Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests

Received: 13 December 2024     Accepted: 6 January 2025     Published: 17 February 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The Ratio Test, developed by Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, is a fundamental method for determining the convergence or divergence of an infinite series and is commonly used as a primary test for many series. However, due to its restricted range of applicability, several generalized forms of the Ratio Test have been introduced to extend its usefulness. In this paper, we combine two of the most effective and reliable generalized Ratio Tests to create more efficient convergence tests. To this end, we show that if a positive valued function, f, is defined for all numbers greater than or equal to one, and if the improper integral of the reciprocal of f, over the interval from one to infinity, diverges, then f has a close relationship with a sister function φ. We then show that these paired functions satisfy a remarkable relationship that completely characterizes all monotonically decreasing sequence of terms whose sum diverge. We demonstrate through several examples the ease with which φ can be found if f is known and vice-versa. Next, we combine the generalized Ratio Tests of Dini and Ermakoff by focusing on a ‘thin’ subsequence of the terms of a large category of infinite series to develop other convergence and divergence tests. Furthermore, we refine these tests to produce practical and easier to apply convergence and divergence tests. Lastly, we demonstrate that for many infinite series, one can factor their terms into the product of the reciprocal of f and L. We then show that the limit superior and limit inferior of an expression based on L determines the convergence or divergence of the original series.

Published in Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal (Volume 14, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12
Page(s) 8-12
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Series, Convergence, Divergence

1. Introduction
In this paper, we shall show how one can combine the ratio tests of Dini and Ermakoff (see , pages 37-45) to develop other tests which can lead to a rapid determination of convergence and divergence for certain infinite series.
Dini’s test for convergence and divergence states that:
If n=1Dn-1 is a divergent series and if Tn=Dnanan+1-Dn+1, then n=1an is convergent if lim̲Tn>0 and divergent if lim̅Tn<0 (see , page 37).
Ermakoff’s tests state that: If f(x) and φx satisfy the following conditions:
fx is strictly increasing on [1,),
fn=an>0 , where Z+, and
φ(x) is an increasing function that satisfies φ(x)>x, then:
n=1an converges if:
lim̅φ'xf(φx)f(x)<1 and diverges if lim̲φ'xf(φx)f(x)>1 (see , page 44).
If one rephrases Dini’s tests as a function of the limit infimum and limit infimum (see of (δ+Dn+1)an+1Dnan, where δR, it becomes apparent that it bears some resemblance to Ermakoff’s tests.
The speculation that some advantage may be gained by combining Ermakoff and Dini’s tests forms the basis of this paper.
In the first section (Preliminaries) we give a characterization of all diverging series via the equation φ'xfx=fφx (see ).
In the third section (Generalized Ratio Tests), we prove two convergence and divergence theorems. In the next section (Main Results), we provide refinements of these two key theorems, by focusing our attention on infinite series that are expressible in the form n=11f(n)L(n)α, where α is a non-zero real number.
A key result from the first section (Preliminaries), is used to devise this refinement scheme. In fact, we show that the problem of finding whether a series converges or diverges, for many infinite series, can be reduced to one of knowing a few basic divergent series and the lim̲ or the lim̅ of quantities of the form Lφn-L(n).
We conclude our paper in the last section with a couple of examples illustrating the use of some of our results.
Throughout this paper, f will denote a continuous, positive valued, and a non-decreasing function on [1,).
2. Preliminaries
Definition 2.1
We shall denote by Dτ the set of all functions φ:1,R, that satisfy:
φ(x)>xand(1)
φ'(x)1.(2)
Definition 2.2
We shall denote by Dϕ the set of all functions f:1,R+ satisfying:
fx is strictly increasing on [1,), and
11f(x)dx=.(3)
Next, we shall continue with a couple of preliminary but important results which would lead us, ultimately, to the fact that: if φ' is an increasing function on 1,, then a function from either Dϕ or Dτ has at least one corresponding function in the other set. Furthermore, these paired functions satisfy a remarkable relationship that completely characterizes all monotonically decreasing sequence of terms whose sums diverge.
Lemma 2.1
Let fDϕ and φDτ. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
φ'xfx=fφx,(4)
xφ(x)1f(t)dt=1φ(1)1f(t)dt, for allx1.(5)
Proof:
To prove that (5) implies (4), differentiate both sides of (5) with respect to x (see ).
Next, suppose that (4) is true. Then,
1x1f(t)dt=1xφ'(t)f(φt)dt=φ(1)φ(x)1f(u)du, whereu=φt(see).
Hence,
1φ(1)1f(t)dt=xφ(x)1f(t)dt, for all x>1.
Theorem 2.1
Let fDϕ, then there exists at least one φDτ such that:
φ'xfx=fφx.(6)
Proof:
Let Fx=1x1f(t)dt. Then F'(x) exists, is non-zero, and F-1(x) exists (see ).
Let ε>0 and define φx as:
φx=F-1(Fx+ε).(7)
The rest of the proof is routine.
Theorem 2.2
Let φDτ. If in addition φ' is an increasing function on 1,, then there exists at least one fDϕ such that the following conditions hold:
φ'xfx=fφx.(8)
11f(x)dx=.(9)
Proof:
Let f be continuous, positive, and a non-decreasing function on 1,φ(1) that satisfies:
fφ1=φ'1f1.
We shall then extendfto[1,)via the equationfφx=φ'xfx.
Clearly, f satisfies condition (6). Therefore, by Lemma 1.1.1, condition (7) also holds and 11f(x)dx=, since
1φ(1)1f(t)dt=xφ(x)1f(t)dt.
Our next result, which is an immediate consequence of Theorems 2.1 and 2.2, can be viewed as a characterization of all monotonically decreasing sequence of positive terms whose sums diverge. Note that the condition 11f(t)dt=, is crucial in the proof of our next result.
Theorem 2.3
Suppose that ann=1 is a sequence of monotonically decreasing sequence of positive terms. Then, there exists a continuous, positive valued, and a non-decreasing function f on [1,) that satisfies n=1an , for all Z+, and at least one function φDτ such that φ'xfx=fφx.
Theorem 1.1.3 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.1.
In the next section, we shall prove a convergence and a divergence result.
For the remainder of this paper, fDϕ, φDτ, and g will denote a non-increasing, almost everywhere continuous function on [1,). For such functions g, it follows from (see page 138, problem number 8 and page 323, Theorem 11.33) that 1g(t)dt is well defined.
3. Generalized Ratio Tests
Theorem 3.1
Let D(x) be a non-decreasing, positive function on [1,), such that n=11Dφn(1) diverges. If φ'(x)Dφxg(φ(x))Dxg(x)1, for all x>ξ>1, then n=1g(n) diverges.
Proof:
If φ'(x)Dφxg(φ(x))Dxg(x)1, for all x>ξ then
ξxφ'(t)Dφtg(φ(t))dtξxDtg(t)dt.
That is, φ(ξ)φ(x)Dug(u)duξxDtg(t)dt.
Therefore, xφ(x)Dug(u)duξφ(ξ)Dtg(t)dt =β>0.
Since D(x) is a non-decreasing, positive function on [1,), it follows that
xφ(x)g(u)du1D(φ(x))xφ(x)Dug(u)duβD(φx).
Thus,
1gxdxβn=11Dφn1= and n=1gn diverges by the Integral Test (see ).
Theorem 3.2
Suppose that Cx is a real-valued function on [1,) such that lim̲C(x)>λ>0.
If φ'(x)Cφxg(φ(x))Cxg(x)1-λC(x), for all x>ξ, then n=1g(n) converges.
Proof
We can assume without loss of generality that for all x>ξ, C(x)>λ. Thus,
ξxφ'(t)Cφtg(φ(t))dtξxCtgtdt-λξxgtdt.
Hence,
λξxgtdtξxCtgtdt-φ(ξ)φ(x)C(u)gudu 
Therefore,
λξxgtdtξφ(ξ)gtC(t)dt-xφ(x)C(u)gudu
 ξφξCtgtdt=β< .
Since x is arbitrary, it follows that 1gxdx converges. Consequently, n=1gn converges (see ).
4. Main Results
In this Section, we shall show how the results from Section 1.1 can be used, in conjunction with Theorems 2.1 and 2.5, to attain practical tests to check for the convergence or divergence of infinite series. We shall focus our attention on infinite series that can be written in the form n=11f(n)L(n)α.
Note that if g(x) is positive and decreasing on [1,), limx0g(x)=0, then g(x) is expressible in the form gx=1f(x)L(x)α where fDϕ, L is non-decreasing on [1,), limnLx=, and αR.
Lemma 3.1
If β>0 and 0<α<1, then there exists a k>0 such that 1-αβ1-.
Proof
If β1, then since 0<α<1, it follows that 1-αβ(1-α).
So, assume that 0<β<1. Then there exists positive integers m, n such that mn<β.
Therefore, 1-αβ1-αmn1-α1n.
Now, let hα=1-n-(1-α), where k=1n+1.
Then, h0=0 and h'α=1-nk(1-)n-1.
Thus, h'(α)>0 and h(α)>0 for all αϵ0, 1 (see ).
Consequently, if β>0 and 0<α<1, then there exists k>0 such that:
1-αβ1-αmn1-α1n1-.
Corollary 3.1
Suppose that fDϕ and φDτ satisfy: φ'xfx=fφx.
If x=1f(x)L(x)α , α>1, and lim̲L(φn-L(n)ω>0, then n=11f(x)L(x)α converges.
Proof
Now, let Cx=L(x).
Then,
φ'(x)Cφxg(φ(x))Cxg(x)=L(x)L(φx)α-1.
Since lim̲L(φn-L(n)ω>0, it follows that limnLx=.
Thus,
L(x)L(φ(x))1-ωLx+ω1-ω2L(x) for sufficiently large x.
If β2, then for sufficiently large x,
L(x)L(φx)β-11-ω2L(x) β-11-ω2L(x)
If 1<β<2, then 0<β-1<1, and for sufficiently large x, it follows from Lemma 3.1 and above that there exists a k>0 such that:
L(x)L(φx)β-11-2L(x)=1-λC(x),
where Lx=Cx and λ=kw2.
It follows from Theorem 3.1 that n=11f(x)L(x)α converges and hence, Corollary 3.1 holds.
Corollary 3.2
Let fDϕ and φDτ satisfy: φ'xfx=fφx.
If gx=1f(x)L(x)α, α1, and lim¯L(φn-L(n)<, then n=11f(x)L(x)α diverges.
Proof:
Now, Dx=L(x).
Then,
φ'(x)Dφxg(φ(x))Dxg(x)=L(φ(x))Lx1-α1.
Since lim¯L(φn-L(n)<, it follows that for sufficiently large x,
0<Lφx-L(x)β.
Thus,
j=01Dφj(1)1βj=01L1+=.
Therefore, n=11f(x)L(x)α diverges by Theorem 3.2
5. Examples
Next, we shall include a couple of examples of functions fDϕ and their corresponding functions φDτ.
Example 4.1
Let f(x) = 1. Then, Fx=1x1f(t)dt = x – 1 and F-1(x) = x + 1. Thus,
if  = 1, (x) = F-1(F(x) + 1) = x + 1.
Example 4.2
Let f(x) = x. Then, F(x) = 1x1tdt=ln(x) Therefore, F-1x=ex. Hence, for  = In2,
x= F-1Fx+ln2=eln(2x)=2x.
Example 4.3
Let f(x) = xInx. Then,
Fx=ex1tlntdt =ln(ln(x) and F-1x=eex.
Hence, for  = In2, (x) = x2.
We shall conclude this paper by demonstrating the ease with which Corollaries 3.2 and 3.3 can be used to determine the convergence and divergence of some well-known series.
Example 4.4
n=11np .
Let f(x) = 1. Hence, (x) = x + 1. Since Lx=x, Lφx-Lx=1.
Hence, n=11np converges if  = p > 1 and diverges if  = p11 (see ).
Example 4.5
n=11nln(n)p. Let f(x) = x. Then, L(x) = Inx and  = p. Since
f(x) = x, (x) = 2x. Now, L((x)) – L(x) = In(2x) – In(x) = In2. Hence,
n=11nln(n)p converges if  = p > 1, and diverges if  = p 1 (see and ) for the interested reader.
6. Conclusion
In this paper, we proved that all monotonically decreasing sequence of positive terms whose sum diverges can be characterized by an equation satisfying φ'xfx=fφx, where φ' is a non-decreasing function on 1,).
We also showed how the tests of Dini and Ermakoff can be combined to establish other convergence and divergence theorems for certain infinite series. These new tests proved to be more malleable and easier to refine by focusing attention on series that are expressible in the form n=11f(n)L(n)α, where α is a real number.
In fact, we proved that the problem of finding whether a series converges or diverges can, in many cases, be reduced to one of knowing a few basic divergent series and the limit superior or the limit inferior of quantities of the form Lφn-L(n).
Abbreviations

pp

Pages

lim̲

Limit Inferior

lim̅

Limit Superior

Acknowledgments
I am eternally indebted to Dr. William F. Ford for his insight and natural ability to see results that never were. His unwavering conjecture that combining the convergence and divergence results of Dini and Ermakoff would yield more practical tests is the motivation for this article.
Author Contributions
Joseph Granville Gaskin is the sole author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Bromwich, T. J., An Introduction to the Theory of Infinite Series, Macmillan & Co. Ltd., New York, Second Edition, 1991.
[2] Bromwich, T. J., An Introduction to the Theory of Infinite Series, Alpha Editions,
[3] Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Introduction to Real Analysis, Vol 1, 2021, pp 80-86.
[4] Gaskin, J. G., Characterization of a large family of Convergent series that leads to a Rapid Acceleration of Slowly Convergent Logarithmic series, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 2024, Vol. 10, Issue 3,
[5] Anton, H, Bivens, I., Davis, S., John Wiley& Sons Inc, pp 309-321.
[6] Briggs, Cochran, Gillet, Schulz, 3rd Edition, Calculus Early Transcendentals, Pearson, 2023.
[7] Stewart, J., Clegg, D. K., Watson, S., Calculus Early Transcendentals, 9th Edition, 2020, pp 329.
[8] Thomson B. S., Bruckner, J. B., Bruckner, A. M., Elementary Real Analysis, 2008, pp 416.
[9] Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, Third Edition, 1976.
[10] Bartle R. G., The Elements of Real Analysis, Wiley Publishers, 2nd Edition, pp 259.
[11] Hunter K. John, An Introduction to Real Analysis, 2014, pp 267.
[12] Thomas, Calculus, 14th Edition, George B Thomas, Joel R Hass, Christopher Heil, Maurice D. Weir, Pearson, pp 197.
[13] Trench, William F., Introduction to Real Analysis, p.cm., Library of Congress Cataloging-in-publication Data, 2013, pp 200-233.
[14] Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Introduction to Real Analysis, Vol 1, 2021, pp 80-86.
[15] Sayel A. Ali, The m^th Ratio Test, Convergence Tests for Series, American Mathematical Monthly, 2008, Vol 115, pp. 514-524.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gaskin, J. G. (2025). Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests. Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal, 14(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gaskin, J. G. Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests. Pure Appl. Math. J. 2025, 14(1), 8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gaskin JG. Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests. Pure Appl Math J. 2025;14(1):8-12. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12,
      author = {Joseph Granville Gaskin},
      title = {Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests},
      journal = {Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal},
      volume = {14},
      number = {1},
      pages = {8-12},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pamj.20251401.12},
      abstract = {The Ratio Test, developed by Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, is a fundamental method for determining the convergence or divergence of an infinite series and is commonly used as a primary test for many series. However, due to its restricted range of applicability, several generalized forms of the Ratio Test have been introduced to extend its usefulness. In this paper, we combine two of the most effective and reliable generalized Ratio Tests to create more efficient convergence tests. To this end, we show that if a positive valued function, f, is defined for all numbers greater than or equal to one, and if the improper integral of the reciprocal of f, over the interval from one to infinity, diverges, then f has a close relationship with a sister function φ. We then show that these paired functions satisfy a remarkable relationship that completely characterizes all monotonically decreasing sequence of terms whose sum diverge. We demonstrate through several examples the ease with which φ can be found if f is known and vice-versa. Next, we combine the generalized Ratio Tests of Dini and Ermakoff by focusing on a ‘thin’ subsequence of the terms of a large category of infinite series to develop other convergence and divergence tests. Furthermore, we refine these tests to produce practical and easier to apply convergence and divergence tests. Lastly, we demonstrate that for many infinite series, one can factor their terms into the product of the reciprocal of f and L. We then show that the limit superior and limit inferior of an expression based on L determines the convergence or divergence of the original series.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Consequences of Generalized Ratio Tests That Lead to More Efficient Convergence and Divergence Tests
    AU  - Joseph Granville Gaskin
    Y1  - 2025/02/17
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12
    T2  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    JF  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    JO  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    SP  - 8
    EP  - 12
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9812
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20251401.12
    AB  - The Ratio Test, developed by Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, is a fundamental method for determining the convergence or divergence of an infinite series and is commonly used as a primary test for many series. However, due to its restricted range of applicability, several generalized forms of the Ratio Test have been introduced to extend its usefulness. In this paper, we combine two of the most effective and reliable generalized Ratio Tests to create more efficient convergence tests. To this end, we show that if a positive valued function, f, is defined for all numbers greater than or equal to one, and if the improper integral of the reciprocal of f, over the interval from one to infinity, diverges, then f has a close relationship with a sister function φ. We then show that these paired functions satisfy a remarkable relationship that completely characterizes all monotonically decreasing sequence of terms whose sum diverge. We demonstrate through several examples the ease with which φ can be found if f is known and vice-versa. Next, we combine the generalized Ratio Tests of Dini and Ermakoff by focusing on a ‘thin’ subsequence of the terms of a large category of infinite series to develop other convergence and divergence tests. Furthermore, we refine these tests to produce practical and easier to apply convergence and divergence tests. Lastly, we demonstrate that for many infinite series, one can factor their terms into the product of the reciprocal of f and L. We then show that the limit superior and limit inferior of an expression based on L determines the convergence or divergence of the original series.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Mathematics & Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, USA

    Research Fields: Real Analysis, Sequences and series, Number Theory, Differential Equations, Point Set Topology.