The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts.
Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12 |
Page(s) | 29-38 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Piétrain, Local Breeds, Improved Breeds, Crossbreeding, Heterosis, Carcasses
Variables | Piétrain | Local | Improved | Piétrain X Local | Piétrain X Improved | Significant | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | ||
Live weight (kg) | 77.78a | 3.75 | 25.47c | 4.19 | 53.75b | 4.10 | 55.34b | 2.30 | 68.09b | 2.30 | *** |
Hot carcass (kg) | 59.22a | 3.22 | 16.19d | 3.57 | 35.58c | 3.59 | 38.94c | 1.96 | 49.22b | 3.22 | *** |
Hot carcass (%) | 76.36b | 6.24 | 64.06d | 5.80 | 66.38c | 4.42 | 70.26c | 6.42 | 72.26a | 5.01 | *** |
Cold carcass (kg) | 53.87a | 2.68 | 14.34d | 3.00 | 34.58c | 3.00 | 35.09c | 1.64 | 46.76b | 1.64 | *** |
Cold carcass (%) | 72.29b | 5.13 | 56.30c | 8.63 | 64.45c | 5.53 | 63.52cb | 4.95 | 68.67a | 5.03 | *** |
Thickness of back fat (cm) | 0.18b | 0.77 | 3.41a | 0.87 | 0.75a | 0.87 | 0.30b | 0.47 | 0.35b | 0.47 | NS |
Neck fat thickness (cm) | 0.18c | 0.26 | 1.05bc | 0.29 | 1.88a | 0.29 | 0.52c | 0.16 | 0.95ab | 0.16 | *** |
Rump fat thickness (cm) | 0.18c | 0.08 | 0.74b | 0.09 | 1.32a | 0.09 | 0.28c | 0.05 | 0.39b | 0.05 | *** |
Average back fat thickness (cm) | 0.18c | 0.10 | 0.97b | 0.12 | 1.35a | 0.12 | 0.37c | 0.06 | 0.57b | 0.07 | *** |
Rack of pork (kg) | 3.76a | 0.36 | 1.49c | 0.40 | 2.50b | 0.40 | 3.48a | 0.22 | 3.19ab | 0.22 | ** |
Rack of pork (%) | 13.96 | 1.81 | 9.77a | 2.91 | 7.33b | 0.93 | 9.88a | 1.01 | 7.13b | 2.13 | *** |
Ham (kg) | 6.27a | 0.41 | 2.70d | 0.45 | 3.10c | 0.45 | 4.84b | 0.25 | 5.18b | 0.25 | *** |
Ham (%) | 11.80b | 2.33 | 11.57b | 1.60 | 8.90c | 0.65 | 11.80a | 2.33 | 9.37c | 2.55 | *** |
Shoulder (kg) | 4.54a | 0.33 | 1.67c | 0.38 | 2.69b | 0.38 | 3.49b | 0.21 | 3.81b | 0.20 | *** |
Shoulder (%) | 8.45b | 1.53 | 11.43a | 0.84 | 7.87b | 1.17 | 10.02a | 0.73 | 7.60b | 2.03 | *** |
Backfat (kg) | 0.36b | 0.06 | 0.53b | 0.06 | 0.80a | 0.07 | 0.42b | 0.04 | 0.39b | 0.03 | *** |
Belly wall (kg) | 1.10a | 0.14 | 0.71b | 0.16 | 1.16b | 0.16 | 0.97ab | 0.09 | 1.07a | 0.09 | NS |
Viscera (kg) | 1.76b | 0.53 | 1.19b | 0.53 | 2.16b | 0.53 | 1.44a | 0.28 | 2.01b | 0.28 | * |
Remaining carcass (kg) | 6.78a | 0.63 | 2.21c | 0.63 | 5.96ab | 0.63 | 5.33ab | 0.33 | 4.90b | 0.33 | ** |
Head (kg) | 6.50a | 0.60 | 1.94c | 0.60 | 4.50b | 0.59 | 6.01ab | 0.31 | 5.35ab | 0.31 | *** |
Head (%) | 12.99b | 2.19 | 13.96ab | 1.85 | 13.99ab | 3.13 | 16.44a | 2.19 | 12.11b | 1.66 | *** |
Legs (kg) | 1.30a | 0.12 | 0.40d | 0.12 | 0.96b | 0.12 | 1.31a | 0.06 | 1.20ab | 0.06 | *** |
Carcass length (cm) | 63.50bc | 3.79 | 19.17 | 3.79 | 73.83a | 3.79 | 58.75c | 2.01 | 66.87ab | 2.01 | *** |
Variables | Piétrain | Local | Improved | Piétrain x Local | Piétrain x Improved | Piétrain x Local | Piétrain x Improved |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Live weight (kg) | 77.78 | 25.47 | 53.75 | 55.34 | 68.09 | 7.20* | 3.54* |
Hot carcass (kg) | 59.22 | 16.19 | 35.58 | 38.94 | 49.22 | 3.28* | 3.84* |
Cold carcass (kg) | 53.87 | 14.34 | 34.58 | 35.09 | 46.76 | 2.89* | 5.73* |
Thickness of back fat (cm) | 0.18 | 3.41 | 0.75 | 0.3 | 0.35 | -43.29*** | -24.73** |
Neck fat thickness (cm) | 0.18 | 1.05 | 1.88 | 0.52 | 0.95 | -15.45** | -7.77* |
Rump fat thickness (cm) | 0.18 | 0.74 | 1.32 | 0.28 | 0.39 | -39.13** | -48.00*** |
Average back fat thickness (cm) | 0.18 | 0.97 | 1.35 | 0.37 | 0.57 | -35.65** | -25.49** |
Rack (kg) | 3.76 | 1.49 | 2.5 | 3.18 | 3.49 | 21.14** | 11.50* |
Ham (kg) | 6.27 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 4.84 | 5.18 | 7.92* | 10.57* |
Shoulder (kg) | 4.54 | 1.67 | 2.69 | 3.49 | 3.81 | 12.40* | 5.39* |
Backfat (kg) | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.8 | 0.42 | 0.39 | -5.62* | -32.76** |
Belly wall (kg) | 1.1 | 0.71 | 1.16 | 0.97 | 1.07 | 7.18* | -5.31* |
Viscera (kg) | 1.76 | 1.19 | 2.16 | 1.44 | 2.01 | -2.37* | 2.55* |
Remaining carcass (kg) | 6.78 | 2.21 | 5.96 | 5.33 | 4.9 | 18.58** | -23.08** |
Head (kg) | 6.5 | 1.94 | 4.5 | 6.01 | 5.35 | 42.42*** | -2.73* |
Legs (kg) | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.96 | 1.31 | 1.2 | 54.12*** | 6.19* |
Carcass length (cm) | 63.5 | 19.17 | 73.83 | 58.75 | 66.87 | 42.13*** | -2.61* |
Rate (kg) | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.088 | 25.00** | -20.00** |
Lungs (kg) | 0.67 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 19.51** | 1.03NS |
Heart (kg) | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 25.00*** | 14.29** |
Kidney (kg) | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 61.54*** | 3.03* |
Liver (kg) | 0.94 | 0.49 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 10.49* | -17.51** |
Testes (g) | 23.68 | 13.11 | 10.68 | 19.79 | 6.71 | 7.58* | -40.94*** |
SE | Standard Error |
NS | No Significant |
[1] | Dotché, O. I., Ahounou, G. S., Salifou, C. F. A., Biobou, R., Kiki, P., Govoeyi, B., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J.-P., Mensah, A. G., Farougou, S., Thilmant, P., Youssao, A. K. I. and Koutinhouin, G. B. (2018). Selection and culling criteria for breeding boars and sows in pig farms from Oueme and Plateau departments in Benin. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 71(1-2): 47–57. |
[2] | Youssao, A. K. I., Dotché, I. O., Toléba, S. S., Kassa, K., Ahounou, G. S., Salifou, C. F. A., Dahouda, M., Antoine Moussiaux, N. D. and Mensah, A. G. (2018). Phenotypic characterization of pig genetic resources in the departments of Oueme and Plateau in Benin. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 71(1-2): 59–65. |
[3] | Djimènou, D., Adoligbé, C. M., Mensah, S. E., Aboh, A. B., Edénnakpo, A. K., Atchadé, T. G. and Koudandé, D. O. (2021). Transformation et commercialisation de la viande de porcs au Sud du Bénin: Caractéristiques socioéconomiques et contraintes. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 48: 8618–36. |
[4] | Tassou, W. A., Attindéhou, S., Mèliho, P. C., Lafia, K. B., Salifou, S. (2021). Déterminants du choix de consommation de la viande porcine au Bénin. Sciences and Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture, 1 (1): 19‑28. |
[5] | Dotché, I. O., Bonou, G. A., Dahouda, M., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J. P., Mensah, G. A., Farougou, S., Thilmant, P., Karim, I. Y. A. and Koutinhouin, B. G. (2020). Reproductive performances of local pigs in West African countries: A review. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 10 (1): 49‑55. |
[6] | Dotché, O. I., Bankolé, B., Dahouda, M., Biobou, R., Bonou, G. A., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J.-P., Thilmant, P., Mensah, G. A., Koutinhouin, G. B. and Youssao, A. K. I. (2020). Comparison of reproductive performances of local and improved pigs reared in south Benin. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52 (2): 687–98. |
[7] | Ganiero, E. (2019). Evaluation de la qualité de la carcasse, des qualités technologique et organoleptique de la viande des porcs des races locales et améliorées au Sud du Bénin. Memoire de Master en Normes et Contrôle de Qualité des Produits Agro-Alimentaires, EPAC/UAC, 50p. |
[8] | Youssao, A. K. I., Verleyen, V., Michaux, C., Clinquart, A. and Leroy, P. L. (2002). Carcass composition, meat quality and exploitation of negative stress Pietrain. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire, 146: 329–338. |
[9] | Hanset, R., Dasnois, C., Scalais, S., Michaux, C. and Grobet, L. (1995). Effets de l’introgression dans le génome Piétrain de l’allèle normal au locus de sensibilité à l’halothane. Genetics Selection Evolution, 27: 77–88. |
[10] | Hanset, R., Dasnois, C., Scalais, S., Michaux, C. and Grobet, L. (1995). Génotypes au locus de sensibilité à l’halothane et caractères de croissance et de carcasse dans une F2 Piétrain× Large White. Genetics Selection Evolution, 27: 63–76. |
[11] | Hanset, R., Scalais, S. and Grobet, L. (1995). Du Piétrain classique au Piétrain résistant à l’halothane ou Piétrain Réhal. Annale de Médecine Vétérinaire, 139, 23–35. |
[12] | Leroy, P., Moula, N., Huart, A., Leroy, E., Cassart, R., Ruppol, P., Levrard, O., ElFadili, M., Binh, D. V. and Van Thang, N. (2012). Amélioration des performances génétiques des races tropicales par les races wallonnes, 2012, p. 22. |
[13] | Do Duc, L., Bo, H. X., Thomson, P. C., Binh, D. V., Leroy, P. and Farnir, F. (2013). Reproductive and productive performances of the stress-negative Piétrain pigs in the tropics: the case of Vietnam. Animal Production Science, 53: 173–9. |
[14] | Bankolé, B. C., Dotché, I. O., Ahounou, G. S., Dahouda, M., Youssao, A. K. I. and Senou, M. (2024). Improving the reproductive performance of local and improved pigs by crossbreeding with stress-negative Pietrain. Point Thèse, 90p. |
[15] | Bankolé, B. C., Dotché, I. O., Ahounou, G. S., Dahouda, M., Youssao, A. K. I. and Senou, M. (2024). Improving the growth performance of local pigs in Benin by crossbreeding with the stress-negative Pietrain. Animal Production Science, submitted, 18. |
[16] | Desmoulin, B., Ecolan, P. and Bonneau, M. (1988). Estimation de la composition tissulaire des carcasses de porcs. Productions Animales, 1: 59–64. |
[17] | SAS (2013). Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.: SAS, 418p. |
[18] | Bo, H. X., Duc, L. D., Moula, N., Clinquart, A., Vu Dinh, T., Dang Vu, B., Farnir, F. and Leroy, P. (2013). Growth performance and meat quality of stress negative Piétrain pigs in the tropics: the case of Vietnam, 5p. |
[19] | Dotché, I. O., Idohou, S., Dahouda, M., Kiki, P., Govoeyi, B., Antoine-Moussiaux, N. and Youssao, A. K. I. (2019). Crossbreeding and consanguinity management in pig farms in the departments of Ouémé and Plateau in Benin. Veterinary World, 12: 1816–25. |
