Background: Incidental findings of mastoid opacification are increasing as cross-sectional imaging is used more often. Mastoid opacification observed on imaging for unrelated clinical purposes is known as incidental mastoid opacification (IMO). Consultations with otolaryngologists are frequently the result of these findings. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the radiological patterns and frequency of IMO on CT imaging. Methodology: Patients who had CT imaging for non-otologic indications between August 2021 and August 2022 were reviewed in a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out at TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital. Findings: 123 (8.4%) of the 1,466 patients experienced incidental mastoid opacification. Of these, 54 (43.9%) had bilateral involvement and 69 (56.1%) had unilateral involvement. Four (3.3%) had a combination of partial and complete opacification, 22 (17.9%) had complete opacification, and 97 (78.9%) had partial opacification. In 48 cases (39%), there was concurrent middle ear opacification. Despite these results, radiology reports only reported mastoid opacification in 31 cases (25%) and described it as either otomastoiditis or simple opacification. Only 7 patients (5.7%) were evaluated by an otolaryngologist, and no active mastoiditis was found. In conclusion, 8.4% of patients having CT scans for non-otologic reasons had incidental mastoid opacification. Complete opacification and concurrent middle ear involvement increased the likelihood of reporting. Few cases were referred for ENT evaluation, though, and most were clinically insignificant. These results emphasize how crucial it is to interpret data carefully in order to prevent needless referrals.
| Published in | International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 13, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11 |
| Page(s) | 31-37 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
CT Scan, ENT, Incidental, Mastoid Opacification
| [1] | Raphael Schillinger B, in Otorhinologic Roentgenology I, York N. PNEUMATIZATION OF THE MASTOID 1 A ROENTGEN STUDY. |
| [2] | Mansour T, Yehudai N, Tobia A, Shihada R, Brodsky A, Khnifies R, et al. Acute mastoiditis: 20 years of experience with a uniform management protocol. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct 1; 125: 187-91. |
| [3] | Lo ACC, Nemec SF. Opacification of the middle ear and mastoid: Imaging findings and clues to differential diagnosis. Vol. 70, Clinical Radiology. W. B. Saunders Ltd; 2015. p. e1-13. |
| [4] | Sayal NR, Boyd S, Zach White G, Farrugia M. Incidental mastoid effusion diagnosed on imaging: Are we doing right by our patients? Laryngoscope. 2019 Apr 1; 129(4): 852-7. |
| [5] | Vazquez E, Castellote A, Piqueras J, Mauleon S, Creixell S, Pumarola F, et al. Imaging of Complications of Acute Mastoiditis in Children. Radiographics. 2003; 23(2): 359-72. |
| [6] | Flint PW, Haughey BH, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Niparko JK, Lund VJ, Lesperance MM. Cummings otolaryngology-head and neck surgery e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014 Nov 28. |
| [7] | Acute mastoiditis in children is computed tomography always necessary. Tamir S, Schwartz Y, Peleg U, Perez R, Sichel JY. Acute mastoiditis in children: is computed tomography always necessary? Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2009 Aug; 118(8): 565-9. |
| [8] | Stähelin-Massik J, Podvinec M, Jakscha J, Rüst ON, Greisser J, Moschopulos M, Gnehm HE. Mastoiditis in children: a prospective, observational study comparing clinical presentation, microbiology, computed tomography, surgical findings and histology. European journal of pediatrics. 2008 May; 167(5): 541-8. |
| [9] | Maroldi R, Farina D, Palvarini L, Marconi A, Gadola E, Menni K, Battaglia G. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of pathologic conditions of the middle ear. European journal of radiology. 2001 Nov 1; 40(2): 78-93. |
| [10] | Habesoglu TE, Habesoglu M, Toros SZ, Deveci I, Surmeli M, Sheidaei S, Baran A, Egeli E. How does childhood otitis media change the radiological findings of the temporal bone?. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2010 Nov 1; 130(11): 1225-9.15. Intratemporal complications and sequelae of otitis media. |
| [11] | Durand ML, Deschler DG, editors. Infections of the Ears, Nose, Throat, and Sinuses. Springer; 2018 May 3. |
| [12] | Mughal Z, Charlton AR, Clark M. The Prevalence of Incidental Mastoid Opacification and the Need for Intervention: A Meta-Analysis. Vol. 132, Laryngoscope. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2022. p. 422-32. |
| [13] | Voudouris C, Psarommatis I, Nikas I, Kafouris D, Chrysouli K. Pediatric masked mastoiditis associated with multiple intracranial complications. Case reports in otolaryngology. 2015 Jun 28; 2015.19. Bilateral facial palsy caused by bilateral masked mastoiditis. |
| [14] | Amiruddin SB, Rahman RA. Masked mastoiditis with meningitis: do we treat ct scan? Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2017 Jun 9; 16(3): 458-60. |
| [15] | Holt GR, Gates GA. Masked mastoiditis. The Laryngoscope. 1983 Aug; 93(8): 1034-7. |
| [16] | Orhan K, Nishiyama H, Tadashi S, Shumei M, Furukawa S. MR of 2270 TMJs: prevalence of radiographic presence of otomastoiditis in temporomandibular joint disorders. European journal of radiology. 2005 Jul 1; 55(1): 102-7. |
| [17] | Abbas Y, Yuen HS, Trinidade A, Watters G. Incidental mastoiditis on magnetic resonance imaging scans: Clinical relevance and cost implications. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2018 Nov 1; 132(11): 1010-2. |
| [18] | Omura T, Motoyama R, Tamura Y, Nonaka K, Tanei ZI, Shigemoto K, Tokumaru AM, Murayama S, Arai T, Araki A. Meningoencephalitis caused by masked mastoiditis that was diagnosed during a follow-up in an elderly patient with diabetes mellitus: A case report. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2020 May; 20(5): 500-1. |
| [19] | Singh S, Rettiganti MR, Qin C, Kuruva M, Hegde S v. Incidental mastoid opacification in children on MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2016 May 1; 46(5): 704-8. |
| [20] | Balci A, Sangun O, Okuyucu S, Karazincir S, Akoglu E, Altintas Y, et al. The prevalence and significance of incidental middle ear and mastoid cavity abnormalities on MRI in a pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Dec; 72(12): 1849-54. |
| [21] | Wilkinson SL, Sahota RS, Constable JD, Harper F, Judd O. Does incidental mastoid opacification on computerized tomography necessitate referral to ENT? Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec 1; 127(12): 2860-5. |
| [22] | Polat S, Aksoy E, Serin GM, YIldIz E, Tanyeri H. Incidental diagnosis of mastoiditis on MRI. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2011 Aug; 268(8): 1135-8. |
| [23] | Blomgren K, Robinson S, Lönnqvist T, Saxèn H, Pitkäranta A. Clinical significance of incidental magnetic resonance image abnormalities in mastoid cavity and middle ear in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 67(7): 757-60. |
| [24] | Pastuszek A, Lomas J, Grigg C, De R. Is mastoiditis being over-diagnosed on computed tomography imaging? —radiological versus clinical findings. Vol. 3, Australian Journal of Otolaryngology. AME Publishing Company; 2020. |
APA Style
Gebremariam, A. S., Gebreslase, M., Reta, B. K., Girmay, H. G., Hailu, K. T., et al. (2025). Frequency and Ct Scan Pattern of Incidental Mastoid Air Cell Opacification. International Journal of Medical Imaging, 13(3), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11
ACS Style
Gebremariam, A. S.; Gebreslase, M.; Reta, B. K.; Girmay, H. G.; Hailu, K. T., et al. Frequency and Ct Scan Pattern of Incidental Mastoid Air Cell Opacification. Int. J. Med. Imaging 2025, 13(3), 31-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11,
author = {Awash Solomon Gebremariam and MusieNegasi Gebreslase and Birhanu Kassie Reta and Haftom Guesh Girmay and Kibrom Tsegay Hailu and Million Abraha Zeray},
title = {Frequency and Ct Scan Pattern of Incidental Mastoid Air Cell Opacification
},
journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging},
volume = {13},
number = {3},
pages = {31-37},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20251303.11},
abstract = {Background: Incidental findings of mastoid opacification are increasing as cross-sectional imaging is used more often. Mastoid opacification observed on imaging for unrelated clinical purposes is known as incidental mastoid opacification (IMO). Consultations with otolaryngologists are frequently the result of these findings. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the radiological patterns and frequency of IMO on CT imaging. Methodology: Patients who had CT imaging for non-otologic indications between August 2021 and August 2022 were reviewed in a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out at TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital. Findings: 123 (8.4%) of the 1,466 patients experienced incidental mastoid opacification. Of these, 54 (43.9%) had bilateral involvement and 69 (56.1%) had unilateral involvement. Four (3.3%) had a combination of partial and complete opacification, 22 (17.9%) had complete opacification, and 97 (78.9%) had partial opacification. In 48 cases (39%), there was concurrent middle ear opacification. Despite these results, radiology reports only reported mastoid opacification in 31 cases (25%) and described it as either otomastoiditis or simple opacification. Only 7 patients (5.7%) were evaluated by an otolaryngologist, and no active mastoiditis was found. In conclusion, 8.4% of patients having CT scans for non-otologic reasons had incidental mastoid opacification. Complete opacification and concurrent middle ear involvement increased the likelihood of reporting. Few cases were referred for ENT evaluation, though, and most were clinically insignificant. These results emphasize how crucial it is to interpret data carefully in order to prevent needless referrals.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Frequency and Ct Scan Pattern of Incidental Mastoid Air Cell Opacification AU - Awash Solomon Gebremariam AU - MusieNegasi Gebreslase AU - Birhanu Kassie Reta AU - Haftom Guesh Girmay AU - Kibrom Tsegay Hailu AU - Million Abraha Zeray Y1 - 2025/12/03 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11 T2 - International Journal of Medical Imaging JF - International Journal of Medical Imaging JO - International Journal of Medical Imaging SP - 31 EP - 37 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-832X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20251303.11 AB - Background: Incidental findings of mastoid opacification are increasing as cross-sectional imaging is used more often. Mastoid opacification observed on imaging for unrelated clinical purposes is known as incidental mastoid opacification (IMO). Consultations with otolaryngologists are frequently the result of these findings. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the radiological patterns and frequency of IMO on CT imaging. Methodology: Patients who had CT imaging for non-otologic indications between August 2021 and August 2022 were reviewed in a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out at TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital. Findings: 123 (8.4%) of the 1,466 patients experienced incidental mastoid opacification. Of these, 54 (43.9%) had bilateral involvement and 69 (56.1%) had unilateral involvement. Four (3.3%) had a combination of partial and complete opacification, 22 (17.9%) had complete opacification, and 97 (78.9%) had partial opacification. In 48 cases (39%), there was concurrent middle ear opacification. Despite these results, radiology reports only reported mastoid opacification in 31 cases (25%) and described it as either otomastoiditis or simple opacification. Only 7 patients (5.7%) were evaluated by an otolaryngologist, and no active mastoiditis was found. In conclusion, 8.4% of patients having CT scans for non-otologic reasons had incidental mastoid opacification. Complete opacification and concurrent middle ear involvement increased the likelihood of reporting. Few cases were referred for ENT evaluation, though, and most were clinically insignificant. These results emphasize how crucial it is to interpret data carefully in order to prevent needless referrals. VL - 13 IS - 3 ER -