Agriculture contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for roughly one-eighth of total anthropogenic emissions. A major yet underutilized resource within this sector is crop residues, biomass byproducts often discarded or burned in open fields. Such practices release large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, degrade soil quality, and exacerbate air pollution. Conversely, sustainable crop residue management presents a critical opportunity for renewable energy generation, greenhouse gas mitigation, and rural development. This review article synthesizes existing research on the current patterns, technologies, and policy frameworks of crop residue management, with a particular focus on developing countries. It highlights the persistence of inefficient traditional practices such as open-field burning and low-efficiency household combustion, and evaluates cleaner and more efficient thermochemical (e.g., pyrolysis, gasification) and biochemical (e.g., anaerobic digestion) conversion pathways. These technologies can transform crop residues into a variety of valuable bio-products, including biofuels, syngas, biochar, biogas, and digestate, that simultaneously offset fossil fuel use and enhance soil fertility. Drawing on findings from life-cycle assessment studies, this review shows that substituting fossil fuels with crop-residue-derived energy can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 50% and non-renewable energy demand by over 80%. The analysis underscores the dual benefits of crop residue utilization for climate change mitigation and sustainable rural energy access, while identifying persistent barriers such as technological inefficiency, collection logistics, soil carbon trade-offs, and inadequate policy and financial support. The review concludes that integrating sustainable crop residue management into national energy and agricultural strategies is essential for achieving low-carbon development and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Strengthened policy measures, promoting technological innovation, farmer education, and private-sector investment, are crucial to transforming crop residues from an environmental burden into a cornerstone of a circular bioeconomy that fosters energy security, soil restoration, and climate resilience.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13 |
| Page(s) | 137-148 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Crop Residue Management, Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Life Cycle Assessment.
| [1] | Bain, R. L., Overend, R. P. and Craig, K. R., 1998. Biomass-fired power generation. Fuel processing technology, 54(1-3), pp. 1-16. |
| [2] | Born, J. (2005). From sugar factories to biorefineries. Baltic Biorefinery Symposium, 23-32. |
| [3] | Cadenas, A. and Cabezudo, S., 1998. Biofuels as sustainable technologies: perspectives for less developed countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58(1-2), pp. 83-103. |
| [4] | Cao, Y., Gao, Y., Qi, Y. and Li, J., 2018. Biochar-enhanced composts reduce the potential leaching of nutrients and heavy metals and suppress plant-parasitic nematodes in excessively fertilized cucumber soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), pp. 7589-7599. |
| [5] | Cherubini, F. and Ulgiati, S., 2010. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems-A LCA case study. Applied Energy, 87(1), pp. 47-57. |
| [6] | Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A. and Fargione, J., 2015. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. Gcb Bioenergy, 7(5), pp. 916-944. |
| [7] | Davis, S. C., Parton, W. J., Grosso, S. J. D., Keough, C., Marx, E., Adler, P. R. and DeLucia, E. H., 2012. Impact of second‐generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse‐gas emissions in the corn‐growing regions of the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(2), pp. 69-74. |
| [8] | Demirbas, A., 2005. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in energy and combustion science, 31(2), pp. 171-192. |
| [9] | Demirbas, A., 2008. Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections. Energy conversion and management, 49(8), pp. 2106-2116. |
| [10] | FAO. 2014a. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks. |
| [11] |
FAO. 2014b. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use.
http://www.fao.org/resources/infographics/infographics-details/en/c/218650/ |
| [12] | FAO. 2017. Emissions by Sector: Other Sources - Emissions. |
| [13] | FAO. 2019. Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM). Retrieved from |
| [14] | Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C. and Garivait, S., 2009. Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution, 157(5), pp. 1554-1558. |
| [15] | Gera, D., Mathur, M. P., Freeman, M. C. and Robinson, A., 2002. Effect of large aspect ratio of biomass particles on carbon burnout in a utility boiler. Energy & fuels, 16(6), pp. 1523-1532. |
| [16] | Gohin, A., 2008. Impacts of the European biofuel policy on the farm sector: A general equilibrium assessment. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 30(4), pp. 623-641. |
| [17] | Goren-Inbar, N., Alperson, N., Kislev, M. E., Simchoni, O., Melamed, Y., Ben-Nun, A. and Werker, E., 2004. Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Yaaqov, Israel. Science, 304(5671), pp. 725-727. |
| [18] | Gregg, J. S. and Smith, S. J., 2010. Global and regional potential for bioenergy from agricultural and forestry residue biomass. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15(3), pp. 241-262. |
| [19] | Haberl, H., Beringer, T., Bhattacharya, S. C., Erb, K. H. and Hoogwijk, M., 2010. The global technical potential of bio-energy in 2050 considering sustainability constraints. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(5-6), pp. 394-403. |
| [20] | Hiloidhari, M., Das, D. and Baruah, D. C., 2014. Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 32, pp. 504-512. |
| [21] | Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Al Seadi, T. and Oleskowicz-Popiel, P., 2009. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource technology, 100(22), pp. 5478-5484. |
| [22] | Huggins, D. R., Allmaras, R. R., Clapp, C. E., Lamb, J. A. and Randall, G. W., 2007. Corn‐soybean sequence and tillage effects on soil carbon dynamics and storage. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(1), pp. 145-154. |
| [23] | Jain, N., Bhatia, A. and Pathak, H., 2014. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(1), pp. 422-430. |
| [24] | Jiang, D., Zhuang, D., Fu, J., Huang, Y. and Wen, K., 2012. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(3), pp. 1377-1382. |
| [25] | Kantarelis, E. and Zabaniotou, A., 2009. Valorization of cotton stalks by fast pyrolysis and fixed bed air gasification for syngas production as precursor of second generation biofuels and sustainable agriculture. Bioresource technology, 100(2), pp. 942-947. |
| [26] | Kapdi, S. S., Vijay, V. K., Rajesh, S. K. and Prasad, R., 2005. Biogas scrubbing, compression and storage: perspective and prospectus in Indian context. Renewable energy, 30(8), pp. 1195-1202. |
| [27] | Kim, S. and Dale, B. E., 2004. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass and bioenergy, 26(4), pp. 361-375. |
| [28] | Koopmans, A., 2005. Biomass energy demand and supply for South and South-East Asia--assessing the resource base. Biomass and Bioenergy, 28(2), pp. 133-150. |
| [29] | Kristensson, I., 2007. Biogas på gasnätet utan propantillsats. Rapport SGC 176. |
| [30] | Li, Y., Park, S. Y. and Zhu, J., 2011. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 15(1), pp. 821-826. |
| [31] | Liu, H., Jiang, G. M., Zhuang, H. Y. and Wang, K. J., 2008. Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: With special references of crop residues. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 12(5), pp. 1402-1418. |
| [32] | Liu, X., Bayard, R., Benbelkacem, H., Buffière, P. and Gourdon, R., 2015. Evaluation of the correlations between biodegradability of lignocellulosic feedstocks in anaerobic digestion process and their biochemical characteristics. Biomass and Bioenergy, 81, pp. 534-543. |
| [33] | Mohammed, Y. S., Mustafa, M. W. and Bashir, N., 2013. Status of renewable energy consumption and developmental challenges in Sub-Sahara Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, pp. 453-463. |
| [34] | Munasinghe, P. C. and Khanal, S. K., 2010. Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: opportunities and challenges. Bioresource technology, 101(13), pp. 5013-5022. |
| [35] |
National Geographic., 2012. Biomass Energy.
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/biomass-energy/ |
| [36] | Ni, H., Han, Y., Cao, J., Chen, L. W. A., Tian, J., Wang, X., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Wang, Q., Wang, P. and Li, H., 2015. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China. Atmospheric Environment, 123, pp. 399-406. |
| [37] | Nussbaumer, T., 2003. Combustion and co-combustion of biomass: fundamentals, technologies, and primary measures for emission reduction. Energy & fuels, 17(6), pp. 1510-1521. |
| [38] | Obi, F. O., Ugwuishiwu, B. O. and Nwakaire, J. N., 2016. Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 35(4), pp. 957-964. |
| [39] | Özçimen, D. and Karaosmanoğlu, F., 2004. Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake. Renewable energy, 29(5), pp. 779-787. |
| [40] | Patel, M., Zhang, X. and Kumar, A., 2016. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, pp. 1486-1499. |
| [41] | Pathak, H., Mohanty, S., Jain, N. and Bhatia, A., 2010. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium budgets in Indian agriculture. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 86(3), pp. 287-299. |
| [42] | Paustian, L., Babcock, B., Hatfield, J. L., Lal, R., McCarl, B. A., McLaughlin, S., Mosier, A., Rice, C., Robertson, G., & Rosenberg, N., 2001. Agricultural mitigation of greenhouse gases: Science and policy options. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC. |
| [43] | Persson, M., Jönsson, O., & Wellinger, A., 2006. Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection. IEA Bioenergy Task Report, 1-34. |
| [44] | Ress, B. B., Calvert, P. P., Pettigrew, C. A. and Barlaz, M. A., 1998. Testing anaerobic biodegradability of polymers in a laboratory-scale simulated landfill. Environmental science & technology, 32(6), pp. 821-827. |
| [45] | Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R. and Lehmann, J., 2010. Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental science & technology, 44(2), pp. 827-833. |
| [46] | Sahai, S., Sharma, C., Singh, S. K. and Gupta, P. K., 2011. Assessment of trace gases, carbon and nitrogen emissions from field burning of agricultural residues in India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 89(2), pp. 143-157. |
| [47] | Saxena, R. C., Adhikari, D. K. and Goyal, H. B., 2009. Biomass-based energy fuel through biochemical routes: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(1), pp. 167-178. |
| [48] | Scarlat, N., Martinov, M. and Dallemand, J. F., 2010. Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: Potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste management, 30(10), pp. 1889-1897. |
| [49] | Schneider, U. A. and McCarl, B. A., 2003. Economic potential of biomass-based fuels for greenhouse gas emission mitigation. Environmental and resource economics, 24(4), pp. 291-312. |
| [50] | Senghor, A., Dioh, R. M. N., Müller, C. and Youm, I., 2017. Cereal crops for biogas production: a review of possible impact of elevated CO2. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, pp. 548-554. |
| [51] | Sohi, S., Lopez-Capel, E., Krull, E. and Bol, R., 2009. Biochar, climate change and soil: A review to guide future research. CSIRO land and water science report, 5(09), pp. 17-31. |
| [52] | Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Woo, J. H. and Carmichael, G. R., 2003. Biomass burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17(4). |
| [53] | Tambone, F., Scaglia, B., D’Imporzano, G., Schievano, A., Orzi, V., Salati, S. and Adani, F., 2010. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere, 81(5), pp. 577-583. |
| [54] | Wicke, B., Smeets, E., Tabeau, A., Hilbert, J. and Faaij, A., 2009. Macroeconomic impacts of bioenergy production on surplus agricultural land—A case study of Argentina. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), pp. 2463-2473. |
| [55] | Winsley, P., 2007. Biochar and bioenergy production for climate change mitigation. New Zealand Science Review, 64(1), pp. 5-10. |
| [56] | Yang, J. and Chen, B., 2014. Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—a dynamic LCA perspective. Applied Energy, 122, pp. 269-279. |
| [57] | Yevich, R. and Logan, J. A., 2003. An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world. Global biogeochemical cycles, 17(4). |
| [58] | Zaman, C. Z., Pal, K., Yehye, W. A., Sagadevan, S., Shah, S. T., Adebisi, G. A., Marliana, E. and Rafique, R. F., 2017. Pyrolysis: A sustainable way to generate energy. Pyrolysis, p. 1. |
| [59] | Zhang, Q., Yang, Z. and Wu, W., 2008. Role of crop residue management in sustainable agricultural development in the North China Plain. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(1), pp. 137-148. |
| [60] | Zhang, J., Li, J., Dong, C., Zhang, X., Rentizelas, A. and Shen, D., 2021. Comprehensive assessment of sustainable potential of agricultural residues for bioenergy based on geographical information system: A case study of China. Renewable Energy, 173, pp. 466-478. |
| [61] | Gatkal, N. R., Nalawade, S. M., Sahni, R. K., Walunj, A. A., Kadam, P. B., Bhanage, G. B. and Datta, R., 2024. Present trends, sustainable strategies and energy potentials of crop residue management in India: A review. Heliyon, 10(21). |
| [62] | Zhang, J., Chen, M., & Li, Y., 2023. Greenhouse gas reduction through crop-residue-based bioenergy pathways: A life-cycle assessment approach. Energy, 272, 130327. |
| [63] | Prateep Na Talang, R., Na Sorn, W., Polruang, S. and Sirivithayapakorn, S., 2024. Alternative crop residue management practices to mitigate the environmental and economic impacts of open burning of agricultural residues. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p. 14372. |
| [64] | Shen, M., Fisher-Vanden, K. and Wrenn, D. H., 2025. Impacts of Water-Related Building Moratoria on California’s Housing Crisis. Land Economics, 101(1), pp. 53-70. |
| [65] | Yi, N., Shen, M., Erdely, D. and Cheng, H., 2020. Stretchable gas sensors for detecting biomarkers from humans and exposed environments. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 133, p. 116085. |
APA Style
Ma, Z., Shen, M. (2025). Crop Residues Management for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Mitigation. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 10(4), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13
ACS Style
Ma, Z.; Shen, M. Crop Residues Management for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Mitigation. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2025, 10(4), 137-148. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13,
author = {Zekun Ma and Mingzhou Shen},
title = {Crop Residues Management for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Mitigation},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {137-148},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20251004.13},
abstract = {Agriculture contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for roughly one-eighth of total anthropogenic emissions. A major yet underutilized resource within this sector is crop residues, biomass byproducts often discarded or burned in open fields. Such practices release large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, degrade soil quality, and exacerbate air pollution. Conversely, sustainable crop residue management presents a critical opportunity for renewable energy generation, greenhouse gas mitigation, and rural development. This review article synthesizes existing research on the current patterns, technologies, and policy frameworks of crop residue management, with a particular focus on developing countries. It highlights the persistence of inefficient traditional practices such as open-field burning and low-efficiency household combustion, and evaluates cleaner and more efficient thermochemical (e.g., pyrolysis, gasification) and biochemical (e.g., anaerobic digestion) conversion pathways. These technologies can transform crop residues into a variety of valuable bio-products, including biofuels, syngas, biochar, biogas, and digestate, that simultaneously offset fossil fuel use and enhance soil fertility. Drawing on findings from life-cycle assessment studies, this review shows that substituting fossil fuels with crop-residue-derived energy can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 50% and non-renewable energy demand by over 80%. The analysis underscores the dual benefits of crop residue utilization for climate change mitigation and sustainable rural energy access, while identifying persistent barriers such as technological inefficiency, collection logistics, soil carbon trade-offs, and inadequate policy and financial support. The review concludes that integrating sustainable crop residue management into national energy and agricultural strategies is essential for achieving low-carbon development and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Strengthened policy measures, promoting technological innovation, farmer education, and private-sector investment, are crucial to transforming crop residues from an environmental burden into a cornerstone of a circular bioeconomy that fosters energy security, soil restoration, and climate resilience.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Crop Residues Management for Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Mitigation AU - Zekun Ma AU - Mingzhou Shen Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13 T2 - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JF - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JO - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics SP - 137 EP - 148 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20251004.13 AB - Agriculture contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for roughly one-eighth of total anthropogenic emissions. A major yet underutilized resource within this sector is crop residues, biomass byproducts often discarded or burned in open fields. Such practices release large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, degrade soil quality, and exacerbate air pollution. Conversely, sustainable crop residue management presents a critical opportunity for renewable energy generation, greenhouse gas mitigation, and rural development. This review article synthesizes existing research on the current patterns, technologies, and policy frameworks of crop residue management, with a particular focus on developing countries. It highlights the persistence of inefficient traditional practices such as open-field burning and low-efficiency household combustion, and evaluates cleaner and more efficient thermochemical (e.g., pyrolysis, gasification) and biochemical (e.g., anaerobic digestion) conversion pathways. These technologies can transform crop residues into a variety of valuable bio-products, including biofuels, syngas, biochar, biogas, and digestate, that simultaneously offset fossil fuel use and enhance soil fertility. Drawing on findings from life-cycle assessment studies, this review shows that substituting fossil fuels with crop-residue-derived energy can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 50% and non-renewable energy demand by over 80%. The analysis underscores the dual benefits of crop residue utilization for climate change mitigation and sustainable rural energy access, while identifying persistent barriers such as technological inefficiency, collection logistics, soil carbon trade-offs, and inadequate policy and financial support. The review concludes that integrating sustainable crop residue management into national energy and agricultural strategies is essential for achieving low-carbon development and advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. Strengthened policy measures, promoting technological innovation, farmer education, and private-sector investment, are crucial to transforming crop residues from an environmental burden into a cornerstone of a circular bioeconomy that fosters energy security, soil restoration, and climate resilience. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -