In this paper, we study the farmers' choices of financial services for drip irrigation systems in Southern Mozambique using survey data collected from 150 household farmers, involving 3 main irrigation schemes in Maputo, Gaza, and Inhambane. The statistical results show the significance of the outlined factors in the performance of small household farmers' adoption of financing options for irrigation. We find that farmers are more likely to adopt financial services for drip irrigation under subsidized interest rates and low irrigation costs. Farmers with lower incomes are less likely to adopt financial services compared to others. Additionally, the main gaps between the supply and demand of irrigation-based financial services can be explained by the farmers’ inability to meet the funding requirements. The solution lies thus in improving the quality of both demand and supply on its critical dimension, which also implies an increase in the economic activity of financing institutions and small farmers. Our study provides useful policy implications for designing efficient financing programs to enhance farmers’ accessibility to funds. Thus, implementing special public policies to minimize financial gaps among small household farmers can play a potential role in driving the household farmers sub-sector, and public incentives are crucial in ensuring sustainable irrigation programs aimed at low-income farmers. The study also suggests the creation of funding institutions aimed at irrigation, which can expand the range of financing mechanisms and take diverse financial services to low-income farmers in rural areas, such as savings, subsidies, vouchers and other types of credit.
| Published in | International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19 |
| Page(s) | 296-302 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Financial Services, Drip Irrigation, Household Farmers, Southern Mozambique, Africa, Logistic Regression
| [1] | Ducrot, R., Leite, M., Gentil, C., Bouarfa, S., Rollin, D., & Famba, S. (2020). Strengthening the capacity of irrigation schemes to cope with flood through improved maintenance: A collaborative approach to analyze the case of Chokwe, Mozambique. Irrigation and Drainage, 69, 126-138. |
| [2] |
Anderson Jamie, & Ahmed, W. (2020). Smallholder Financial Diaries: Building the Evidence Base with Farming Families in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Pakistan.
https://bfaglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/CGAP_Smallholder-Diaries.pdf |
| [3] | Hunguana, et al. (2012). The Status of Agricultural and Rural Financial Services in Mozambique. Ifad. (2017). Rural Enterprise Financing Project (Refp). |
| [4] | Pittock, J., Bjornlund, H., & van Rooyen, A. (2020). Transforming failing smallholder irrigation schemes in Africa: a theory of change. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36, S1-S19. |
| [5] |
Yaron, J., Benjamin, M., & Piprek, G. (1997). Rural finance: issues, design and best practices. Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (ESSD) Studies and Monographs Series 14. World Bank: Washington DC, USA.
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/680961468136490369 |
| [6] | Antunes, A., Cavalcanti, T., & Villamil, A. (2015). The effects of credit subsidies on development. Economic Theory, 58(1), 1-30. |
| [7] |
Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA). (2019), Mozambique Outcome Monitoring Report 2019, AGRA-PIATA Programme.
https://agra.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AGRA-OM-Mozambique-Report_FINAL.pdf |
| [8] | Ruete, M. (2015). Financing for Agriculture: How to boost opportunities in developing countries Policy Brief 3 Investment in Agriculture. |
| [9] |
Bank of Mozambique.(2016a), Annual Report 2015.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/rgi-documents/b4ad686ca89153fdb595d7431457c6c3a4fc57a7.pdf |
| [10] | Pernechele, V., Fontes, F., Baborska, R., Nkuingoua, J., Pan, X., & Tuyishime, C. (2021). Public expenditure on food and agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. |
| [11] | Suwadu Sakho-Jimbira, & Ibrahima Hathie. (2020). The Future of Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Southern Voice. Boston University, Boston. |
| [12] | FAOSTAT. (2021). Agricultural Investments and Capital Stock 2000-2020: Global and Regional Trends. |
| [13] | Braverman, A., & Guasch, J. L. (1995). Rural credit in developing countries (Vol. 219), World Bank Publications. |
| [14] | Carter, M., Laajaj, R., & Yang, D. (2021). Subsidies and the African green revolution: Direct effects and social network spillovers of randomized input subsidies in Mozambique. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 13(2), 206-29. |
| [15] | Bank of Mozambique. (2016b), Nationl Financial Inclusion Strategy (FINS) 2016–2022. |
| [16] | Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling Design and Analysis (3rd ed.), CRC, New York. |
| [17] |
Levin, J., & Milgrom, P. (2004). Introduction to choice theory. Available from internet:
https://web.stanford.edu/~jdlevin/Econ%20202/Choice%20Theory.pdf |
| [18] | Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge. |
| [19] |
Veldwisch, G. J. A., Beekman, P. W., & Bolding, J. A. (2013). Smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: Three cases from rural Mozambique. Water Alternatives, 6(1), 125-141.
https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol6/v6issue1/202-a6-1-7/file |
| [20] | Oni, O., et al. (2022) Socioeconomic Characteristics of Farmers, Profitability and Militating Factors Affecting Small Ruminant Production in Ondo State, South-West, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. |
| [21] | Adjognon, S. G., Liverpool-Tasie, L. S. O. and Reardon, T. A. (2017) Agricultural Input credit in Sub-Saharan Africa: Telling Myth from Facts. Food Policy. |
| [22] | Carter, M. R., Laajaj, R., & Yang, D. (2014). Subsidies and the persistence of technology adoption: Field experimental evidence from Mozambique (No. w20465). National Bureau of Economic Research. |
| [23] | Michael R. Carter, Rachid Laajaj, et al.(2019), Savings, Subsidies and Sustainable Food Security: A Field Experiment in Mozambique. IFDC. |
| [24] |
Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative (CABRI). (2019). The role of governments in developing agriculture value chains. Policy Dialogue.
https://www.cabri-sbo.org/uploads/files/Documents/CS-Mauritius-Sugar-cane-ENG.pdf |
| [25] |
Studying African Farmer-led Irrigation. (2015), Estudar a Irrigação Dirigida pelos Produtores Agrícolas em África.
http://www.safi-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SAFI-Inception-report-2015-ENG-web-v1.1.pdf |
| [26] | Beekman, W., et al. (2014). Identifying the potential for irrigation development in Mozambique: Capitalizing on the drivers behind farmer-led irrigation expansion (Discussão sobre informalidade da irrigação e implicações para financiamento). |
| [27] |
Szymon, M et al. (2021). Unlocking smallholder finance for sustainable agriculture in southeast Asia: WWF Deutschland.
https://search.worldcat.org/pt/title/1343879936?oclcNum=1343879936 |
| [28] |
Cabri. (2019). The Role of Governments in Developing Agriculture Value Chains.
https://www.cabri-sbo.org/uploads/files/Documents/Background-Study-PD-Agri-ENG.pdf |
APA Style
Macuacue, D. A., Lin, B. (2025). Farmers’ Choices of Financial Services for Drip Irrigation System in Southern Mozambique. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10(5), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19
ACS Style
Macuacue, D. A.; Lin, B. Farmers’ Choices of Financial Services for Drip Irrigation System in Southern Mozambique. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2025, 10(5), 296-302. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19
@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19,
author = {Dercio Alberto Macuacue and Benxi Lin},
title = {Farmers’ Choices of Financial Services for Drip Irrigation System in Southern Mozambique
},
journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {296-302},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20251005.19},
abstract = {In this paper, we study the farmers' choices of financial services for drip irrigation systems in Southern Mozambique using survey data collected from 150 household farmers, involving 3 main irrigation schemes in Maputo, Gaza, and Inhambane. The statistical results show the significance of the outlined factors in the performance of small household farmers' adoption of financing options for irrigation. We find that farmers are more likely to adopt financial services for drip irrigation under subsidized interest rates and low irrigation costs. Farmers with lower incomes are less likely to adopt financial services compared to others. Additionally, the main gaps between the supply and demand of irrigation-based financial services can be explained by the farmers’ inability to meet the funding requirements. The solution lies thus in improving the quality of both demand and supply on its critical dimension, which also implies an increase in the economic activity of financing institutions and small farmers. Our study provides useful policy implications for designing efficient financing programs to enhance farmers’ accessibility to funds. Thus, implementing special public policies to minimize financial gaps among small household farmers can play a potential role in driving the household farmers sub-sector, and public incentives are crucial in ensuring sustainable irrigation programs aimed at low-income farmers. The study also suggests the creation of funding institutions aimed at irrigation, which can expand the range of financing mechanisms and take diverse financial services to low-income farmers in rural areas, such as savings, subsidies, vouchers and other types of credit.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Farmers’ Choices of Financial Services for Drip Irrigation System in Southern Mozambique AU - Dercio Alberto Macuacue AU - Benxi Lin Y1 - 2025/10/27 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19 DO - 10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19 T2 - International Journal of Agricultural Economics JF - International Journal of Agricultural Economics JO - International Journal of Agricultural Economics SP - 296 EP - 302 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3843 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20251005.19 AB - In this paper, we study the farmers' choices of financial services for drip irrigation systems in Southern Mozambique using survey data collected from 150 household farmers, involving 3 main irrigation schemes in Maputo, Gaza, and Inhambane. The statistical results show the significance of the outlined factors in the performance of small household farmers' adoption of financing options for irrigation. We find that farmers are more likely to adopt financial services for drip irrigation under subsidized interest rates and low irrigation costs. Farmers with lower incomes are less likely to adopt financial services compared to others. Additionally, the main gaps between the supply and demand of irrigation-based financial services can be explained by the farmers’ inability to meet the funding requirements. The solution lies thus in improving the quality of both demand and supply on its critical dimension, which also implies an increase in the economic activity of financing institutions and small farmers. Our study provides useful policy implications for designing efficient financing programs to enhance farmers’ accessibility to funds. Thus, implementing special public policies to minimize financial gaps among small household farmers can play a potential role in driving the household farmers sub-sector, and public incentives are crucial in ensuring sustainable irrigation programs aimed at low-income farmers. The study also suggests the creation of funding institutions aimed at irrigation, which can expand the range of financing mechanisms and take diverse financial services to low-income farmers in rural areas, such as savings, subsidies, vouchers and other types of credit. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -