| Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia

Received: 7 June 2013     Published: 20 August 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background and objectives: In our study, it is aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the use of local anesthetics by the addition of adjuvant drugs to the patients who had hand surgery with regional intravenous anesthesia. In this context, contributions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent to the local anesthetics as adjuvant medication during and after surgery for the patients and their positive and negative effects on the patients were evaluated. Methods: The Study was designed to cover backward date range of January 2010-August 2011 period of University Hospital Operating Room records of the hand surgery patients operated with regional intravenous anesthesia (RIVA) and those were evaluated. Total 44 patients’ records retrospectively evaluated. The patients treated with prilocaine were selected as control group (Group 1), the other 22 patients treated with prilocaine and Dexketoprofen were selected as the adjuvant drug added group for the RIVA process (Group 2). The sensory and motor block onset and end times of the patients, the surgical wound pain VAS values and also VAS scores that could be derived from tourniquet pain were examined. Results: We found the positive impact on the patients, in terms of pain, as statistically significant, by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug as an adjuvant, during and after surgery, for the RIVA technique. In this study, the starting and ending times of sensory and motor block, surgical wound VAS scores, tourniquet VAS scores measurements were taken. The mean onset time of sensorial block of Group I was calculated as 9.4 min, whereas Group II, mean onset time of sensorial block was calculated 7.09 min. In Group 2, 40 Minutes after the tourniquet had a lower VAS scores. Conclusion: It is concluded that, in the first 24 hours in RIVA, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement was reduced by Dexketoprofen.

Published in Journal of Anesthesiology (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12
Page(s) 9-14
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Prilocaine, Dexketoprofen, Regional Intravenous Anesthesia

References
[1] Erdine S. Rejyonel Anestezi. Istanbul: Nobel tip kitabevleri 2005, 1-44;104-108.
[2] Wilgis EFS. Observations on the effect of tourniquet ischemia. J Bone Joint Surgery 1971; 53(a): 1343-6.
[3] Lauwers M, Camu F, Breivik H, et al. The safety and effectiveness of remifentanil as an adjunct sedative for regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999; 88-134
[4] Collins VJ. Principles of Anesthesiology: General and Regional Anesthesia. Pennsylvania: Lea & Febiger; 1993, 1199-281.
[5] Acalovschi I, Cristea T. Intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine. Anesth & Analg 1995; 81: 539-43.
[6] Guldogus, F, Orbay O, Karakaya D. Regional intravenöz anestezide lidokain, lidokain+fentanil ve lidokain+atrakuryum kombinasyonları değerlendirilmesi. Türk Anest. ve Reani. Cem. Mecmuası 2001; 29: 129-34.
[7] Elhakim M, Sadek RA. Addition of atracurium to lidocaine for intravenous anesthesia. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 542-544
[8] Ates Y, Cetin S, Ozgunay S. H1-receptor blockers promote faster onset of sensory blockade but is not free of postoperative side effects in intravenous regional anesthesia. IMRA 1999;11(3): 146
[9] Talo R, Kunt N, Kafali H: The comparison of lidocain and lidocain + rocuronium combination on intravenous regional anesthesia. IMRA 1999;11 (3):144.
[10] Thapar P, Skerman H. Evaluation of 0.2 % lidocain with fentanyl and d-tubocurarine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesth & Analg 1997; 84:342.
[11] Lurie SD, Klatt ML. Dose response study of intravenous regional anesthesia with demerol. Anesth & Analg 1998; 86: 286-92
[12] Amiot JF, Bouju PH, Palacci JH, et al. Intravenous regional anesthesia with ketamine. Anesthesia 1985; 40: 899-901.
[13] Jones NC, Pugh SC. The additation of tenoxicam to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesthesia, 1996; 51:446-448
[14] Steinberg RB, Reuben SS, Gardner G. The dose response relationship of keterolac as a companent of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:791-793.
[15] Bigat Z, Boztug N. Riva’da lidokain ve lidokain’e eklenen tenoksikam ve deksametazonun karşılaştırılması.Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2004; 32: 200
[16] Reuben SS, Steinberg RB, Klatt JL; Klatt ML. Intravenous regional anesthesia using lidocaine and clonidine. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 654-658.
[17] Erciyes N., Akturk G., Solak M., Dohman D.: Morphine/prilocaine combination for intravenous regional anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 845
[18] Acalovschi I, Cristea T, Margarit S. Tramadol added at lidocaine for Intreaveneous regional anaesthesia. Anesth & Analg 2000; 90: 523-9.
[19] Armstrong P, Power I, Wildsmith JA. Addition of fentanyl to prilocaine for intravenous regioanla anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 278-80.
[20] Sakirgil E, Günes Y, Ozbek H, Ozcengiz D. Minör el cerrahisinde rejyonal intravenöz anestezide ropivakain, ropivakain-tramadol ve ropivakain-morfinin karşılaştırılması. Ağrı 2005; 17(2): 52-58.
[21] Fahim MR, Eldeen HMB, Saad W. The Addition of Sufentanil, Tramadol or Dexmedetomidine to Lidocaine or Intraveneous Regional Anaesthesia, Eg J Anaesth 2005; 21: 283-288.
[22] Tan SM, Pay LL, Chan ST. Intravenous regional anesthesi using lidocaine and tramadol. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2001; 30(5): 516-9.
[23] Ozcan S, Ustun H, Baran FN. Lidocaine and tramadol hydrocloride in intravenous regional anaesthesia. IMRA 1999; 11(3): 145-8.
[24] Kurt N, Kurt I, Aygunes B, Oral H, Tulunay M. Effects of adding alfentanil or atracurium to lidocaine solution for intravenous regional anaesthesia. Eur J Anaestesiol 2002; 19(7): 522-5.
[25] Reuben SS, Gardner G. The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anaesthesia with lidocaine. Anaesth & Analg 1998; 86(4): 791-3.
[26] Gentili M, Bernard JM, Bonnet F. Adding clonidine to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia prevents tourniquet pain. Anesth & Analg 1999; 88: 1327
[27] Nila B, Karen L,Goa JM, Karen JM. Dexmedetomidine. Drugs 2000; 59: 263-68.
[28] R.Aantaa, A.Kallio, R.Virtanen. Dexmedetomidine, a novel alpha2 adrenergic agonist: a review of its pharmacodynamic characteristics. Drugs of the Future 1993; 18(1): 49-56.
[29] Turan A, Karamanlıoglu B, Memis D, Kaya G, Pamukcu Z. Intravenous regional anesthesia using prilocaine and neostigmine. Anesth Analg 2002; 95(5): 1419
[30] Memis D, Turan A, Karamanlıglu B, Pamukcu Z, Kurt I. Adding dexmedetomidine to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 835-40.
[31] Esmaoglu A, Tercan E, Arıkan N, Bilen A, Ersoy O, Boyacı A. Rejyonel intravenöz anestezide lokal anestezik solusyona vekuronyum eklenmesi. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 1995; 23: 448-51.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ersin Ozgur Sahin, Kenan Kaygusuz, Ahmet Cemil Isbir, Cevdet Duger, Iclal Ozdemir Kol, et al. (2013). Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine, 1(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ersin Ozgur Sahin; Kenan Kaygusuz; Ahmet Cemil Isbir; Cevdet Duger; Iclal Ozdemir Kol, et al. Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia. Int. J. Anesth. Clin. Med. 2013, 1(1), 9-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ersin Ozgur Sahin, Kenan Kaygusuz, Ahmet Cemil Isbir, Cevdet Duger, Iclal Ozdemir Kol, et al. Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia. Int J Anesth Clin Med. 2013;1(1):9-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12,
      author = {Ersin Ozgur Sahin and Kenan Kaygusuz and Ahmet Cemil Isbir and Cevdet Duger and Iclal Ozdemir Kol and Sinan Gursoy and Caner Mimaroglu},
      title = {Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia},
      journal = {International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {9-14},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ja.20130101.12},
      abstract = {Background and objectives: In our study, it is aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the use of local anesthetics by the addition of adjuvant drugs to the patients who had hand surgery with regional intravenous anesthesia. In this context, contributions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent to the local anesthetics as adjuvant medication during and after surgery for the patients and their positive and negative effects on the patients were evaluated. Methods: The Study was designed to cover backward date range of January 2010-August 2011 period of University Hospital Operating Room records of the hand surgery patients operated with regional intravenous anesthesia (RIVA) and those were evaluated. Total 44 patients’ records retrospectively evaluated. The patients treated with prilocaine were selected as control group (Group 1), the other 22 patients treated with prilocaine and Dexketoprofen were selected as the adjuvant drug added group for the RIVA process (Group 2). The sensory and motor block onset and end times of the patients, the surgical wound pain VAS values and also VAS scores that could be derived from tourniquet pain were examined. Results: We found the positive impact on the patients, in terms of pain, as statistically significant, by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug as an adjuvant, during and after surgery, for the RIVA technique. In this study, the starting and ending times of sensory and motor block, surgical wound VAS scores, tourniquet VAS scores measurements were taken. The mean onset time of sensorial block of Group I was calculated as 9.4 min, whereas Group II, mean onset time of sensorial block was calculated 7.09 min. In Group 2, 40 Minutes after the tourniquet had a lower VAS scores. Conclusion: It is concluded that, in the first 24 hours in RIVA, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement was reduced by Dexketoprofen.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Adjuvant Dexketoprofen in Regional Intravenous Anesthesia
    AU  - Ersin Ozgur Sahin
    AU  - Kenan Kaygusuz
    AU  - Ahmet Cemil Isbir
    AU  - Cevdet Duger
    AU  - Iclal Ozdemir Kol
    AU  - Sinan Gursoy
    AU  - Caner Mimaroglu
    Y1  - 2013/08/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12
    T2  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    JF  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    JO  - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine
    SP  - 9
    EP  - 14
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2997-2698
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ja.20130101.12
    AB  - Background and objectives: In our study, it is aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the use of local anesthetics by the addition of adjuvant drugs to the patients who had hand surgery with regional intravenous anesthesia. In this context, contributions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent to the local anesthetics as adjuvant medication during and after surgery for the patients and their positive and negative effects on the patients were evaluated. Methods: The Study was designed to cover backward date range of January 2010-August 2011 period of University Hospital Operating Room records of the hand surgery patients operated with regional intravenous anesthesia (RIVA) and those were evaluated. Total 44 patients’ records retrospectively evaluated. The patients treated with prilocaine were selected as control group (Group 1), the other 22 patients treated with prilocaine and Dexketoprofen were selected as the adjuvant drug added group for the RIVA process (Group 2). The sensory and motor block onset and end times of the patients, the surgical wound pain VAS values and also VAS scores that could be derived from tourniquet pain were examined. Results: We found the positive impact on the patients, in terms of pain, as statistically significant, by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug as an adjuvant, during and after surgery, for the RIVA technique. In this study, the starting and ending times of sensory and motor block, surgical wound VAS scores, tourniquet VAS scores measurements were taken. The mean onset time of sensorial block of Group I was calculated as 9.4 min, whereas Group II, mean onset time of sensorial block was calculated 7.09 min. In Group 2, 40 Minutes after the tourniquet had a lower VAS scores. Conclusion: It is concluded that, in the first 24 hours in RIVA, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement was reduced by Dexketoprofen.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • The Ministry of Health of Turkey Turhal State Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Tokat, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Cumhuriyet University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Sivas, Turkey

  • Sections