Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia

Received: 24 October 2024     Accepted: 11 November 2024     Published: 28 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at Degam district during main cropping season to investigate the response of bread wheat varieties to NPSB fertilizer rates and identify its economic benefit. Factorial combination of three improved bread wheat varieties (Danda’a, Hidase and Kakaba) and six fertilizer rates [Control, 50, 100, 150, 200 kg ha-1 NPSB fertilizer each supplemented with 92 kg N ha-1 and 64/20 kg NP ha-1 (Blanket recommendation) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The highest NKS (54.9), AGBM (13.8 tons ha-1), SY (9.4 tons ha-1) and GY (4549kg ha-1) were recorded from 200 kg NPSB fertilizer. Among the varieties the highest NKS (54.3) from Danda’a, TKW (49.3 g) and GY (3351kg ha-1) were recorded from Hidase variety. Variety Kakaba score the highest PH (102.5 cm) and PNT (5 per plant) with combination of 200 kg and 150 kg NPSB fertilizer respectively and reached days to heading and maturity earlier than Danda’a and Hidase. In general, the economic feasibility of the fertilizer over varieties combination indicated that application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1to all varieties Hidase, Danda’a and Kakaba resulted in maximum marginal rates of return 640.14 %, 604.81% and 481.47%, with a net benefit of 97993, 88596, and 82996 ETB respectively. Although, application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1 led to the highest MRR for the Hidase variety as compared to all other treatments and with about a total of 9397 ETB net benefit increment. Therefore, application of 200 kg of NPSB in supplement of 92 kg N ha-1 fertilizer with Hidase variety was the best producing economically profitable with acceptable grain yield.

Published in Science Development (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11
Page(s) 79-91
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bread Wheat, Economic Benefit, MRR, NPSB, Profitability, Varieties, Yield

References
[1] Abebe Tadele and Hirpa Legese, 2018. Effects of Fertilizer Rate (Blended) and Sowing Methods on Yield and Yield Components of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) in Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Compressive Research and Biological Science.
[2] Alam, M. S. and Jahan, I. 2013. Yield and yield components of wheat as affected by phosphorus fertilization. Rajshahi University Journal of Life and Earth and Agricultural Sciences, 41. pp: 21-27.
[3] Anoynomous. 2017. Degam Woreda Profile. North Shewa Zone, Oromia Regional State (Unpublished).
[4] ATA (Agricultural Transformation Agency). 2013. Status of soil resources in Ethiopia and priorities for sustainable management. Ethiopian agricultural transformation agency In: Global Soil partnership (GSP) for eastern and southern Africa. March 25-27: 2013, Nairobi, Kenya.
[5] Bereket Haileselassie, Dawit Habte, Mehretab Haileselassie and Gebremedhin Gebremeskel. 2014. Effects of mineral nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on yield and nutrient utilization of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) on the sandy soils of Hawzen District, Northern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(3): 189-198.
[6] Bizuwork Tafese and Yibekal Alemayehu. 2020. Optimizing blended (NPSB) and N fertilizer rates for the productivity of Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.var. durum) in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture (2020), 6: 1766733.
[7] Brian N. Otteson, Mohamed Mergoum and J. K. R. 2007. Seeding rate and nitrogen management effects on spring wheat yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal, 99(6): 1615-1621.
[8] CIMMYT. 1988. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico, D.F.
[9] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2018. Agricultural Sample Survey: Report on Area and Production of Major Crops. Vol. I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[10] Diriba Shiferaw G, Rut-Duga D and Wogayehu W. 2019. Effects of Blended Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Varieties on Growth and Yield Attributes. Journal of Ecology & Natural Resource, 3(3): 000170.
[11] Engida Mersha. 2001. Application of Agro-climatic Analogue Technique to Characterize the Crop Growing Season in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 3 (1): 1-18.
[12] EthioSIS (Ethiopian Soil Information System). 2014. Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of Tigray Region. Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA).
[13] EthioSIS. 2016. The Role of DSM in Transforming Agriculture: The Case of Ethiopian Soil Information System. 7th Global DSM Workshop 2016, 27 June -1 July 2016, Aarhus, Denmark.
[14] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2014. Food Balance Sheets. Rome: FAO. At http://faostat.fao.org/site/368/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=368#ancor Accessed on 20 May, 2017.
[15] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2017. Crop Production Data. Rome: FAO. Accessed at
[16] FAOSTAT (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Statistics). 2015. Food Balance Sheets. FAOSTAT. Rome.
[17] Gete Zeleke, Getachew Agegnehu, Dejene Abera, and Shahidur Rashid. 2010. Fertilizer and soil fertility potential in Ethiopia: Constraints and opportunities for enhancing the system. IFPRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 63 p.
[18] Gerba Leta, Getachew Belay and Walelign Worku, 2013. Nitrogen fertilization effects on grain quality of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.var.durum) varieties in central Ethiopia. Agricultural Sciences. 4(3): 123-130.
[19] Hillette Hailu, Tekalign Mamo, R. Keskinen, E. Karltun, Heluf Gebrekidan and Taye Bekele. 2015. Soil fertility status and wheat nutrient content in Vertisol cropping systems of central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Secure. 4(1): 19-23.
[20] Horneck DA, Sullivan DM, Owen JS, Hart JM. 2011. Soil test interpretation guide. (Corvallis, Or.): Oregon State University, Extension Service. Available:
[21] Kidane Giorgis. 2015. Dry land Agriculture Production Systems in Ethiopia. National Publishers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[22] Landon JR. 1991. Booker tropical soil manual: A handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and sub-tropics. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, New York. pp. 474.
[23] Mann, M and Warner, J. 2015. Ethiopian Wheat Yield and Yield Gap Estimation: A Small Area Integrated Data Approach. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[24] Minot, N. J., Warner, S., Lemma, L., Kasa, A., Gashaw and Rashid, S. 2015. The Wheat Supply Chain in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends and policy options. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[25] MoA (Ministry of Agriculture). 2012. Ministry of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Regulatory Directorate. Crop variety register, Issue No. 15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[26] Nicholas Minot, J. W, Solomon Lemma, Leulsegged Kasa, A. G. and S. R. 2015. The Wheat Supply Chain in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends and policy options. (Accessed on February 11, 2017).
[27] Tekalign T 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure and compost analysis. Working Document No. 13. International Livestock Research Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.
[28] Tilahun Chibsa, Heluf Gebrekidan, Kibebew Kibret and Tolessa Debele. 2016. Effect of rate and time of nitrogen fertilizer application on durum wheat (Triticum turgidum Var L. Durum) grown on Vertisols of Bale highlands, southeastern Ethiopia. American Journal of Research Communication, 5(1): 39-56.
[29] Tilahun Abera and Tamado Tana. 2019. Growth, yield component and yield response of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. Durum) to blended NPS fertilizer supplemented with N rates at Arsi Negelle, Central Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 13(1): 9-20.
[30] Valin, H. 2014. The future of food demand: understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics, 45, pp: 51-67.
[31] Van Beek, C. L. E. Elias, G. S. Yihenew, H. Heesmans. A. Tsegaye H., Feyisa M., Tola M., Melmuye Y., Gebremeskel S., Mengist. 2016. Soil nutrient balances under diverse agro-ecological settings in Ethiopia. Nutrient Cycle Agro ecosystem.
[32] Wogene Solomon and Agena Anjulo. 2017. Response of Bread Wheat Varieties to Different Levels of Nitrogen at Doyogena, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(2): 452–459.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Feyisa, A., Alemayehu, Y. (2024). Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia. Science Development, 5(4), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Feyisa, A.; Alemayehu, Y. Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia. Sci. Dev. 2024, 5(4), 79-91. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Feyisa A, Alemayehu Y. Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia. Sci Dev. 2024;5(4):79-91. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11,
      author = {Abreham Feyisa and Yibekal Alemayehu},
      title = {Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia
    },
      journal = {Science Development},
      volume = {5},
      number = {4},
      pages = {79-91},
      doi = {10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scidev.20240504.11},
      abstract = {The field experiment was conducted at Degam district during main cropping season to investigate the response of bread wheat varieties to NPSB fertilizer rates and identify its economic benefit. Factorial combination of three improved bread wheat varieties (Danda’a, Hidase and Kakaba) and six fertilizer rates [Control, 50, 100, 150, 200 kg ha-1 NPSB fertilizer each supplemented with 92 kg N ha-1 and 64/20 kg NP ha-1 (Blanket recommendation) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The highest NKS (54.9), AGBM (13.8 tons ha-1), SY (9.4 tons ha-1) and GY (4549kg ha-1) were recorded from 200 kg NPSB fertilizer. Among the varieties the highest NKS (54.3) from Danda’a, TKW (49.3 g) and GY (3351kg ha-1) were recorded from Hidase variety. Variety Kakaba score the highest PH (102.5 cm) and PNT (5 per plant) with combination of 200 kg and 150 kg NPSB fertilizer respectively and reached days to heading and maturity earlier than Danda’a and Hidase. In general, the economic feasibility of the fertilizer over varieties combination indicated that application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1to all varieties Hidase, Danda’a and Kakaba resulted in maximum marginal rates of return 640.14 %, 604.81% and 481.47%, with a net benefit of 97993, 88596, and 82996 ETB respectively. Although, application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1 led to the highest MRR for the Hidase variety as compared to all other treatments and with about a total of 9397 ETB net benefit increment. Therefore, application of 200 kg of NPSB in supplement of 92 kg N ha-1 fertilizer with Hidase variety was the best producing economically profitable with acceptable grain yield.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Optimum Determination of NPSB Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum asetivum.L) Varieties at Degam District of North Shewa Zone, Oromia
    
    AU  - Abreham Feyisa
    AU  - Yibekal Alemayehu
    Y1  - 2024/11/28
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11
    T2  - Science Development
    JF  - Science Development
    JO  - Science Development
    SP  - 79
    EP  - 91
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7154
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20240504.11
    AB  - The field experiment was conducted at Degam district during main cropping season to investigate the response of bread wheat varieties to NPSB fertilizer rates and identify its economic benefit. Factorial combination of three improved bread wheat varieties (Danda’a, Hidase and Kakaba) and six fertilizer rates [Control, 50, 100, 150, 200 kg ha-1 NPSB fertilizer each supplemented with 92 kg N ha-1 and 64/20 kg NP ha-1 (Blanket recommendation) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. The highest NKS (54.9), AGBM (13.8 tons ha-1), SY (9.4 tons ha-1) and GY (4549kg ha-1) were recorded from 200 kg NPSB fertilizer. Among the varieties the highest NKS (54.3) from Danda’a, TKW (49.3 g) and GY (3351kg ha-1) were recorded from Hidase variety. Variety Kakaba score the highest PH (102.5 cm) and PNT (5 per plant) with combination of 200 kg and 150 kg NPSB fertilizer respectively and reached days to heading and maturity earlier than Danda’a and Hidase. In general, the economic feasibility of the fertilizer over varieties combination indicated that application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1to all varieties Hidase, Danda’a and Kakaba resulted in maximum marginal rates of return 640.14 %, 604.81% and 481.47%, with a net benefit of 97993, 88596, and 82996 ETB respectively. Although, application of 200 kg NPSB ha-1 led to the highest MRR for the Hidase variety as compared to all other treatments and with about a total of 9397 ETB net benefit increment. Therefore, application of 200 kg of NPSB in supplement of 92 kg N ha-1 fertilizer with Hidase variety was the best producing economically profitable with acceptable grain yield.
    
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections