Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin

Received: 16 March 2025     Accepted: 31 March 2025     Published: 27 April 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts.

Published in International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
Page(s) 29-38
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Piétrain, Local Breeds, Improved Breeds, Crossbreeding, Heterosis, Carcasses

1. Introduction
The pig herd in Benin is comprised of three distinct categories: local, crossbred, and improved pigs . The term "improved breed" is used to refer to exotic breeds such as the Large White and Landrace, as well as the products of various crossbreeding carried out between these breeds . The cross-breeds are the result of crossbreeding between the improved breed and the local breed. Each breed possesses distinctive zootechnical and butchery characteristics. Local pigs are highly regarded by butchers and consumers , whereas farmers perceive them as unprofitable in semi-intensive or intensive farming . The crossbreeds and improved pigs are appreciated by breeders for their growth and prolificity. However, butchers and consumers find them to be fatty, with a technological, organoleptic, and sensory quality that is less appealing than that of local pigs . Nevertheless, breeders have observed that local pigs exhibit greater resistance to African Swine Fever compared to crossbred and improved pigs. In summary, crossbreeds and improved breeds demonstrate robust growth and prolificacy; however, their carcass and meat quality are not highly regarded due to their high fat content and increased susceptibility to African Swine Fever. To correct these deficiencies, the Large White and Landrace pig, which constitute the majority of the improved breeds and a portion of the crossbreeds, can be replaced in crossbreeding schemes by the Piétrain, a hypermuscular breed of Belgian origin (culard gene). In contrast to the Large White and Landrace breeds, the Piétrain has been demonstrated to possess a high-quality, low-fat carcass with exceptional organoleptic qualities . The Piétrain's susceptibility to stress has historically constrained its distribution in tropical regions. The development of the so-called "stress-negative" line with the NN or Nn halothane-sensitive genotype has enabled the breed to adapt to tropical environments. It is now found in Burkina Faso, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Vietnam .
The crossbreeding of stress-negative Piétrain with local Benin pigs and improved pigs, respectively, revealed that Piétrain improved reproductive performance in both local and improved pigs . Similarly, crossbred piglets (F1) showed significantly higher weights and average daily gains than local piglets, and Piétrain had significantly higher growth performance compared with the other two . If stress negative Piétrain improves the zootechnical performance of both local and improved pigs, what is the impact of this on the carcass quality of these two breeds?
The objective of this study is to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs resulting from negative-stress Piétrain crossbreeding with local and improved pig breeds. The findings will provide farmers with high-performance genetic types that can benefit breeders, butchers, and consumers.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
The study was carried out in the pig farms of the Genetic Improvement Unit of the Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Meat Technology of the Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi of the University of Abomey-Calavi (Benin), from July 2019 to June 2022. This laboratory is located in the commune of Abomey-Calavi between 6°24'42'' north latitude and 2°20'22'' east longitude. This commune enjoys sub-equatorial climatic conditions characterized by two rainy seasons: the long season (April to July) and the short season (October to November). These two seasons are interspersed with dry seasons, the longest of which lasts from December to March. Temperatures vary from 25 to 30°C, and rainfall ranges from 900 mm to 1,500 mm per year.
2.2. Experimental Design
The work was conducted at the Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi. In total, two lots of six primiparous sows of the local breed, two lots of six primiparous sows of the improved breed, and a lot of six primiparous Pietrains were constituted. The first lot of local females was mated with a local boar (Lot 1), while the second lot of local females was inseminated with Stress-Negative Pietrain semen (Lot 2). The first lot of improved breed females was inseminated with a Piétrain semen (lot 3), while the second lot of improved females was inseminated with the semen of improved males (lot 4). Finally, the Piétrain females were inseminated with Piétrain semen (lot 5). The Pietrain breed was imported from Belgium. Following its delivery, the females in lots 2 and 3 were inseminated after heat synchronization. Those that were not pregnant were inseminated again. The occurrence of pregnancies and parturition was recorded for each of the five lots.
The animals utilized in this experiment were provided with ad libitum access to a feed containing 20% protein and an energy content of 3000 kcal/kg feed from the time of their birth until they reached the age of 2.5 months, at which point they were weaned. Subsequently, the animals were fattened on a growth-finish feed comprising the following ingredients: wheat bran (38%), fish meal (2%), corn bran (30%), palm kernel meal (28%), dicalcium phosphate (0.2%), lysine (0.1%), methionine (0.1%), cooking salt (0.5%), and oyster shell (1%). The energy content of the feed was 2,900 or 2,500 kilocalories per kilogram, and the total nitrogen content was 16%. During the fattening phase, which spanned from 2.5 to 8 months of age, water and feed were provided in unlimited quantities.
From a health and medical perspective, the animals were subject to regular monitoring throughout the course of the experiment. Prior to their placement in the fattening pens, all animals were administered anti-stress treatment. At the outset of the experiment, the animals were dewormed against gastrointestinal parasitosis and also received preventive treatment against trypanosomiasis. The same treatments were administered to the animals two months later. Animals exhibiting signs of illness were treated in a systematic manner, in accordance with the clinical cases presented. In order to ensure the implementation of sanitary prophylaxis, two foot baths were installed at the entrance to the buildings.
2.3. Slaughtering Procedures
A total of 10 pigs, comprising 5 males and 5 females, were randomly selected from each lot for slaughter. On the day preceding the slaughter, the animals were fasted from 6 p.m. until slaughter at 7 a.m. the following morning. Once the animal was slaughtered and the jugular vein severed, it was first scalded and then depilated and eviscerated. Subsequently, the carcass was divided into two halves and subsequently re-dried at room temperature. The carcass was separated from the left half carcass, which was maintained in a cold storage environment at 4 degrees Celsius for a period of 24 hours. The leg (comprising the portion of the thigh containing the pelvic bones, femur, tibia, fibula, and associated muscles) was divided into sections at the ilium and tarsal joints using a clean cutting technique. Subsequently, the shoulder (portion of the anterior limb) was sectioned at the carpal joint. The rack (portion of the loin) has been sectioned at the 2nd thoracic vertebra and at the last lumbar vertebra, thus containing the filet and the rate of filet. The backfat (rind and adipose tissue) was detached from the loin. The dissection proceeded in accordance with the procedure described by Desmoulin et al .
2.4. Carcass Characteristics
The carcass characteristics were evaluated on the left half carcass. Carcass length is defined as the distance between the first thoracic rib and the pubis. The thickness of the back fat is gauged with a caliper at the level of the neck, extending from the last thoracic rib to the rump. The mean back fat thickness is calculated as the mean of the three aforementioned measurements. The slaughter yield is defined as the ratio of carcass weight to final live weight, which is measured prior to fasting. The hot and cold carcass yields were calculated using the following formulas:
Hot carcass yield =Hot carcass weight*100Live weight at slaughter
Cold carcass yield =Cold carcass weight*100Live weight at slaughter
The head and legs were subjected to a weighing procedure, after which their respective weight percentages in relation to the carcass weight were calculated.
The heterosis effect of each trait was calculated using the following formula:
Heterosis %= F1-(Parent 1+Parent 2)2(Parent 1+Parent2)2*100
Where:
1. F1 is the performance value of the crossed individual (Piétrain X local breed or Piétrain X improved breed),
2. Parent1: Father, is the performance value of the F1 individual's father;
3. Parent 2: Mother, is the performance value of the F1 individual's mother.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Analysis System Software . A fixed-effects linear model was employed for the analysis of live weight data and carcass characteristics. The fixed effects of this model were breed and sex. The interaction between breed and sex was found to be statistically significant and was therefore incorporated into the Analysis of variance model. The mathematical expression of this model is as follows:
Yijk=μ+Bi+Sj+B*Sij+eijk
With:
1. Yijk is the live weight or a carcass characteristic of animal k; of breed i and sex j;
2. μ is the overall average;
3. Bi is the fixed effect of breed i (Local, Improved, Petrain, Petrain X Local, Petrain X Improved);
4. S j is the fixed effect of sex j (male and female);
5. B*Sij is the interaction between race i and sex j;
6. eijkl is the random residual error.
The generalized linear model procedure of Statistical Analysis System Software was employed for the analysis of variance. The F-test was employed to determine the significance of each model effect, and the least-squares means were estimated and compared in pairs by Student's t-test.
3. Results
3.1. Breed Effect on Carcass Characteristics
Table 1 presents the findings regarding carcass characteristics of the five genetic types. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain were observed to be higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). The slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of the local breed (p < 0.001). A similar trend was noted between Piétrain-improved cross-breeds and the improved breed. The Piétrain breed exhibited the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds.
Table 1. Body composition of piétrain, local, improved and crossbred pigs.

Variables

Piétrain

Local

Improved

Piétrain X Local

Piétrain X Improved

Significant

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Mean

SE

Live weight (kg)

77.78a

3.75

25.47c

4.19

53.75b

4.10

55.34b

2.30

68.09b

2.30

***

Hot carcass (kg)

59.22a

3.22

16.19d

3.57

35.58c

3.59

38.94c

1.96

49.22b

3.22

***

Hot carcass (%)

76.36b

6.24

64.06d

5.80

66.38c

4.42

70.26c

6.42

72.26a

5.01

***

Cold carcass (kg)

53.87a

2.68

14.34d

3.00

34.58c

3.00

35.09c

1.64

46.76b

1.64

***

Cold carcass (%)

72.29b

5.13

56.30c

8.63

64.45c

5.53

63.52cb

4.95

68.67a

5.03

***

Thickness of back fat (cm)

0.18b

0.77

3.41a

0.87

0.75a

0.87

0.30b

0.47

0.35b

0.47

NS

Neck fat thickness (cm)

0.18c

0.26

1.05bc

0.29

1.88a

0.29

0.52c

0.16

0.95ab

0.16

***

Rump fat thickness (cm)

0.18c

0.08

0.74b

0.09

1.32a

0.09

0.28c

0.05

0.39b

0.05

***

Average back fat thickness (cm)

0.18c

0.10

0.97b

0.12

1.35a

0.12

0.37c

0.06

0.57b

0.07

***

Rack of pork (kg)

3.76a

0.36

1.49c

0.40

2.50b

0.40

3.48a

0.22

3.19ab

0.22

**

Rack of pork (%)

13.96

1.81

9.77a

2.91

7.33b

0.93

9.88a

1.01

7.13b

2.13

***

Ham (kg)

6.27a

0.41

2.70d

0.45

3.10c

0.45

4.84b

0.25

5.18b

0.25

***

Ham (%)

11.80b

2.33

11.57b

1.60

8.90c

0.65

11.80a

2.33

9.37c

2.55

***

Shoulder (kg)

4.54a

0.33

1.67c

0.38

2.69b

0.38

3.49b

0.21

3.81b

0.20

***

Shoulder (%)

8.45b

1.53

11.43a

0.84

7.87b

1.17

10.02a

0.73

7.60b

2.03

***

Backfat (kg)

0.36b

0.06

0.53b

0.06

0.80a

0.07

0.42b

0.04

0.39b

0.03

***

Belly wall (kg)

1.10a

0.14

0.71b

0.16

1.16b

0.16

0.97ab

0.09

1.07a

0.09

NS

Viscera (kg)

1.76b

0.53

1.19b

0.53

2.16b

0.53

1.44a

0.28

2.01b

0.28

*

Remaining carcass (kg)

6.78a

0.63

2.21c

0.63

5.96ab

0.63

5.33ab

0.33

4.90b

0.33

**

Head (kg)

6.50a

0.60

1.94c

0.60

4.50b

0.59

6.01ab

0.31

5.35ab

0.31

***

Head (%)

12.99b

2.19

13.96ab

1.85

13.99ab

3.13

16.44a

2.19

12.11b

1.66

***

Legs (kg)

1.30a

0.12

0.40d

0.12

0.96b

0.12

1.31a

0.06

1.20ab

0.06

***

Carcass length (cm)

63.50bc

3.79

19.17

3.79

73.83a

3.79

58.75c

2.01

66.87ab

2.01

***

p>0.05; *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***; SE: Standard Error
Improved breeds exhibit higher slaughter weights, heavier carcasses, and higher hot and cold carcass yields at slaughter compared to local pigs (p < 0.001). The performance of the breed was enhanced through crossbreeding with the Piétrain. The carcass length of the improved breeds was observed to be longer than that of the Piétrain (p < 0.01), while the carcass length of the local breeds was found to be the shortest (p < 0.001).
In contrast to local and improved breeds, Piétrain exhibited a markedly reduced back fat thickness. Furthermore, Piétrain crosses with local and improved breeds, respectively, demonstrated a diminished back fat thickness compared to local and improved breeds (p < 0.001). The same trend was observed in the backfat (p < 0.001).
In terms of lean cuts, the Piétrain exhibited a heavier rack, ham, and shoulder than the local and improved breeds, while the crossbreeds demonstrated a cut weight that was intermediate between the parent breeds.
Additionally, the Piétrain exhibits a greater weight of the head, while the Piétrain and local crosses demonstrate the highest proportion of the head.
3.2. Effect of Sex on Carcass Characteristics
The overall slaughter weight of males and females within the same breed was found to be statistically indistinguishable. However, in the improved breed, males exhibited a higher hot carcass weight than females, while females demonstrated a higher belly wall weight than males (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between carcass characteristic measurements of males and females of Piétrain-improved crosses, and the same observations were made in Piétrain and Piétrain X Locale crosses. In local pigs, females exhibit a greater degree of dorsal fat thickness, a more substantial backfat, and a heavier belly wall (p < 0.05). Table 2 presents the results of carcass characteristics for the five genetic types by sex.
Table 2. Body composition of piétrain, local, improved and crossbred pigs according to sex.
NS: p>0,05; ***: p<0,001
3.3. Heterosis Effect
The heterosis effect was observed to have a positive impact on live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder). Conversely, the heterosis effect was observed to have a negative impact on the fatty cuts, particularly backfat, belly wall, and back fat thickness. The heterosis effect was observed to have a positive impact on head weight, carcass length, liver weight, and testicle weight in Piétrain-Local Breed crosses, while in improved crosses, the effect was noted to be negative for these same traits. Table 3 illustrates the heterosis effect values for carcass characteristics in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crosses.
Table 3. Heterosis effect on carcass characteristics of Piétrain x local breed and Piétrain x Improved breed crosses.

Variables

Piétrain

Local

Improved

Piétrain x Local

Piétrain x Improved

Piétrain x Local

Piétrain x Improved

Live weight (kg)

77.78

25.47

53.75

55.34

68.09

7.20*

3.54*

Hot carcass (kg)

59.22

16.19

35.58

38.94

49.22

3.28*

3.84*

Cold carcass (kg)

53.87

14.34

34.58

35.09

46.76

2.89*

5.73*

Thickness of back fat (cm)

0.18

3.41

0.75

0.3

0.35

-43.29***

-24.73**

Neck fat thickness (cm)

0.18

1.05

1.88

0.52

0.95

-15.45**

-7.77*

Rump fat thickness (cm)

0.18

0.74

1.32

0.28

0.39

-39.13**

-48.00***

Average back fat thickness (cm)

0.18

0.97

1.35

0.37

0.57

-35.65**

-25.49**

Rack (kg)

3.76

1.49

2.5

3.18

3.49

21.14**

11.50*

Ham (kg)

6.27

2.7

3.1

4.84

5.18

7.92*

10.57*

Shoulder (kg)

4.54

1.67

2.69

3.49

3.81

12.40*

5.39*

Backfat (kg)

0.36

0.53

0.8

0.42

0.39

-5.62*

-32.76**

Belly wall (kg)

1.1

0.71

1.16

0.97

1.07

7.18*

-5.31*

Viscera (kg)

1.76

1.19

2.16

1.44

2.01

-2.37*

2.55*

Remaining carcass (kg)

6.78

2.21

5.96

5.33

4.9

18.58**

-23.08**

Head (kg)

6.5

1.94

4.5

6.01

5.35

42.42***

-2.73*

Legs (kg)

1.3

0.4

0.96

1.31

1.2

54.12***

6.19*

Carcass length (cm)

63.5

19.17

73.83

58.75

66.87

42.13***

-2.61*

Rate (kg)

0.1

0.06

0.12

0.1

0.088

25.00**

-20.00**

Lungs (kg)

0.67

0.15

0.3

0.49

0.49

19.51**

1.03NS

Heart (kg)

0.3

0.1

0.19

0.25

0.28

25.00***

14.29**

Kidney (kg)

0.18

0.08

0.15

0.21

0.17

61.54***

3.03*

Liver (kg)

0.94

0.49

0.83

0.79

0.73

10.49*

-17.51**

Testes (g)

