The present review article aims to provide an overview of the additive and non-additive genetic effects of crossbreeding and their contribution to the improvement of growth and egg production traits in chickens. It discusses the advancement in crossbreeding effects and mating design contribution to a significant rate of genetic progress in indigenous chicken. In Ethiopia, crossbreeding practice may be used to enhance the performance of local chicken ecotypes. The article extensively reviews various papers related to crossbreeding trials conducted in Ethiopia, evaluating their effectiveness in improving growth and egg production. It discusses the mating design and breeds used in these programs, such as exotic breeds like Rhode Island Red, Fayoumi, White Leghorn, Koekoek, Sasso, Kuroiler, and local Ethiopian chicken ecotypes. Among the exotic breeds involved in crossbreeding, Rhode Island Red and Sasso are considered more favorable for improving growth rate and color preference, while White Leghorn is preferred for enhancing egg production traits. In opposite to these indigenous chickens are preferred for disease resistance and product quality. Additive genetic effects are typically responsible for the genetic improvement of traits over generations through selection. In egg production, additive genetic effects influence the overall capacity of a chicken to lay eggs, affecting traits like egg number and egg size. Whereas, In growth performance, additive genetic effects influence traits like body weight gain, feed conversion efficiency, and overall growth rate. Non-additive genetic effects include dominance and epistatic interactions between genes. These effects can lead to genetic heterogeneity and can impact traits like egg production and growth performance besides playing a role in hybrid vigor or heterosis. In conclusion, both additive and non-additive genetic effects play a crucial role in determining egg production and growth performance in chickens. Additive effects drive genetic improvement over generations, while non-additive effects provide immediate benefits like hybrid vigor. Understanding and utilizing both types of genetic effects is essential for enhancing these traits in poultry breeding programs. Chicken crossbreeding programs are highly important in the poultry industry as they continuously improve the genetic potential of chickens, leading to more efficient production systems and higher profitability for producers.
Published in | International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13 |
Page(s) | 106-111 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Additives Effects, Crossbreeding, Heterosis Effect, Maternal Effects
[1] | Amuzu-Aweh, E. N., Bovenhuis, H. De Koning, D. J. & Bijma, P., 2015. Predicting heterosis for egg production traits in crossbred offspring of individual white Leghorn sires using genome-wide SNP data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 47, 27. |
[2] | Taye, S., Goshu, G., & Abegaz, S. (2022). Effect of Crossbreeding on Growth Performance of Improved Horro Crosses with Koekoek and Kuroiler Chicken Breeds. Poultry Science Journal, 10(1), 35-44. |
[3] | Khawaja, T., Khan, S. H., Mukhtar, N., Ullah, N. and Parveen, A., 2013. Production performance, egg quality and biochemical parameters of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41(2), 208-217. |
[4] | El-Tahawy, W. S., Habashy, W. S., 2021. Genetic effects on growth and egg production traits in two-way crosses of Egyptian and commercial layer chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 51(3): 349–354. |
[5] | Galukande, E., Mulindwa, H., Wurzinger, M., Roschinsky, R., Mwai, A. O. and Sölkner, J., 2013. Cross-breeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: achievements, challenges and opportunities. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, 52, pp. 111-125. |
[6] | Saxena, V. K. and Kolluri, G., 2018. Selection methods in poultry breeding: from genetics to genomics. Application of genetics and genomics in poultry science, 19. |
[7] | Bourdon, R. M. 2014. Understanding Animal Breeding, 2nd Edition. Pearson New International Edition, Pearson Education Ltd, London. |
[8] | Udeh, I. 2010. Mode of inheritance and interrelationship among age at first egg, body weight at first egg and weight of first egg in local by exotic inbred chicken crosses. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(10): 948–953. |
[9] | Fairfull, R. W., Gowe, R. S. and Emsley, J. A. B. 1983. Diallel cross of six long-term selected leghorn strains with emphasis on heterosis and reciprocal effects. British Poultry Science, 24: 133–158. |
[10] | Iraqi, M. M., Khalil M. H., El-Attrouny, M. 2013 Estimation of crossbreeding components for growth traits in crossing Golden Montazah with White Leghorn chickens, in: VI the International Conference: Balnimalcon, pp. 3–5. |
[11] | Wolf, J. and Knížetová, H. 1994. Crossbreeding effects for body weight and carcass traits in Pekin duck. British Poultry Science, 35(1): 33–45. |
[12] | Nath, M., Singh, B. P. and Saxena, V. K. 2014. Estimation of crossbreeding parameters for humoral. |
[13] | Lotfi, E., Zerehdaran, S. and Azari, M. A. 2012. Direct and maternal genetic effects of body weight traits in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 76(3): 150–154. |
[14] | Simm, G., Pollott, G., Mrode, R., Houston, R. and Marshall, K. 2021. Genetic Improvement of Farmed Animals. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. |
[15] | Williams, S. M., Price, S. E. and Siegel, P. B. 2002. Heterosis of growth and reproductive traits in fowl. Poultry Science, 81: 1109–1112. |
[16] | Grosso, J. L. B. M., Balieiro, J. C. C., Eler, J. P., Ferraz, J. B. S., Mattos, E. C. and Filho, T. M. 2010. Comparison of different models to estimate genetic parameters for carcass traits in a commercial broiler line. Genetics and Molecular Research, 9(2): 908–918. |
[17] | Harvey, W. R., 1960. Least-squares Analysis of Data with Unequal Subclass Numbers. Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. |
[18] | Rajkumar, U., Sharma, R. P., Padhi, M. K., Rajaravindra, K. S., Reddy, B. L. N., Niranjan, M., Bhattacharya, T. K., Haunshi, S. and Chatterjee, R. N. 2011. Genetic analysis of juvenile growth and carcass traits in a full diallel mating in selected coloured broiler lines. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43: 1129–1136. |
[19] | Kedija Hussen, Wondmeneh Esatu, Gebeyehu Goshu and Solomon Abegaz. 2020. Crossbreeding effect on egg production traits of Horro ecotype crossed with exotic Dominant Red Barred D 922 chickens: A step towards synthetic breed development in Ethiopia. British Journal of Poultry Sciences, 9(1): 1–17. 37. |
[20] | Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th Edition. Addison Wesley Longman Ltd, Harlow, England. |
[21] | Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Rajkumar U, Niranjan M and Haunshi S. 2016. Evaluation of a three-way cross chicken developed for backyard poultry in respect to growth, production and carcass quality traits under intensive system of rearing. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44: 390–94. |
[22] | Fikerneh N., Abegaz, S., Tadesse, Y., Jembere, T., Esatu, W., Dessie, T. 2023 Evaluation of growth performance and feed efficiency in reciprocal crosses of Fayoumi with three exotic chicken breeds. Acta Agric. Scand. A -Anim. Science. |
[23] | Eisen, E. J., Hörstgen, S. G., Saxton, A. M. and Bandy, T. R. 1983. Genetic interpretation and analysis of diallel crosses with animals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 65: 17–23. |
[24] | Henderson, C. R., 1948. Estimation of general, specific, and maternal combing abilities in crosses among inbred lines of swine. Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State College Library, Ames, Iowa. |
[25] | Fairfull, R. W. & Gowe, R. S., Nagai, J., 1987. Dominance and epistasis in heterosis of White Leghorn strain crosses. Can. J. Animal Sci. 67, 663-680. |
[26] | Onofri, A., Terzaroli, N. and Russi, L. 2021. Linear models for diallel crosses: a review with R functions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134: 585–601. |
[27] | Jakubec, V., Nitter, G., Komender, P., Fewson, D. and Soukupova, Z. 1988. Crossbreeding in farm animals II. Analysis of a diallel experiment for sex-linked effects with application to poultry. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 105: 26–35. |
APA Style
Taye, S., Dawit, M. (2024). Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects on Growth and Egg Production Performance of Crossbred Chicken in Ethiopia. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 8(4), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13
ACS Style
Taye, S.; Dawit, M. Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects on Growth and Egg Production Performance of Crossbred Chicken in Ethiopia. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2024, 8(4), 106-111. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13
AMA Style
Taye S, Dawit M. Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects on Growth and Egg Production Performance of Crossbred Chicken in Ethiopia. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2024;8(4):106-111. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13, author = {Shambel Taye and Mahilet Dawit}, title = {Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects on Growth and Egg Production Performance of Crossbred Chicken in Ethiopia }, journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {106-111}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20240804.13}, abstract = {The present review article aims to provide an overview of the additive and non-additive genetic effects of crossbreeding and their contribution to the improvement of growth and egg production traits in chickens. It discusses the advancement in crossbreeding effects and mating design contribution to a significant rate of genetic progress in indigenous chicken. In Ethiopia, crossbreeding practice may be used to enhance the performance of local chicken ecotypes. The article extensively reviews various papers related to crossbreeding trials conducted in Ethiopia, evaluating their effectiveness in improving growth and egg production. It discusses the mating design and breeds used in these programs, such as exotic breeds like Rhode Island Red, Fayoumi, White Leghorn, Koekoek, Sasso, Kuroiler, and local Ethiopian chicken ecotypes. Among the exotic breeds involved in crossbreeding, Rhode Island Red and Sasso are considered more favorable for improving growth rate and color preference, while White Leghorn is preferred for enhancing egg production traits. In opposite to these indigenous chickens are preferred for disease resistance and product quality. Additive genetic effects are typically responsible for the genetic improvement of traits over generations through selection. In egg production, additive genetic effects influence the overall capacity of a chicken to lay eggs, affecting traits like egg number and egg size. Whereas, In growth performance, additive genetic effects influence traits like body weight gain, feed conversion efficiency, and overall growth rate. Non-additive genetic effects include dominance and epistatic interactions between genes. These effects can lead to genetic heterogeneity and can impact traits like egg production and growth performance besides playing a role in hybrid vigor or heterosis. In conclusion, both additive and non-additive genetic effects play a crucial role in determining egg production and growth performance in chickens. Additive effects drive genetic improvement over generations, while non-additive effects provide immediate benefits like hybrid vigor. Understanding and utilizing both types of genetic effects is essential for enhancing these traits in poultry breeding programs. Chicken crossbreeding programs are highly important in the poultry industry as they continuously improve the genetic potential of chickens, leading to more efficient production systems and higher profitability for producers. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Additive and Non-additive Genetic Effects on Growth and Egg Production Performance of Crossbred Chicken in Ethiopia AU - Shambel Taye AU - Mahilet Dawit Y1 - 2024/11/28 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13 T2 - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JF - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology JO - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology SP - 106 EP - 111 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1312 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240804.13 AB - The present review article aims to provide an overview of the additive and non-additive genetic effects of crossbreeding and their contribution to the improvement of growth and egg production traits in chickens. It discusses the advancement in crossbreeding effects and mating design contribution to a significant rate of genetic progress in indigenous chicken. In Ethiopia, crossbreeding practice may be used to enhance the performance of local chicken ecotypes. The article extensively reviews various papers related to crossbreeding trials conducted in Ethiopia, evaluating their effectiveness in improving growth and egg production. It discusses the mating design and breeds used in these programs, such as exotic breeds like Rhode Island Red, Fayoumi, White Leghorn, Koekoek, Sasso, Kuroiler, and local Ethiopian chicken ecotypes. Among the exotic breeds involved in crossbreeding, Rhode Island Red and Sasso are considered more favorable for improving growth rate and color preference, while White Leghorn is preferred for enhancing egg production traits. In opposite to these indigenous chickens are preferred for disease resistance and product quality. Additive genetic effects are typically responsible for the genetic improvement of traits over generations through selection. In egg production, additive genetic effects influence the overall capacity of a chicken to lay eggs, affecting traits like egg number and egg size. Whereas, In growth performance, additive genetic effects influence traits like body weight gain, feed conversion efficiency, and overall growth rate. Non-additive genetic effects include dominance and epistatic interactions between genes. These effects can lead to genetic heterogeneity and can impact traits like egg production and growth performance besides playing a role in hybrid vigor or heterosis. In conclusion, both additive and non-additive genetic effects play a crucial role in determining egg production and growth performance in chickens. Additive effects drive genetic improvement over generations, while non-additive effects provide immediate benefits like hybrid vigor. Understanding and utilizing both types of genetic effects is essential for enhancing these traits in poultry breeding programs. Chicken crossbreeding programs are highly important in the poultry industry as they continuously improve the genetic potential of chickens, leading to more efficient production systems and higher profitability for producers. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -