Background: Cleistopholis patens leaves are used to treat stomach disorders in Nigeria. This research investigated the gastroprotective and antigastric ulcer effects of the methanol fraction of Cleistopholis patens leaves (MFCPL) in rats. Methods: In vitro experiments involved DPPH-radical scavenging and H+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activities. Two ulcer models, diclofenac sodium (DS) (using 50 mg/kg b.w. DS orally) and acidified ethanol (AE) (using 0.3 M HCl + 60% ethanol orally), were used. The experimental rats (n=24) were grouped into 6 of 4 groups for each of the DS and AE ulcer models. In the DS model, group 1 served as the normal group, whereas group 2 was ulcer-induced without treatment. Group 3 received 20 mg/kg b.w. omeprazole, whereas groups 4, 5 and 6 received 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg b.w. MFCPL, respectively, for 14 days. For the AE ulcer model, 7 days after pretreatment with MFCPL, all groups except group 1 received acidified ethanol and were sacrificed after 1 hr. The ulcer indices, gastric mucosa morphology and serum antioxidant status of the rats were evaluated. Additionally, GC‒MS analyses of MFCPL were carried out. Results: The MFCPL had H+, K+-ATPase-inhibiting and DPPH-radical-scavenging activities, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 50.10 ± 10.52 μg/ml and 16.72 ± 2.47 μg/ml, respectively. Compared with the ulcer control, the administration of MFCPL led to a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in total ulcer counts and gastric volumes with high pH. Compared with those in the control group, the number of gastric lesions in the treated group was markedly lower than that in the control group. The antioxidant status of the treated rats improved. GC‒MS analyses of the MFCPL revealed 20 bioactive compounds. Conclusion: MCPL has an antigastric ulcer effect attributable to its H+/K+-ATPase inhibition and antioxidant activities due to its rich bioactive components and hence can be used to manage ulcers and their associated biochemical aberrations.
Published in | Advances in Biochemistry (Volume 13, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11 |
Page(s) | 61-78 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cleistopholis Patens, Antigastric Ulcer, H+/K+-ATPase, Antioxidants, GC‒MS
Phytochemicals | Crude Extract | Chloroform Fraction | Ethylacetate Fraction | Methanol Fraction |
---|---|---|---|---|
Steroid | 3.13 ± 0.20c | 0.86 ± 0.25a | 4.06 ± 0.07d | 2.37 ± 0.18b |
Terpenoids | 64.03 ± 3.42b,c | 28.88 ± 2.92a | 68.87 ± 24.10 c | 44.02 ± 6.17a,b |
Glycoside | 5.31 ± 0.26a,b | 6.09 ± 0.03 c | 4.99 ± 0.11 a | 5.43 ± 0.28 b |
Reducing Sugar | 456.16 ± 88.38 b | 296.74 ± 1.96 a | 504.89 ± 29.72 b | 317.03 ± 34.10 a |
Alkaloids | 70.97 ± 6.97 b | ND | 76.81 ± 15.99 b | 70.00 ± 1.44 b |
Total phenols | 354.57 ± 4.14 c | 96.77 ± 2.42 a | 374.46 ± 7.92 d | 243.01 ± 11.47 b |
Tannins | 15.25 ± 0.55 c | 6.68 ± 0.49 a | 9.21 ± 0.33 b | 17.06 ± 1.26 d |
Flavonoids | 255.10 ± 41.20 b | 142.08 ± 40.63 a | 321.30 ± 12.19b,c | 387.50 ± 43.59 c |
Phase/Groups | Dosage of extract (mg/kg b.w) | Mortality rate (%) |
---|---|---|
Phase I | ||
Group 1 | 10 | 0/3 |
Group 2 | 100 | 0/3 |
Group 3 | 1000 | 0/3 |
Phase II | ||
Group 1 | 1600 | 0/3 |
Group 2 | 2900 | 0/3 |
Group 3 | 5000 | 0/3 |
Concentration (μg/ml) | Crude | Chloroform | Ethylacetate | Methanol | Standard (ascorbic acid) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 | 58.06 ± 6.41a | 64.88 ± 1.02a | 66.02 ± 2.80a | 65.45 ± 2.72a | 93.20±2.49bc |
40 | 53.98 ± 11.84a | 65.81 ± 2.64ab | 74.48 ± 3.58b | 71.90 ± 4.96a | 94.15±0.61bc |
80 | 66.38 ± 3.13ab | 69.24 ± 2.28b | 73.48 ± 2.80b | 73.69 ± 4.41a | 93.15±1.63bc |
160 | 64.23 ± 9.79a | 68.24 ± 0.66ab | 73.33 ± 2.82b | 75.05 ± 13.71a | 90.43±.63ab |
320 | 77.78 ± 1.08bc | 74.12 ± 3.13c | 82.72 ± 1.38c | 91.76 ± 1.58b | 90.43±1.07ab |
640 | 84.80 ± 3.45c | 77.49 ± 2.57c | 94.27 ± 1.40d | 91.11 ± 1.02b | 89.43±2.26a |
Concentration (μg/ml) | Std drug | Crude | Chloroform | Ethylacetate | Methanol |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 53.85 ± 2.54a | 43.72 ± 7.79a | 10.64 ± 0.184c | 62.82 ± 6.17a | 52.31 ± 7.25 a |
100 | 60.00 ± 4.36ab | 59.23 ±7.25ab | 5.77 ± 0.54b | 57.44 ± 13.78a | 53.72 ± 7.43 a |
200 | 65.90 ± 1.81bc | 53.46 ±2.72ab | 59.10 ± 0.18d | 57.18 ± 7.62 a | 75.13 ± 14.50 a |
400 | 70.77 ± 4.71c | 66.28 ± 3.80b | 1.67 ± 0.18a | 65.00 ± 1.27 a | 72.18 ± 1.27 a |
Groups | Total ulcer | G. Volume | G. pH |
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.23 ± 0.01 b | 4.50 + 0.12 e |
Group 2 | 43.50 ± 4.30f | 0.47 ± 0.01 a | 2.48 + 0.85 a |
Group 3 | 4.50 ± 2.08b | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 4.22 + 0.13d,e |
Group 4 | 20.50 ± 1.29e | 0.38 ± 0.08a,b | 3.20 + 0.08 b |
Group 5 | 14.25 ± 2.22d | 0.35 ± 0.01a,b | 3.50 + 0.02b,c |
Group 6 | 8.75 ± 1.70c | 0.30 ± 0.02 a | 3.90 + 0.08c,d |
Groups | Total Ulcer | G. Volume | G. pH |
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.23 ± 0.01 a | 4.55 ± 0.10 c |
Group 2 | 36.75 ±7.27d | 0.45 ± 0.06 b | 2.78 ± 0.48 a |
Group 3 | 2.50 ± 2.65a | 0.30 ± 0.08 a | 4.25 ± 0.48b,c |
Group 4 | 14.00 ± 6.68c | 0.35 ± 0.06 a | 3.30 ± 1.34a,b |
Group 5 | 10.25 ± 5.12b,c | 0.33 ± 0.13 a | 3.40 ± 0.08a,b |
Group 6 | 6.00 ± 1.83a,b | 0.30 ± 0.08 a | 3.73 ± 0.05a,b |
Groups | TOTAL ULCER | G. VOLUME | G. pH |
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.36 ± 0.01 d | 4.25 ± 0.24 e |
Group 2 | 42.25 ± 2.06e | 0.47 ± 0.01 e | 2.10 ± 0.82 a |
Group 3 | 3.00 ±1.41b | 0.25 ± 0.01 a | 4.20 ± 0.16 e |
Group 4 | 22.25 ± 2.22d | 0.36 ± 0.04c,d | 2.60 ± 0.08 b |
Group 5 | 10.75 + 1.26c | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 3.35 ± 0.25c |
Group 6 | 5.25 ± 1.710b | 0.30 ± 0.01 b | 3.80 ± 0.16d |
GROUPS | MDA (mg/dl) | SOD (U/mg) | CAT (U/mg) | GPx (U/mg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preventive | Curative | Preventive | Curative | Preventive | Curative | Preventive | Curative | |
Group 1 | 0.67 ± 0.19a | 0.67 ± 0.19a | 11.33 ± 0.05d | 11.33 ± 0.06d | 7.91 ± 1.80c | 7.91 ± 1.80c | 0.56 ± 0.04d | 0.54 ± 0.05d |
Group 2 | 3.27 ± 0.13d | 3.79 ± 0.09e | 4.56 ± 0.52a | 4.55 ± 0.58a | 1.93 ± 0.10a | 2.02 ± 0.02a | 0.13 ± 0.03a | 0.24 ± 0.22a,b |
Group 3 | 0.58 ± 0.33 a | 0.91 ± 0.17 b | 11.04 ± 0.35d | 11.00 ± 0.47d | 7.12 ± 1.28b,c | 7.18 ± 1.14b | 0.53 ± 0.02d | 0.42 ± 0.19b,c,d |
Group 4 | 3.04 ± 0.08d | 3.35 ± 0.18d | 5.66 ± 1.16b | 5.35 ± 1.18a,b | 2.16 ± 0.11a | 2.16 ± 0.11a | 0.17 ± 0.01a | 0.16 ± 0.01a |
Group 5 | 2.19 ± 0.16c | 2.09 ± 0.14c | 6.28 ± 0.80b | 6.40 ± 0.98b | 3.25 ± 0.10 a | 3.24 ± 0.07 a | 0.33 ± 0.02b | 0.33 ± 0.04a,b,c |
Group 6 | 1.02 ± 0.01b | 1.11 ± 0.13b | 8.60 ± 0.94c | 8.93 ± 0.94c | 5.86 ± 0.88b | 6.21± 0.89b | 0.44 ± 0.03c | 0.46 ± 0.03c,d |
Compounds | Peak | Retention time (min) | % Peak Area | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Molecular formular |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acetic acid, butyl ester | 1 | 3.346 | 3.27 | 16.16 | C6H12O2 |
Glycerin | 2 | 5.893 | 2.15 | 92.09382 | C3H8O3 |
Glycerin | 3 | 5.946 | 3.49 | 92.09382 | C3H8O3 |
Dodecane | 4 | 7.175 | 1.21 | 170.34 | C12H26 |
Tridecane | 5 | 7.981 | 1.48 | 184.4 | C13H28 |
Tetradecane | 6 | 8.728 | 2.20 | 198.39 | C14H30 |
Dodecanoic acid, | 7 | 9.851 | 4.55 | 200.3178 | C12H24O2 |
1-Hexadecene, | 8 | 10.045 | 1.67 | 224.42 | C16H32 |
Hexadecane | 9 | 10.087 | 2.96 | 226.445 | C₁₆H₃₄ |
Methyl hexanoic acid | 10 | 10.398 | 22.47 | 130.187 | C7H14O2 |
Pentanoic acid | 11 | 10.457 | 6.47 | 102.13 | C5H10O2 |
Alpha.-D-Galactopyranoside | 12 | 10.486 | 8.73 | 194.18 | C7H14O6 |
Decanoic acid | 13 | 10.851 | 9.45 | 172.26 | C10H20O2 |
Tetradecanoic acid | 14 | 11.081 | 2.41 | 228.37 | C14H28O2 |
1-Pentadecanethiol | 15 | 11.781 | 2.87 | 286.56 | C18H38S |
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 16 | 12.022 | 1.27 | 270.45 | C17H34O2 |
Hexadecanoic acid | 17 | 12.245 | 16.17 | 256.43 | C₁₆H₃₂O₂ |
1,2 Benzenedicarboxylic acid | 18 | 12.298 | 1.89 | 166.14 | C8H6O4 |
Oleic Acid, | 19 | 13.327 | 1.44 | 282.46 | C18H34O2 |
Octadecanoic acid | 20 | 13.475 | 3.86 | 284.48 | C18H36O2 |
MFCPL | Methanol Fraction of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves |
H. pylori | Helicobacter pylori |
ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
NSAID | Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug |
DPPH | 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl |
CMEFCPL | Crude Methanol Extract And Fractions of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves |
LD50 | Median Lethal Dose |
ANOVA | One-way Analysis of Variance |
[1] | Siddique O, Ovalle A, Siddique AS, Moss SF. Helicobacter pylori infection: an update for the internist in the age of increasing global antibiotic resistance. Am. J. Med. 2018; 131(5): 473-479. Available at: |
[2] | Hooi JK, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MM, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VW, Wu JC, Chan FK. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017; 153(2): 420-429. Available at: |
[3] | Okechukwu PN, Ekeuku SO, Sharma M, Nee CP, Chan HK, Mohamed N, Froemming GR. In vivo and in vitro antidiabetic and antioxidant activity of spirulina. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2019; 15 (Suppl 1): S17-S29. Available at: |
[4] | Narayanan M, Reddy KM, Marsicano E. Peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori infection. Missouri medicine. 2018; 115(3): 219. Available at: |
[5] | Liu B, Feng X, Zhang J, Wei Y, Zhao X. Preventive effect of Anji white tea flavonoids on alcohol-induced gastric injury through their antioxidant effects in Kunming mice. Biomolecules. 2019 4; 9(4): 137. Available at: |
[6] | Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, Mujagic Z, Vila AV, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 2016 29; 352(6285): 565-569. Available at: |
[7] |
Marieb E, Keller S. Essentials of human anatomy and physiology. Harlow: Pearson Education, Limited, 2021. Available at:
https://www.amazon.com/Essentials-Human-Anatomy-Physiology-Global/dp/129240194X |
[8] | Spechler SJ. Proton pump inhibitors: what the internist needs to know. Medical Clinics. 2019; 103(1): 1-14. Available at: |
[9] | Palle S, Kanakalatha A, Kavitha CN. Gastroprotective and antiulcer effects of Celastrus paniculatus seed oil against several gastric ulcer models in rats. J. Diet. Suppl. 2018; 15(4): 373-385. Available at: |
[10] |
Onaolapo AJ. Entomotoxic activity of powder of Cleistopholis patens benth against the indian meal moth, plodia interpunctella (hübner) (lepidoptera: pyralidae). Int. J. Entomol. Res. 2017; 5(2): 33-42. Available at:
https://journals.esciencepress.net/index.php/IJER/article/view/1781 |
[11] | Udem SC, Ezeonuegbu UC, Obidike RI. Experimental studies on the hypolipidemic and haematological properties of aqueous leaf extract of Cleistopholis patens Benth. & Diels. (Annonacae) in hypercholesterolemic rats. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2011; 1(1): 115-122. Available at: |
[12] | Ouattara ZA, Yapi TA, Békro YA, Mamyrbékova-Békro AJ, Paoli M, Tomi P, Casanova J, Bighelli A, Tomi F. Composition and chemical variability of root bark oil from ivoirian Cleistopholis patens. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018; 13(6): 6-9. Available at: |
[13] | Still WC, Kahn M, Mitra A. Rapid chromatographic technique for preparative separations with moderate resolution. J. Org. Chem. 1978; 43(14): 2923-2925. Available at: |
[14] | Harborne JB. (1973). Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands; 1973. Available at: |
[15] | Braca A, De Tommasi N, Di Bari L, Pizza C, Politi M, Morelli I. Antioxidant principles from bauhinia tarapotensis. J. Nat Prod. 2001; 64(7): 892-895. Available at: |
[16] | Reyes-Chilpa R, Baggio CH, Alavez-Solano D, Estrada-Muñiz E, Kauffman FC, Sanchez RI, Mesia-Vela S. Inhibition of gastric H+, K+-ATPase activity by flavonoids, coumarins and xanthones isolated from Mexican medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006; 105(1-2): 167-172. Available at: |
[17] | Lorke D. Determination of acute toxicity. Arch Toxicol. 1983; 53: 275-279. |
[18] | Guth PH, Aures D, Paulsen G. Topical aspirin plus HCl gastric lesions in the rat: cytoprotective effect of prostaglandin, cimetidine, and probanthine. Gastroenterology. 1979; 76(1): 88-93. Available at: |
[19] | Mózsik G, Moron F, Jávor T. Cellular mechanisms of the development of gastric mucosal damage and of gastrocytoprotection induced by prostacyclin in rats. A pharmacological study. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Medicine. 1982 1; 9(1): 71-84. Available at: |
[20] |
Amr AR, Maysa ME. Anti-ulcer effect of cinnamon and chamomile aqueous extracts in rat models. J Am Sci. 2010; 6(12): 209-216. Available at:
https://www.jofamericanscience.org/journals/am-sci/am0612/25_3251am0612_209_216.pdf |
[21] |
Ketuly KA, Abdulla MA, Hadi HA, Mariod AA, Abdel-Wahab SI. Anti-ulcer activity of the 9alpha-bromo analogue of Beclomethasone dipropionate against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury in rats. J Med Plants Res. 2011; 5(4): 514-20. Available at:
https://academicjournals.org/journal/JMPR/article-abstract/0661E1625909 |
[22] |
Durak I, Canbolat O, Kavutçu M, Öztürk HS, Yurtarslani Z. Activities of total, cytoplasmic, and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase enzymes in sera and pleural fluids from patients with lung cancer. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 1996; 10(1): 17-20. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(1996)10:1%3C17::aid-jcla4%3E3.0.co; 2-i |
[23] | Aebi HE. Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Weinhem, Verlag Chemie; 1983. p. 273–286. |
[24] | Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967; 70(1): 158-69. Available at: |
[25] | Wallin B, Rosengren B, Shertzer HG, Camejo G. Lipoprotein oxidation and measurement of thiobarbituric acid reacting substances formation in a single microtiter plate: its use for evaluation of antioxidants. Anal. Biochem. 1993; 208(1): 10-15. Available at: |
[26] | Osuntokun OT. Evaluation of Inhibitory Zone Diameter (IZD), phytochemical screening, elemental composition and proximate analysis of crude cleistopholis patens (Benth) on infectious clinical isolates. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2018; 9(385): 2. Available at: |
[27] | Daniels A, Temikotan T. Fatty acid profile, antioxidant and antibacterial effect of the ethyl acatate extract of cleistopholis patens. Bull. Sci. Res. 2021; 3: 21-31. Available at: |
[28] | Bhoumik D, Masresha B, Mallik A. Antiulcer properties of herbal drugs: a review. Int J Biomed Res. 2017; 8(3): 116-24. Available at: |
[29] | Harborne, J. B., & Williams, C. A. (2000). Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochem. 55(6), 481-504. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00235-1 |
[30] | Rahman MA, Moon SS. Antioxidant polyphenol glycosides from the plant Draba nemorosa. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007; 28(5): 827-31. available at: |
[31] | Aruoma OI. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in plant foods. Mutat. Res. - Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003; 523: 9-20. Available at: |
[32] | Abd El-Dayem AM, El-Agaimy MA. Nonwood forest products, physico-chemical characteristics and fatty acid composition of three seed oils. In WOCMAP I-Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Conference: part 1 of 4 333 1992 Jul 19 (pp. 287-294). Available at: |
[33] | Onasanwo SA, Singh N, Olaleye SB, Palit G. Anti-ulcerogenic and proton pump (H+, K+ ATPase) inhibitory activity of Kolaviron from Garcinia kola Heckel in rodents. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2011; 49: 461-468. Available at: |
[34] | Murakami S, Arai I, Muramatsu M, Otomo S, Baba K, Kido T, Kozawa M. Inhibition of gastric H+, K+-ATPase and acid secretion by cassigarol A, a polyphenol from Cassia garrettiana Craib. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1992; 44(1): 33-37. Available at: |
[35] | Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, Olszewski M, Rainsford KD, Lanas A. Mechanisms of damage to the gastrointestinal tract from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gastroenterology. 2018; 154(3): 500-14. Available at: |
[36] | Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Hanchar AJ. Cytoprotection by prostaglandins in rats: Prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HCl, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl, and thermal injury. Gastroenterology. 1979; 77(3): 433-43. Available at: |
[37] | Hiruma-Lima CA, Batista LM, de Almeida AB, de Pietro Magri L, dos Santos LC, Vilegas W, Brito AR. Antiulcerogenic action of ethanolic extract of the resin from Virola surinamensis Warb. (Myristicaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009; 122(2): 406-9. Available at: |
[38] | Glavin GB, Szabo S. Experimental gastric mucosal injury: laboratory models reveal mechanisms of pathogenesis and new therapeutic strategies. The FASEB journal. 1992; 6(3): 825-831. Available at: |
[39] | Bento EB, de Brito Júnior FE, de Oliveira DR, et al. Antiulcerogenic activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Annona muricata Linnaeus in mice. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018; 25(4): 609-621 available at: |
[40] | Abebaw M, Mishra B, Gelayee DA. Evaluation of anti-ulcer activity of the leaf extract of Osyris quadripartita Decne. (Santalaceae) in rats. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017; 16: 1-1. Available at: |
[41] | Eswaran MB, Surendran S, Vijayakumar M, Ojha SK, Rawat AK, Rao CV. Gastroprotective activity of Cinnamomum tamala leaves on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol.. 2010; 128(2): 537-540. Available at: |
[42] | Kwiecien S, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Effects of reactive oxygen species action on gastric mucosa in various models of mucosal injury. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2002; 53(1): 39-50. Available at: |
[43] | Shetty BV, Arjuman A, Jorapur A, Samanth R, Yadav SK, Valliammai N, Tharian AD, Sudha K, Rao GM. Effect of extract of Benincasa hispida on oxidative stress in rats with indomethacin induced gastric ulcers. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008; 52(2): 178-182. Available at: |
[44] | Saeed AL-Wajeeh N, Halabi MF, Hajrezaie M. et al. Correction: the gastroprotective effect of vitex pubescens leaf extract against ethanol-provoked gastric mucosal damage in sprague-dawley rats. Plos one. 2017; 12(5): e0179072. Available at: |
[45] | Hajrezaie M, Golbabapour S, Hassandarvish P, et al. Acute toxicity and gastroprotection studies of a new schiff base derived copper (II) complex against ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions in rats. PloS one. 2012; 7(12): e51537. Available at: |
[46] | Tuluce Y, Ozkol H, Koyuncu I, Ine H. Gastroprotective effect of small centaury (Centaurium erythraea L) on aspirin-induced gastric damage in rats. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 2011; 27(8): 760-768. Available at: |
[47] | Ighodaro OM, Akinloye OA. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): Their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alex. J. Med. 2018; 54(4): 287-293. Available at: |
[48] | Karaoğlan ES, Albayrak A, Kutlu Z, Bayır Y. Gastroprotective and antioxidant effects of Eremurus spectabilis Bieb. methanol extract and its isolated component isoorientin on indomethacin induced gastric ulcers in rats. Acta Cir. Bras. 2018; 33: 609-618. Available at: |
[49] | da Silva LM, Pezzini BC, Somensi LB et al. Hesperidin, a citrus flavanone glycoside, accelerates the gastric healing process of acetic acid-induced ulcer in rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2019; 308: 45-50. Available at: |
[50] | Tachakittirungrod S, Okonogi S, Chowwanapoonpohn S. Study on antioxidant activity of certain plants in Thailand: Mechanism of antioxidant action of guava leaf extract. Food Chem. 2007; 103(2): 381-8. Available at: |
[51] | Boniface MT, Ngozi OE, Eiza YP, Mathew AO, Adejoh IP. Gas Chromatography‒Mass Spectrometry (GC‒MS) Profiling and Anti-ulcer Activity of the Aqueous Extract of Lophira Lanceolata Leaves. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2020; 7(8): 48-55. Available at: |
[52] | Shrivastava R, John GW. Treatment of aphthous stomatitis with topical Alchemilla vulgaris in glycerine. Clin. Drug Investig. 2006; 26: 567-573. Available at: |
[53] | Mamani R, Alhaji NM. GC‒MS analysis of phytocomponents in methanolicextract of Coleus aromaticus. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2019; 8(4): 106-109. Available at: |
[54] | Klavina L, Springe G, Nikolajeva V, Martsinkevich I, Nakurte I, Dzabijeva D, Steinberga I. Chemical composition analysis, antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity screening of moss extracts (moss phytochemistry). Molecules. 2015; 20(9): 17221-17243. Available at: |
[55] | Sudha T, Chidambarampillai S, Mohan VR. GC‒MS analysis of bioactive components of aerial parts of Fluggea leucopyrus Willd. (Euphorbiaceae). J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013; 3(5): 126-130. Available at: |
[56] | Okoro I, Joshua P, Okagu I, Amah C, Ikenna N, Chiaka-Onyemeze N, Anaduaka E, Obasi D, Okoroh P, Orieke D, Ogugua V. Proximate analyses, in vitro antioxidant activity and GC-MS analyses of fermented Pentaclethra macrophylla seeds. Life Research Journal. 2024; 7(3): 12. Available at: |
[57] | El-Din SM, El-Ahwany AM. Bioactivity and phytochemical constituents of marine red seaweeds (Jania rubens, Corallina mediterranea and Pterocladia capillacea). J Taibah Univ Sci. 2016; 10(4): 471-484. Available at: |
[58] | Omoruyi BE, Afolayan AJ, Bradley G. Chemical composition profiling and antifungal activity of the essential oil and plant extracts of Mesembryanthemum edule (L.) bolus leaves. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2014; 11(4): 19-30. Available at: |
[59] | Narasimhan B, Dhake AS. Antibacterial principles from Myristica fragrans seeds. Journal of medicinal food. 2006 Sep 1; 9(3): 395-399. Available at: |
[60] | Gupta AD, Bansal VK, Babu V, Maithil N. Chemistry, antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt). J. Genet. Eng. & Biotechnol. 2013; 11(1): 25-31. Available at: |
[61] | Agoramoorthy G, Chandrasekaran M, Venkatesalu V, Hsu MJ. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of fatty acid methyl esters of the blind-your-eye mangrove from India. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2007; 38: 739-742. Available at: |
APA Style
Ikenna, N., Joshua, P., Okoro, I., Okagu, I., Ogugua, V. (2025). Gastroprotective and Antigastric Ulcer Effects of the Methanol Fraction of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves on Two Ulcer Models in Rats. Advances in Biochemistry, 13(3), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11
ACS Style
Ikenna, N.; Joshua, P.; Okoro, I.; Okagu, I.; Ogugua, V. Gastroprotective and Antigastric Ulcer Effects of the Methanol Fraction of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves on Two Ulcer Models in Rats. Adv. Biochem. 2025, 13(3), 61-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11
@article{10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11, author = {Nnamani Ikenna and Parker Joshua and Ikechukwu Okoro and Innocent Okagu and Victor Ogugua}, title = {Gastroprotective and Antigastric Ulcer Effects of the Methanol Fraction of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves on Two Ulcer Models in Rats }, journal = {Advances in Biochemistry}, volume = {13}, number = {3}, pages = {61-78}, doi = {10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ab.20251303.11}, abstract = {Background: Cleistopholis patens leaves are used to treat stomach disorders in Nigeria. This research investigated the gastroprotective and antigastric ulcer effects of the methanol fraction of Cleistopholis patens leaves (MFCPL) in rats. Methods: In vitro experiments involved DPPH-radical scavenging and H+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activities. Two ulcer models, diclofenac sodium (DS) (using 50 mg/kg b.w. DS orally) and acidified ethanol (AE) (using 0.3 M HCl + 60% ethanol orally), were used. The experimental rats (n=24) were grouped into 6 of 4 groups for each of the DS and AE ulcer models. In the DS model, group 1 served as the normal group, whereas group 2 was ulcer-induced without treatment. Group 3 received 20 mg/kg b.w. omeprazole, whereas groups 4, 5 and 6 received 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg b.w. MFCPL, respectively, for 14 days. For the AE ulcer model, 7 days after pretreatment with MFCPL, all groups except group 1 received acidified ethanol and were sacrificed after 1 hr. The ulcer indices, gastric mucosa morphology and serum antioxidant status of the rats were evaluated. Additionally, GC‒MS analyses of MFCPL were carried out. Results: The MFCPL had H+, K+-ATPase-inhibiting and DPPH-radical-scavenging activities, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 50.10 ± 10.52 μg/ml and 16.72 ± 2.47 μg/ml, respectively. Compared with the ulcer control, the administration of MFCPL led to a significant (p Conclusion: MCPL has an antigastric ulcer effect attributable to its H+/K+-ATPase inhibition and antioxidant activities due to its rich bioactive components and hence can be used to manage ulcers and their associated biochemical aberrations. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Gastroprotective and Antigastric Ulcer Effects of the Methanol Fraction of Cleistopholis Patens Leaves on Two Ulcer Models in Rats AU - Nnamani Ikenna AU - Parker Joshua AU - Ikechukwu Okoro AU - Innocent Okagu AU - Victor Ogugua Y1 - 2025/07/04 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11 T2 - Advances in Biochemistry JF - Advances in Biochemistry JO - Advances in Biochemistry SP - 61 EP - 78 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0862 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ab.20251303.11 AB - Background: Cleistopholis patens leaves are used to treat stomach disorders in Nigeria. This research investigated the gastroprotective and antigastric ulcer effects of the methanol fraction of Cleistopholis patens leaves (MFCPL) in rats. Methods: In vitro experiments involved DPPH-radical scavenging and H+/K+-ATPase inhibitory activities. Two ulcer models, diclofenac sodium (DS) (using 50 mg/kg b.w. DS orally) and acidified ethanol (AE) (using 0.3 M HCl + 60% ethanol orally), were used. The experimental rats (n=24) were grouped into 6 of 4 groups for each of the DS and AE ulcer models. In the DS model, group 1 served as the normal group, whereas group 2 was ulcer-induced without treatment. Group 3 received 20 mg/kg b.w. omeprazole, whereas groups 4, 5 and 6 received 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg b.w. MFCPL, respectively, for 14 days. For the AE ulcer model, 7 days after pretreatment with MFCPL, all groups except group 1 received acidified ethanol and were sacrificed after 1 hr. The ulcer indices, gastric mucosa morphology and serum antioxidant status of the rats were evaluated. Additionally, GC‒MS analyses of MFCPL were carried out. Results: The MFCPL had H+, K+-ATPase-inhibiting and DPPH-radical-scavenging activities, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 50.10 ± 10.52 μg/ml and 16.72 ± 2.47 μg/ml, respectively. Compared with the ulcer control, the administration of MFCPL led to a significant (p Conclusion: MCPL has an antigastric ulcer effect attributable to its H+/K+-ATPase inhibition and antioxidant activities due to its rich bioactive components and hence can be used to manage ulcers and their associated biochemical aberrations. VL - 13 IS - 3 ER -