[20] | Choi, I., Steibel, J. P., Bates, R. O., Raney, N. E., Rumph, J. M. and Ernst, C. W. (2011). Identification of carcass and meat quality QTL in an F2 Duroc\times Pietrain pig resource population using different least-squares analysis models. Frontiers in genetics, 2: 1–10. |
[21] | Kowalski, E., Vossen, E., Millet, S., Ampe, B., Callens, B., Van Royen, G., De Smet, S. and Aluwé, M. (2020). Performance and carcass, loin and ham quality in crossbreds from three terminal sire lines Meat science, 167, 108158 (Elsevier). |
[22] | Kowalski, E., Vossen, E., Millet, S., Ampe, B., De Smet, S. and Aluwé, M. (2021). Effect of terminal sire line and timing second vaccination on effectiveness of immunocastration, performance, and carcass and meat quality Meat Science, 175, 108451 (Elsevier). |
[23] | Karamucki, T. and Jakubowska, M. (2020). Meat quality of crossbred pigs with various percentage of Pietrain and Duroc breeds (E and U classes in the Europ system). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Zootechnica, 19: 17–24. |
[24] | Kim, J. A., Cho, E. S., Jeong, Y. D., Choi, Y. H., Kim, Y. S., woo Choi, J., Kim, J. S., Jang, A., Hong, J. K. and Sa, S. J. (2020). The effects of breed and gender on meat quality of Duroc, Pietrain, and their crossbred. Journal of animal science and technology, 62: 409–19. |
[25] | Glinoubol, J., Jaturasitha, S., Mahinchaib, P., Wicke, M. and Kreuzer, M. (2015). Effects of crossbreeding Thai native or Duroc pigs with Pietrain pigs on carcass and meat quality. Agriculture and agricultural science procedia, 5: 133–8. |
[26] | Jussiau, R., Papet, A., Rigal, J. and Zanchi, E. (2013). Amélioration génétique des animaux d’élevage. Educagri édition, 320p. |
[27] | Simm, G., Pollott, G., Mrode, R., Houston, R. and Marshall, K. (2021). Genetic improvement of farmed animals. CABI, 202p. |
APA Style
Mikidadou, I. T., Ignace, D. O., Serge, A. G., Apollinaire, M. G., Mahamadou, D., et al. (2025). Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 9(2), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
ACS Style
Mikidadou, I. T.; Ignace, D. O.; Serge, A. G.; Apollinaire, M. G.; Mahamadou, D., et al. Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9(2), 29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
AMA Style
Mikidadou IT, Ignace DO, Serge AG, Apollinaire MG, Mahamadou D, et al. Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2025;9(2):29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12, author = {Issifou Tamimou Mikidadou and Dotché Ogoudanan Ignace and Ahounou Gbênagnon Serge and Mensah Guy Apollinaire and Dahouda Mahamadou and Youssao Abdou Karim Issaka}, title = {Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin }, journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {29-38}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20250902.12}, abstract = {The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin AU - Issifou Tamimou Mikidadou AU - Dotché Ogoudanan Ignace AU - Ahounou Gbênagnon Serge AU - Mensah Guy Apollinaire AU - Dahouda Mahamadou AU - Youssao Abdou Karim Issaka Y1 - 2025/04/27 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 29 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12 AB - The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -