein structures. The integrated pipeline enables the identification of modification-tolerant regions while minimizing immunogenic potential. This purely computational strategy reduces experimental dependency, accelerates strain optimization, and provides a reproducible foundation for future probiotic engineering studies under appropriate biosafety and regulatory frameworks. This study provides a computational foundation for designing safer and more effective probiotic strains for gut health, immunomodulation, and disease prevention. The framework can support functional food development, precision microbiome therapies, vaccine-adjuvant research, and regulatory pre-screening of engineered probiotics while minimizing laboratory costs and biosafety risks.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections