American Journal of Art and Design

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Contemporary Sculptural Haptics in Sociocultural Context

In the paper the phenomenon of the so-called contemporary sculptural haptics is discussed. Under this term the authors understand the quality of contemporary art objects to make sight bodily, that is, to reduce any image or imagery that these objects (be they physical or virtual) attempt to represent to merely physical shapes, which is done in such a way that the horizon of the transcendental appears to be sealed off or cut off by immense sensory overload. Consequently, when dealing with sculptural haptics our eyes rather "touch" the art object (even if it is a seemingly shapeless and amorph sculpture) than look at it. This lack or collapse of transcendental horizon that was once glowing from the inside of things and especially works of art results in a form of sensual eternalism, when art is understood only as something that represents this or that form of "reality", be it the reality of concepts produced by our mind to describe the world we live in or the so-called "physical reality" of dense material objects or any other given, particular, defined form of reality, as opposed to Transcendental Reality as such. It is also stated that haptics of this kind, overall, results in an uncritical attitude when works of public art that are totally irrelated to the unique character of the place are installed in it (the so-called plop-art). Instead of this subtle form of the violence of international market economy and post-capitalism over the residents of the place where such artworks are installed, more subtle and sensitive to the environment site-specific works should instead be preferred.

Contemporary Haptics, Public Art, Plop Art, Site-Specific Art, Sculpture of Ukraine

APA Style

Protas, M., Isychenko, I. (2023). Contemporary Sculptural Haptics in Sociocultural Context. American Journal of Art and Design, 8(4), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajad.20230804.11

ACS Style

Protas, M.; Isychenko, I. Contemporary Sculptural Haptics in Sociocultural Context. Am. J. Art Des. 2023, 8(4), 99-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ajad.20230804.11

AMA Style

Protas M, Isychenko I. Contemporary Sculptural Haptics in Sociocultural Context. Am J Art Des. 2023;8(4):99-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ajad.20230804.11

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Labyak, I. Scandal with a magnificent sculpture in Lviv: a wave of hate and eventually an attack by vandals. TSN. UA. 23 August 2023. https://tsn.ua/ukrayina/skandal-iz-pishnotiloyu-skulpturoyu-u-lvovi-2396008.html
2. Serra, R., Foster, H. Conversations about Sculpture. Yale University Press, 2018.
3. United Nations. Sustainable Development. Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11; https://sdgs.un.org/topics/sustainable-cities-and-human-settlements
4. Foster, H. Design and Crime (And Other Diatribes). London; New York: Verso, 2002, р. 4.
5. Shkepu, M. The Aesthetics of Ugliness of Karl Rosenkranz. Kyiv: Feniks, 2010, p. 9.
6. Fiedler, L. Cross the Border – Close the Gap. Art & Popular Culture. URL: https://www.artandpopularculture.com/Cross_the_Border_%E2%80%94_Close_the_Gap
7. Epstein, M. Philosophy of the body. Aleteia, 2006, p. 11–13, 36, 75, 80.
8. Plop art. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plop_art
9. Baudrillard, J. Symbolic Exchange and Death. London: Sage, 1993, p. 70.
10. Sculpture by the Sea. Exhibit Turns Australian Coastline Into an Open-Air Museum. Mu Boyan, Horizon, Bondi 2018. https://mymodernmet.com/sculpture-by-the-sea-2018/; https://sculpturebythesea.com/gallery/
11. Egor Zigura, Colossus Holding the World. https://www.egorzigura.art/items/32
12. Baudrillard, J. Fatal strategies. Lviv: Calvary, 2010, p. 8–10.
13. Fenner, D. Gardens and Plasticity. Contemporary Aesthetics. Vol. 21, 2023. https://contempaesthetics.org/2023/01/15/gardens-and-plasticity/
14. McGuigan, J. From cultural populism to cool capitalism. Art & the Public Sphere. Vol. 1(1), 2011, р. 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1386/aps.1.1.7_1
15. Platonova, A. Peter Osborne: "National identity should be sought in the future, not in the past." LB.ua. 17 February 2023. https://lb.ua/culture/2023/01/13/542239_piter_osborn_natsionalnu.html
16. Shkepu, Mariia. The Methodological Amorphousness of Post-Culturology and Antinomy of Creative Culture. Art research of Ukraine. Vol. 20, 2020, р. 121–130. https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8155.20.2020.220931
17. Sustainable peace manifesto. Never again 2.0. Executive Summary. https://sustainablepeacemanifesto.org/uk/
18. Pushp, A. Retrocausality and Quantum Mechanics. Jul 18, 2023. Resonance Science Foundation. https://www.resonancescience.org/blog/retrocausality-and-quantum-mechanics?fbclid=IwAR3kDEoedH6nzAlfHVM38WZHeENiFlSSdgycrXkH0jxWNypyTxmXzmfY1UA
19. Hesmondhalgh, D., Pratt, A. Cultural industries and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy. London. 11 (1), 2005, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630500067598
20. Lyotard, Jean-François. Anima Minima. In Moralités postmodernes. Paris: Galilée, 1993, р. 199–210.