This study provides a comprehensive, quantitative forecast of the dynamic impact of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on forest product exports from nine major Asia-Pacific economies to the EU market. To address the complexity of this policy shock, we develop a novel two-stage forecasting framework that integrates LASSO regression for high-dimensional variable selection with OLS modeling. This approach generates dynamic monthly projections from October 2025 to December 2027, simulating the policy’s effect by combining a historical proxy from the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR) with a calibrated “intensity multiplier” based on the EUDR country-risk classification. Our projections reveal a distinct multi-phase adjustment process across the region: an immediate, sharp contraction in Q4 2025, followed by a period of significant volatility and supply chain disruption throughout 2026, and an uneven recovery in 2027. The findings underscore substantial heterogeneity in impacts driven by the EUDR risk-based framework. Standard-risk countries, such as Indonesia and Malaysia, are projected to face severe volatility and suppressed growth trajectories, with Malaysia’s exports showing particular vulnerability. In contrast, some smaller, low-risk nations like the Philippines may capitalize on a substitution effect, gaining market share as larger suppliers struggle with compliance. The study concludes that the EUDR acts as a powerful disruptive force, reshaping competitive dynamics and necessitating urgent policy responses, including enhanced traceability infrastructure and strategic market diversification, for Asia-Pacific exporters.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14 |
| Page(s) | 149-160 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), Forest Product Trade, Asia-Pacific, Time-series Forecasting, LASSO
| [1] | Yin, Z. H., Li, J. Q., Tian, H., et al. (2011). Impacts of EU Timber Regulation on international trade of forest products and China's countermeasures. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 32(5), 537-541. |
| [2] | Hou, X. Y.; Yin, Z. H.; Qiu, L. Y.; et al. Study on the challenges of EU Timber Regulation to China's wood forest products trade and countermeasures. Forestry Economics 2013, 37, 54-57. |
| [3] | Hou, F. M.; Zhuang, J. Q. Impact analysis of EU Timber Regulation on China's wooden furniture exports to the EU. Journal of Xi’an University of Finance and Economics 2015, 28, 99-105. |
| [4] |
Brack, D. (2017). The European Union’s Timber Regulation: Is it working? Chatham House URL:
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2017/06/european-unions-timber-regulation-it-working |
| [5] | Mao, X. Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, H. F. EU's Regulation on deforestation-free products and its impacts and countermeasures. World Forestry Research 2022, 35, 93-98. |
| [6] | Simonnet, A. The impact of the European Deforestation-Free Regulation on trade relations with Southeast Asia. Regulation (EU) 2023, 1115. |
| [7] |
Permatasari, A. P.; Fauziyah, D.; Naufal, F.; Afian, S.; Nisa, S.; Fetra, T.; Hadad, N. Strengthening Indonesia’s readiness to navigate the European Union Deforestation-Free regulation through improved governance and inclusive partnership. 2024. URL:
https://madaniberkelanjutan.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Madani-Update-EUDDR-ENG_Final.pdf |
| [8] | Jopke, P., & Schoneveld, G. C. (2022). The European Union Deforestation Regulation: A primer for policymakers in producer countries. CIFOR. URL: |
| [9] | Roldan Muradian, Raras Cahyafitri, Tomaso Ferrando, Carolina Grottera, Luiz Jardim-Wanderley, Torsten Krause, Nanang I. Kurniawan, Lasse Loft, Tadzkia Nurshafira, Debie Prabawati-Suwito, Diaz Prasongko, Paula A. Sanchez-Garcia, Barbara Schröter, Diana Vela-Almeida. Will the EU deforestation-free products regulation (EUDR) reduce tropical forest loss? Insights from three producer countries. Ecological Economics. 225(227): 108389. |
| [10] | Anderson, J. E. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am. Econ. Rev. 1979, 69, 106-116. |
| [11] | Larson, J.; Baker, J.; Latta, G.; Ohrel, S.; Wade, C. Modeling International Trade of Forest Products: Application of PPML to a Gravity Model of Trade. Forest Products Journal 2018, 68, 303-316. |
| [12] | Nasrullah, M.; Chang, L.; Khan, K.; Rizwanullah, M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Ishfaq, M. Determinants of forest product group trade by gravity model approach: A case study of China. Forest Policy and Economics 2020, 113, 102117. |
| [13] | Xu, Y. S.; Hou, F. M.; Shi, Z. H.; et al. Impact of EU Deforestation-free Regulation on China's forest products trade: An analysis based on GTAP model. World Forestry Research 2025, 38, 94-101. |
| [14] | Hu, Y. H.; Meng, Q.; Xia, J.; Chen, N. Impact of EU Deforestation-free Regulation on China's forest products trade. Working paper 2025. |
| [15] | Wang, F. T.; Liu, S. T.; Cheng, B. D.; Jiang, Q. E.; Tian, Y.; Xiong, L. C. How Can Intra Industry Trade of Forest Products be Promoted? An Empirical Analysis from China. Forests 2019, 10, 882. |
| [16] | Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1996, 58, 267-288. |
| [17] | Medeiros, M. C.; Vasconcelos, G. F.; Veiga, Á.; Zilberman, E. Forecasting inflation in a data-rich environment: the benefits of machine learning methods. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2021, 39, 98-119. 23. |
APA Style
Hu, Y., Meng, Q., Chen, N., Yuan, M., Xia, J. (2025). Forecasting the Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on Asia-Pacific Forest Product Trade. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 10(4), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14
ACS Style
Hu, Y.; Meng, Q.; Chen, N.; Yuan, M.; Xia, J. Forecasting the Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on Asia-Pacific Forest Product Trade. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2025, 10(4), 149-160. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14,
author = {Yuanhui Hu and Qian Meng and Neng Chen and Mei Yuan and Jie Xia},
title = {Forecasting the Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on Asia-Pacific Forest Product Trade},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {149-160},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20251004.14},
abstract = {This study provides a comprehensive, quantitative forecast of the dynamic impact of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on forest product exports from nine major Asia-Pacific economies to the EU market. To address the complexity of this policy shock, we develop a novel two-stage forecasting framework that integrates LASSO regression for high-dimensional variable selection with OLS modeling. This approach generates dynamic monthly projections from October 2025 to December 2027, simulating the policy’s effect by combining a historical proxy from the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR) with a calibrated “intensity multiplier” based on the EUDR country-risk classification. Our projections reveal a distinct multi-phase adjustment process across the region: an immediate, sharp contraction in Q4 2025, followed by a period of significant volatility and supply chain disruption throughout 2026, and an uneven recovery in 2027. The findings underscore substantial heterogeneity in impacts driven by the EUDR risk-based framework. Standard-risk countries, such as Indonesia and Malaysia, are projected to face severe volatility and suppressed growth trajectories, with Malaysia’s exports showing particular vulnerability. In contrast, some smaller, low-risk nations like the Philippines may capitalize on a substitution effect, gaining market share as larger suppliers struggle with compliance. The study concludes that the EUDR acts as a powerful disruptive force, reshaping competitive dynamics and necessitating urgent policy responses, including enhanced traceability infrastructure and strategic market diversification, for Asia-Pacific exporters.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Forecasting the Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on Asia-Pacific Forest Product Trade AU - Yuanhui Hu AU - Qian Meng AU - Neng Chen AU - Mei Yuan AU - Jie Xia Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14 T2 - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JF - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JO - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics SP - 149 EP - 160 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.14 AB - This study provides a comprehensive, quantitative forecast of the dynamic impact of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on forest product exports from nine major Asia-Pacific economies to the EU market. To address the complexity of this policy shock, we develop a novel two-stage forecasting framework that integrates LASSO regression for high-dimensional variable selection with OLS modeling. This approach generates dynamic monthly projections from October 2025 to December 2027, simulating the policy’s effect by combining a historical proxy from the European Union Timber Regulation (EUTR) with a calibrated “intensity multiplier” based on the EUDR country-risk classification. Our projections reveal a distinct multi-phase adjustment process across the region: an immediate, sharp contraction in Q4 2025, followed by a period of significant volatility and supply chain disruption throughout 2026, and an uneven recovery in 2027. The findings underscore substantial heterogeneity in impacts driven by the EUDR risk-based framework. Standard-risk countries, such as Indonesia and Malaysia, are projected to face severe volatility and suppressed growth trajectories, with Malaysia’s exports showing particular vulnerability. In contrast, some smaller, low-risk nations like the Philippines may capitalize on a substitution effect, gaining market share as larger suppliers struggle with compliance. The study concludes that the EUDR acts as a powerful disruptive force, reshaping competitive dynamics and necessitating urgent policy responses, including enhanced traceability infrastructure and strategic market diversification, for Asia-Pacific exporters. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -