Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for education, yet it remains excluded from Namibia’s secondary school curriculum. The reasons for this exclusion are unclear. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed fundamental flaws in the lack of AI integration, as the education sector—like many others—faced significant disruptions. Introducing AI education and incorporating its use in secondary schools could enable Namibia to leapfrog in innovation and harness the opportunities presented by emerging technologies. This could drive both innovation and socio-economic growth. For this to occur, it is essential to understand teachers’ perspectives on teaching AI. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study investigates Namibian teachers’ behavioural intentions to teach AI, examining the roles of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, alongside implementation challenges. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining surveys with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involving 22 teachers from the Khomas Region. While the primary aim—assessing TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions)—was achieved, predictive analysis was limited by sample size. EFA extracted three TPB-aligned factors: attitude (ATT), behavioural intention (BI), and subjective norm (SN). However, statistical power was insufficient for regression or structural equation modelling (KMO = 0.50; Bartlett’s p < 0.001), reflecting the need for broader sampling. Demographically, most participants (54.5% male, 45.5% female) were aged 30–39, held honours degrees, and taught in urban public schools. Despite low perceived behavioural control (e.g., limited resources), teachers reported strong intentions to teach AI, driven by positive attitudes and social expectations. The findings highlight the TPB’s relevance in Namibia’s AI education context while revealing systemic barriers. To facilitate adoption, policymakers must address resource gaps, provide teacher training, and improve infrastructure. This study offers a foundational TPB-based framework for future research in under-resourced educational settings.
Published in | Higher Education Research (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.her.20251003.12 |
Page(s) | 77-87 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Artificial Intelligence in Education, Theory of Planned Behaviour, Teacher Technology Adoption, Namibian Education, Secondary Education
[1] | L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, |
[2] | M. Avanzo, A. Trianni, F. Botta, C. Talamonti, M. Stasi, and M. Iori, “Artificial Intelligence and the Medical Physicist: Welcome to the Machine,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1691, Feb. 2021, |
[3] | M. A. Ayanwale, I. T. Sanusi, O. P. Adelana, K. D. Aruleba, and S. S. Oyelere, “Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools,” Comput. Educ., 2022. |
[4] | C. N. Jatileni, I. T. Sanusi, S. A. Olaleye, M. A. Ayanwale, F. J. Agbo, and P. B. Oyelere, “Artificial intelligence in compulsory level of education: perspectives from Namibian in-service teachers,” Educ. Inf. Technol., Dec. 2023, |
[5] | C. Zhang, J. Schießl, L. Plößl, F. Hofmann, and M. Gläser-Zikuda, “Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 49, Sep. 2023, |
[6] | C. S. Chai, X. Wang, and C. Xu, “An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior for the Modelling of Chinese Secondary School Students’ Intention to Learn Artificial Intelligence,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 11, p. 2089, Nov. 2020, |
[7] | C. S. Chai, T. K. F. Chiu, X. Wang, F. Jiang, and X.-F. Lin, “Modeling Chinese Secondary School Students’ Behavioral Intentions to Learn Artificial Intelligence with the Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Determination Theory,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 605, Dec. 2022, |
[8] | C. S. Chai, P.-Y. Lin, M. S.-Y. Jong, Y. Dai, T. K. F. Chiu, and J. Qin, “Perceptions of and Behavioral Intentions towards Learning Artificial Intelligence in Primary School Students”. |
[9] | F. Tahiru, “AI in Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Cases Inf. Technol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2021, |
[10] | Lancrin Vincent, “Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Promises and challenges,” OECD Education Working Papers 218, Apr. 2020. |
[11] | D. J. Woo, Y. Wang, H. Susanto, and K. Guo, “Understanding English as a Foreign Language Students’ Idea Generation Strategies for Creative Writing With Natural Language Generation Tools,” EdArXiv, preprint, Jun. 2022. |
[12] | S. Mohr and R. Kühl, “Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: an application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior,” Precis. Agric., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1816–1844, Dec. 2021, |
[13] | X. Li, M. Y. Jiang, M. S. Jong, X. Zhang, and C. Chai, “Understanding Medical Students’ Perceptions of and Behavioral Intentions toward Learning Artificial Intelligence: A Survey Study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 8733, Jul. 2022, |
[14] | P. M. L. Matyila, “A model for digital literacy enhancement through technology adoption in resource-constrained environments”. |
[15] | E. Awadallah and A. Elgharbawy, “Utilizing the theory of reasoned action in understanding students’ choice in selecting accounting as major,” Account. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 86–106, Jan. 2021, |
[16] | R. Chocarro, M. Cortiñas, and G. Marcos-Matás, “Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics,” Educ. Stud., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 295–313, Mar. 2023, |
[17] | A. Daxini, “An examination of the factors which influence farmers’ intentions towards the implementation of nutrient management planning”. |
[18] | T.-D. Nguyen, “Theory of Planned Behavior as a Theoretical Framework,” Open Science Framework, preprint, Aug. 2020. |
[19] | R. Nadlifatin, B. A. Miraja, S. F. Persada, P. F. Belgiawan, A. A. N. P. Redi, and S.-C. Lin, “The Measurement of University Students’ Intention to Use Blended Learning System through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) at Developed and Developing Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. IJET, vol. 15, no. 09, p. 219, May 2020, |
[20] | M. Afshardoost and M. S. Eshaghi, “Destination image and tourist behavioural intentions: A meta-analysis,” Tour. Manag., vol. 81, p. 104154, Dec. 2020, |
[21] | C.-P. Kao, K.-Y. Lin, and H.-M. Chien, “Predicting Teachers’ Behavioral Intentions Regarding Web-based Professional Development by the Theory of Planned Behavior,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 5, Feb. 2018, |
[22] | E. Ulker-Demirel and G. Ciftci, “A systematic literature review of the theory of planned behavior in tourism, leisure and hospitality management research,” J. Hosp. Tour. Manag., vol. 43, pp. 209–219, 2020, |
[23] | P. J. Boer and T. I. Asino, “Exploring Namibia’s Educational Emergency Response Teaching: A Policy and Practice Perspective,” in Global Perspectives on Educational Innovations for Emergency Situations, V. Dennen, C. Dickson-Deane, X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, S. Murthy, and J. C. Richardson, Eds., in Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 15–23. |
[24] | D. Purmayanti, “The Challenges of Implementing Digital Literacy in Teaching and Learning Activities for EFL Learners in Indonesia,” 2020. |
[25] | D. Baidoo-Anu and L. Owusu Ansah, “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023, |
[26] | L. Floridi and J. Cowls, “A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society,” Harv. Data Sci. Rev., Jun. 2019, |
[27] | S. Akgun and C. Greenhow, “Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings,” AI Ethics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 431–440, Aug. 2022, |
[28] | W. O. Bearden, S. Sharma, and J. E. Teel, “Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 425–430, 1982. |
[29] | V. Dignum, “The role and challenges of education for responsible AI,” Lond. Rev. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, 2021, |
[30] | N. Shrestha, “Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis,” Am. J. Appl. Math. Stat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4–11, Jan. 2021, |
[31] | I. Hussey, T. Alsalti, F. Bosco, M. Elson, and R. Arslan, “An aberrant abundance of Cronbach’s alpha values at. 70”. |
APA Style
Stefanus, L., Nhinda, G. T., Shaanika, I. N. (2025). Teachers' AI Adoption in Namibia: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Analysis. Higher Education Research, 10(3), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251003.12
ACS Style
Stefanus, L.; Nhinda, G. T.; Shaanika, I. N. Teachers' AI Adoption in Namibia: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Analysis. High. Educ. Res. 2025, 10(3), 77-87. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20251003.12
@article{10.11648/j.her.20251003.12, author = {Loide Stefanus and Gabriel Tuhafeni Nhinda and Irja Naambo Shaanika}, title = {Teachers' AI Adoption in Namibia: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Analysis }, journal = {Higher Education Research}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {77-87}, doi = {10.11648/j.her.20251003.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251003.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20251003.12}, abstract = {Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for education, yet it remains excluded from Namibia’s secondary school curriculum. The reasons for this exclusion are unclear. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed fundamental flaws in the lack of AI integration, as the education sector—like many others—faced significant disruptions. Introducing AI education and incorporating its use in secondary schools could enable Namibia to leapfrog in innovation and harness the opportunities presented by emerging technologies. This could drive both innovation and socio-economic growth. For this to occur, it is essential to understand teachers’ perspectives on teaching AI. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study investigates Namibian teachers’ behavioural intentions to teach AI, examining the roles of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, alongside implementation challenges. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining surveys with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involving 22 teachers from the Khomas Region. While the primary aim—assessing TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions)—was achieved, predictive analysis was limited by sample size. EFA extracted three TPB-aligned factors: attitude (ATT), behavioural intention (BI), and subjective norm (SN). However, statistical power was insufficient for regression or structural equation modelling (KMO = 0.50; Bartlett’s p < 0.001), reflecting the need for broader sampling. Demographically, most participants (54.5% male, 45.5% female) were aged 30–39, held honours degrees, and taught in urban public schools. Despite low perceived behavioural control (e.g., limited resources), teachers reported strong intentions to teach AI, driven by positive attitudes and social expectations. The findings highlight the TPB’s relevance in Namibia’s AI education context while revealing systemic barriers. To facilitate adoption, policymakers must address resource gaps, provide teacher training, and improve infrastructure. This study offers a foundational TPB-based framework for future research in under-resourced educational settings. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Teachers' AI Adoption in Namibia: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Analysis AU - Loide Stefanus AU - Gabriel Tuhafeni Nhinda AU - Irja Naambo Shaanika Y1 - 2025/05/22 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251003.12 DO - 10.11648/j.her.20251003.12 T2 - Higher Education Research JF - Higher Education Research JO - Higher Education Research SP - 77 EP - 87 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-935X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251003.12 AB - Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for education, yet it remains excluded from Namibia’s secondary school curriculum. The reasons for this exclusion are unclear. However, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed fundamental flaws in the lack of AI integration, as the education sector—like many others—faced significant disruptions. Introducing AI education and incorporating its use in secondary schools could enable Namibia to leapfrog in innovation and harness the opportunities presented by emerging technologies. This could drive both innovation and socio-economic growth. For this to occur, it is essential to understand teachers’ perspectives on teaching AI. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this study investigates Namibian teachers’ behavioural intentions to teach AI, examining the roles of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control, alongside implementation challenges. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining surveys with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involving 22 teachers from the Khomas Region. While the primary aim—assessing TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions)—was achieved, predictive analysis was limited by sample size. EFA extracted three TPB-aligned factors: attitude (ATT), behavioural intention (BI), and subjective norm (SN). However, statistical power was insufficient for regression or structural equation modelling (KMO = 0.50; Bartlett’s p < 0.001), reflecting the need for broader sampling. Demographically, most participants (54.5% male, 45.5% female) were aged 30–39, held honours degrees, and taught in urban public schools. Despite low perceived behavioural control (e.g., limited resources), teachers reported strong intentions to teach AI, driven by positive attitudes and social expectations. The findings highlight the TPB’s relevance in Namibia’s AI education context while revealing systemic barriers. To facilitate adoption, policymakers must address resource gaps, provide teacher training, and improve infrastructure. This study offers a foundational TPB-based framework for future research in under-resourced educational settings. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -