International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology

Archive

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Effect of Packing Materials on Shelf Life of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Under Laboratory Condition

The experiment was done to study the effect of packing materials on the shelf life of tomatoes (lycopersican esulentam) under laboratory conditions of Hawassa University Agriculture College protection laboratory in 2020. To reduce post-harvest losses of tomato production the packing materials such as Nets, DPB, LTPB, and cartons were evaluated concerning their effect on the produce of shelf life of tomatoes under laboratory conditions. These studies were conducted for analysis of total weight losses, disease incidence and severity, firmness, pH value, TSS and TAA green matured tomatoes at 20°C laboratory conditions. In general, after 24 days of the storage period, the pH value of the tomato was high a significant difference within each other treatment, and the total weight losses were relatively different with the low temperature of storage condition. The disease incidence and severity closely occurred on the control with 100±2.5298%. The TSS and TAA DPB, LTPB treatment was found to be superior in retaining maximum TSS, titrable acidity, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits even up to the end of the storage period. The firmness measured by the newton of treatment five shows high superiority which recorded carton (743.33N ±60.590) when compared with control (130N ±60.590). The firmness values were decreased in all the samples stored in different conditions and with different packing materials.

Packaging Materials, Firmness, Disease Incidence and Severity, Weight Loss

APA Style

Gobena Tesfaye. (2023). Effect of Packing Materials on Shelf Life of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Under Laboratory Condition. International Journal of Food Engineering and Technology, 7(1), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfet.20230701.15

ACS Style

Gobena Tesfaye. Effect of Packing Materials on Shelf Life of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Under Laboratory Condition. Int. J. Food Eng. Technol. 2023, 7(1), 68-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20230701.15

AMA Style

Gobena Tesfaye. Effect of Packing Materials on Shelf Life of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Under Laboratory Condition. Int J Food Eng Technol. 2023;7(1):68-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfet.20230701.15

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Salunke SJ, Yu MH. (2005). Quality and nutritional composition of Tomato fuit as influenced by certain biochemical and physiological changes. Journal of Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 24, 85-113.
2. Nunes MCN, Morais AMMB, Brecht JK, Sargent SA, 1996. Quality of pink tomatoes after storage under controlled atmosphere at chilling and nonchilling temperatures. J. Food Qual., 19: 363-374.
3. Evan der Knaap ZB, Lippman SD, Tanksley, 2002. Extremely elongated tomato fruit controlled by four quantitative trait loci with epistatic interactions.
4. FAO (1999). The state of food and agriculture. Food systems for better nutrition, Rome. FAO Agricultural Service Bulletin No. 93.
5. Venket Rao & Sanjiv Agarwal (2000) Role of Antioxidant Lycopene in Cancer and Heart Disease, Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 19: 5, 563-569, DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718953.
6. De Lucia M, Assennato D, 1994. Agricultural engineering in development. Post-harvest operations and management of foodgrains.
7. FAO (1989) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.
8. Kader AA, Morris LL, 1975. Ameloration of chilling injury symptoms on tomato fruits. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 10: 324.
9. Giovannoni J. (2001). Molecular Biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. and Plant Mol. Biol., 52, 725-74.
10. Thorne S, Alvarez JSS, 1982. The effect of irregular storage temperature on firmness and surface color in tomatoes. J. Sci. Food Agric., 33: 671-676.
11. Saheed AF, Khan SN, Sarwar A, Tahira JJ. (2010). Effect of packaging materials of the storage of Tomato. Mcopath, 3 (2), 85-89.
12. Rosa, S. (2006). Postharvest management of fruit and vegetables in the Asia-Pacific region/Asian Productivity Organization. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Anon (2011). Color classification requirements in United States standards for grades of fresh.
13. Batu A. (1998). Some factors affecting the determination and measurement of Tomato firmness. Tropical J. of Agriculture and Forestry., 22, pp. 411-418.
14. Mathooko FM. 2013. A comparison of modified atmosphere packaging under ambient conditions and low temperatures storage on quality of tomato fruit. African J. Food Agric. Nutr. Develop. 3: 63–70.
15. Ait-Oubahou A, Dilley DR, 1990 Design and optimization of modified atmosphere packaging of Empire apple fruit following Controlled Atmosphere Storage. Proceeding of the Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathologicla Union, October 28-Nov. 3, Agadir, Morocco.
16. Aulakh, J. and Regmi, A. (2013) Post-Harvest Food Losses Estimation-Development of Consistent Methodology. In: Selected Poster Prepared for Presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association’s 2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting, Washington DC.
17. NSPRI. (1990). Storing your produce: Advisory Booklet No. 4: Fruits and vegetables. Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, 20-25.
18. Anon (2011). Color classification requirements in United States standards for grades of fresh graduates students.
19. Islam, Z. and Siengthai, S. (2009) Quality of Work Life and Organizational Perform Empirical Evidence from Dhaka Export Processing Zone. ILO Conference on Regulating for Decent Work, Geneva, 119. http:/www.ilo.org/legacy/english/protection/travail/pdf/rdwpaper37a.pdf
20. Ullah J. (2009, October). Storage of fresh Tomatoes to determine the level of CaCl2 coating and optimum temperature for extended shelf. A post Doctoral Fellowship report submitted to https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.s.2015030102.12 the Department of Food Science and Technology, pp. 85-113.
21. Tefera, A., Seyoum, T., Woldetsadik, K., 2008. Effects of disinfection, packaging and evaporatively cooled storage on sugar content of mango. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7 (1). Available online at. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB.
22. Ali, B. (2004). Determination of acceptable firmness and colour values of tomatoes. Journal of Food Engineering 61, 471-475.
23. Tompson, J. F. and Mitchell, F. G. 2002. Packages for horticultural crops. In Kader, A. A. (ed.) Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. 3rd edition. Publication #3311. Coop. Ext. Uni. of Ca. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Davis, CA, USA, pp. 85-96.
24. Kays, S. J. Postharvest Physiology of Perishable Plant Products; Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA; Athens, Greece, 1997.
25. Roncal-Jimenez, C. A., Lanaspa, M. A., Rivard, C. J., Nakagawa, T., Sanchez-Lozada, L. G., Jalal, D., Andres-Hernando, A., Tanabe, K., Madero, M., Li, N., Cicerchi, C., Fann, K. M., Sautin, Y. Y., & Johnson, R. J. (2011). Sucrose induces Fatty Liver and Pancreatic Inflammation in Male Breeder Rats Independent of Excess Energy Intake. Metabolism: Clinical and experimental, 60 (9), 1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2011.01.008
26. Srividya, S.; Subramanian, S.; Sadanandane, C.; Vasuki, V.; Jambulingam, P. Determinants of transmission hotspots and filarial infection in households after eight rounds of mass drug administration in India. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2018, 23, 1251–1258.