| Peer-Reviewed

The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon

Received: 3 December 2014     Accepted: 19 December 2014     Published: 27 December 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre (Euphorbiaceae), Gnetum buchholzianum Engl. and Gnetum africanum Welw. (Gnetaceae) are among the major species of non timber forest products (NTFPs) of the Lobeke National Park (LNP). The growing demand for these products has led to an increase in exploitation; but no information exists on the status of the resource base. There is equally very little information on the importance of these resources to the local population. A survey was conducted in 152 households to get the perception of locals on the availability and use of these resources in the Lobeke landscape. An inventory was also conducted to determine the abundance of the species in three forest systems including protected area, production forest and agroforest. Productivity of Ricinodendron heudelotii was assessed by counting fruits from fifteen trees in each forest system. 88 % of respondents collected Ricinodendron heudelotii, mostly for sale and earned between 69300 and 1002000 FCFA per year. All respondents collected Gnetum leaves, and up to 35 % of collectors solely for consumption. Sale of Gnetum leaves ranged from 200 to 9200 FCFA per week. 99 % of collectors thought that the quantity of Gnetum in the wild has reduced over the years while Ricinodendron heudelotii is still abundant. There were more trees of Ricinodendron heudelotii in the production forest and agroforest than in the protected area. No significant difference was observed in mean diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees in all forest systems. Mean number of fruits was significantly higher for trees in the agroforest than for those in the production forest and protected area. A significantly higher number of Gnetum buchholzianum vines was observed in the production forest than in the agroforest and protected area while the growth of Gnetum buchholzianum seedlings were significantly lower in the agroforest than in the protected area and production forest which showed no significant difference. The presence of productive individuals of Ricinodendron heudelotii is an indication that the resource will be available for some time but the near absence of younger individuals is unfavorable for the perpetuity of the species. It is recommended that the local population be sensitized on the importance of domesticating these species and trained on appropriate techniques to propagate and incorporate them into suitable agro systems.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 3, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16
Page(s) 469-480
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Non-Timber Forest Products, Resource Base, Forest System, Baka Pygmies, Bangando

References
[1] de Wasseige C., de Marcken P., Bayol N., Hiol Hiol F., Mayaux Ph., Desclée B., Nasi R., Billand A., Defourny P. and Eba’a Atyi R. 2012 The forests of the Congo basin-state of the forest 2010. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. 276 p. ISBN: 978-92-79-22716-5, doi:10.2788/47210
[2] FAO, 2007. State of the World’s Forests 2007. Rome. ISBN: 978-92-5-105586-1.144pp.
[3] FAO, 2005. State of the World’s Forests 2005. FAO-Rome. ISBN: 92-5-105187-9. 153 pp.
[4] Ichikawa, M. 2012. Central African forests as hunter-gatherers’ living environment: An approach to historical ecology. African Study Monographs Supplementary Issue, 43: 3−14.
[5] Hoare, A.L. 2007. The use of non timber forest products in the Congo basin, Constraints and opportunities. http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/files/Forest%20Products%20Low%20PDF.pdf
[6] Ingram, V. and Schure, J. (2010). Review of Non Timber Forest Prouducts (NTFPs) in Central Africa, Cameroon. Center for International Forestry Research.
[7] Ingram, V., O. Ndoye, D.M. Iponga, J. C. Tieguhong, R. Nasi, 2012. Non-timber forest products: contribution to national economy and strategies for sustainable management In: de Wasseige C., de Marcken P., Bayol N., Hiol Hiol F., Mayaux Ph., Desclée B., Nasi R., Billand A., Defourny P. and Eba’a Atyi R. 2012 The forests of the Congo basin-state of the forest 2010. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. 276 p. ISBN: 978-92-79-22716-5, doi:10.2788/47210
[8] IFAD 2004. Commerce et developpement rural: enjeux et perspectives pour les ruraux pauvres. 31pp.
[9] Noubissie E.T., Chupezi, J., Ndoye, O. 2008. Studies on the Socio-Economic Analysis of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in Central Africa. Synthesis of reports of studies in the Project GCP/RAF/398/GER. Fao. Yaounde, Cameroon, FAO GCP/RAF/398/GER Enhancing Food Security in Central Africa through the management and sustainable use of NWFP: p. 43.
[10] Neumann, R. P., Hirsch, E. 2000. Commercialization of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.
[11] Ankila, J.H. 2004. The Ecological Consequences of Managing Forests for Non-Timber Products. Conservation & Society 2 (2) 211-216
[12] Ticktin, T. 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 11–21
[13] Brites, A. D., Morsello, C. 2012. The Ecological Effects of Harvesting Non-Timber Forest Products from Natural Forests: a Review of the Evidence. VI Encontro Nacional da Anppas 18 a 21 de setembro de 2012, Belém - PA – Brasil
[14] Peters, C.M. 1994. Sustainable harvest of non-timber plant resources in tropical moist forest: An ecological primer. Washington, Biodiversity Support Program.
[15] Ndoye O., and Awono A., 2009. Regulatory policies and Gnetum spp. trade in Cameroon: Overcoming Constraints that Reduce Benefits and Discourage Sustainability. In: Wild Product Governance: Finding Policies that Work for Non- Timber Forest Products, edited by S.A. Laird, R. McLain and R.P. Wynberg. London: EarthScan.
[16] Tieguhong J.C., Ndoye O., Vantomme P., Zwolinski J., and Masuch J., 2010. Coping with crisis in Central Africa: enhanced role for non-wood forest products. Unasylva 233 (60):49-54.
[17] Laird S., Ingram V., Awono A., Ndoye O., Sunderland T., Lisinge E., and Nkuinkeu R., 2010. Integrating customary and statutory systems: The struggle to develop a legal and policy framework for NTFPs in Cameroon. In: Laird S.A., McLain R., and Wynberg R.P., 2010. Wild Product Governance: Finding Policies that Work for Non-Timber Forest Products, London: Earthscan.
[18] Clark, L. E., Sunderland, T. C. H. 2004. The Key Non-Timber Forest Products of Central Africa: State of the Knowledge. Technical Paper No. 122, SD Publication Series
[19] Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., Anthony, R. 2009. Agroforestry Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0 (http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp)
[20] Eyog-Matig. O, O. Ndoye, J. Kengue, A. Awono, (eds). Les fruitierscomestibles du Cameroun. International Plant resources Institute.
[21] SCUC, 2006. Ndjanssang: Ricinodendron heudelotii, Field manual for extension workers and farmers. Southhampton, UK; Southhampton Center for Underutilized crops, University of Southhampton.
[22] Lemmens, R.H.M.J, Louppe, D and Oteng-Amoaka, A.A. 2012 (eds.).Plant resources of tropical Africa 7 (2). Timbers 2. PROTA Foundation/CTA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
[23] Tchoundjeu, Z., and Atangana, A.R. (2006). Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Southampton Centre for Underutilized Crops. University of Southampton: Southampton, UK; 74p.
[24] Ngobo, M.P., Weise, S.F., Macdonald, M.A. 2003. Non-wood forest products in short duration fallow lands of Southern Cameroon. Paper presented at the XII world forestry congress, 2003, Quebec, Canada.
[25] Fondoun, J.M. Tiki Manga, T. Kengue, J. 1999. Ricinodendron heudelotii (Djansang): ethnobotany and importance for forest dwellers in southern Cameroon. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 118: 1–6
[26] Jell, B. 1998. Utilisation des produits secondaires par les Baka et les Bangando dans la region de Lobeke au Sud Est Cameroun. Etude de cas. Report submitted to GTZ on Projet de conservation des forets naturelles au sud-est Cameroun (PROFORNAT). September 1998.
[27] Nkwatoh, A.F., Labode, P., Ebobenow, J., Nkwatoh, F.W., Ndumbe, N.L., and Ewane, M.E. (2011). Gathering Processing and Marketing of Ricinodendron species (Bail) in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Agric. Sci. Res. Journal 1(9). 213 – 221.
[28] Mialoundama, F. 1980. Corrélations intervenant dans la croissance des rameaux chez Gnetum africanum Welw. Compte Rendus des Sceances Academie Scientifique serie D, 291, 509-512.
[29] Shiembo, P.N., Newton, A.C., Leakey, R.R.B. 1996. Vegetative propagation of Gnetum africanum Welw., a leafy vegetable from West Africa. Journal of Horticultural Science 71(1): 149–55.
[30] Mialoundama, F. 1993. Nutritional and socio-economic value of Gnetum leaves in Central African forest. In: Tropical forests, people and food: biocultural interactions and applications to development. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Publishing Group.
[31] Shiembo, P.N. (1997). Domestication of Gnetum spp.by vegetative propagation techniques. In R.R.Schippers and L. Budd (eds.) African indigenous vegetables. Workshop proceedings. January 13–18, 1997, Limbe, Cameroon.IPGRI and NRI.
[32] Ndumbe L., Ingram V., and Awono A., 2009. Baseline study on Gnetum spp. in the South West and Littoral Regions of Cameroon, edited by CIFOR. Yaoundé, Cameroon: FAO CIFOR-SNV-World Agro-forestry Center- COMIFAC.
[33] Shiembo, P.N. 1999. The sustainability of eru (Gnetum africanum and G. buchholzianum): an overexploited non-wood forest product from the forests of Central Africa. In: Sunderland, T.C.H. Clark, L.E., Vantomme, P (eds.) .Non-wood forest products of Central Africa: current research issues and prospects for conservation and development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, pp. 61–66.
[34] Fondoun, J. M., Tiki-Manga, T. 2000. Farmers indigenous practices for conserving Garcinia kola and Gnetum africanum in Southern Cameroon." Agroforestry Systems 48: 289-302.
[35] Lakeman Fraser, P., Bachman, S. 2008. Gnetum africanum. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 February 2014.
[36] Baloch, E. 2009. Gnetum buchholzianum. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 February 2014
[37] Awono A., Manirakiza D. and Ingram V., 2009. Étude de base de la filiere Gnetum spp. (Fumbwa) dans les Provinces de L’Équateur et de Kinshasa, RDC. FAO-CIFOR-SNVWorld Agro-forestry Center-COMIFAC, February 2009. Web site: http://www.fao.org/forestry/ enterprises/45716/en/.
[38] Nkwatoh, A.F., Labode, P.,Iyassa, S.M., Nkwatoh, F.W., Ndumbe, N.L., Ewane M.E. 2010. Harvesting and marketing of Gnetum species (Engl) in Cameroon and Nigeria. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment 2(9) 187-193.
[39] Jiofack, T., C. Fokunang, V. Kemeuze, E. Fongnzossie, N. Tsabang, R. Nkuinkeu, P. M. Mapongmetsem and B. A. Nkongmeneck (2008). "Ethnobotany and phytopharmacopoea of the South-West ethnoecological region of Cameroon." Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2(8): 197-206.
[40] CIFOR (2008). Gnetum spp (Okok or Eru) Fact Sheet. CIFOR. Yaounde, CIFOR: 2
[41] Schippers, R.R. (2000). African indigenous vegetables: an overview of the cultivated species. U.K.: Natural Resources Institute/ACP/EU Technical Centre for Agriculture and Rural Cooperation.
[42] Toirambe B., 2002. Utilisation des feuilles de Gnetum spp. Dans la lutte contre la pauvreté et l’insécurité alimentaire dans le Bassin du Congo, cas de la RDC. Kinshasa, FAO: 32.
[43] Ayuk, E.T., Duguma B., Franzel, S., Kengue, J., Mollet, M., Tiki-Manga, T., Zenkeng, P. 1999. Forest Ecology and Management 113. 1-9.
[44] ICRAF, 1999. Diversification of Tree crops: Domestication of companion crops for poverty reduction and environmental services.
[45] Egbe, E.A., Tabot,P.T., Fonge, B.A. 2012. Ethnobotany and prioritization of some selected tree species in south-western Cameroon. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 10:235-246
[46] Asare, R. 2005. Cocoa agroforests in West Africa. A look at activities on preferred trees in the farming system. Forest and Landscape. Working Paper No. 6, 2005.
[47] Leaky, R.R.B. 1998. Agroforestry in the humid lowlands of West Africa: some reflections on future directions for research. Agroforestry Systems 40: 253–262.
[48] Leakey, R. R. B., Tomich, T.P. 1999. Domestication of Tropical Trees: from Biology to Economics and Policy. Agroforestry In: Sustainable Agricultural Systems. L. E. Buck, J. P. Lassoie and E. C. M. Fernandes. Nairobi, ICRAF: 319-338.
[49] Adeola, A. O. 1995. The process of multipurpose tree species prioritization for agroforestry research. Forestry and the small scale farmer, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria, Forestry Association of Nigeria
[50] Tieguhong, J.C. and Zwolinski, J. (2008). Unrevealed economic benefits from the forests in Cameroon; IUFRO 4.05.00: emerging needs of society from forest ecosystems, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, May 22-24, 2008
[51] Ekobo, A. 1995. Conservation of the African forest elephant (Loxodonta africana cyclotis) in Lobéké, Southeast Cameroon. PhD. Thesis, University of Kent, 151.
[52] WWF, 2006. Plan d’Amenagement du Parc National de Lobeke et de sa zone peripherique. Période d’exécution : 2006 – 2010. WWF.
[53] Wong, J.L.G. 2001. The biometrics of Non-Timber Forest Product resource assessment: A review of current methodology.
[54] Alene, D .C., Djieto-Lordon, C., Burckhardt, D., Messi, J., 2008. Population dynamics of the Ricinodendron psyllid, Diclidophlebia xuani, and its predators in Southern Cameroon. Mitteilungen Der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 1 (2) 87-103
[55] Sunderland, T. C. H. and P. Tchouto (1999). A Participatory Survey and Inventory of Timber and Non-Timber Forest Products of the Mokoko River Forest Reserve, SW Province, Cameroon.
[56] Shiembo, P. (1994). Domestication of multipurpose tropical plants with particular reference to Irvingia gabonensis Baill., Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre ex Pax and Gnetum africanum Welw. Edinburgh.
[57] Burkill, H.M. (2000). The useful plants of west tropical Africa, vol 5. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
[58] Fongzossie, F.E., Ngansop, T.M., Zapfack, L., Kameuze, V.A., Sonwa, D.J., Nguenang, G.M., Nkongmeneck, B.A. 2014. Density and natural regeneration potential of selected non-timber forest products species in the semi deciduous rainforest of southeastern Cameroon. African study monographs, suppl. 49:69-90
[59] van Dijk, J.F.W. 1999. An assessment of non-wood forest product resources for the development of sustainable commercial extraction. In T.C.H. Sunderland, L.E. Clark and P. Vantomme (eds.). Non-wood forest products of Central Africa: current research issues and prospects for conservation and development. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation, pp. 37–50.
[60] Musoko, M., Last, F.T. and Mason, A. (1994). Populations of spores of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in undisturbed soils of secondary semideciduous moist tropical forest in Cameroon. Forest Ecology and Management 63 (2–3): 359–77.
[61] ICUC, 2004. Fruits for the future. Ndjanssang. International Centre for Underutilized Crops. Factsheet No. 10. April 2004. 1-2pp.
[62] Moutsamboté, J.M. 1994. Végétation et plantes alimentaires de la région de la Sangha (Nord-Congo). In L.J.G. van der Maesen, X.M. van der Burgt & J.M. van Medenbach de Rooy (eds.). The biodiversity of African plants:proceedings of XIVth AETFAT Congress. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 754-756.
[63] Halle, F., Oldemann, R.A.A. and Tomlinson, P.B. (1978). Tropical trees and forests. An architectural analysis. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 242-244,441.
[64] Nkefor, J., Ndam, N., Blackmore, P , Engange, F. and Monono, C. (2000). Transfer of eru (Gnetum africanum Welw. and G. buchholzianum Engl.) domestication model to village-based farmers on and around Mount Cameroon. (Unpublished.) Report for CARPE.
[65] Sunderland, T.C.H.( 2001). Cross River State Community Forest Project: non-timber forest products advisor report. Department for International Development/Environmental Resources Management, Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick & Co Ltd.
[66] Tieguhong, J.C. 2008. Ecotourism for sustainable development: Economic valuation of recreational potentials of protected areas in the Congo Basin. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of KwaZulu Natal.
[67] Tieguhong J.C. and Ndoye O. 2006. Transforming subsistence products to propellers of sustainable rural development: Non- timber forest products (NTFPs) production and trade in Cameroon. Africa-Escaping the Primary Commodities Dilemma. African Development Perspective Yearbook Vol. 11. Unit 1. VERLAG Berlin. Pp. 107-137. ISBN 3-8258-7842-2
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Roseline Gusua Caspa, Isaac Roger Tchouamo, Jean-Pierre Mate Mweru, Joseph Mbang Amang. (2014). The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(6), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Roseline Gusua Caspa; Isaac Roger Tchouamo; Jean-Pierre Mate Mweru; Joseph Mbang Amang. The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon. Agric. For. Fish. 2014, 3(6), 469-480. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Roseline Gusua Caspa, Isaac Roger Tchouamo, Jean-Pierre Mate Mweru, Joseph Mbang Amang. The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon. Agric For Fish. 2014;3(6):469-480. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16,
      author = {Roseline Gusua Caspa and Isaac Roger Tchouamo and Jean-Pierre Mate Mweru and Joseph Mbang Amang},
      title = {The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6},
      pages = {469-480},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20140306.16},
      abstract = {Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre (Euphorbiaceae), Gnetum buchholzianum Engl. and Gnetum africanum Welw. (Gnetaceae) are among the major species of non timber forest products (NTFPs) of the Lobeke National Park (LNP). The growing demand for these products has led to an increase in exploitation; but no information exists on the status of the resource base. There is equally very little information on the importance of these resources to the local population. A survey was conducted in 152 households to get the perception of locals on the availability and use of these resources in the Lobeke landscape. An inventory was also conducted to determine the abundance of the species in three forest systems including protected area, production forest and agroforest. Productivity of Ricinodendron heudelotii was assessed by counting fruits from fifteen trees in each forest system. 88 % of respondents collected Ricinodendron heudelotii, mostly for sale and earned between 69300 and 1002000 FCFA per year. All respondents collected Gnetum leaves, and up to 35 % of collectors solely for consumption. Sale of Gnetum leaves ranged from 200 to 9200 FCFA per week. 99 % of collectors thought that the quantity of Gnetum in the wild has reduced over the years while Ricinodendron heudelotii is still abundant. There were more trees of Ricinodendron heudelotii in the production forest and agroforest than in the protected area. No significant difference was observed in mean diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees in all forest systems. Mean number of fruits was significantly higher for trees in the agroforest than for those in the production forest and protected area. A significantly higher number of Gnetum buchholzianum vines was observed in the production forest than in the agroforest and protected area while the growth of Gnetum buchholzianum seedlings were significantly lower in the agroforest than in the protected area and production forest which showed no significant difference. The presence of productive individuals of Ricinodendron heudelotii is an indication that the resource will be available for some time but the near absence of younger individuals is unfavorable for the perpetuity of the species. It is recommended that the local population be sensitized on the importance of domesticating these species and trained on appropriate techniques to propagate and incorporate them into suitable agro systems.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Ecological Status and Uses of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre and Gnetum Species around the Lobeke National Park in Cameroon
    AU  - Roseline Gusua Caspa
    AU  - Isaac Roger Tchouamo
    AU  - Jean-Pierre Mate Mweru
    AU  - Joseph Mbang Amang
    Y1  - 2014/12/27
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 469
    EP  - 480
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140306.16
    AB  - Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre (Euphorbiaceae), Gnetum buchholzianum Engl. and Gnetum africanum Welw. (Gnetaceae) are among the major species of non timber forest products (NTFPs) of the Lobeke National Park (LNP). The growing demand for these products has led to an increase in exploitation; but no information exists on the status of the resource base. There is equally very little information on the importance of these resources to the local population. A survey was conducted in 152 households to get the perception of locals on the availability and use of these resources in the Lobeke landscape. An inventory was also conducted to determine the abundance of the species in three forest systems including protected area, production forest and agroforest. Productivity of Ricinodendron heudelotii was assessed by counting fruits from fifteen trees in each forest system. 88 % of respondents collected Ricinodendron heudelotii, mostly for sale and earned between 69300 and 1002000 FCFA per year. All respondents collected Gnetum leaves, and up to 35 % of collectors solely for consumption. Sale of Gnetum leaves ranged from 200 to 9200 FCFA per week. 99 % of collectors thought that the quantity of Gnetum in the wild has reduced over the years while Ricinodendron heudelotii is still abundant. There were more trees of Ricinodendron heudelotii in the production forest and agroforest than in the protected area. No significant difference was observed in mean diameter at breast height (DBH) of trees in all forest systems. Mean number of fruits was significantly higher for trees in the agroforest than for those in the production forest and protected area. A significantly higher number of Gnetum buchholzianum vines was observed in the production forest than in the agroforest and protected area while the growth of Gnetum buchholzianum seedlings were significantly lower in the agroforest than in the protected area and production forest which showed no significant difference. The presence of productive individuals of Ricinodendron heudelotii is an indication that the resource will be available for some time but the near absence of younger individuals is unfavorable for the perpetuity of the species. It is recommended that the local population be sensitized on the importance of domesticating these species and trained on appropriate techniques to propagate and incorporate them into suitable agro systems.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Regional Postgraduate School of Integrated Tropical Forest and Landscape Management (ERAIFT), University of Kinshasa, P.O. Box 15373 Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

  • Department of Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon

  • Regional Postgraduate School of Integrated Tropical Forest and Landscape Management (ERAIFT), University of Kinshasa, P.O. Box 15373 Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo

  • Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), P.O. Box 2123 Yaounde, Cameroon

  • Sections