| Peer-Reviewed

Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts

Received: 8 June 2022    Accepted: 22 June 2022    Published: 30 June 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Concerns over student retention and development within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) higher education present a need for research that examines educational caring in STEM leadership. This work purports that senior academic administrative leadership's positional influence and caring intelligence are necessary to cultivate and sustain caring STEM environments. Building on cross-disciplinary scholarship on academic caring, the STEM Caring Intelligence Framework for Academic Administrative Leadership is proposed as five interrelated dimensions of caring intelligence: STEM caring, academic caring, administrative caring, leadership caring, and champion-driven caring. The proposed conceptual framework and a thematic analysis were used to examine caring intelligence within the interview transcripts of seven provosts at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who were identified as STEM supportive. Atlas TI software was used for management of the data, coding, and assistance with thematic analysis. Extending previous scholarship tested with HBCU deans, the findings substantiate the relevance of the framework for understanding characteristics of STEM caring intelligence of provosts serving as chief academic officers. All seven provosts’ reflections on STEM leadership promoted at least one of the five dimensions of caring intelligence that were proposed in the framework. STEM caring and champion-driven caring were found to be the most common dimensions present in the provosts’ reflections on their STEM leadership and efforts to broaden participation. Thus, the reflections of the participating HBCU provosts provided a narrative for the practice and study of caring in STEM leadership. Implications for future research are discussed.

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.her.20220703.15
Page(s) 91-99
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

STEM Leadership, Broadening Participation, Higher Education Academic Administration, Caring Intelligence, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)

References
[1] Lisberg, A., & Woods, B. (2018). Mentorship, mindset and learning strategies: An integrative approach to increasing underrepresented minority student retention in a STEM undergraduate program. Journal of STEM Education, 19 (3), 14-20.
[2] Christe, B. L. (2013). The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14 (3), 22-26.
[3] Leary, M., Tylka, A., Corsi, V., and Bryner, R. (2021). The effect of first-year seminar classroom design on social integration and retention of STEM first-time, full-time college freshmen. Education Research International, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4262905
[4] Blackmon, A. T., Askew, K., McKayle, C., Engerman, K., & Clavier, N. (2021). “I see the potential in you”: Provosts’ purposeful perspective-taking on HBCU students to promote broadening STEM participation. Journal of Negro Education, 90 (3), 322-333.
[5] Hendrickson, K. A., & Francis, K. A. (2021). University administrators as caring academic leaders in an HBCU setting: Investigating student perceptions. In M. T. Miller & G. D. Gearhart (Eds.), Handbook of research on the changing role of college and university leadership pp. 147-174. IGI Global.
[6] Taylor, O. L., Campone, F., & Moreland, N. (2022). Leadership to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Introduction. Journal of Negro Education, 90 (3), 257-264.
[7] Hendrickson, K. A., & Francis, K. A. (2020). Investigating authentic university academic care at a U.S. non-mainland HBCU. In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger, & M. Makhanya (Eds.), Improving classroom engagement and international development programs: International perspectives on humanizing higher education, 59-74. Emerald Publishing Limited.
[8] Abreu Pederzini, G. D. (2020). Realistic egocentrism: Caring leadership through an evolutionary lens. Culture and Organization, 26 (5-6), 372-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1637875
[9] Burnier, D. (2003). Other voices/other rooms: Towards a care-centered public administration. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 25 (4), 529-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2003.11029423
[10] Kerby, M. B., Branham, K. R., & Mallinger, G. M. (2014). Consumer-based higher education: The uncaring of learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 14 (5), 42-54. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/KerbyMB_Web14_5_.pdf
[11] Noddings, N. (1986). Fidelity in teaching, teacher education, and research for teaching. Harvard Educational.
[12] Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
[13] Stewart, C. (2019, January 28). The elusive (and expanding) role of the provost. HigherEdJobs. https://www.higheredjobs.com/Articles/articleDisplay.cfm?ID=1815
[14] Hendrickson, K. A., Askew, K., McKayle, C., & Engerman, K. (2021). Exploring caring-oriented STEM academic leadership: Views from HBCU academic middle management. Journal of Negro Education, 90 (3), 334-345.
[15] Bilimoria, D., & Singer, L. T. (2019). Institutions Developing Excellence in Academic Leadership (IDEAL): A partnership to advance gender equity, diversity, and inclusion in academic STEM. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 38 (3), 362-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-10-2017-0209.
[16] Maghroori, R., & Powers, C. (2007, August 2). Vice President vs. Provost. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/vice-president-vs-provost/
[17] Barrow, C. (2021). Rationality crisis in higher education. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Critical transformative educational leadership and policy studies—a reader: Discussions and solutions from the leading voices in education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
[18] Little, B. (2012). A new spirit for fostering organizational success. Human Resource Management International Digest, 20 (4), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09670731211233366
[19] Burnier, D. (2009). Markets no more: Toward a care-centered public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31 (3), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806310308
[20] Krist, C. S., & Suárez, E. A. (2018). Doing science with fidelity to persons: Instantiations of caring participation in science practices. In Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 1, 424-431. ICLS. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/875
[21] Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminist approach to ethics. University of California Berkeley.
[22] Freeman, K. E., Winston-Proctor, C. E., Gangloff-Bailey, F., & Jones, J. M. (2021). Racial identity-rooted academic motivation of first-year African American students majoring in STEM at an HBCU. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669407
[23] Coleman, D. G. (1995). Book review: Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession. International Journal of Educational Reform, 4 (3), 390-395.
[24] Kroth, M., and Keeler, C. (2009). Caring as a managerial strategy. Human Resource Development Review, 8 (4), 506-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309341558.
[25] Undung, Y., & de Guzman, A. B. (2014). Who says we are not human? The art and science of forgiveness in educational leadership. In The 14th Annual SEAAIR Conference—Cross-cultural education in AEC 2015: Realizing possibilities, defining foundations, 239-254. Aquinas University of Legazpi, Philippines.
[26] Louis, K. S., Murphy, J., & Smylie, M. (2016). Caring leadership in schools: Findings from exploratory analyses. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52 (2), 310-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15627678
[27] Bricheno, P., & Thornton, M. (2007). Role model, hero or champion? Children's views concerning role models. Educational Research, 49 (4), 383-396.
[28] Evans, J. M., Daub, S., Goldhar, J., Wojtak, A., & Purbhoo, D. (2016). Leading integrated health and social care systems: Perspectives from research and practice. Health Quarterly, 18 (4), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2016.24553.
[29] Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A model of educational leadership: Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8 (4), 347-364.
[30] Gilfoyle, E. M. (1980). Caring: A philosophy for practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34 (8), 517-521.
[31] Vandamme, F., & Cotton, A. M. (2013). Marc Spoelders: Homo Pedagogicus, a contributor to education for wisdom and harmony. Scientia Paedagogica Experimentalis, L (1-2), 25-53.
[32] Shi, Y., & Ye, M. (2016), Responsible leadership: Review and prospects. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6, 877-884. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.68083.
[33] Al-Abedi, A. R., & Adosh, H. F. H. (2021). How the organizational envy effects on organization's brilliance? The moderating role of contextual leadership intelligence. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12 (4), 665-673.
[34] Alade, K., & Windapo, A. O. (2021). Developing effective 4IR leadership framework for construction organisations. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28 (5), 1377-1396. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-05764
[35] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (Special Report NSF 19-304). National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd
[36] National Center for Education Statistics (n.d.). Fast facts: Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Retrieved March 1, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kenny Hendrickson, Karyl Askew. (2022). Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts. Higher Education Research, 7(3), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220703.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kenny Hendrickson; Karyl Askew. Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts. High. Educ. Res. 2022, 7(3), 91-99. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220703.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kenny Hendrickson, Karyl Askew. Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts. High Educ Res. 2022;7(3):91-99. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220703.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.her.20220703.15,
      author = {Kenny Hendrickson and Karyl Askew},
      title = {Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts},
      journal = {Higher Education Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {3},
      pages = {91-99},
      doi = {10.11648/j.her.20220703.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220703.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20220703.15},
      abstract = {Concerns over student retention and development within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) higher education present a need for research that examines educational caring in STEM leadership. This work purports that senior academic administrative leadership's positional influence and caring intelligence are necessary to cultivate and sustain caring STEM environments. Building on cross-disciplinary scholarship on academic caring, the STEM Caring Intelligence Framework for Academic Administrative Leadership is proposed as five interrelated dimensions of caring intelligence: STEM caring, academic caring, administrative caring, leadership caring, and champion-driven caring. The proposed conceptual framework and a thematic analysis were used to examine caring intelligence within the interview transcripts of seven provosts at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who were identified as STEM supportive. Atlas TI software was used for management of the data, coding, and assistance with thematic analysis. Extending previous scholarship tested with HBCU deans, the findings substantiate the relevance of the framework for understanding characteristics of STEM caring intelligence of provosts serving as chief academic officers. All seven provosts’ reflections on STEM leadership promoted at least one of the five dimensions of caring intelligence that were proposed in the framework. STEM caring and champion-driven caring were found to be the most common dimensions present in the provosts’ reflections on their STEM leadership and efforts to broaden participation. Thus, the reflections of the participating HBCU provosts provided a narrative for the practice and study of caring in STEM leadership. Implications for future research are discussed.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Advancing a Framework for STEM Caring Intelligence for Academic Administrative Leadership to Broaden Participation: Perspectives of HBCU Provosts
    AU  - Kenny Hendrickson
    AU  - Karyl Askew
    Y1  - 2022/06/30
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220703.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20220703.15
    T2  - Higher Education Research
    JF  - Higher Education Research
    JO  - Higher Education Research
    SP  - 91
    EP  - 99
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-935X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220703.15
    AB  - Concerns over student retention and development within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) higher education present a need for research that examines educational caring in STEM leadership. This work purports that senior academic administrative leadership's positional influence and caring intelligence are necessary to cultivate and sustain caring STEM environments. Building on cross-disciplinary scholarship on academic caring, the STEM Caring Intelligence Framework for Academic Administrative Leadership is proposed as five interrelated dimensions of caring intelligence: STEM caring, academic caring, administrative caring, leadership caring, and champion-driven caring. The proposed conceptual framework and a thematic analysis were used to examine caring intelligence within the interview transcripts of seven provosts at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who were identified as STEM supportive. Atlas TI software was used for management of the data, coding, and assistance with thematic analysis. Extending previous scholarship tested with HBCU deans, the findings substantiate the relevance of the framework for understanding characteristics of STEM caring intelligence of provosts serving as chief academic officers. All seven provosts’ reflections on STEM leadership promoted at least one of the five dimensions of caring intelligence that were proposed in the framework. STEM caring and champion-driven caring were found to be the most common dimensions present in the provosts’ reflections on their STEM leadership and efforts to broaden participation. Thus, the reflections of the participating HBCU provosts provided a narrative for the practice and study of caring in STEM leadership. Implications for future research are discussed.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership, University of the Virgin Islands, Saint Thomas, USA

  • Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership, University of the Virgin Islands, Saint Thomas, USA

  • Sections