Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach

Received: 19 June 2025     Accepted: 7 January 2026     Published: 2 February 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Mental health conditions impose a substantial economic burden in India, yet evidence on treatment costs and insurance pricing-particularly for outpatient psychiatric care-remains limited. This cross-sectional study estimates provider-reported outpatient treatment costs for common and severe mental illnesses and derives indicative insurance premiums using a prevalence-based actuarial approach. Primary data were collected through structured interviews with 100 mental health professionals, including psychiatrists (n = 47), psychologists (n = 28), and counselors (n = 25), practicing in private outpatient clinics across four major referral hubs-Kolkata, New Delhi, Bangalore, and Pune. While 77% of clinics were urban and 23% semi-urban, providers served patients from urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. From the provider perspective, the estimated annual treatment cost for common mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety were INR 57,571, with psychological and pharmacological interventions accounting for 80.5% of out-of-pocket expenditure. For severe mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the annual cost was higher at INR 77,237, largely driven by counseling, psychotherapy, and medication costs (85.4%). Based on prevalence-adjusted costing, pure risk premiums were estimated at INR 1,900 annually for depression and anxiety, INR 463 for bipolar disorder, and INR 232 for schizophrenia. Applying premium loadings of 40–90% to account for administrative costs and uncertainty yielded indicative insurance premiums aligned with early-stage mental health coverage markets. Although the estimates assume full treatment-seeking behavior and may overstate realized claims, they provide a pragmatic economic basis for mental health insurance pricing and policy planning in India.

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 14, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11
Page(s) 1-9
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Mental Healthcare Act 2017, Health Insurance, Premium, Mental Disorders, Cost Estimation

References
[1] GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators (2022). Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The lancet. Psychiatry, 9(2), 137–150.
[2] Prakash, S., & India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. (2019). First comprehensive estimates of disease burden due to mental disorders and their trends in every state of India. Public Health Foundation of India.
[3] Gururaj, G., Varghese, M., Benegal, V., Rao, G. N., Pathak, K., Singh, L. K., Mehta, R. Y., Ram, D., Shibukumar, T. M., Kokane, A., Lenin Singh, R. K., Chavan, B. S., Sharma, P., Ramasubramanian, C., Dalal, P. K., Saha, P. K., Deuri, S. P., Giri, A. K., Kavishvar, A. B., NMHS Collaborators Group. (2016). National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015–16: Summary (NIMHANS Publication No. 128). National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences.
[4] Kapoor, V., & Mahashur, A. (2021, June 18). Right to health insurance: Ensuring parity for mental illness in India. JURIST.
[5] Government of India. (2017). The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (No. 10 of 2017). Ministry of Law and Justice, Gazette ofIndia.
[6] Avula, V. C. R. (2025). Mental health insurance in India: An examination of policy implementation post-MHCA 2017. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication.
[7] Breslau, J., Yu, M., Collins, R. L., Tanielian, T., Malsberger, R., & Kataoka, S. H. (2020). Impact of the ACA Medicaid expansion on utilization of mental health care. Medical Care, 58(9), 757–764.
[8] AIA Singapore. (n.d.). AIA Beyond Critical Care.
[9] Australian Government Department of Health. (2023, April 26). Waiting periods and exemptions.
[10] Thorlby, R. (2020). England | International Health Care System Profiles. The Commonwealth Fund.
[11] Liu, J., Ma, H., He, Y. L., Xie, B., Xu, Y. F., Tang, H. Y., Li, M., Hao, W., Wang, X. D., Zhang, M. Y., & Ng, C. H. (2011). Mental health system in China: History, recent service reform and future challenges. World Psychiatry, 10(3), 210–216.
[12] Xu, J., Wang, J., Wimo, A., Qiu, C., & Fratiglioni, L. (2018). Rural–urban disparities in the utilization of mental health inpatient services in China: The role of health insurance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 479.
[13] Expatica. (2025, August 26). Accessing mental health services in Austria.
[14] Stulz, N., Jörg, R., Reim-Gautier, C., Bonsack, C., Conus, P., Evans-Lacko, S., Gabriel-Felleiter, K., Heim, E., Jäger, M., Knapp, M., Richter, D., Schneeberger, A., Thornicroft, G., Traber, R., Wieser, S., Tuch, A., & Hepp, U. (2023). Mental health service areas in Switzerland. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 32(1), e1937.
[15] Ramalho, R., McKenna, B., Adams, C., & Smith, M. (2023). Community mental health care in Aotearoa New Zealand: Reflections on the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 32(1), 4–12.
[16] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022).
[17] Kondapura, M. B., Manjunatha, N., Nagaraj, A. K. M., Praharaj, S. K., Kumar, C. N., Math, S. B., & Rao, G. N. (2023). Cost of illness analysis of common mental disorders: A study from an Indian academic tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(5), 519–525.
[18] Yerramilli, S. S. R. R., & Bipeta, R. (2012). Economics of mental health: Part I - Economic consequences of neglecting mental health - an Indian perspective. AP Journal of Psychological Medicine, 13(2), 80–86.
[19] Jain, N., Singh, H., & Pathak, A. (2013). Pathway to psychiatric care in a tertiary mental health centre in North India. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 6(1), 39–43.
[20] Sarkar, D., & Chandra, S. (2017). Cost-of-treatment of clinically stable severe mental illnesses in India: Analysis of published data. Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research, 6(2), 96–100.
[21] Sharma, V., Das, S., & Grover, S. (2004). An estimate of the monthly cost of two major mental disorders in an Indian metropolis. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 289–295.
[22] Garg, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Comparing the average cost of outpatient care of public and for-profit private providers in India. Health Policy and Planning, 36(7), 1122–1133.
[23] Grover, S., Avasthi, A., Chakrabarti, S., Bhargava, V., Sharan, P., Kumar, S., & Singh, A. (2005). Cost of care of schizophrenia: A study of Indian out-patient attenders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(4), 279–285.
[24] McGorry, P. D., & Mei, C. (2018). Early intervention in youth mental health: progress and future directions. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 21(4), 182–184.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ghosh, M. (2026). Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ghosh, M. Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2026, 14(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ghosh M. Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2026;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11,
      author = {Madhurima Ghosh},
      title = {Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach},
      journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
      volume = {14},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-9},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20261401.11},
      abstract = {Mental health conditions impose a substantial economic burden in India, yet evidence on treatment costs and insurance pricing-particularly for outpatient psychiatric care-remains limited. This cross-sectional study estimates provider-reported outpatient treatment costs for common and severe mental illnesses and derives indicative insurance premiums using a prevalence-based actuarial approach. Primary data were collected through structured interviews with 100 mental health professionals, including psychiatrists (n = 47), psychologists (n = 28), and counselors (n = 25), practicing in private outpatient clinics across four major referral hubs-Kolkata, New Delhi, Bangalore, and Pune. While 77% of clinics were urban and 23% semi-urban, providers served patients from urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. From the provider perspective, the estimated annual treatment cost for common mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety were INR 57,571, with psychological and pharmacological interventions accounting for 80.5% of out-of-pocket expenditure. For severe mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the annual cost was higher at INR 77,237, largely driven by counseling, psychotherapy, and medication costs (85.4%). Based on prevalence-adjusted costing, pure risk premiums were estimated at INR 1,900 annually for depression and anxiety, INR 463 for bipolar disorder, and INR 232 for schizophrenia. Applying premium loadings of 40–90% to account for administrative costs and uncertainty yielded indicative insurance premiums aligned with early-stage mental health coverage markets. Although the estimates assume full treatment-seeking behavior and may overstate realized claims, they provide a pragmatic economic basis for mental health insurance pricing and policy planning in India.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modeling Pure Risk Premium for Mental Health Insurance in India: An Actuarial Approach
    AU  - Madhurima Ghosh
    Y1  - 2026/02/02
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11
    T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 9
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7616
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20261401.11
    AB  - Mental health conditions impose a substantial economic burden in India, yet evidence on treatment costs and insurance pricing-particularly for outpatient psychiatric care-remains limited. This cross-sectional study estimates provider-reported outpatient treatment costs for common and severe mental illnesses and derives indicative insurance premiums using a prevalence-based actuarial approach. Primary data were collected through structured interviews with 100 mental health professionals, including psychiatrists (n = 47), psychologists (n = 28), and counselors (n = 25), practicing in private outpatient clinics across four major referral hubs-Kolkata, New Delhi, Bangalore, and Pune. While 77% of clinics were urban and 23% semi-urban, providers served patients from urban, semi-urban, and rural areas. From the provider perspective, the estimated annual treatment cost for common mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety were INR 57,571, with psychological and pharmacological interventions accounting for 80.5% of out-of-pocket expenditure. For severe mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the annual cost was higher at INR 77,237, largely driven by counseling, psychotherapy, and medication costs (85.4%). Based on prevalence-adjusted costing, pure risk premiums were estimated at INR 1,900 annually for depression and anxiety, INR 463 for bipolar disorder, and INR 232 for schizophrenia. Applying premium loadings of 40–90% to account for administrative costs and uncertainty yielded indicative insurance premiums aligned with early-stage mental health coverage markets. Although the estimates assume full treatment-seeking behavior and may overstate realized claims, they provide a pragmatic economic basis for mental health insurance pricing and policy planning in India.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections