The pre-extension demonstration trial was conducted during the 2024 main rainy season in Burka Jiren Community Watershed of Gechi District, Buno Bedele Zone. The objectives were to evaluate grain yield, economic profitability and collect farmers’ feedback. The study evaluated soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation against blanket recommendation for tef (Dursi variety) across three demonstration sites. Data were collected on yield, cost incurred, profit gained, and farmers’ feedback. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and benefit-cost ratio. The descriptive analysis result revealed that, the mean grain yield of 15.1 and 9.9 qt ha-1 were obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation and blanket recommendation for tef respectively. There was statistically significant mean grain yield difference at (P<.05) between soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation and blanket recommendation for tef with 69.7% yield advantage. Soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef was also favored by the farmers due to having a number of productive tillers per plant, plant height (biomass), spike length, seed quality and higher grain yield compared to blanket recommendation for tef. Likewise, higher net benefit of 136,884 ETB ha-1 was obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef with benefit-cost ratio of 3.1 compared to blanket recommendation. This implies, farmers can recover all the incurred costs and gain an additional 3.1 ETB for every 1 ETB they invest when using soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef. The overall result showed that soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef had a significant yield advantage, net benefit, and were favored by farmers, leading to the recommendation for scaling up this technology in similar agro-ecologies.
| Published in | International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16 |
| Page(s) | 139-145 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Demonstration, Farmers, Tef, Fertilizer, Soil Test, Yield
| [1] | GEBREMEDHIN, H. & ABRAHA, A. 2025. Teff: a healthy crop of the century–challenges and opportunities for enhancing productivity under climate change. Discover Agriculture, 3, 31. |
| [2] | GETE, Z., GETACHEW, A., DEJENE, A. & SHAHID, R. 2010. A Report on fertilizer and soil fertility. |
| [3] | HAILE, W. & MAMO, T. 2013. The effect of potassium on the yields of potato and wheat grown on the acidic soils of Chencha and HagereSelam in Southern Ethiopia. International Potash Institute Research Findings, 35, 3-8. |
| [4] | MAMO, T., KARLTUN, E. & BEKELE, T. 2014. Soil fertility status and fertilizer recommendation atlas for Tigray Regional State. Ethiopia, Ministry of Agriculture and Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency, Addis Abeba, 91. |
| [5] | MERGA, M. 2018. Progress, achievements and challenges of tef breeding in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research, 9, 1-8. |
| [6] | REDA, G. T. 2016. Verification and Demonstration of Soil Test Based Phosphorus Fertilizer Recommendation Rate on Yield of Teff (EragrostisTef (Zucc) Trotter) in Vertisols of Northern Ethiopia. J. Nat. Sci. Res, 6, 51-55. |
| [7] | SANTHI, R., NATESAN, R. & SELVAKUMARI, G. 2002. Soil test crop response correlation studies under integrated plant nutrition system for onion (Allium cepa L. var. Aggregatum) in Inceptisols of Tamil Nadu. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 50, 489-492. |
| [8] | CIMMYT. 1988. From agricultural data to farm records. An economic training handbook. Economics programme. CIMMYT, Maxico D. E. |
| [9] | Dekking, L. S and K. F. Koning, 2005. The Ethiopian Cereal Tef in Celiac Disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 353: 1748-1749. |
| [10] | Mebratu, Y., C. V. Rhagaviah and H. Ashagre, 2016. Production potential of tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter). Genotypes in relation to integrated nutrient management on vertisols of mid high lands of Oromia region of Ethiopia, East Africa. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech., 4: 249. |
APA Style
Aman, S., Mengistu, D. (2025). Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate for Tef in Burka Jiren Watershed of Gechi District, Oromia. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 10(4), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16
ACS Style
Aman, S.; Mengistu, D. Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate for Tef in Burka Jiren Watershed of Gechi District, Oromia. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2025, 10(4), 139-145. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16,
author = {Suleiman Aman and Dechasa Mengistu},
title = {Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate for Tef in Burka Jiren Watershed of Gechi District, Oromia},
journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {139-145},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20251004.16},
abstract = {The pre-extension demonstration trial was conducted during the 2024 main rainy season in Burka Jiren Community Watershed of Gechi District, Buno Bedele Zone. The objectives were to evaluate grain yield, economic profitability and collect farmers’ feedback. The study evaluated soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation against blanket recommendation for tef (Dursi variety) across three demonstration sites. Data were collected on yield, cost incurred, profit gained, and farmers’ feedback. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and benefit-cost ratio. The descriptive analysis result revealed that, the mean grain yield of 15.1 and 9.9 qt ha-1 were obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation and blanket recommendation for tef respectively. There was statistically significant mean grain yield difference at (P-1 was obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef with benefit-cost ratio of 3.1 compared to blanket recommendation. This implies, farmers can recover all the incurred costs and gain an additional 3.1 ETB for every 1 ETB they invest when using soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef. The overall result showed that soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef had a significant yield advantage, net benefit, and were favored by farmers, leading to the recommendation for scaling up this technology in similar agro-ecologies.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer Rate for Tef in Burka Jiren Watershed of Gechi District, Oromia AU - Suleiman Aman AU - Dechasa Mengistu Y1 - 2025/10/31 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16 T2 - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JF - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JO - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology SP - 139 EP - 145 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1735 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251004.16 AB - The pre-extension demonstration trial was conducted during the 2024 main rainy season in Burka Jiren Community Watershed of Gechi District, Buno Bedele Zone. The objectives were to evaluate grain yield, economic profitability and collect farmers’ feedback. The study evaluated soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation against blanket recommendation for tef (Dursi variety) across three demonstration sites. Data were collected on yield, cost incurred, profit gained, and farmers’ feedback. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, independent t-test, and benefit-cost ratio. The descriptive analysis result revealed that, the mean grain yield of 15.1 and 9.9 qt ha-1 were obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation and blanket recommendation for tef respectively. There was statistically significant mean grain yield difference at (P-1 was obtained from soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef with benefit-cost ratio of 3.1 compared to blanket recommendation. This implies, farmers can recover all the incurred costs and gain an additional 3.1 ETB for every 1 ETB they invest when using soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef. The overall result showed that soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation for tef had a significant yield advantage, net benefit, and were favored by farmers, leading to the recommendation for scaling up this technology in similar agro-ecologies. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -