International Journal of Neurosurgery


Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom

Purpose: Day-case surgery for selected procedures has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient experience. In neurosurgery, brain biopsies have been performed as day-case procedures for selected patients. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a clinical pathway that facilitates day-case brain biopsy surgery to improve the generalisability of the evidence and inform wider adoption of this practice. Materials and methods: A single centre, retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years requiring a brain biopsy for presumed tumour between November 2009 and December 2017 was performed. All patients received pre-admission radiology imaging +/- trajectory planning (as required), an operation on a morning theatre list and post-biopsy CT head 4-6 hours to rule out haemorrhage or other complications. Discharge was aimed at 6 hours post-biopsy if observations and CT were satisfactory. All data was collected via an institution operative database and descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 447 brain tumour biopsies performed over the eight-year study period of which a total of n=160 (35.8%) were planned day-case. The proportion of biopsies performed as day-case increased over the study period, from four in 2009 to 33 per annum in 2017, an increase from only 10% (n=4) to 66% (n=33) of the total annual biopsies for this centre. Of the 160 planned day-cases, 135 (84.4%) were actual day-cases and successfully discharged on the same day as the operation. The mean patient age was 58 years. Twenty-five cases had at least one overnight unplanned stay, revealing a failure rate of 15.6%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the safety of our day-case brain tumour biopsy service and is consistent with other centres’ experiences. This represents an opportunity for neurosurgeons to confidently contribute to an increasing provision of day-case surgery across the service.

Tumour, Biopsy, Patient Safety, Day-Case Surgery

APA Style

William Bolton, Fozia Saeed, Sandeep Solanki, Gnanamurthy Sivakumar, Robert Corns, et al. (2023). The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Neurosurgery, 7(2), 46-51.

ACS Style

William Bolton; Fozia Saeed; Sandeep Solanki; Gnanamurthy Sivakumar; Robert Corns, et al. The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Neurosurg. 2023, 7(2), 46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16

AMA Style

William Bolton, Fozia Saeed, Sandeep Solanki, Gnanamurthy Sivakumar, Robert Corns, et al. The Feasibility and Safety of Day Case Brain Tumour Biopsy: An Eight-Year Experience in the United Kingdom. Int J Neurosurg. 2023;7(2):46-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ijn.20230702.16

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Abou-Zeid, A., Palmer, J. and Gnanalingham, K. (2014) ‘Day case lumbar discectomy–Viable option in the UK?’, British journal of neurosurgery, 28 (3), pp. 320–3.
2. Alderwick, H. and Dixon, J. (2019) ‘The NHS long term plan’, BMJ (Online), 364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l84.
3. Audit Commission (1990) A short cut to better services: day surgery in England and Wales. London: HMSO.
4. Audit Commission (2001) Day surgery: review of national findings. London: Audit Commission Publications.
5. Aylin, P. et al. (2005) ‘Trends in day surgery rates.’, BMJ, 8 (331), p. 803.
6. Bailey, C. et al. (2019) ‘Guidelines for day‐case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery.’, Anaesthesia, 74 (6), pp. 778–92.
7. Bhardwaj, R. and Bernstein, M. (2002) ‘Prospective feasibility study of outpatient stereotactic brain lesion biopsy.’, Neurosurgery, (51), p. 358=364.
8. Boulton, M. and Bernstein, M. (2008) ‘Outpatient brain tumor surgery: innovation in surgical neurooncology.’, Journal of neurosurgery, 108 (4), pp. 649–54.
9. Cancer Research UK (2023) Brain, other CNS and intracranial tumours statistics.
10. Darwin, L. and Chung, F. (2013) ‘Patient selection for day surgery.’, Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 14 (3), pp. 114–118.
11. Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a plan for investment. a plan for reform.
12. Field, M. et al. (2001) ‘Comprehensive assessment of hemorrhage risks and outcomes after stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurgery, (94), pp. 545–551.
13. Grundy, P., Weidmann, C. and Bernstein, M. (2008) ‘Day-case neurosurgery for brain tumours: the early United Kingdom experience.’, British journal of neurosurgery., 22 (3), pp. 360–7.
14. Heper, A. et al. (2005) ‘An analysis of stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors and nonneoplastic lesions: a prospective clinicopathologic study.’, Surgical neurology, 1 (64), pp. 82–8.
15. Kaakaji, W., Barnett, G. and Bernhard, D. (2001) ‘Clinical and economic consequences of early discharge of patients following supratentorial stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurg, (94), pp. 892–8.
16. Kulkarni, A. et al. (1998) ‘Incidence of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic brain biopsy.’, J Neurosurg, (89), pp. 31–35.
17. Lemos, P. et al. (2009) ‘Patient satisfaction following day surgery.’, Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia, (21), pp. 200–205.
18. Mirian, C. et al. (2019) ‘Antiepileptic drugs as prophylaxis for de novo brain tumour-related epilepsy after craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of harm and benefits.’, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 90 (5), pp. 599–607.
19. NICE (2021) Brain tumours (primary) and brain metastases in over 16s.
20. Purzner, T. et al. (2011) ‘Outpatient brain tumor surgery and spinal decompression: a prospective study of 1003 patients.’, Neurosurgery, 69 (1), pp. 119–27.
21. Quemby, D. and Stocker, M. (2014) ‘Day surgery development and practice: key factors for a successful pathway.’, Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain., 14 (6), pp. 256–61.
22. Reisch, R. et al. (2013) ‘The keyhole concept in neurosurgery.’, World neurosurgery, 79 (2), pp. 17–19.
23. Richardson, A. et al. (2019) ‘Predictors of Successful Discharge of Patients on Postoperative Day 1 After Craniotomy for Brain Tumor.’, World neurosurgery, 1 (126), pp. 869–77.
24. Sawin, P. et al. (1998) ‘Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: A risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases.’, Surg Neurol, (49), pp. 640–640.
25. Taylor, W. et al. (1995) ‘Timing of post- operative intracranial hematoma development and implications for the best use of neurosurgical intensive care.’, J Neurosurg, (82), pp. 48–50.
26. Vaishnav, A. and McAnany, S. (2019) ‘Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.’, Journal of Spine Surgery, 2.
27. Vallejo, F. et al. (2022) ‘Same-day discharge after brain tumor resection: a prospective pilot study.’, Journal of Neuro-oncology, 157 (2), pp. 345–53.
28. Venkatraghavan, L. et al. (2016) ‘Same-day discharge after craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery: a retrospective observational single-centre study.’, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 63 (11), pp. 1245–57.
29. Weerakkody, R. et al. (2009) ‘The air bubble technique for confirming the location of an image-guided biopsy - a technical note.’, Br J Neurosurg, 29 (3), pp. 329–31.
30. Wohns, R. (2010) ‘Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty.’, Surgical neurology international.