23.68

13.11

10.68

19.79

6.71

7.58*

-40.94***

NS: p>0,05; *: p<0,05; **: p<0,01, ***: p<0,001
4. Discussion
4.1. Breed Effect on Carcass Characteristics
The live weight at slaughter, hot and cold carcass weights, hot and cold carcass yields, and lean cuts of Piétrain pigs exhibited higher values than those of local and improved pigs. This difference can be attributed to genetic factors. In contrast to local and improved pig breeds, the Piétrain is a hypermuscular pig, exhibiting a pronounced muscular development at the shoulders, a well-defined back (rack, 27%) and exceptional hams (27%) in temperate environments. In tropical environments, the lean meat content is 63% . The improved genetic type is the result of a series of crossbreeding events between pure exotic breeds (such as Large White and Landrace) and other genetic sources. Its weight performance is superior to that of local pigs and improved crosses with local breeds .
The crossbred Piétrain-local breed exhibited higher slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields than the local breed. A similar trend was observed between the crossbred Piétrain-improved breed and the Improved breed. The disparity observed between the cross-breeds and their two parental breeds can be attributed to the influence of the dominant Piétrain genes, which are responsible for the expression of these traits, and which prevail over the recessive genes present in the local and improved breeds.
In contrast to local and improved breeds, the Piétrain breed is characterized by a relatively low backfat thickness. In Vietnam, the mean backfat thickness for Pietrain CC genotypes was 0.88 cm, while for CT genotypes it was 0.83 cm . These values are higher than those obtained in this study on Piétrain. The range of backfat thickness measurements for Duroc-Piétrain crossbreeds is reported to be between 0.22 cm and 0.41 cm , which is comparable to the values obtained for crossbreeds in our study.
The weight of the backfat and the thickness of the back fat are both relatively low in the Piétrain. Consequently, Piétrain carcasses exhibit a higher ratio of muscle to fat content, which is more highly regarded by butchers and consumers. The Piétrain crossbreeds exhibited lower back fat thicknesses and backfat weights than the local and improved breeds, indicating that the Piétrain contributes to an improvement in the lean meat content of the carcass in crossbreeds.
The carcass yield of the Piétrain was 76%, a figure that is significantly higher than that of the local and improved breeds. This elevated carcass yield can be attributed to the hypermuscular phenotype (culard gene) observed in the ham, shoulder, and back muscles of the Piétrain. Similar results are reported by Bo et al. in Vietnam and by Kowalski et al. in Piétrain pig lines in Belgium. This yield is higher and can even reach 83% in Piétrain pigs that are TT halothane-sensitive.
As carcass quality is linked to yield, lean meat content, and low-fat cover, the Piétrain breed is utilized in industrial crossbreeding schemes on farms to provide consumers with lean meat . In Thailand, the Piétrain has been employed in terminal crosses with Duroc and local Thai pigs with the objective of enhancing the carcass quality of the latter .
4.2. Effect of Sex on Carcass Characteristics
In general, there is no significant difference in slaughter weight between males and females within the same breed. The absence of a difference between males and females can be attributed to the fact that the animals are slaughtered at the age of eight months, which is the typical mating age for this breed. At this age, the influence of sex hormones on weight performance was not discernible. Despite the absence of a difference between the sexes in terms of slaughter weight, disparities were nonetheless discernible with respect to specific cuts. In the improved breed, females exhibit a greater degree of belly wall development than males. This discrepancy can be attributed to the development of adipose tissue in the abdominal wall of females.
No significant difference was observed in the backfat thicknesses of male and female Pietrain pigs slaughtered at 8 months of age. In contrast, a study conducted in Vietnam revealed that at 7.5 months of age, females exhibited a thicker back fat than males (0.82 vs. 0.89 cm) . The lack of significant differences observed in our study may be attributed to the relatively low weight at slaughter, although it should be noted that the animals in our study are threshed at eight months of age. In Vietnam, for instance, the average slaughter weight for males is 93.85 kg, while that for females is 101.11 kg . This is in stark contrast to the findings of the present study, where the average slaughter weight for males and females was 72.81 kg and 82.75 kg, respectively. The observed trend in the present study indicates that Piétrain females have a higher slaughter weight than whole Piétrain at 8 months of age. In the local pig, females have a thicker dorsal lard, a backfat, and a heavier belly wall than males. This trend is also observed in the Pietrain in Vietnam .
4.3. Heterosis Effect of Carcass Characteristics
The heterosis effect was observed to have a positive impact on live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts for both crossbreeding schemes. In regard to these traits, the expression of the genotype of individuals from the first generation (F1) was observed to exceed the average performance value of the parents. This finding is contrary to what would be expected if there were a simple additive combination of traits. The process of crossbreeding has been demonstrated to reduce the frequency of homozygous alleles, which are pairs of identical genes, while simultaneously increasing the number of heterozygous alleles . Consequently, the majority of recessive, deleterious traits are obscured by advantageous dominant traits. This is the reason why hybrids frequently exhibit genetic traits that are significantly above the mean of their parental lines. In the present study, heterosis values are high for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts. These results can be explained by the Piétrain's distance from the local and genetically improved breeds.
The heterosis effect was negative for fatty cuts, particularly backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses. Consequently, the Piétrain breed enhances the carcass quality of crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds, respectively, by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts.
5. Conclusion
A study of carcass quality in pigs derived from Stress-negative Piétrain crosses and local and improved pig breeds in southern Benin demonstrates that the Piétrain breed exhibits superior slaughter weight and carcass quality compared to local and improved breeds. The proportion of fatty cuts is reduced and that of lean cuts is increased in crossbreeds from local and improved breeds, respectively, as a result of this improvement in carcass quality. Overall, no significant differences were observed in the slaughter weight or carcass characteristics of males and females within the same breed. A further study is required to elucidate the relationships between the carcass characteristics of these genetic types.
Abbreviations

SE

Standard Error

NS

No Significant

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the University of Abomey-Calavi for its support in carrying out this work, thanks to the project entitled "Amélioration des aptitudes bouchères et de la résilience du porc local du Bénin par croisement avec le Pietrain stress négatif au sud du Bénin", abbreviated as Projet Pietrain, through the Programme Fonds Compétitifs de Recherche de l’Université d’Abomey-Calavi.
Author Contributions
Issifou Tamimou Mikidadou: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft
Dotché Ogoudanan Ignace: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization
Ahounou Gbênagnon Serge: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation
Mensah Guy Apollinaire: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Dahouda Mahamadou: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Software, Supervision
Youssao Abdou Karim Issaka: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Funding
The work was financed by the Competitive Research Funds Program of the University of Abomey-Calavi through the Pietrain project.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Dotché, O. I., Ahounou, G. S., Salifou, C. F. A., Biobou, R., Kiki, P., Govoeyi, B., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J.-P., Mensah, A. G., Farougou, S., Thilmant, P., Youssao, A. K. I. and Koutinhouin, G. B. (2018). Selection and culling criteria for breeding boars and sows in pig farms from Oueme and Plateau departments in Benin. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 71(1-2): 47–57.
[2] Youssao, A. K. I., Dotché, I. O., Toléba, S. S., Kassa, K., Ahounou, G. S., Salifou, C. F. A., Dahouda, M., Antoine Moussiaux, N. D. and Mensah, A. G. (2018). Phenotypic characterization of pig genetic resources in the departments of Oueme and Plateau in Benin. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux, 71(1-2): 59–65.
[3] Djimènou, D., Adoligbé, C. M., Mensah, S. E., Aboh, A. B., Edénnakpo, A. K., Atchadé, T. G. and Koudandé, D. O. (2021). Transformation et commercialisation de la viande de porcs au Sud du Bénin: Caractéristiques socioéconomiques et contraintes. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 48: 8618–36.
[4] Tassou, W. A., Attindéhou, S., Mèliho, P. C., Lafia, K. B., Salifou, S. (2021). Déterminants du choix de consommation de la viande porcine au Bénin. Sciences and Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture, 1 (1): 19‑28.
[5] Dotché, I. O., Bonou, G. A., Dahouda, M., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J. P., Mensah, G. A., Farougou, S., Thilmant, P., Karim, I. Y. A. and Koutinhouin, B. G. (2020). Reproductive performances of local pigs in West African countries: A review. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 10 (1): 49‑55.
[6] Dotché, O. I., Bankolé, B., Dahouda, M., Biobou, R., Bonou, G. A., Antoine-Moussiaux, N., Dehoux, J.-P., Thilmant, P., Mensah, G. A., Koutinhouin, G. B. and Youssao, A. K. I. (2020). Comparison of reproductive performances of local and improved pigs reared in south Benin. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52 (2): 687–98.
[7] Ganiero, E. (2019). Evaluation de la qualité de la carcasse, des qualités technologique et organoleptique de la viande des porcs des races locales et améliorées au Sud du Bénin. Memoire de Master en Normes et Contrôle de Qualité des Produits Agro-Alimentaires, EPAC/UAC, 50p.
[8] Youssao, A. K. I., Verleyen, V., Michaux, C., Clinquart, A. and Leroy, P. L. (2002). Carcass composition, meat quality and exploitation of negative stress Pietrain. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire, 146: 329–338.
[9] Hanset, R., Dasnois, C., Scalais, S., Michaux, C. and Grobet, L. (1995). Effets de l’introgression dans le génome Piétrain de l’allèle normal au locus de sensibilité à l’halothane. Genetics Selection Evolution, 27: 77–88.
[10] Hanset, R., Dasnois, C., Scalais, S., Michaux, C. and Grobet, L. (1995). Génotypes au locus de sensibilité à l’halothane et caractères de croissance et de carcasse dans une F2 Piétrain× Large White. Genetics Selection Evolution, 27: 63–76.
[11] Hanset, R., Scalais, S. and Grobet, L. (1995). Du Piétrain classique au Piétrain résistant à l’halothane ou Piétrain Réhal. Annale de Médecine Vétérinaire, 139, 23–35.
[12] Leroy, P., Moula, N., Huart, A., Leroy, E., Cassart, R., Ruppol, P., Levrard, O., ElFadili, M., Binh, D. V. and Van Thang, N. (2012). Amélioration des performances génétiques des races tropicales par les races wallonnes, 2012, p. 22.
[13] Do Duc, L., Bo, H. X., Thomson, P. C., Binh, D. V., Leroy, P. and Farnir, F. (2013). Reproductive and productive performances of the stress-negative Piétrain pigs in the tropics: the case of Vietnam. Animal Production Science, 53: 173–9.
[14] Bankolé, B. C., Dotché, I. O., Ahounou, G. S., Dahouda, M., Youssao, A. K. I. and Senou, M. (2024). Improving the reproductive performance of local and improved pigs by crossbreeding with stress-negative Pietrain. Point Thèse, 90p.
[15] Bankolé, B. C., Dotché, I. O., Ahounou, G. S., Dahouda, M., Youssao, A. K. I. and Senou, M. (2024). Improving the growth performance of local pigs in Benin by crossbreeding with the stress-negative Pietrain. Animal Production Science, submitted, 18.
[16] Desmoulin, B., Ecolan, P. and Bonneau, M. (1988). Estimation de la composition tissulaire des carcasses de porcs. Productions Animales, 1: 59–64.
[17] SAS (2013). Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.: SAS, 418p.
[18] Bo, H. X., Duc, L. D., Moula, N., Clinquart, A., Vu Dinh, T., Dang Vu, B., Farnir, F. and Leroy, P. (2013). Growth performance and meat quality of stress negative Piétrain pigs in the tropics: the case of Vietnam, 5p.
[19] Dotché, I. O., Idohou, S., Dahouda, M., Kiki, P., Govoeyi, B., Antoine-Moussiaux, N. and Youssao, A. K. I. (2019). Crossbreeding and consanguinity management in pig farms in the departments of Ouémé and Plateau in Benin. Veterinary World, 12: 1816–25.
[20] Choi, I., Steibel, J. P., Bates, R. O., Raney, N. E., Rumph, J. M. and Ernst, C. W. (2011). Identification of carcass and meat quality QTL in an F2 Duroc\times Pietrain pig resource population using different least-squares analysis models. Frontiers in genetics, 2: 1–10.
[21] Kowalski, E., Vossen, E., Millet, S., Ampe, B., Callens, B., Van Royen, G., De Smet, S. and Aluwé, M. (2020). Performance and carcass, loin and ham quality in crossbreds from three terminal sire lines Meat science, 167, 108158 (Elsevier).
[22] Kowalski, E., Vossen, E., Millet, S., Ampe, B., De Smet, S. and Aluwé, M. (2021). Effect of terminal sire line and timing second vaccination on effectiveness of immunocastration, performance, and carcass and meat quality Meat Science, 175, 108451 (Elsevier).
[23] Karamucki, T. and Jakubowska, M. (2020). Meat quality of crossbred pigs with various percentage of Pietrain and Duroc breeds (E and U classes in the Europ system). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Zootechnica, 19: 17–24.
[24] Kim, J. A., Cho, E. S., Jeong, Y. D., Choi, Y. H., Kim, Y. S., woo Choi, J., Kim, J. S., Jang, A., Hong, J. K. and Sa, S. J. (2020). The effects of breed and gender on meat quality of Duroc, Pietrain, and their crossbred. Journal of animal science and technology, 62: 409–19.
[25] Glinoubol, J., Jaturasitha, S., Mahinchaib, P., Wicke, M. and Kreuzer, M. (2015). Effects of crossbreeding Thai native or Duroc pigs with Pietrain pigs on carcass and meat quality. Agriculture and agricultural science procedia, 5: 133–8.
[26] Jussiau, R., Papet, A., Rigal, J. and Zanchi, E. (2013). Amélioration génétique des animaux d’élevage. Educagri édition, 320p.
[27] Simm, G., Pollott, G., Mrode, R., Houston, R. and Marshall, K. (2021). Genetic improvement of farmed animals. CABI, 202p.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mikidadou, I. T., Ignace, D. O., Serge, A. G., Apollinaire, M. G., Mahamadou, D., et al. (2025). Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 9(2), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mikidadou, I. T.; Ignace, D. O.; Serge, A. G.; Apollinaire, M. G.; Mahamadou, D., et al. Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9(2), 29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mikidadou IT, Ignace DO, Serge AG, Apollinaire MG, Mahamadou D, et al. Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2025;9(2):29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12,
      author = {Issifou Tamimou Mikidadou and Dotché Ogoudanan Ignace and Ahounou Gbênagnon Serge and Mensah Guy Apollinaire and Dahouda Mahamadou and Youssao Abdou Karim Issaka},
      title = {Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {29-38},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20250902.12},
      abstract = {The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Carcass Quality in Pigs Resulting from Crossbreeding Between Piétrain Stress Negative and Local and Improved Pig Breeds in Southern Benin
    
    AU  - Issifou Tamimou Mikidadou
    AU  - Dotché Ogoudanan Ignace
    AU  - Ahounou Gbênagnon Serge
    AU  - Mensah Guy Apollinaire
    AU  - Dahouda Mahamadou
    AU  - Youssao Abdou Karim Issaka
    Y1  - 2025/04/27
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
    T2  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JF  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JO  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    SP  - 29
    EP  - 38
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1312
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.12
    AB  - The carcass of the local pig breed and the improved pig breed of Benin is observed to contain a high proportion of fat cover. The objective of the study was to evaluate the carcass quality of pigs obtained through the process of crossbreeding, specifically between the Stress-negative Piétrain and local and improved pig breeds. To achieve this objective, five lots of pigs of different genetic types were constituted: lot 1 (local pigs), lot 2 (Piétrain X local pig), lot 3 (Piétrain X Improved), lot 4 (Improved), and lot 5 (Piétrain). A sample of 10 pigs (5 males and 5 females) was selected from each lot and fattened and slaughtered at 8 months of age. The slaughter live weight, hot and cold carcass weights, and hot and cold carcass yields of Piétrain pigs were found to be significantly higher than those of local and improved pigs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the slaughter weights, hot and cold carcass weights, and slaughter carcass yields of Piétrain-local breed crossbreeds were observed to be higher than those of local pigs (p < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident between Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds and Improved. The Piétrain exhibits the highest carcass yield, at a minimum of 70%, in comparison to other breeds. In contrast to the local and improved breeds, the Piétrain has a markedly reduced back fat thickness. The cross-breeds of the Piétrain with the local and improved breeds exhibited a significantly lower back fat thickness than their respective parent breeds (p < 0.001). The same differences were observed for the backfat (p < 0.001). The heterosis effect was observed to be positive for live weight at slaughter, hot carcass weight, cold carcass weight, and lean cuts (rack, ham, and shoulder) in Piétrain-local breed and Piétrain-improved breed crossbreeds. Conversely, the heterosis effect was negative with regard to fatty cuts, particularly the backfat, belly wall, and back fat thicknesses in both crossbreeds. The findings indicate that the Piétrain breed enhances carcass quality in crossbreeds derived from local and improved breeds by reducing the proportion of fatty cuts and increasing those of lean cuts.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information