Arabic Language, Literature & Culture

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

A Contextual Analysis of the “Move Ahead” Curriculum Impact on ESL Student's Learning and Acquisition

Education is the only component that plays a tangible role in the occurrence of countries and nations renaissance and development. The curriculum represents the main core of educational courses at schools and universities. The design of the curriculum can be nurtured through students’ points of view because they will study it. The objective of the current paper is to provide a contextual analysis of one of the Macmillan Education Curriculums “Move Ahead” which is taught to grade 7 British Department students in one of the United Arab Emirates Schools. The researcher utilized a designed google-form questionnaire to collect data. The study was conducted in Abu Dhabi on ESL school students following Cambridge University Curriculum. The findings showed that most students are interested in the topics offered by the curriculum; however, students depend on their teachers and other resources to compensate for the weaknesses in some skills which require modification and update in the curriculum. Students’ perspectives and notions about the material they are using in their learning can be suggested in designing curriculums for further academic enhancement. The results reflected how students’ participation in criticizing can lead editors to take into consideration that learners’ ages, attitudes, cultures, and perspectives are influential and create comfort during self-created curriculums.

Education, Teaching, Learning Processes, Student Achievement, School Achievement, Curriculum Quality, Analysis, Theories

APA Style

Khalid Mohamed Ahmed. (2023). A Contextual Analysis of the “Move Ahead” Curriculum Impact on ESL Student's Learning and Acquisition. Arabic Language, Literature & Culture, 7(4), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.allc.20220704.11

ACS Style

Khalid Mohamed Ahmed. A Contextual Analysis of the “Move Ahead” Curriculum Impact on ESL Student's Learning and Acquisition. Arab. Lang. Lit. Cult. 2023, 7(4), 16-27. doi: 10.11648/j.allc.20220704.11

AMA Style

Khalid Mohamed Ahmed. A Contextual Analysis of the “Move Ahead” Curriculum Impact on ESL Student's Learning and Acquisition. Arab Lang Lit Cult. 2023;7(4):16-27. doi: 10.11648/j.allc.20220704.11

Copyright © 2022 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Ralph Tyler (1957): The curriculum is all of the student’s learning, which is planned by and directed by the school to attain its educational goals.
2. Becker, G. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with reference to education. 3rd Edition. New York. Colombia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. Melissa Williams, 2019: Why is a curriculum important?
4. Natasha Ridge, 2017 “Curriculum Development in the United Arab Emirates”.
5. Horgan, C. (2011). A typology of transformation: Reviewing the transformative learning literature. Stud. Educ. Adults 48, 65–82. doi: 10.1080/02660830.2016.1155849.
6. Bestor (1956): The curriculum must consist essentially of disciplined study in five great areas. https://www.homeofbob.com/pedagogy/plan/curDev/defList.htm
7. Demirel, Ö. (1999). Kuramdan uygulamayaeğitimde programgeliştirme. (3.Baskı), Ankara: Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
8. Beauchamp, G. A. (1982). Curriculum theory: Meaning, development, and use. Theory into Practice, 21 (1), 23-27.
9. Mizikacı, F. (2017). Complex codes of education programs: ideology, knowledge, pedagogy discourse and evaluation.
10. Carl, A. (2009). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development theory into practice. Juta&Company Ltd.
11. Eisner, E. (1985). Educational imagination. (2nd ed). NY: Macmillian.
12. Vallance, E. (1974). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
13. Schiro, a M. S. (2012). Curriculum theory: conflicting visions and enduring concerns. USA: Sage Publications.
14. Hurson, C. The impact of curriculum developed in line with authentic learning on the teacher candidates’ success, attitude, and self-directed learning skills. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 17, 73–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9409-2
15. Williams, C, 2011: Why is a curriculum important?
16. Allen, M. (2017). The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc doi: 10.4135/9781483381411.
17. Abawi. (2017). Data collection methods (questionnaire and interview). Training Course in Sexual and Reproductive Health Research; 2017 Nov 28; Geneva.
18. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of psychosomatic research, 11 (2), 213-218.
19. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. and Razavieh, A. (1996) Introduction to Research in Education. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth.
20. Maxwell J. Qualitative research design: An interpretive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1996. [Google Scholar].
21. Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781506326139.
22. Creswell, J. W (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.