Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations

Received: 9 April 2025     Accepted: 27 April 2025     Published: 29 May 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Efficient bit formation matching is imperative for the success and cost-effectiveness of drilling operations and emissions reduction to provide energy solutions. Currently, drill bit selection predominantly depends on historical data and experiential knowledge. While machine learning, particularly Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), has gained prominence in bit selection, other diverse and impactful algorithms such as XGBOOST and Random Forest (RF), are often overlooked. This paper involves the systematic application and comparative analysis of XGBOOST, RF, and ANN, alongside an optimization approach using Genetic Algorithm. The study comprehensively considers various influential factors including formation properties, drilling fluid characteristics, bit design, and operational parameters. In this study, we achieved promising results with the highest classification accuracy for bit selection recorded at 0.97 using the XGBOOST model, while RF and ANN yielded accuracies of 0.91 and 0.93 respectively. Additionally, we obtained impressive R squared values of 0.991, 0.975, and 0.953 for predicting the Rate of Penetration using the XGBOOST, ANN, and RF models respectively. These algorithms, coupled with the optimization techniques, aim to establish a robust framework for nuanced and accurate bit-formation matching. The results obtained hold significant potential for minimizing costs and optimizing resource allocation and utilization during the planning and execution of drilling projects in the oil and gas industry.

Published in Petroleum Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14
Page(s) 38-47
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Machine Learning, Bit-Formation Matching, Drilling, Artificial Neural Networks, XGBOOST, Random Forest

References
[1] Momeni, M., Hosseini, S. J., Ridha, S., Laruccia, M. B., and Liu, X. (2018). An optimum drill bit selection technique using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms to increase the rate of penetration. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(2), 361–372.
[2] Watalingam, P. (2014). Bit Selection Using Drilling Data By Artificial Neural Networks. May.
[3] Bilgesu, H. I., Al-Rashidi, A. F., Aminian, K., and Ameri, S. (2001). An Unconventional Approach for Drill-Bit Selection. Proceedings of the Middle East Oil Show, 198–203.
[4] Fasheum, M. (1997). THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING by. April.
[5] McGehee, D. Y., Dahlem, J. S., Gieck, J. C., Kost, B., Lafuze, D., Reinsvold, C. H., and Steinke, S. C. (1992). The IADC Roller Bit Classification System.
[6] Jamshidi, E., and Mostafavi, H. (2013). Soft computation application to optimize drilling bit selection utilizing virtual inteligence and genetic algorithms. Society of Petroleum Engineers - International Petroleum Technology Conference 2013, IPTC 2013: Challenging Technology and Economic Limits to Meet the Global Energy Demand, 1(October), 357–371.
[7] Brandon, B. D., Cerkovnik, J., Koskie, E., Bayoud, B. B., Colston, F., Clayton, R. I., Anderson, M. E., Hollister, K. T., Senger, J., and Niemi, R. (1992). Development of a New IADC Fixed Cutter Drill Bit Classification System.
[8] Rabia, H., Farrelly, M., and Barr, M. V. (1986). A New Approach to Drill Bit Selection. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, 421–428.
[9] Bataee, M., Edalatkhah, S., and Ashna, R. (2010). Comparison between Bit Optimization Using Artificial Neural Network and Other Methods Base on Log Analysis Applied in Shadegan Oil Field. Society of Petroleum Engineers - International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2010, IOGCEC, 4, 3097–3103. h
[10] Hightower, W. J. "Proper Selection of Drill Bits and Their Use." Paper presented at the SPE Mechanical Engineering Aspects of Drilling and Production Symposium, Fort Worth, Texas, March 1964.
[11] Onyia, E. C. (1988). Relationships Between Formation Strength, Drilling Strength, and Electric Log Properties. Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, (Paper) SPE, OMEGA.
[12] Igemhokhai, S., Bello, K., and Adejumo, A. (2025). A machine learning approach to Intelligent Artificial lift method selection. International Journal of Frontiers in Engineering and Technology Research, 8(2), 001–015.
[13] M. Ali, R. Prasad, Y. Xiang, Z. M. Yaseen, Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition hybridized with random forest and kernel ridge regression model for monthly rainfall forecasts, J. Hydrol. 584 (2020) 124647,
[14] Speiser, J. L., Miller, M. E., Tooze, J., and Ip, E. (2019). A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 134, 93–101.
[15] Nosakhare, A., Igemhokhai, S., Aimhanesi, S., Ugbodu, F., and Iyore, N. (2024). Heliyon Data-driven intelligent modeling, optimization, and global sensitivity analysis of a xanthan gum biosynthesis process. Heliyon, 10(3), e25432.
[16] Alshboul, O., Shehadeh, A., Almasabha, G., and Almuflih, A. S. (2022). Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction. Sustainability, 14(11), 6651.
[17] Michell, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms [electronic resource]. Mit Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Igemhokhai, S., Bello, K., Olaoye, A., Momodu, E., Adejumo, A., et al. (2025). Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations. Petroleum Science and Engineering, 9(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Igemhokhai, S.; Bello, K.; Olaoye, A.; Momodu, E.; Adejumo, A., et al. Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2025, 9(1), 38-47. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Igemhokhai S, Bello K, Olaoye A, Momodu E, Adejumo A, et al. Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations. Pet Sci Eng. 2025;9(1):38-47. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14,
      author = {Shedrach Igemhokhai and Kelani Bello and Abiodun Olaoye and Ehigie Momodu and Abayomi Adejumo and Oladele Akindayini},
      title = {Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations 
    },
      journal = {Petroleum Science and Engineering},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {38-47},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pse.20250901.14},
      abstract = {Efficient bit formation matching is imperative for the success and cost-effectiveness of drilling operations and emissions reduction to provide energy solutions. Currently, drill bit selection predominantly depends on historical data and experiential knowledge. While machine learning, particularly Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), has gained prominence in bit selection, other diverse and impactful algorithms such as XGBOOST and Random Forest (RF), are often overlooked. This paper involves the systematic application and comparative analysis of XGBOOST, RF, and ANN, alongside an optimization approach using Genetic Algorithm. The study comprehensively considers various influential factors including formation properties, drilling fluid characteristics, bit design, and operational parameters. In this study, we achieved promising results with the highest classification accuracy for bit selection recorded at 0.97 using the XGBOOST model, while RF and ANN yielded accuracies of 0.91 and 0.93 respectively. Additionally, we obtained impressive R squared values of 0.991, 0.975, and 0.953 for predicting the Rate of Penetration using the XGBOOST, ANN, and RF models respectively. These algorithms, coupled with the optimization techniques, aim to establish a robust framework for nuanced and accurate bit-formation matching. The results obtained hold significant potential for minimizing costs and optimizing resource allocation and utilization during the planning and execution of drilling projects in the oil and gas industry.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Application of Machine Learning for Bit-formation Matching in Drilling Operations 
    
    AU  - Shedrach Igemhokhai
    AU  - Kelani Bello
    AU  - Abiodun Olaoye
    AU  - Ehigie Momodu
    AU  - Abayomi Adejumo
    AU  - Oladele Akindayini
    Y1  - 2025/05/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14
    T2  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    JF  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    JO  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    SP  - 38
    EP  - 47
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4516
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250901.14
    AB  - Efficient bit formation matching is imperative for the success and cost-effectiveness of drilling operations and emissions reduction to provide energy solutions. Currently, drill bit selection predominantly depends on historical data and experiential knowledge. While machine learning, particularly Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), has gained prominence in bit selection, other diverse and impactful algorithms such as XGBOOST and Random Forest (RF), are often overlooked. This paper involves the systematic application and comparative analysis of XGBOOST, RF, and ANN, alongside an optimization approach using Genetic Algorithm. The study comprehensively considers various influential factors including formation properties, drilling fluid characteristics, bit design, and operational parameters. In this study, we achieved promising results with the highest classification accuracy for bit selection recorded at 0.97 using the XGBOOST model, while RF and ANN yielded accuracies of 0.91 and 0.93 respectively. Additionally, we obtained impressive R squared values of 0.991, 0.975, and 0.953 for predicting the Rate of Penetration using the XGBOOST, ANN, and RF models respectively. These algorithms, coupled with the optimization techniques, aim to establish a robust framework for nuanced and accurate bit-formation matching. The results obtained hold significant potential for minimizing costs and optimizing resource allocation and utilization during the planning and execution of drilling projects in the oil and gas industry.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections