The visual interpretation of water samples obtained around some selected dumpsites in federal capital territory, Abuja was done. The interpretation was done in order to ascertain the sources/evolution and the fate of the dissolved constituent of the water samples. The study was necessitated by the fact that the visual interpretation of the aqueous geochemical will reveal the process(s) that predominantly influence the water chemistry. The water samples obtained around these dumpsites were analyzed geochemically in a quality assured laboratory. The geochemical data obtained from the geochemical analyses were interpreted using visual procedures like Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, H-FED and Gaillardet diagram. More than 85% of the water samples are confined to Calcium-bicarbonate field (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium- bicarbonate field ((Ca-Na-HCO3). The result suggests that there is a clear contribution from the weathering of surrounding basement rocks with the weak acids in the water samples exceeding the strong acids. It was also deduced that water rock interactions is the dominant process that govern the composition of the water samples. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive visual interpretation of the hydro-geochemical characteristics of water samples collected in the vicinity of selected dumpsites within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The primary objective was to ascertain the sources, evolution, and fate of the water's dissolved constituents, thereby identifying the dominant processes influencing its overall chemistry. The research was initiated based on the critical need to understand how localized anthropogenic activities, such as waste disposal, interact with the underlying geology to affect groundwater quality in a rapidly urbanizing environment. Following a rigorous, quality-assured geochemical analysis in a certified laboratory, the data were subjected to a suite of established visual interpretation methods. The analytical data, encompassing a wide range of major ions, were plotted on several hydro-geochemical diagrams, including Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, HFE-D, and Gaillardet. These graphical tools collectively provided a multi-faceted perspective on the water's hydro-chemical facies and its evolutionary path. The collective findings from these diagrams were highly consistent. Over 85% of the water samples were classified within the Calcium-bicarbonate (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium-bicarbonate (Ca-Na-HCO3) fields. This hydro-chemical signature unequivocally points to water-rock interaction as the primary process governing the composition of the groundwater. The results suggest a clear and substantial contribution from the chemical weathering of the surrounding basement rocks. Furthermore, the predominance of bicarbonate as a major anion indicates that weak acids are significantly more prevalent than strong acids in the water samples. These findings underscore that while dumpsites remain a potential source of localized contamination, the overarching hydro-chemical signature and compositional evolution of the groundwater in the study area are fundamentally controlled by natural geological processes.
Published in | American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11 |
Page(s) | 42-56 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dumpsites, Visual Interpretation, Water Samples, Abuja, Weathering
Sample | Label | EC | TDS | HCO3 | Cl | pH | PO4 | SO4 | Na | K | Mg | Ca |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWw1 | Bwari | 134.00 | 254 | 506 | 56.2 | 6.93 | 0.045 | 47.2 | 64.7 | 10.2 | 35.4 | 56.2 |
BWw2 | Bwari | 127.00 | 224 | 368 | 36.1 | 6.69 | 0 | 2.41 | 22.2 | 7.11 | 5.09 | 20.6 |
BWw3 | Bwari | 11.00 | 270 | 414 | 56.4 | 6.49 | 0.015 | 47.1 | 38.4 | 10 | 35.8 | 51.6 |
