| Peer-Reviewed

Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria

Received: 10 August 2016     Accepted: 2 September 2016     Published: 8 October 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The assessment of Carbon monoxide (CO) and Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was carried out at Gboko in Benue State, Nigeria. A total of six areas were surveyed across the town. The concentrations of the CO and SO2 varied from 1.90 to 8.00 ppm and 0.10 to 0.24 ppm respectively. Studies indicate that, the average hourly concentration in parts per million (ppm) of CO and SO2 in all the six points surveyed were found to be 4.98 and 0.15 ppm respectively, with a standard deviation of 1.83 ppm and 0.05 ppm. This is about 50.17 and 11.76 % deviations for CO and SO2 from the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 10.00 and 0.17 ppm for CO and SO2 respectively. These results do not pose an immediate threat to the environment but subsequent accumulation may be dangerous.

Published in International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12
Page(s) 127-130
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biomass, Bye-product, Concentration, Gasman Meter, Air Quality Standard, ppm, Pollution

References
[1] Ikyo B. A, Akombor A. A, and Igbawua T. (2007). Determination of Ground Level Concentration of Pollutants from the Benue State Cement Company (BCC) PLC Gboko, Nigeria (A Mathematical approach). Journal of Research in Physical sciences, Volume 3, N04, pp.35-43. Duncern Science Publishers-Nigeria.
[2] Reinhardt Timothy. (2001). Smoke Impacts from Agricultural Burning in Rural Brazilian Town. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. Pp. 443-450.
[3] Cannon N. and Joseph K.(1984). Air Quality Effect of Residential Wood Combustion. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. Pp.895-897.
[4] Burnet Paul (1986). Particulate, Carbon monoxide and Acid Emission factors Association. Pp.102-108.
[5] Sofuoglu, S. C.; Aslan, G.; Inal, F.; Sofuoglu, A. (2011). An assessment of indoor air concentrations and health risks of volatile organic compounds in three primary schools. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 214, 38–46.
[6] Nigel Bruce, Rogelio Perez-Padilla and Rachel Albalak. (2002). The health effects of indoor air pollution exposure in developing countries.
[7] Rae M. N. and Roa H. N. (1989). Air pollution. Tata McGraw- Hill Publisher. Ltd New Delhi.
[8] Albalak R (1997) Cultural Practices and Exposure to Particulate Pollution from Indoor Biomass Cooking: Effects on Respiratory Health and Nutritional Status among the Aymara Indians of the Bolivian Highlands, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.
[9] Ezzati M, Kammen D. (2001a). Indoor air pollution from biomass combustion and acute respiratory infections in Kenya: an exposure response study. Lancet;358:619-624.
[10] Guneser S, Stici A, Alparslan N & Cinaz P (1994). Effects of indoor environmental factors on respiratory systems of children. J Trop Pediatrics; 40: 114-116.
[11] Ezzati M, Kammen D. (2001b). Quantifying the effects of exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion on acute respiratory infections in developing countries. Environmental Health Perspectives 109:481-488.
[12] Crowcon Detecting Gas Saving Lives (2013). Gasman Portable Gas Detection Equipment. www.crowcon.com.
[13] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATDR), USA.(2001). Centre for Disease Control. htt//www.atsdv.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/phs900.htm.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Aungwa Francis, Danladi Eli, Gyuk Philip Musa, Joshua Adeyemi Owolabi, Gabriel Olawale Olowomofe, et al. (2016). Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 4(5), 127-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Aungwa Francis; Danladi Eli; Gyuk Philip Musa; Joshua Adeyemi Owolabi; Gabriel Olawale Olowomofe, et al. Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2016, 4(5), 127-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Aungwa Francis, Danladi Eli, Gyuk Philip Musa, Joshua Adeyemi Owolabi, Gabriel Olawale Olowomofe, et al. Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2016;4(5):127-130. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12,
      author = {Aungwa Francis and Danladi Eli and Gyuk Philip Musa and Joshua Adeyemi Owolabi and Gabriel Olawale Olowomofe and Muhammad Sani Ahmad and Baba Isa Garba},
      title = {Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria},
      journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
      volume = {4},
      number = {5},
      pages = {127-130},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.20160405.12},
      abstract = {The assessment of Carbon monoxide (CO) and Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was carried out at Gboko in Benue State, Nigeria. A total of six areas were surveyed across the town. The concentrations of the CO and SO2 varied from 1.90 to 8.00 ppm and 0.10 to 0.24 ppm respectively. Studies indicate that, the average hourly concentration in parts per million (ppm) of CO and SO2 in all the six points surveyed were found to be 4.98 and 0.15 ppm respectively, with a standard deviation of 1.83 ppm and 0.05 ppm. This is about 50.17 and 11.76 % deviations for CO and SO2 from the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 10.00 and 0.17 ppm for CO and SO2 respectively. These results do not pose an immediate threat to the environment but subsequent accumulation may be dangerous.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Environmental Assessment of CO and SO2 Pollution Resulting from Bye-Product of Biomass Fuel at Gboko Town, in Benue State, Nigeria
    AU  - Aungwa Francis
    AU  - Danladi Eli
    AU  - Gyuk Philip Musa
    AU  - Joshua Adeyemi Owolabi
    AU  - Gabriel Olawale Olowomofe
    AU  - Muhammad Sani Ahmad
    AU  - Baba Isa Garba
    Y1  - 2016/10/08
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12
    T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    SP  - 127
    EP  - 130
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7667
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20160405.12
    AB  - The assessment of Carbon monoxide (CO) and Sulphur dioxide (SO2) was carried out at Gboko in Benue State, Nigeria. A total of six areas were surveyed across the town. The concentrations of the CO and SO2 varied from 1.90 to 8.00 ppm and 0.10 to 0.24 ppm respectively. Studies indicate that, the average hourly concentration in parts per million (ppm) of CO and SO2 in all the six points surveyed were found to be 4.98 and 0.15 ppm respectively, with a standard deviation of 1.83 ppm and 0.05 ppm. This is about 50.17 and 11.76 % deviations for CO and SO2 from the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 10.00 and 0.17 ppm for CO and SO2 respectively. These results do not pose an immediate threat to the environment but subsequent accumulation may be dangerous.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Department of Physics, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria

  • Sections