Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets

Received: 13 April 2024    Accepted: 28 April 2024    Published: 17 May 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A 3x3 factorial experiment was carried out to assess the performance of Boran breed (BRN), Iringa Red (IRR) and Singida White (SWT) strains of cattle fed on three different diets (D1, D2, and D3) under a feedlot condition. The diets contained hominy feed plus molasses (D1 or control), molasses and cassava meal (D2) and rice polishing (D3) as main energy sources. In addition, they contained sunflower seed cake as protein source, minerals and vitamins premix. Fifty-four (54) bulls of equal numbers of each strain, aged between 2 and 2.5 years and average initial weight of 194 ± 12.6 kg were randomly allocated in the three diets and housed in a feedlot structure. They were fed individually with their respective dietary treatments for 80 days, during which data on feed intake and growth performance were recorded. Thereafter 45 bulls with equal number of strains were slaughtered, and carcass characteristics were assessed and gross margins computed. The CP contents (g/kg) in the diets were highest in D2 (155), followed by D1 (141.7) and lowest (130) in D3. There were no significant (P>0.05) interaction effect of diet and breed/strain in all the parameters assessed on performance. Bulls fed on D2 grew faster (0.99 kg/d) and attained greater final weight (269.9 kg) and heavier carcasses (140.8 kg) followed by those fed on D1 with mean values of (0.92 kg/d), (258.1 kg) and (131.5 kg), respectively. The average dressing percentage followed a similar trend, being higher (P<0.05) in bulls fed on D2 (52.4) compared to those on D1 (51.7) and D3 (51.1). The BRN bulls had faster growth rates (1.04 kg/d) followed by the IRR (0.83 g/d), which had similar (P>0.05) average daily gain to that of SWT (0.83 g/d). The final weight of BRN bulls (267.4 kg) was not different (P>0.05) from that of IRR (257.5 kg), which was also found to be similar (P>0.05) to that of SWT (251.2 kg). The hot carcass weights followed similar trend, BRN having carcass weight (138.2 kg) similar (P>0.05) to IRR (130.4 kg), which happened to be not different (P>0.05) from that of SWT (129.3 kg). The mean dressing percentage was higher (P<0.05) for BRN (52.2) than other strains. It is concluded that value of weight gains and slaughter characteristics of Iringa red are comparable to those of Boran, thus for feedlot finishing farmers should be advised to select and use Iringa red bulls to obtain high carcass and large profit.

Published in International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 8, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12
Page(s) 21-29
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Boran, Iringa Red, Singida White, Feedlot, Weight Gain

References
[1] MLDF (2019). Tanzania livestock sector Analysis.
[2] Mruttu, H., Ndomba, C., Nandonde, S., & Brook, K. N. (2016). Animal genetics strategy and vision for Tanzania. Tanzania Livestock Master Plan Background Paper.
[3] Das, S. M. and Mkonyi, J. I. (2003). Important aspects of conservation of indigenous cattle in Tanzania: A review. In Tanzania Society of Animal Production Conference Series 30: 59-70.
[4] Muzzo, B. I., &Provenza, F. D. (2018). A review of strategies for overcoming challenges of beef production in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30(12), 1-11.
[5] Mushi, D. E. (2020). Feedlot performance of Tanzanian Shorthorn Zebu finished on local feed resources. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52(6): 3207-3216.
[6] Polcarp, J. (2014). Evaluation of cattle finishing systems and availability of animal feedstuffs in Magu and Ilemela districts, Mwanza Region (Doctoral dissertation, Sokoine University of Agriculture).
[7] Kimirei, S. O. G., Chenyambuga, S. W., Mushi, D. E., Msalya, G. M., & Mpenda, Z. (2022). Feedlot performance and profitability of Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu finished on local feed resources in Kongwa District, Tanzania.
[8] Devendra, C., & Leng, R. A. (2011). Feed resources for animals in Asia: issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(3), 303-321.
[9] Obi, F. O., Ugwuishiwu, B. O., & Nwakaire, J. N. (2016). Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 35(4), 957-964.
[10] Moletta, J. L., Torrecilhas, J. A., Ornaghi, M. G., Passetti, R. A. C., Eiras, C. E., & Prado, I. N. D. (2014). Feedlot performance of bulls and steers fed on three levels of concentrate in the diets. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 36, 323-328.
[11] Msanga, Y. N., Mwakilembe, P. L., & Sendalo, D. (2012). The indigenous cattle of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: distinct phenotypic features, performance and uses. Livest. Res. Rural Dev, 24, 1-14.
[12] Mushi, D. E., & Baruani, J. M. (2021). Preliminary study on slaughter and meat quality characteristics of selected strains of Tanzania shorthorn Zebu. Tanzania Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(2), 278-294.
[13] Asimwe, L., Kimambo, A. E., Laswai, G. H., Mtenga, L. A., Weisbjerg, M. R. and Madsen, J. (2016). Economics of finishing Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu cattle in feedlot and optimum finishing period. Livestock Research for Rural Development 28(11).
[14] Zhang, Y., Huo, M., Zhou, J., & Xie, S. (2010). PKSolver: An add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 99(3), 306-314.
[15] NRC (2000). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7 th edition. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. 47pp.
[16] AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. Fifteen Edition. AOAC, Arlington, Virginia, USA. 1298pp.
[17] MAFF. (1975). Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Energy allowance and Feeding Systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, HMSO, London, pp 62-67.
[18] Rutherglen, D. C., 1995. Energy and protein requirements of beef cattle. Victoria state Government Agricultural notes. AG0374 ISSN 1329-8062.
[19] de la Higuera, M. (2001). Effects of nutritional factors and feed characteristics on feed intake. Food intake in fish, 250-268.
[20] Mordenti, A. L., Giaretta, E., Campidonico, L., Parazza, P., & Formigoni, A. (2021). A review regarding the use of molasses in animal nutrition. Animals, 11(1), 115.
[21] Can, A., Denek, N., & Yazgan, K. (2004). Effect of urea and molasses supplementation on nutrient intake and digestibility of sheep fed with straw. Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances, 3(7), 466-469.
[22] Silvestre, A. M., Cruz, G. D., Owens, F. N., Pereira, M. C. S., Hicks, R. B., & Millen, D. D. (2019). Predicting feedlot cattle performance from intake of dry matter and NEg early in the feeding period. Livestock Science, 223, 108-115.
[23] Chenyambuga, S. W., Nalaila, S. M., &Mbaga, S. H. (2008). Assessment of uses, special qualities and management aspects of Iringa Red Zebu cattle in Tanzania. Age, 1(5), 3.
[24] Gebremariam, T. T. (2019). Feedlot performance and carcass yield of Hararghe Highland (Bos indicus) bulls using different concentrate feeds. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 41.
[25] Fitzsimons, C., Kenny, D. A., & McGee, M. (2014). Visceral organ weights, digestion and carcass characteristics of beef bulls differing in residual feed intake offered a high concentrate diet. Animal, 8(6), 949-959.
[26] Mwilawa, A. J. (2012). Effects of breed and diet on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of beef cattle. Ph.D. thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
[27] Moloney, A. P., Keane, M. G., Mooney, M. T., Rezek, K., Smulders, F. J. M., & Troy, D. J. (2008). Energy supply patterns for finishing steers: Feed conversion efficiency, components of bodyweight gain and meat quality. Meat science, 79(1), 86-97.
[28] Ustuner, H., Ardicli, S., Arslan, O., & Brav, F. C. (2020). Fattening performance and carcass traits of imported Simmental bulls at different initial fattening age. Large Animal Review, 26(4), 161-165.
[29] Bayssa, M., Yigrem, S., Betsha, S., & Tolera, A. (2021). Production, reproduction and some adaptation characteristics of Boran cattle breed under changing climate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 16(5), e0244836.
[30] Castro Bulle, F. C. P., Paulino, P. V., Sanches, A. C., & Sainz, R. D. (2007). Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes. Journal of Animal Science, 85(4), 928-936.
[31] Ambreen, N., Hanif, N. Q., & Khatoon, S. (2006). Chemical composition of rice polishing from different sources. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 26(4), 190.
[32] Cowley, F. C., Syahniar, T. M., Ratnawati, D., Mayberry, D. E., Pamungkas, D., & Poppi, D. P. (2020). Greater farmer investment in well-formulated diets can increase liveweight gain and smallholder gross margins from cattle fattening. Livestock Science, 242, 104297.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Salum, K. A., Laswai, G. H., Mushi, D. E. (2024). Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 8(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Salum, K. A.; Laswai, G. H.; Mushi, D. E. Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2024, 8(2), 21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Salum KA, Laswai GH, Mushi DE. Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2024;8(2):21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12,
      author = {Khatibu Abdallah Salum and Germana Henry Laswai and Daniel Elia Mushi},
      title = {Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {21-29},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20240802.12},
      abstract = {A 3x3 factorial experiment was carried out to assess the performance of Boran breed (BRN), Iringa Red (IRR) and Singida White (SWT) strains of cattle fed on three different diets (D1, D2, and D3) under a feedlot condition. The diets contained hominy feed plus molasses (D1 or control), molasses and cassava meal (D2) and rice polishing (D3) as main energy sources. In addition, they contained sunflower seed cake as protein source, minerals and vitamins premix. Fifty-four (54) bulls of equal numbers of each strain, aged between 2 and 2.5 years and average initial weight of 194 ± 12.6 kg were randomly allocated in the three diets and housed in a feedlot structure. They were fed individually with their respective dietary treatments for 80 days, during which data on feed intake and growth performance were recorded. Thereafter 45 bulls with equal number of strains were slaughtered, and carcass characteristics were assessed and gross margins computed. The CP contents (g/kg) in the diets were highest in D2 (155), followed by D1 (141.7) and lowest (130) in D3. There were no significant (P>0.05) interaction effect of diet and breed/strain in all the parameters assessed on performance. Bulls fed on D2 grew faster (0.99 kg/d) and attained greater final weight (269.9 kg) and heavier carcasses (140.8 kg) followed by those fed on D1 with mean values of (0.92 kg/d), (258.1 kg) and (131.5 kg), respectively. The average dressing percentage followed a similar trend, being higher (P0.05) average daily gain to that of SWT (0.83 g/d). The final weight of BRN bulls (267.4 kg) was not different (P>0.05) from that of IRR (257.5 kg), which was also found to be similar (P>0.05) to that of SWT (251.2 kg). The hot carcass weights followed similar trend, BRN having carcass weight (138.2 kg) similar (P>0.05) to IRR (130.4 kg), which happened to be not different (P>0.05) from that of SWT (129.3 kg). The mean dressing percentage was higher (P<0.05) for BRN (52.2) than other strains. It is concluded that value of weight gains and slaughter characteristics of Iringa red are comparable to those of Boran, thus for feedlot finishing farmers should be advised to select and use Iringa red bulls to obtain high carcass and large profit.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance of Boran and Two Strains of Tanzania Short Horn Zebu Cattle Fed on Three Different Diets
    
    AU  - Khatibu Abdallah Salum
    AU  - Germana Henry Laswai
    AU  - Daniel Elia Mushi
    Y1  - 2024/05/17
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12
    T2  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JF  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JO  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    SP  - 21
    EP  - 29
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1312
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20240802.12
    AB  - A 3x3 factorial experiment was carried out to assess the performance of Boran breed (BRN), Iringa Red (IRR) and Singida White (SWT) strains of cattle fed on three different diets (D1, D2, and D3) under a feedlot condition. The diets contained hominy feed plus molasses (D1 or control), molasses and cassava meal (D2) and rice polishing (D3) as main energy sources. In addition, they contained sunflower seed cake as protein source, minerals and vitamins premix. Fifty-four (54) bulls of equal numbers of each strain, aged between 2 and 2.5 years and average initial weight of 194 ± 12.6 kg were randomly allocated in the three diets and housed in a feedlot structure. They were fed individually with their respective dietary treatments for 80 days, during which data on feed intake and growth performance were recorded. Thereafter 45 bulls with equal number of strains were slaughtered, and carcass characteristics were assessed and gross margins computed. The CP contents (g/kg) in the diets were highest in D2 (155), followed by D1 (141.7) and lowest (130) in D3. There were no significant (P>0.05) interaction effect of diet and breed/strain in all the parameters assessed on performance. Bulls fed on D2 grew faster (0.99 kg/d) and attained greater final weight (269.9 kg) and heavier carcasses (140.8 kg) followed by those fed on D1 with mean values of (0.92 kg/d), (258.1 kg) and (131.5 kg), respectively. The average dressing percentage followed a similar trend, being higher (P0.05) average daily gain to that of SWT (0.83 g/d). The final weight of BRN bulls (267.4 kg) was not different (P>0.05) from that of IRR (257.5 kg), which was also found to be similar (P>0.05) to that of SWT (251.2 kg). The hot carcass weights followed similar trend, BRN having carcass weight (138.2 kg) similar (P>0.05) to IRR (130.4 kg), which happened to be not different (P>0.05) from that of SWT (129.3 kg). The mean dressing percentage was higher (P<0.05) for BRN (52.2) than other strains. It is concluded that value of weight gains and slaughter characteristics of Iringa red are comparable to those of Boran, thus for feedlot finishing farmers should be advised to select and use Iringa red bulls to obtain high carcass and large profit.
    
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections