International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Implications of Tech-Enabled Transport on Planning and Investment of Transport Infrastructure

As the world continues to experience rapid improvements in technology across most if not all sectors it will be important to understand how changes in technology affect longer term planning and decision making, especially in the infrastructure sector. This paper summarizes an investigation into how technology enabled transport stands to impact on business case development, risk assessment and economic modelling of transportation infrastructure, with implications for transport planning, design and operation in the medium to long term. The paper outlines the research findings of an industry-led investigation working with government and the private sector to investigate how anticipated changes in the level of technology enablement of vehicles may influence decisions around investment in transport infrastructure by transport agencies. The research was undertaken in three stages: Stage 1 involved the identification of precedent for policy changes to support and control the trialing and use of vehicles capable of driverless operation; Stage 2 involved the identification of 12 areas where technology change stands to directly influence infrastructure investment in the future; Stage 3 explored the 12 areas to identify 28 implications that were then prioritized into 6 key themes based on industry need and relevance. This prioritisation was based on industry partner perceptions of the level of influence of each area on investment decisions. Recommendations are provided for each area along with initial strategic considerations for further investigation. The research concludes that the transport sector needs to increase efforts to understand how rapidly developing technology will impact medium to long term decision to ensure that planning and design approaches and specifications are appropriately updated as the understanding of the technology and its implications improves. At the same time implications on the overall modal mix need to be carefully considered given new opportunities for automated on-demand services to enhance shared transit options and be provided by private operators as part of the primary transport network. This research has been developed with funding and support provided by Australia’s Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre (SBEnrc) and its partners.

Driverless Vehicles, Tech-Enabled Transport, Safety, Accessibility, Efficiency, Reliability, Economic Performance

APA Style

Karlson Hargroves, Daniel Conley, Hussein Dia. (2023). Implications of Tech-Enabled Transport on Planning and Investment of Transport Infrastructure. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 9(2), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtet.20230902.12

ACS Style

Karlson Hargroves; Daniel Conley; Hussein Dia. Implications of Tech-Enabled Transport on Planning and Investment of Transport Infrastructure. Int. J. Transp. Eng. Technol. 2023, 9(2), 36-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20230902.12

AMA Style

Karlson Hargroves, Daniel Conley, Hussein Dia. Implications of Tech-Enabled Transport on Planning and Investment of Transport Infrastructure. Int J Transp Eng Technol. 2023;9(2):36-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20230902.12

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Austroads 2017, Assessment of Key Road Operator Actions to Support Automated Vehicles, Austroads, AP-R543-17, May 2017.
2. EU 2016, Declaration of Amsterdam - Cooperation in the field of connected and automated driving, 14-15 April 2016.
3. AAA 2018, ‘Vehicle Technology Survey – Phase 3’, American Automotive Association.
4. KPMG 2016, ‘The Autonomous Vehicle Insurer: Driving change in UK insurance’. KPMG.
5. SAE International 2016, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, SAE International, J3016.
6. Hargroves, K., Conley, D., Niemann, A., Carpenter, H., Ho, D. and Dia, H. 2018, ‘Consideration of the Implications of Technology-enabled Transport on Infrastructure Investment’, Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre (SBEnrc), Australia.
7. United Nations 1968, Vienna Convention on Road Traffic’, Chapter 11 Transport and Communication - Road Traffic, Vienna, 8 November 1968.
8. NCSL 2018, Autonomous Vehicles – Self-Driving Vehicles enacted legislation, National Conference of State Legislatures, NCSL, 21 May 2018.
9. Bird&Bird 2017, At a Glance: Autonomous Vehicles, Bird&Bird, 25 July 2017.
10. Sencerin, J. 2017, Autonomous Driving French National Plan, Workshop Presentation, Renault.
11. Amanuel, M. 2016, ‘Sweden proposes a progressive legislation for autonomous vehicle trials’, Drive Sweden, 11 April 2016.
12. The Strats Times 2017, “New rules for autonomous vehicles” The Strats Times, Singapore.
13. NTC 2017, Guidelines for trials of automated vehicles in Australia, National Transport Commission, Melbourne, Australia.
14. SA Government 2016, Motor Vehicles (Trials of Automotive Technologies) Amendment Act 2016—No 10 of 2016, South Australian Government.
15. NCSL (2020) Autonomous Vehicles and Self Driving Vehicles Enacted Legislation, National Conference of State Legislators, February 18 2020.
16. Muoio, D. 2017, Why self-driving cars could be terrible for traffic, 24 November 2017.
17. Truong, L., De Gruyter, C., Currie, G. and Delbosc, A. 2017, Estimating the trip generation impacts of autonomous vehicles on car travel in Victoria, Australia.
18. Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., and Pavone, M. 2014, Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore, MIT Open Access Articles, 2014.
19. International Transport Forum 2015, Urban Mobility System Upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic, p 10.
20. King, B. 2013, Roads that cars can read. A Quality Standard for Road Markings and Traffic Signs on Major Rural Roads, Proposals for Consultation.
21. Raposo, M., Ciuffo, B., Makridis, M. and Thiel, C. 2017, The r-evolution of driving: from Connected Vehicles to Coordinated Automated Road Transport (C-ART).
22. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., and Helbing, D. 2008, Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transportation Research C, 16 (6), pp. 668–683.
23. Work, D., Stern, R., Cui, S., Delle Monache, M., Piccoli, B., Seibold, B., and Sprinkle, J. 2017, Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments, 2017.
24. VanderWerf, J., Shladover, S., Miller, M. and Kourjanskaia, N. 2003, Evaluation of the Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Highway Traffic Flow Capacity and Implications for Deployment of Future Automated Systems. 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 78–84.
25. Shladover, S. 2009, Cooperative (rather than autonomous) vehicle-highway automation systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 1 (1), pp. 10–19.
26. Queensland Government 2016, Stopping distances on wet and dry roads, Queensland Government.
27. Bierstedt, J., Gooze, A., Gray, C., Peterman, J., Raykin, L. and Walters, J. 2014, Effects of Next-Generation Vehicles on Travel Demand and Highway Capacity, op. cit.
28. Sun, Y. 2016, Road to autonomous vehicles in Australia: A comparative literature review. University of Western Australia.
29. Keolis n.d., Unlimited Mobility, p 15., viewed 25 November 2017, www.keolis.com/sites/default/files/atoms/files/keolis_autonomous_shuttles.pdf
30. International Association of Public Transport 2017, Autonomous Vehicles: A Potential Game Changer for Urban Mobility.
31. Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J. 1999, Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press.
32. Bertoncello, M. and Wee, D. 2015, Ten ways autonomous driving could redefine the automotive world, McKinsey & Company.
33. Chapin, T., Stevens, L., Crute, J., Crandall, J., Rokyta, A. and Washington, A. 2016, Envisioning Florida’s Future: Transportation and Land Use in an Automated Vehicle World, p 7. Florida State University Department of Urban & Regional Planning, USA.
34. Hendrickson, C., Biehler, A. and Mashayekh, Y. 2014, Connected and Autonomous Vehicles 2040 Vision. Carnegie-Mellon University. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Planning and Research, USA.
35. Ilgin Guler, S., Menendez, M. and Meier, L. 2014, Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 46, pp. 121-131.
36. Nationalgrid 2017, Future Energy Scenarios, July 2017.
37. Bullis, K 2013, Could Electric Cars Threaten the Grid?, viewed 25 November 2017.
38. Patterson, B. 2015, Electric Vehicles Drive to Back Up the Grid, viewed 25 November 2017.