| Peer-Reviewed

A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003

Received: 4 January 2022     Accepted: 17 February 2022     Published: 29 September 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

HIV was first detected in Kenya in 1984. Since then, Kenya's government has launched a number of response measures in collaboration with other development partners. The Kenyan government's initial responses to HIV/AIDS were characterized by denial and inactivity. External donors and significant global financial institutions were invited to assist the government in creating HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care structures and strategies as a result of the government's inaction and lack of political commitment. While external donor financing and support are critical in the battle against HIV/AIDS, relying solely on donor funds and policy guidance puts the intervention methods' identity, autonomy, and mission at risk. External funders have monopolized and dictated the HIV/AIDS conversation in Kenya, particularly in terms of establishing programs and policies, to the point where government initiatives are stymied if not dictated. Kenya's government spends more time negotiating competing donor demands than identifying their own priorities and implementing their own programs as a result of this approach.

Published in International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science (Volume 8, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11
Page(s) 42-54
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

HIV/AIDS, Policies, Legislations, Responses, Strategies, Kenya

References
[1] Barasa, L., & Omari, E. (2005). Fake Groups Fleecing State of AIDS Cash, Claim MPs. Daily Nation August 1, 2005. Nairobi: Kenya.
[2] Barnett, T., and Blaikie, P. (1992). AIDS in Africa: Its Present and Future Impact. New York: The Guilford Press.
[3] Central Bureau of Statistics.(2004). Kenya Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Nairobi: Kenya.
[4] Daily Nation. (1999). Kenya: Moi Declares Aids A National Disaster. Daily Nation November 26, 1999.
[5] Elderkin, S., ed. (1998). HIV/AIDS and Development in Nyanza Province: Leadership Symposium. Nyanza Professional Caucus: Kisumu.
[6] Gledhill, R. (2006). Pope Reviews Guidance on Use of Condom. Times April 24, 2006. New York.
[7] IPAR. (2004a). Combating HIV/AIDS in Kenya: Priority Setting and Resource Allocation. NAIROBI, IPAR, Vol. 10, Issue 13, 2004.
[8] IPAR. (2004b). Funding the Fight Against HIV/AIDS: Budgetary Analysis of Kenya’s HIV/AIDS activity Prioritisation and Financing. Nairobi: IPAR Vol 10, Issue 8, 2004.
[9] K’Oyugi, B. O., & Muita, J. (2002). The Impact of Growing HIV/AIDS Epidemic on the Kenyan Children. Giovanni Andrea Cornia ed., AIDS, Public Policy and Child Well-Being. UNICEF.
[10] Kamau, N. (2006). Misused Funds: What Do We Tell the Sick. Daily Nation April 6, 2006. Nairobi: Kenya.
[11] Kazungu, N. (2005). Days Numbered for Bogus AIDS NGOs. Daily Nation August 15, 2005. Nairobi: Kenya.
[12] Kimani, C. (2002). Has War on AIDS Been Compromised? Daily Nation July 5. 2002. Nairobi: Kenya.
[13] Kiragu, J. W. (2000). Leadership Challenges in the Strengthening National Legal Instruments and Frameworks to Address the Consequences of HIV/AIDS from a Gender Perspective. Report of the UNFPA-Organised Breakout Panel Africa Development Forum. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, 3-7 Dec. 2000.
[14] Lacey, M. (2003). Kenya Starts Crackdown on Fake Charity Groups New York Times July 9, 2003. Nairobi: Kenya.
[15] Ministry of Health & NACC. (2001). National Condom Policy and Strategy 2001 – 2005. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[16] Ministry of Health. (1997). Sessional Paper No. 4 of 1997 on AIDS in Kenya. Nairobi: Government of Kenya Printer.
[17] Mwaniki, M. (2003). AIDS Chief Suspended Over Sh 27 Million Pay Fraud Daily Nation Saturday August 23, 2003. Nairobi: Kenya.
[18] NASCOP. (1994). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[19] NASCOP. (1996). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[20] NASCOP. (1998). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[21] NASCOP. (1999). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[22] NASCOP. (2001). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[23] NASCOP. (2003). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[24] NASCOP. (2005). AIDS in Kenya: Background, Projections, Impact, Interventions and Policy. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.
[25] Nation Correspondent New York (2006) Two Kenyan Women Draw Cheers at UN AIDS Meeting. Daily Nation June 2, 2006. Nairobi: Kenya.
[26] Njeru, E., Kioko, U., Mains, T. (2005). Coordination and Harmonisation of Programs for Fighting HIV/AIDS: The Kenya Case Study. ACTION AID; AMREF and Italian Network Against AIDS:
[27] Nyaga, R. K., Kimani, D. N., Mwabu, G., Kimenyi, S. M. (2004). HIV/AIDS in Kenya: A Review of Research and Policy Issues. Nairobi: KIPPRA Discussion Paper No. 38 June 2004.
[28] Office of the President. (2000). The Kenya National HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan 2000 - 2005 Popular Version. Nairobi: Kenya.
[29] Office of the President. (2005). The Kenya National HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan 2005 – 2010. Nairobi: Kenya.
[30] Ogot, B. A. (2004). Politics and the AIDS epidemic in Kenya 1983-2003. Kisumu: Anyange Press Ltd.
[31] Okuro, S. O. (2009). Daniel arap Moi and the politics of HIV and AIDS in Kenya, 1983–2002. African Journal of AIDS Research 2009, 8 (3): 275–283.
[32] Onsomu, E. O., Moore, D., Abuya, B. A., Valentine, P. & Vanessa Duren-Winfield. (2013). Importance of the Media in Scaling-Up HIV Testing in Kenya. Importance of the Media in Scaling-Up HIV Testing in Kenya (sagepub.com) accessed 3 January 2022.
[33] OSAA. (2003). Community Realities and Responses to HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. United Nation: New York June 2003.
[34] Patterson, A. S. (2005) The African State and the AIDS Crisis. Ashgate, Global Health.
[35] Poku, N. K, & Freedman J. (2005). State Responses to the AIDS Pandemic. Ulf Engel & Gorm Olsen eds. The African Exception. England: Ashgate.
[36] Schuler, N. (2004). Case Study on Local Government Response to HIV/AIDS in Kenya. World Bank: Local Government Responses to HIV/AIDS. http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/134438/ALGAF/Algaf_cd/algaf_docs/Resources/Kenya%20Local%20Government%20AIDS%20Case%20Study%20(2003).pdf
[37] Singhal, A., & Rogers, M. E. (2003). Combating AIDS: Communication Strategies in Action. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
[38] Stover, J & Johnston, A. (1999). The Art Of Policy Formulation: Experiences From Africa In Developing National HIV/AIDS Policies. The Art of Policy Formulation: Experiences from Africa in Developing National HIV/AIDS Policies (policyproject.com) accessed on 3rd January 2022.
[39] Tuju, R., &Panos Institute. (1990). Kenya’s Pied Crow Gives the Facts. World AIDS (January 1990). No. 7 p. 4.
[40] Tuju; R. (1990). A Brief Report on Letter Response to the Radio Programmes. Kenyan AIDS Newsletter. Vol. 2 No. 2.
[41] United Nations. (2003). Community Realities and Responses to HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa. UN office of the Special Adviser on Africa: New York.
[42] Waitheka, M., Bessinger, R. (2001). Sexual Behaviour and Condom Use in the Context of HIV/AIDS Prevention in Kenya. Population Services International. Nairobi: Chapel Hill/North Carolina.
[43] Whiteside, A. W., ed. (2001) AIDS Analysis in Africa. South Africa: Whiteside and Nafrik Publication.
[44] WHO. (2005). WHO Country Cooperation Strategy: Republic of Kenya, 2002-2005. Brazzaville: Regional Office for Africa.
[45] World Bank. (2002). Project Performance Assessment Report: Kenya Sexually Transmitted Infections Project (Credit 2686). The World Bank Oct. 15, 2002.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Samwel Ongwen Okuro. (2022). A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003. International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science, 8(2), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Samwel Ongwen Okuro. A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003. Int. J. HIV/AIDS Prev. Educ. Behav. Sci. 2022, 8(2), 42-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Samwel Ongwen Okuro. A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003. Int J HIV/AIDS Prev Educ Behav Sci. 2022;8(2):42-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11,
      author = {Samwel Ongwen Okuro},
      title = {A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003},
      journal = {International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {42-54},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhpebs.20220802.11},
      abstract = {HIV was first detected in Kenya in 1984. Since then, Kenya's government has launched a number of response measures in collaboration with other development partners. The Kenyan government's initial responses to HIV/AIDS were characterized by denial and inactivity. External donors and significant global financial institutions were invited to assist the government in creating HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care structures and strategies as a result of the government's inaction and lack of political commitment. While external donor financing and support are critical in the battle against HIV/AIDS, relying solely on donor funds and policy guidance puts the intervention methods' identity, autonomy, and mission at risk. External funders have monopolized and dictated the HIV/AIDS conversation in Kenya, particularly in terms of establishing programs and policies, to the point where government initiatives are stymied if not dictated. Kenya's government spends more time negotiating competing donor demands than identifying their own priorities and implementing their own programs as a result of this approach.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A History of HIV and AIDS Responses in Kenya, 1983-2003
    AU  - Samwel Ongwen Okuro
    Y1  - 2022/09/29
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11
    T2  - International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science
    JF  - International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science
    JO  - International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science
    SP  - 42
    EP  - 54
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-5765
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20220802.11
    AB  - HIV was first detected in Kenya in 1984. Since then, Kenya's government has launched a number of response measures in collaboration with other development partners. The Kenyan government's initial responses to HIV/AIDS were characterized by denial and inactivity. External donors and significant global financial institutions were invited to assist the government in creating HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care structures and strategies as a result of the government's inaction and lack of political commitment. While external donor financing and support are critical in the battle against HIV/AIDS, relying solely on donor funds and policy guidance puts the intervention methods' identity, autonomy, and mission at risk. External funders have monopolized and dictated the HIV/AIDS conversation in Kenya, particularly in terms of establishing programs and policies, to the point where government initiatives are stymied if not dictated. Kenya's government spends more time negotiating competing donor demands than identifying their own priorities and implementing their own programs as a result of this approach.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sections