BWw4 | Bwari | 91.00 | 208 | 311 | 36.3 | 6.57 | 1.54 | 3.57 | 38.2 | 15.2 | 5.08 | 35.4 |
GWw1 | Gwagwalada | 121.00 | 320 | 207 | 122 | 6.39 | 0.028 | 30.2 | 50.4 | 34.9 | 17.9 | 34.4 |
GWw2 | Gwagwalada | 162.00 | 209 | 299 | 117 | 6.84 | 0.034 | 41.1 | 54 | 11.5 | 29.1 | 76.7 |
GWw3 | Gwagwalada | 117.00 | 245 | 322 | 55.8 | 6.47 | 0.015 | 47.3 | 63.2 | 10.2 | 29.2 | 54.5 |
GWw4 | Gwagwalada | 97.00 | 234 | 311 | 46.7 | 6.70 | 0.014 | 30.5 | 50.1 | 13.4 | 25 | 46.5 |
KWw1 | Kubwa | 165.00 | 243 | 219 | 0.87 | 6.35 | 0.063 | 0.69 | 12 | 2.22 | 2.63 | 26.7 |
KWw2 | Kubwa | 198.00 | 309 | 299 | 33.2 | 6.43 | 0.03 | 33.5 | 21.7 | 5.14 | 9.61 | 58.9 |
KWw3 | Kubwa | 113.00 | 219 | 265 | 21.8 | 6.76 | 0.017 | 1.52 | 25.6 | 32.8 | 15.9 | 46.4 |
KWw4 | Kubwa | 87.00 | 323 | 368 | 54.7 | 6.69 | 0.009 | 53.4 | 62.9 | 8.98 | 32.3 | 52.5 |
KWw5 | Kubwa | 134.00 | 233 | 368 | 55.8 | 6.69 | 0.016 | 46.6 | 65.1 | 9.51 | 33.6 | 57.5 |
KRSw1 | Karshi | 187.00 | 183 | 173 | 18 | 6.39 | 0.008 | 9.58 | 23.3 | 54.3 | 13.3 | 31.2 |
KRSw2 | Karshi | 111.00 | 167 | 417 | 86.3 | 6.93 | 0.071 | 38.3 | 43.5 | 11.4 | 44 | 51.3 |
KRSw3 | Karshi | 142.00 | 320 | 342 | 43.1 | 6.69 | 0.67 | 17.2 | 43.9 | 8.5 | 7.48 | 67.9 |
KRSw4 | Karshi | 78.67 | 200 | 321 | 48.4 | 6.49 | 0.015 | 47.1 | 38.4 | 10 | 35.8 | 51.6 |
GOw1 | Gosa | 162.00 | 235 | 299 | 45.4 | 6.84 | 0.051 | 40.9 | 61 | 8.18 | 34.7 | 62.8 |
GOw2 | Gosa | 168.00 | 304 | 306 | 41.7 | 6.47 | 0.047 | 34.3 | 48.4 | 12.4 | 30.1 | 51.1 |
GOw3 | Gosa | 123.00 | 243 | 216 | 15.9 | 6.70 | 0.045 | 37.8 | 62.4 | 11.4 | 36 | 38.9 |
GOw4 | Gosa | 125.00 | 236 | 426 | 45.8 | 6.93 | 0.076 | 53.8 | 50 | 9.8 | 31.7 | 46.6 |
AZHw1 | Azhata | 132.00 | 198 | 254 | 40.7 | 6.69 | 0.87 | 4.04 | 41.6 | 10.43 | 16.42 | 37.8 |
AZHw2 | Azhata | 112.00 | 248 | 394 | 36.5 | 6.49 | 0.26 | 14.7 | 36.8 | 9.4 | 26.2 | 52.1 |
AZHw3 | Azhata | 123.00 | 211 | 279 | 33.6 | 6.57 | 0.78 | 28.6 | 31 | 12.5 | 15.21 | 24.6 |
KUJw1 | Kuje | 132.00 | 174 | 260 | 116 | 6.39 | 0.167 | 27.5 | 44 | 18.8 | 14.6 | 21.5 |
KUJw2 | Kuje | 107.00 | 215 | 267 | 58.9 | 6.84 | 0.079 | 37 | 32 | 8.65 | 19.8 | 24.7 |
KUJw3 | Kuje | 131.00 | 241 | 308 | 36.4 | 6.47 | 0.56 | 21.6 | 33.1 | 9.6 | 15.6 | 18.9 |
Sample | Label | NO3 -N | Cu | Cd | As | Zn | Pb | Mn | Ni | Fe | Cr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BWw1 | Bwari | 6.84 | 4.31 | 0.005 | 0.015 | 9.85 | 0.026 | 0.521 | 0.0711 | 0.525 | 0.062 |
BWw2 | Bwari | 1.83 | 2.08 | 0.001 | 0.052 | 4.66 | 0.015 | 0.64 | 0.043 | 1.104 | 0.077 |
BWw3 | Bwari | 4.9 | 2.08 | 0.008 | 0.017 | 8.37 | 0.013 | 0.93 | 0.15 | 0.433 | 0.109 |
BWw4 | Bwari | 0 | 1.56 | 0.0011 | 0.0178 | 12.3 | 0.019 | 0.739 | 0.055 | 0.106 | 0.0138 |
GWw1 | Gwagwalada | 0.349 | 2.54 | 0.01 | 0.051 | 6.86 | 0.13 | 1.037 | 0.045 | 0.941 | 0.096 |
GWw2 | Gwagwalada | 6.52 | 1.15 | 0 | 0.007 | 4.75 | 0.011 | 0.899 | 0.075 | 0.289 | 0.0101 |
GWw3 | Gwagwalada | 24.6 | 2.82 | 0.0013 | 0.034 | 8.24 | 0.018 | 0.41 | 0.0374 | 0.268 | 0.089 |
GWw4 | Gwagwalada | 3.26 | 1.08 | 0.0015 | 0.011 | 1.65 | 0.0186 | 0.744 | 0.086 | 0.139 | 0.019 |
KWw1 | Kubwa | 0.132 | 0.24 | 0.0016 | 0.067 | 4.72 | 0.011 | 1.106 | 0 | 1.086 | 0.079 |
KWw2 | Kubwa | 0.324 | 0.64 | 0.0014 | 0.019 | 9.53 | 0.014 | 1.02 | 0.022 | 1.015 | 0.098 |
KWw3 | Kubwa | 0 | 4.46 | 0 | 0.025 | 3.62 | 0.017 | 0.238 | 0.0466 | 0.522 | 0.034 |
KWw4 | Kubwa | 9.24 | 0.7 | 0.0015 | 0.019 | 7.06 | 0.024 | 0.68 | 0.0745 | 0.604 | 0.017 |
KWw5 | Kubwa | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.0016 | 0.016 | 5.93 | 0.042 | 0.19 | 0.017 | 0.278 | 0.03 |
KRSw1 | Karshi | 0.118 | 1.28 | 0.001 | 0.018 | 9.56 | 0.0235 | 0.25 | 0.024 | 0.136 | 0.095 |
KRSw2 | Karshi | 8.71 | 5.62 | 0.0015 | 0.022 | 2.08 | 0.019 | 0.712 | 0.089 | 0.587 | 0.0112 |
KRSw3 | Karshi | 1.65 | 2.08 | 0.001 | 0.0152 | 4.66 | 0.025 | 0.64 | 0.043 | 0.146 | 0.057 |
KRSw4 | Karshi | 4.9 | 1.98 | 0.005 | 0.017 | 8.37 | 0.003 | 0.93 | 0.015 | 0.433 | 0.0109 |
GOw1 | Gosa | 10.12 | 1.56 | 0.001 | 0.078 | 12.3 | 0.022 | 0.739 | 0.0505 | 0.106 | 0.038 |
GOw2 | Gosa | 37.6 | 2.54 | 0.0011 | 0.011 | 6.86 | 0.013 | 0.77 | 0.0415 | 0.941 | 0.096 |
GOw3 | Gosa | 5.07 | 1.15 | 0.013 | 0.007 | 4.75 | 0.011 | 0.899 | 0.075 | 0.289 | 0.015 |
GOw4 | Gosa | 10.5 | 2.82 | 0.001 | 0.0134 | 8.24 | 0.018 | 0.459 | 0.0304 | 0.255 | 0.089 |
AZHw1 | Azhata | 3.25 | 1.08 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 16.5 | 0.0126 | 0.744 | 0.086 | 1.09 | 0.0109 |
AZHw2 | Azhata | 8.19 | 0.24 | 0.001 | 0.015 | 4.72 | 0.021 | 0.646 | 0 | 1 | 0.091 |
AZHw3 | Azhata | 0.98 | 1.56 | 0.0011 | 0.0108 | 12.3 | 0.009 | 0.739 | 0.051 | 0.106 | 0.01 |
KUJw1 | Kuje | 0.596 | 2.54 | 0.0016 | 0.0191 | 6.86 | 0.013 | 0.437 | 0.045 | 0.941 | 0.096 |
KUJw2 | Kuje | 6.52 | 1.15 | 0.0013 | 0.007 | 4.75 | 0.018 | 0.85 | 0.075 | 0.289 | 0.0119 |
KUJw3 | Kuje | 11.5 | 2.82 | 0.0021 | 0.034 | 8.24 | 0.018 | 1.01 | 0.0341 | 0.21 | 0.089 |
Mean | Median | Mode | STD | Min. | Max. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC | 125.58 | 125.00 | 134.00 | 36.89 | 11.00 | 198.00 |
TDS | 239.48 | 235.00 | 320.00 | 43.99 | 167.00 | 323.00 |
HCO3- | 315.52 | 308.00 | 368.00 | 75.73 | 173.00 | 506.00 |
Cl- | 50.35 | 45.40 | 55.80 | 29.44 | 0.87 | 122.00 |
pH | 6.63 | 6.69 | 6.69 | 0.18 | 6.35 | 6.93 |
PO42- | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
SO42- | 29.54 | 33.50 | 47.10 | 17.22 | 0.69 | 53.80 |
Na+ | 42.89 | 43.50 | 38.40 | 14.91 | 12.00 | 65.10 |
K+ | 13.57 | 10.20 | 10.20 | 10.73 | 2.22 | 54.30 |
Mg2+ | 22.87 | 25.00 | 35.80 | 11.65 | 2.63 | 44.00 |
Ca2+ | 44.40 | 46.60 | 51.60 | 15.39 | 18.90 | 76.70 |
NO3-N | 6.38 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 8.20 | 0.00 | 37.60 |
Mean | Median | Mode | STD | Min. | Max. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu2+ | 1.988 | 1.600 | 2.080 | 1.275 | 0.240 | 5.620 |
Cd2+ | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.013 |
As3+ | 0.023 | 0.017 | 0.011 | 0.018 | 0.007 | 0.078 |
Zn2+ | 7.323 | 6.860 | 12.300 | 3.415 | 1.650 | 16.500 |
Pb2+ | 0.026 | 0.018 | 0.013 | 0.026 | 0.011 | 0.130 |
Mn2+ | 0.703 | 0.739 | 0.739 | 0.250 | 0.190 | 1.106 |
Ni2+ | 0.051 | 0.045 | 0.075 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.150 |
Fe2+ | 0.513 | 0.433 | 0.106 | 0.362 | 0.106 | 1.104 |
Cr3+ | 0.054 | 0.057 | 0.096 | 0.037 | 0.010 | 0.109 |
EC | TDS | HCO3- | Cl | pH | PO43- | SO42- | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | NO3- N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC | 1 | |||||||||||
TDS | 0.04 | 1 | ||||||||||
HCO3- | -0.37 | 0.13 | 1 | |||||||||
Cl- | -0.13 | -0.04 | 0.11 | 1 | ||||||||
pH | -0.09 | -0.19 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 1 | |||||||
PO43- | -0.10 | -0.15 | -0.08 | -0.17 | -0.08 | 1 | ||||||
SO42- | -0.24 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.32 | -0.46 | 1 | |||||
Na+ | -0.15 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.42 | -0.16 | 0.69 | 1 | ||||
K+ | 0.15 | -0.19 | -0.48 | 0.09 | -0.25 | -0.08 | -0.28 | -0.16 | 1 | |||
Mg2+ | -0.34 | -0.04 | 0.48 | 0.28 | 0.45 | -0.46 | 0.80 | 0.70 | -0.17 | 1 | ||
Ca2+ | 0.06 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.36 | -0.23 | 0.48 | 0.52 | -0.22 | 0.51 | 1 | |
NO3- N | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.21 | 0.39 | 0.40 | -0.23 | 0.45 | 0.25 | 1 |
Cu2+ | Cd2+ | As 3+ | Zn2+ | Pb2+ | Mn2+ | Ni2+ | Fe2+ | Cr3+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cu2+ | 1.00 | ||||||||
Cd2+ | 0.01 | 1.00 | |||||||
As3+ | 0.00 | -0.03 | 1.00 | ||||||
Zn2+ | -0.17 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 1.00 | |||||
Pb2+ | 0.11 | 0.39 | 0.29 | -0.06 | 1.00 | ||||
Mn2+ | -0.33 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1.00 | |||
Ni2+ | 0.21 | 0.34 | -0.29 | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.17 | 1.00 | ||
Fe2+ | -0.08 | 0.06 | 0.22 | -0.05 | 0.14 | 0.23 | -0.19 | 1.00 | |
Cr3+ | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.22 | -0.03 | -0.28 | 0.38 | 1.00 |
HFE-D | Hydro-geochemical Facies Evolution Diagram |
[1] | Yang J, Liu H & Tang Z, 2022 Visualization of Aqueous Geochemical Data Using Python and WQChartPy, Ground water 60(4) |
[2] | Pant, R. R., F. Zhang, F. U. Rehman, G. Wang, M. Ye, C. Zeng, and H. Tang. 2018. Spatiotemporal variations of hydrogeochemistry and its controlling factors in the Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalaya Nepal. Science of the Total Environment 622-623: 770-782. |
[3] | Yang, J., M. Ye, Z. Tang, T. Jiao, X. Song, Y. Pei, and H. Liu. 2020. Using cluster analysis for understanding spatial and temporal patterns and controlling factors of groundwater geochemistry in a regional aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 583: 124594. |
[4] | Liu, H., J. Yang, M. Ye, S. C. James, Z. Tang, J. Dong, and T. Xing. 2021a. Using t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) for cluster analysis and spatial zone delineation of groundwater geochemistry data. Journal of Hydrology 597: 126146. |
[5] | Liu, H., J. Yang, M. Ye, Z. Tang, J. Dong, and T. Xing. 2021b. Using one-way clustering and co-clustering methods to reveal spatio-temporal patterns and controlling factors of groundwater geochemistry. Journal of Hydrology 603: 127085. |
[6] | Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt St´efan, J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, ˙I., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., Vijaykumar, A., Bardelli Alessandro, P., Rothberg, A., Hilboll, A., Kloeckner, A., Scopatz, A., Lee, A., Rokem, A., Woods, C. N., Fulton, C., Masson, C., H¨aggstr¨om, C., Fitzgerald, C., Nicholson David, A., Hagen David, R., Pasechnik Dmitrii, V., Olivetti, E., Martin, E., Wieser, E., Silva, F., Lenders, F., Wilhelm, F., Young, G., Price Gavin, A., Ingold, G.-L., Allen Gregory, E., Lee Gregory, R., Audren, H., Probst, I., Dietrich J¨org, P., Silterra, J., Webber James, T., Slaviˇc, J., Nothman, J., Buchner, J., Kulick, J., Sch¨onberger Johannes, L., de Miranda Cardoso Jos´e, V., Reimer, J., Harrington, J., Rodr´ıguez Juan Luis, C., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Kuczynski, J., Tritz, K., Thoma, M., Newville, M., K¨ummerer, M., Bolingbroke, M., Tartre, M., Pak, M., Smith Nathaniel, J., Nowaczyk, N., Shebanov, N., Pavlyk, O., Brodtkorb Per, A., Lee, P., McGibbon Robert, T., Feldbauer, R., Lewis, S., Tygier, S., Sievert, S., Vigna, S., Peterson, S., More, S., Pudlik, T., Oshima, T., Pingel Thomas, J., Robitaille Thomas, P., Spura, T., Jones Thouis, R., Cera, T., Leslie, T., Zito, T., Krauss, T., Upadhyay, U., Halchenko Yaroslav, O., and V´azquez-Baeza, Y. 2020. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, no. 3: 261-272 |
[7] | McKinney, W. 2010. Data structures for statistical computing in python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference 445: 56-61. |
[8] | Harris, C. R., K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, R. Kern, M. Picus, S. Hoyer, M.. van Kerkwijk, M. Brett, A. Haldane, J. F. Del Rio, M. Wiebe, P. Peterson, P. Gerard-Marchant, K. Sheppard, T. Reddy, W. Weckesser, H. Abbasi, C. Gohlke, and T. E. Oliphant. 2020. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, no. 7825: 357-362. |
[9] | Hunter, J. D. 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9, no. 3: 90-95. |
[10] | Bakker, M., V. Post, C. D. Langevin, J. D. Hughes, J. T. White, J. J. Starn, and M. N. Fienen. 2016. Scripting MODFLOW model development using python and FloPy. Ground Water 54, no. 5: 733-739. |
[11] | Collenteur, R. A., M. Bakker, R. Calj´e, S. A. Klop, and F. Schaars. 2019. Pastas: Open source software for the anal- ysis of groundwater time series. Groundwater 57, no. 6: 877-885. |
[12] | Peeters, L. 2014. A background color scheme for piper plots to spatially visualize hydrochemical patterns. Ground Water 52, no. 1: 2-6. |
[13] | Adama, O. (2007) Governing from above: Solid waste management in Nigeria's new capital city of Abuja. Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden. |
[14] | NPC. National Population Commission of Nigeria Website (2012). Available |
[15] | Olanrewaju O and Ilemobade A. (2009) Waste to wealth: A case study of the Ondo State integrated wastes recycling and treatment project. Nigerian, European Journal of Social Sciences. 8(1): 7-16. |
[16] | Ezeah, C., Roberts, C. L., Watkin, G. D, Philips, P. S. and Odunfa, A. (2009a) Analysis of barriers affecting the adoption of a sustainable municipal solid waste management system in Nigeria. In the proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, 12 - 15 March, 2009. Widener University, Philadelphia, P. A, USA, pp. 1556-1564. |
[17] | Dada, S. S. (2006). Proterozoic evolution of Nigeria. In: Oshin, O. (ed.). The Basement Complex of Nigeria and its mineral resources. Ibadan, Nigeria, Akin Jinad & Co. |
[18] | Edet, A. E and Okereke, C. (2003). Contribution to the development of groundwater resources in the Precambrian Oban Massif, south-eastern Nigeria, based on geo-electrical and hydrochemical data. In: J. Krasny, Z. Hrkal & J. Bruthans (Eds.). Groundwater in fractured rocks (pp. 249 - 250). Prague, Czech Republic. |
[19] | Elueze, A. A Ekwere. A. S and Nton M. E (2009) Geo-environmental assessment of the environs of the Aluminium Smelting Company in Ikot Abasi, south-eastern Nigeria, Journal of Mining and Geology Vol. 45(2) pp. 115-129. |
[20] | Duce, R. A., Quinn, J. G. Olney, C. E., Poitrowiecz, S. R., Ray, S. J. and Wade, T. L. 1972. Enrichment of heavy metals and organic compounds in the surface micro layer of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Science 176, pp. 161-163. |
[21] | USEPA. Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (2012): EPA 822-S-12-001. Washington, DC: Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. |
[22] | Piper, A. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 25(6), 914-923. |
[23] | Chadha, S. P. (1968). A New Diagrammatic Method for Analyzing the Relationship between Two Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324), 758-767. |
[24] | Gaillardet, J., B. Dupr´e, P. Louvat, and C. J. All`egre. 1999. Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chemical Geology 159, no. 1: 3-30. |
[25] | Schoeller, H. 1962. Les eaux souterraines. Paris: Masson. |
[26] | Gimenez-Forcada, E. 2010. Dynamic of sea water interface using hydrochemical facies evolution diagram. Ground Water 48, no. 2: 212-216. |
[27] | Appelo, C. A. J., and D. Postma. 2005. Geochemistry, Ground- water and Pollution. Great Britain: Taylor and Francis. |
[28] | Gimenez-Forcada, E., and F. J. Sanchez San Roman. 2015. An excel macro to plot the HFE-diagram to identify Sea water intrusion phases. Ground Water 53, no. 5: 819-824. |
[29] | Durov, S. A. 1948. Natural waters and graphic representation of their composition. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 59: 87-90. |
[30] | Gibbs, R. J. 1970. Mechanisms controlling world water chem-istry. Science 170, no. 3962: 1088-1090. |
APA Style
Ayodele, O. J., Temitope, A. J., Ojoina, O. A. (2025). Visual Interpretations of Aqueous Geochemical Data Obtained Around Selected Solid Waste Dumpsites in Abuja, North Central Nigeria. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 11(3), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11
ACS Style
Ayodele, O. J.; Temitope, A. J.; Ojoina, O. A. Visual Interpretations of Aqueous Geochemical Data Obtained Around Selected Solid Waste Dumpsites in Abuja, North Central Nigeria. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2025, 11(3), 42-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11, author = {Owolabi Joseph Ayodele and Arogundade Johnson Temitope and Omali Aurelius Ojoina}, title = {Visual Interpretations of Aqueous Geochemical Data Obtained Around Selected Solid Waste Dumpsites in Abuja, North Central Nigeria }, journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics}, volume = {11}, number = {3}, pages = {42-56}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20251103.11}, abstract = {The visual interpretation of water samples obtained around some selected dumpsites in federal capital territory, Abuja was done. The interpretation was done in order to ascertain the sources/evolution and the fate of the dissolved constituent of the water samples. The study was necessitated by the fact that the visual interpretation of the aqueous geochemical will reveal the process(s) that predominantly influence the water chemistry. The water samples obtained around these dumpsites were analyzed geochemically in a quality assured laboratory. The geochemical data obtained from the geochemical analyses were interpreted using visual procedures like Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, H-FED and Gaillardet diagram. More than 85% of the water samples are confined to Calcium-bicarbonate field (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium- bicarbonate field ((Ca-Na-HCO3). The result suggests that there is a clear contribution from the weathering of surrounding basement rocks with the weak acids in the water samples exceeding the strong acids. It was also deduced that water rock interactions is the dominant process that govern the composition of the water samples. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive visual interpretation of the hydro-geochemical characteristics of water samples collected in the vicinity of selected dumpsites within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The primary objective was to ascertain the sources, evolution, and fate of the water's dissolved constituents, thereby identifying the dominant processes influencing its overall chemistry. The research was initiated based on the critical need to understand how localized anthropogenic activities, such as waste disposal, interact with the underlying geology to affect groundwater quality in a rapidly urbanizing environment. Following a rigorous, quality-assured geochemical analysis in a certified laboratory, the data were subjected to a suite of established visual interpretation methods. The analytical data, encompassing a wide range of major ions, were plotted on several hydro-geochemical diagrams, including Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, HFE-D, and Gaillardet. These graphical tools collectively provided a multi-faceted perspective on the water's hydro-chemical facies and its evolutionary path. The collective findings from these diagrams were highly consistent. Over 85% of the water samples were classified within the Calcium-bicarbonate (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium-bicarbonate (Ca-Na-HCO3) fields. This hydro-chemical signature unequivocally points to water-rock interaction as the primary process governing the composition of the groundwater. The results suggest a clear and substantial contribution from the chemical weathering of the surrounding basement rocks. Furthermore, the predominance of bicarbonate as a major anion indicates that weak acids are significantly more prevalent than strong acids in the water samples. These findings underscore that while dumpsites remain a potential source of localized contamination, the overarching hydro-chemical signature and compositional evolution of the groundwater in the study area are fundamentally controlled by natural geological processes.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Visual Interpretations of Aqueous Geochemical Data Obtained Around Selected Solid Waste Dumpsites in Abuja, North Central Nigeria AU - Owolabi Joseph Ayodele AU - Arogundade Johnson Temitope AU - Omali Aurelius Ojoina Y1 - 2025/08/26 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11 T2 - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JF - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JO - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics SP - 42 EP - 56 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-979X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.11 AB - The visual interpretation of water samples obtained around some selected dumpsites in federal capital territory, Abuja was done. The interpretation was done in order to ascertain the sources/evolution and the fate of the dissolved constituent of the water samples. The study was necessitated by the fact that the visual interpretation of the aqueous geochemical will reveal the process(s) that predominantly influence the water chemistry. The water samples obtained around these dumpsites were analyzed geochemically in a quality assured laboratory. The geochemical data obtained from the geochemical analyses were interpreted using visual procedures like Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, H-FED and Gaillardet diagram. More than 85% of the water samples are confined to Calcium-bicarbonate field (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium- bicarbonate field ((Ca-Na-HCO3). The result suggests that there is a clear contribution from the weathering of surrounding basement rocks with the weak acids in the water samples exceeding the strong acids. It was also deduced that water rock interactions is the dominant process that govern the composition of the water samples. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive visual interpretation of the hydro-geochemical characteristics of water samples collected in the vicinity of selected dumpsites within the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. The primary objective was to ascertain the sources, evolution, and fate of the water's dissolved constituents, thereby identifying the dominant processes influencing its overall chemistry. The research was initiated based on the critical need to understand how localized anthropogenic activities, such as waste disposal, interact with the underlying geology to affect groundwater quality in a rapidly urbanizing environment. Following a rigorous, quality-assured geochemical analysis in a certified laboratory, the data were subjected to a suite of established visual interpretation methods. The analytical data, encompassing a wide range of major ions, were plotted on several hydro-geochemical diagrams, including Piper, Chadha, Gibbs, Schoeller, HFE-D, and Gaillardet. These graphical tools collectively provided a multi-faceted perspective on the water's hydro-chemical facies and its evolutionary path. The collective findings from these diagrams were highly consistent. Over 85% of the water samples were classified within the Calcium-bicarbonate (Ca-HCO3) and Calcium-Sodium-bicarbonate (Ca-Na-HCO3) fields. This hydro-chemical signature unequivocally points to water-rock interaction as the primary process governing the composition of the groundwater. The results suggest a clear and substantial contribution from the chemical weathering of the surrounding basement rocks. Furthermore, the predominance of bicarbonate as a major anion indicates that weak acids are significantly more prevalent than strong acids in the water samples. These findings underscore that while dumpsites remain a potential source of localized contamination, the overarching hydro-chemical signature and compositional evolution of the groundwater in the study area are fundamentally controlled by natural geological processes. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -